290 ... Lisa Morgan ... Barrow and Furness
332 ... Julia Maria Long ... Bexhill and Battle
196 ... Kellie-Jay Keen ... Bristol Central
452 ... Catherine Briggs ... Doncaster North
318 ... Katharine Margaret Murphy ... Finchley and Golders Green
244 ... Hazel Exon ... Honiton and Sidmouth
354 ... Lesley Woodburn ... Islington South and Finsbury
116 ... Una Marie O'Mahony ... Kensington and Bayswater
283 ... Liz Panton ... Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend
455 ... Linda Jane Law ... Norwich South
337 ... Katherine Mary Longthorp ... Oxford East
482 ... Louise McDonald ... Sheffield Heeley
295 ... Bernadette O'Malley ... South West Hertfordshire
274 ... Bev White ... St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire
286 ... Kelly Jane Oliver Dougall ... Tynemouth
363 ... Seonaid Dawn Barber ... West Worcestershire
Original thread here https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5092728-party-of-women-has-16-candidates-standing-for-election-on-4-july-2024
Party of Women – number of votes for 16 women brave enough to take a public stand
IwantToRetire · 05/07/2024 19:11
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.mumsnet.com/og-image.png)
Party of Women has 16 candidates standing for election on 4 July 2024 | Mumsnet
1 ... Lisa Morgan ... Barrow and Furness 2 ... Julia Maria Long ... Bexhill and Battle 3 ... Kellie-Jay Keen ... Bristol Central 4 ... Catherine Brigg...
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5092728-party-of-women-has-16-candidates-standing-for-election-on-4-july-2024
Show more
NoWordForFluffy · 07/07/2024 19:58
Scaremongering has ceased to have meaning...
ApocalipstickNow · 07/07/2024 14:24
Every thread Cassie posts on- under whatever name at the time- the pattern is the same.
Dominate a thread with ridiculous, easily disprovable claims, get all the women pointing out their idiocy, me-rail to satisfaction.
AstonScrapingsNameChange · 08/07/2024 15:02
I absolutely take my hat off to all those candidates brave enough to stand in this overwhelmingly misogynistic environment. Thank you for putting yourselves out there.
I think it's interesting that some posters have asserted that the low percentage of votes in places with a high level of LGB voters means that there is not widespread LGB support for the PoW.
I'm not sure that's a statistically valid conclusion to draw. There are many possible explanations and without further analysis we won't know the reason.
Eg there could have been a really great LGB candidate also standing.
Many of the LGB voters in those constituencies could have prioritised other issues to vote on.
A vote for a particular candidate isn't necessarily a vote against their opponent. As we've seen on these election threads, people decide who to vote for based on a variety of reasons.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.