Pennsylvania gubernatorial election, 2018 (May 15 Republican primary)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search


2022
2014
Governor and Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Democratic primary
Republican primary
General election
Election details
Filing deadline: March 6, 2018
Primary: May 15, 2018
General: November 6, 2018

Pre-election incumbent(s):
Gov. Tom Wolf (Democrat)
Lt. Gov. Mike Stack (Democrat)
How to vote
Poll times: 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.
Voting in Pennsylvania
Race ratings
Cook Political Report: Likely Democratic
Sabato's Crystal Ball: Safe Democratic
Inside Elections: Likely Democratic
Ballotpedia analysis
Federal and state primary competitiveness
State executive elections in 2018
Impact of term limits in 2018
State government trifectas
State government triplexes
Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2018
Pennsylvania
executive elections
Governor

Lieutenant governor

Scott Wagner won the May 15 Republican primary for governor of Pennsylvania. Wagner received 44.3 percent of the vote to Paul Mango's 36.9 percent and Laura Ellsworth's 18.8 percent.[1]

A state senator who owns a waste disposal business, Wagner early on emphasized his electability and business experience, running ads targeting incumbent Gov. Tom Wolf (D). The Republican Party of Pennsylvania endorsed Wagner.[2]

Mango emphasized his business and military credentials. Like Wagner, Mango positioned himself as a counterweight to a corrupt and detached Harrisburg.

Ellsworth, an attorney, emphasized her status as a political outsider. She did not start airing ads until May 2, when she launched an ad containing clips of her opponents' ads targeting each other.

Wagner and Mango aired ads targeting each other, with Wagner referring to Mango as a liberal and Mango accusing Wagner, a former landlord, of predatory practices.

The incumbent, Gov. Tom Wolf (D), was elected in 2014, and was the only Democratic gubernatorial candidate that year to successfully flip a governor's seat from Republican to Democrat.

Candidates and election results

Scott Wagner defeated Paul Mango and Laura Ellsworth in the Republican primary for Governor of Pennsylvania on May 15, 2018.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Governor of Pennsylvania

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Scott_Wagner.jpg
Scott Wagner
 
44.3
 
326,612
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/Paul_Mango.jpg
Paul Mango
 
36.9
 
271,857
Image of https://s3.amazonaws.com/ballotpedia-api4/files/thumbs/100/100/ellsworth-laura_400xx520-520-0-61.jpg
Laura Ellsworth
 
18.8
 
138,843

Total votes: 737,312
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Candidate profiles

Republican Party Laura Ellsworth

Laura Ellsworth.jpg

At the time of her entrance to the 2018 election, Ellsworth was an attorney with law firm Jones Day. She had not previously sought elected office.

In her October 2017 announcement speech, Ellsworth emphasized her professional background: "During my career in the private sector I’ve been a solutions oriented leader, creating diverse coalitions to tackle major problems...That’s exactly the approach I’ll bring to Harrisburg. As governor my priority will be people, not politics. For me, being governor is about doing something not being somebody."[3] On her campaign website's home page, Ellsworth said "I’m not a professional politician, you bet I’m not, and that’s exactly what we need right now."[4] The website emphasized Ellsworth's stances on jobs and the economy, long-term planning, and energy.[5]

Republican Party Paul Mango

Paul Mango.jpg

At the time of his entrance to the 2018 election, Mango worked with consulting firm McKinsey. He has served as a paratrooper in the 82nd Airborne Division. Mango had not previously sought elected office.

In his May 2017 announcement speech, Mango expressed his dissatisfaction with sitting Gov. Tom Wolf (D): "I refer to him as Thomas "The Tax Engine" Wolf. He has never met a tax he doesn't like."[6] On his campaign website's homepage, Mango said "The time for incremental change is now past. Harrisburg needs nothing short of transformational change."[7] The website highlighted Mango's stances on jobs, taxes, and budgeting.

Mango was endorsed by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR).

Republican Party Scott Wagner

Scott Wagner.jpg

Wagner was first elected to the Pennsylvania State Senate in a special election in 2014, becoming the first write-in candidate to win election to the chamber. At the time of the 2018 campaign, Wagner served as the chairman of the Local Government Committee and as the vice-chairman of the Labor & Industry Committee.

In his January 2017 announcement speech, Wagner criticized the first term of Gov. Tom Wolf (D): "Pennsylvanians are becoming more frustrated. It's very simple. Governor Wolf is a failed governor."[8] Wagner's campaign website said that "Governor Tom Wolf promised us a Fresh Start, but he and the entrenched political class have done nothing to reverse course. In fact, they’ve given us more of the same by continuing the failure of Harrisburg’s tax, borrow, and spend mentality that has kept Pennsylvania BROKE and BROKEN."[9] The website emphasized Wagner's stances on the economy, budgeting, and education.

Wagner was endorsed by Rep. Scott Perry (R), Gov. Larry Hogan (R-MD), and the Republican Party of Pennsylvania.

Timeline

Endorsements

Republican candidate endorsements
Endorsement Date Wagner Mango Ellsworth
Federal officials
Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA)[10] October 3, 2017
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR)[11] May 31, 2017
National figures
Former presidential candidate Carly Fiorina (R)[12] April 24, 2018
Former Senior Counselor to the President Steve Bannon[13] September 26, 2017
Gov. Larry Hogan (R-MD)[14] July 19, 2017
State figures
State Sen. Mike Regan (R)[10] October 3, 2017
State Rep. Seth Grove (R)[10] October 3, 2017
State Rep. Keith Gillespie (R)[10] October 3, 2017
State Rep. Dawn Keefer (R)[10] October 3, 2017
State Rep. Kate Anne Klunk (R)[10] October 3, 2017
State Rep. Kristin Hill (R)[10] October 3, 2017
State Rep. Stanley Saylor (R)[10] October 3, 2017
Local figures
Beaver County Commissioner Dan Camp[15] March 23, 2018
Beaver County Commissioner Sandie Egley[15] March 23, 2018
Blair County Commissioner Bruce Erb[15] March 23, 2018
Butler County Commissioner Kim Geyer[15] March 23, 2018
Butler County Commissioner Leslie Osche[15] March 23, 2018
Clinton County Commissioner Pete Smeltz[15] March 23, 2018
Clinton County Commissioner Jeffrey Snyder[15] March 23, 2018
Beaver County Commissioner Sandie Egley[15] March 23, 2018
Fayette County Commissioner Angela Zimmerlink[15] March 23, 2018
Greene County Commissioner Archie Trader[15] March 23, 2018
Mifflin County Commissioner Stephen Dunkle[15] March 23, 2018
Northumberland County Commissioner Samuel Schiccatano[15] March 23, 2018
Tioga County Commissioner Joseph Kantz[15] March 23, 2018
Tioga County Commissioner Lee Knepp[15] March 23, 2018
Tioga County Commissioner Mark Hamilton[15] March 23, 2018
Union County Commissioner Preston Boop[15] March 23, 2018
Warren County Commissioner Benjamin Kafferlin[15] March 23, 2018
Westmoreland County Commissioner Charles Anderson[15] March 23, 2018
York County Commissioner Chris Reilly[10] October 3, 2017
Dauphin County Commissioner Jeff Haste[16] July 25, 2017
Snyder County Commissioner Joe Kantz[16] July 25, 2017
Berks County Commissioner Christian Leinbach[16] July 25, 2017
Washington County Commissioner Diana Irey Vaughan[16] July 25, 2017
Activist and former radio host Glen Meakem[17] May 25, 2017
Organizations
The Unionville Times[18] May 7, 2018
The Coatesville Times[19] May 7, 2018
The Philadelphia Inquirer[20] May 4, 2018
The Patriot-News/PennLive.com[21] May 4, 2018
Family Research Council Action PAC[22] April 12, 2018
Republican Party of Pennsylvania[2] February 10, 2018
Luzerne County Republican Party[23] November 28, 2017

Campaign themes and policy stances

Campaign themes

Republican Party Laura Ellsworth

Delivering on the Promise of Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania has everything it needs to be the #1 place to live and work in the United States. Yet, the reality is that Pennsylvania is at or near the bottom of virtually every important indicator of economic growth, and every day, we watch another business close entirely or move to another state, while we are saddled with a state budget that is months overdue, mortgages our children’s future after destroying our credit rating, and provides a tax base that, rather than depending on people building, and making and growing things, is ever more dependent on our citizens drinking and smoking and gambling and smoking pot. What have we become?

It is time for the citizens–who know how to run businesses and raise families and contribute in meaningful ways to our communities–to reclaim our government. Providing an economic environment that generates good private-sector jobs for Pennsylvanians is the first order of business for government. That requires two basic things: a clear business plan and a sound budget process. And the vision, resolve, and experience to deliver on both. No more dysfunction, no more wasted time and wasted taxes. It is time for us to have leadership who understands that their only job is to actually GET THINGS DONE, and deliver on the promise of Pennsylvania, for the people of Pennsylvania.

HERE IS HOW THAT CAN BE DONE:

1. A Clear, Unambiguous Commitment to Job Creation
Creating jobs across the Commonwealth should be the centerpiece of the state government’s agenda, and commitment to that goal must start at the top. Job creation doesn’t mean growing an already engorged government payroll; the focus needs to be on creation of jobs in the private sector, both by growing existing businesses and starting new ones, and by attracting companies to come to Pennsylvania. Focusing on private sector job growth will reduce the tax burden, freeing up businesses to invest in their growth and add jobs across the state. Too often today, businesses in Pennsylvania feel that their greatest competition is their own government, with suffocating regulation and a lack of understanding of what it takes to grow a business. For companies looking to site new businesses, they see the second highest corporate net income tax in the nation, a disorganized and unfocused economic development team, and an Administration that has no concept of what it takes to compete for business against other states. We need leadership in Harrisburg who knows what it takes to run a business and to attract new businesses. As a business owner who has done business in Pennsylvania, as a lawyer who has represented many top companies doing business and seeking to do business in Pennsylvania, and as a civic leader who has worked at the intersection of private and public sectors for over a decade to attract new business to Pennsylvania in competition with other states, I understand what it takes to develop private sector jobs. That includes a renewed commitment to engaging the private sector in a meaningful and productive way. The talent, expertise, business discipline, creativity and, yes, community commitment of business leaders in Pennsylvania are second to none. Marshalling that prodigious talent in a way that advances job creation across the Commonwealth is a primary goal of government, and the Governor should be the one leading that charge. As Governor, I will.

2. Creation of a Council on Economic Development and a Governor's Outreach Team
Dedication to growing Pennsylvania’s economy means bringing together business leaders and establishing a system that unleashes their knowledge and talent to bring about action. The creation of this Council on Economic Development would be comprised of leaders from across the state representing all business sectors–large and small–who have demonstrated their commitment to solving the problems that make our state so hard to do business in. This Council would report directly to the Governor and would be given the charge to identify, within 90 days, specific achievable goals to be pursued in the following six months. At the end of six months, the Council would reconvene to benchmark success, assess adjustments necessary to achieve success, and identify additional goals. And the Council would continue in that fashion to monitor the accountability of government response and to identify new goals to move job creation forward. Too often, the private sector is invited to share its ideas, but it is largely for show, and there is never any delivery by government. The structure and accountability of the Council process will change that, and will provide an active, robust, and focused place to harness the collective wisdom and expertise of the private sector in helping to solve government problems. A subset of the Council will serve on the Governor’s Outreach Team, which will work actively with prospective new businesses looking to establish operations in Pennsylvania. Business leaders relate to business leaders more than government bureaucrats. Actively engaging private sector leaders in the statewide business attraction activities of the state will materially improve the nature and quality of the discussion. Other members of the Outreach Team will include senior members of the Governor’s staff, all of whom will have backgrounds in business and economic development. The Outreach Team will be a professional and experienced group of business people who can effectively make the business case for operating here, and they also will be used to target companies for affirmative outreach, both elsewhere in the United States and around the world. Whether suppliers, or customers, or others operating in the sector, existing businesses often have the best view on attractive business opportunities for other industries and sectors, and the Outreach Team will be the central repository for that information and organized business outreach.

3. Develop 'the Map': A Visual Depiction of What we Want Pennsylvania to be 10 Years from now
Every businessperson knows that there is no way to move a complex organization forward without a clear and coherent business plan. Without any specific goal, there is no way to conduct the kind of long-term planning necessary to achieve significant improvement, to organize disparate groups in an organized way, or to benchmark whether we are making progress toward our goals. Pennsylvania has no plan, so it is no surprise that we are making no progress. Our current leadership lunges from one issue to another, driven by the need to solve immediate cash flow issues created by their own lack of discipline and focus (or their own political aspirations), rather than asking the question of how their activity does, or does not, advance progress toward where we want to be as a state ten years from now. We need to change that; government by “whack-a-mole” must come to an end.

We need to come together around a common vision of what our state should look like ten years from now. That vision then presents a roadmap so that everyone who cares about delivering that future for Pennsylvania is welcome at the table to roll up their sleeves and work together to get it done. The Map is a visual depiction of that common vision of what we want Pennsylvania to look like 10 years from now. Not everyone will agree with every part. But with a comprehensive plan, every Pennsylvanian will see a role that they can play in delivering on that vision.

The Map is an illustration of what we choose our destiny to be, and it reveals that we already have all the things that we need to be the #1 place to live and work in the United States. All we need is the vision, energy, and discipline to bring them together with a common purpose and resolve.

This Map of Pennsylvania will show:

  • Pennsylvania is the energy capital of the United States, with a thriving and diverse energy sector that utilizes our extensive energy assets, including natural gas, and coal, and solar, and wind, and nuclear to deliver low-cost energy to families and manufacturing alike, throughout the nation;
  • Infrastructure, including highways, waterways, airports, mass transit, and rail, that connects energy, transportation, logistics, workforce, and education, making working and living in Pennsylvania efficient and attractive for all our citizens;
  • Pad-ready sites and robust manufacturing locations, with supply chain businesses feeding those sites, all benefitting from the manufacturing feedstock that is a natural part of our unparalleled natural gas resources;
  • Educational institutions that train our workforce, improve the quality of life in communities across our state, and enhance the critical thinking and respect for diverse ideas that are at the heart of any democracy;
  • A workforce whose training and skills and work ethic are second to none;
  • Thriving research universities that power innovation and technical advancement and attract the best and brightest young people from around the world;
  • An agricultural sector that applies the latest technologies to grow product that is delivered throughout Pennsylvania, the United States, and the world;
  • A high quality of life, including clean environment and abundant green recreational and outdoor spaces, that will attract both tourism and workforce.

And there is so much more. An initial draft of The Map would be created within my first 30 days in office and then opened to a collaborative public comment process, with finalization of The Map within our first six months in office. The Map will remain a living document, subject to refinement and enhancement as events evolve, but it will be the key planning document around which our agenda will evolve. It will also provide a way for citizens to hold government accountable, because each year, we will report progress toward those goals, so that citizens can determine for themselves whether they are being well-served by their leaders.

That kind of long-term comprehensive planning is critical to the complex and time- and capital-intensive infrastructure projects necessary to bring Pennsylvania into the future. Large transportation and infrastructure projects call for planning that is (1) Comprehensive; they need to interconnect with one another and with centers of business, education, population, and transportation now and in the future, and therefore require a strong partner at the state-planning level; (2) Predictable: these projects require long-term and stable funding and therefore cannot operate effectively in a chaotic and unpredictable environment (such as, where funds dedicated to transportation are raided to provide immediate funding solutions for a budget gap, as was done in the most recent budget); and (3) Focused and urgent: as with any highly complex and large-scope project, it will founder if not delivered with focus and urgency to see it through to completion. At present, our state lacks comprehensive planning, predictability, focus, and urgency. Top-down leadership from the Governor can go a long way to correcting that and enabling transportation and infrastructure growth that our state needs.

Finally, the focused, organized, and coherent business plan embodied in The Map will help restore our recently decimated state credit rating, thereby reducing state borrowing costs and the additional taxpayer burdens those borrowing costs have imposed.

4. Energy Policy
A thriving energy sector is good for Pennsylvania, and good for the United States.

Low energy cost is important to every family in Pennsylvania. And it is vital to economic development and job creation as well. Energy is one of the largest cost components of manufacturing, and transmission is one of the largest components of energy cost. Therefore, a proximate source of energy is a huge economic advantage for business.

Here in Pennsylvania, we sit atop one of the largest sources of natural gas in the world, with the potential to deliver to the United States complete energy independence from foreign energy supply. We are blessed with extensive coal resources that have supported generations of hardworking families and are now becoming free of unreasonable regulation that have hampered their growth, so they again can be a significant driver of jobs and economic development here in Pennsylvania. We have solar, and wind, and nuclear assets that present a diversified portfolio of energy assets that can be deployed in many different ways.

The state government must be a good steward of this tremendous resource and work collaboratively with the private sector while maintaining rational environmental standards, to responsibly leverage these vital energy assets. Developing our energy sector in a smart way will boost manufacturing, create jobs, make Pennsylvania an attractive place to work and employ people, and overall boost the economy and productivity of our state. Today, Harrisburg is too focused on how to bleed tax dollars out of the industry in the near term rather than how to develop strategies that will maximize the asset to the benefit of Pennsylvania’s families consistent with The Map’s 10-year Plan. Now, tax policy is being used by politicians to solve the immediate fiscal problems created by their own lack of planning and discipline. We should not allow the development of our precious energy assets to be squandered to protect political futures. The future of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania families is what counts, and we need a leader in Pennsylvania who will make sure that the 10-year future of Pennsylvania families comes before the short-term interests of Pennsylvania politicians.

Finally, the development of Pennsylvania’s energy sector is good for not only its citizens, but for the country. Example: Russia is a long-standing threat to the United States, and it derives a significant percentage of its government funds from its sales of natural gas to Europe. Shipping Pennsylvania gas to Europe provides a way for us to fight the Russians with our natural gas, rather than with our brave young men and women, all while providing jobs and economic development to Pennsylvania. Washington is too divided and distracted at the moment to focus on what a tremendous asset Pennsylvania presents to the nation. We need a Governor who can organize the business leaders in the industry and put together a convincing case to be made to Washington about the geopolitical asset present here in Pennsylvania. Developing joint state-federal priorities for the development of our natural energy resources will increase demand and job creation here at home and will support our national security interests around the world. Having worked for a major international firm for 25 years, I understand how those conversations occur, and as a lawyer for 35 years, I know how to make an effective case that wins the day. The Governor needs to be that active and vocal voice in Washington for the people of Pennsylvania.

5. Taxes
Business Tax: In order to be competitive with other states and countries competing with us for business, we need to be competitive from a tax perspective. Yet, with a 9.99% CNI, Pennsylvania is the second most expensive state in the nation to do business. Combined with the world’s highest federal corporate tax rate of 35%, that makes Pennsylvania one of the most expensive places in the world to do business from a tax perspective. If we expect businesses to stay here and to come here, we need to change that. While it appears that some help is coming through federal tax reform, we need to change our state tax structure to be “in the game” when it comes to prospective businesses considering expanding or locating in Pennsylvania.

In order for Pennsylvania to compete with other states for new business, we need to:

1. Reduce the 9.99% Corporate Net Income Tax
2. Increase the cap on net operating loss carryforwards
3. Finish the phase-out of the capital stock and franchise tax
In competing for business investment, tax credits and incentive programs are effective when they are just that–short-term incentives meant to “prime the pump,” not ongoing corporate welfare for noncompetitive businesses. Back-end incentive mechanisms such as wage tax credits (used only if a company actually delivers on promised jobs) should be favored over subsidies that determine winners and losers in industry regardless of actual goals accomplished.

We also need to reorganize DCED, which currently operates multiple programs in silos, rather than as one comprehensive plan for the economic development of the state. Using The Map to drive economic development initiatives will deliver more coordinated and effective investments for Pennsylvania.

Property Tax: Our property tax issue is a pension issue; the primary driver of recent increases in property taxes is teacher pensions. We need to address our pension underfunding issue, while keeping the promises we have made to teachers who have worked and saved their whole careers. We will address approaches to the pension issue in a separate briefing document, but it is a problem that was years in the making, and it will take years to correct it. In the meantime, we need to protect our citizens against the harm that flows from the underfunding problem with which decades of politicians have saddled us all.

For example, we should freeze property taxes for any individual who has been paying property taxes in Pennsylvania for at least 35 years. That provides protection for our seniors, who must live on a fixed income and cannot bear the increase of their property taxes.

Finally, we need to break away from the limited thinking that the only choice we have is to raise taxes or cut spending. We must find creative ways to fund important initiatives, including through public-private partnerships (P3s). We also need to find ways to address multiple problems with one fix.

For example, we should explore working with the pension funds to have them invest some of the $73 billion in public pension funds in the development of pad-ready manufacturing sites, giving the Funds competitive return on investment plus dedicated tax revenues for a period of 10 years. This way, the Pension Funds help solve the pension funding problem, while simultaneously growing the pension funds themselves, and also fostering economic development and job creation.

We also should explore selling our state store system and applying the proceeds to pay down the pension underfunding and thereby reduce property taxes. That way, we provide broader selection and availability for our consumers, while simultaneously reducing property taxes, and also shoring up our pension system, which, in turn, results in greater economic security for the many Pennsylvanians who have spent their careers in teaching, public safety, and administration.

Finally, we should be using social impact investing to address difficult public problems. Social impact investing involves the private sector developing actual programs that solve public problems, which the government then “purchases” but only if the program demonstrably works. These solutions not only use private financing, but also private-sector design and expertise in finding solutions to problems. Other states are using these kinds of solutions, but Pennsylvania has lacked the business sophistication necessary to strike these deals to the benefit of Pennsylvanians. A sophisticated business person in the Governor’s chair, with experience in the P3 field, will solve that problem and allow Pennsylvania to develop this new and important funding sector.

6. Regulatory Reform
We currently have a regulatory system that is adrift, on autopilot, accountable to no one. In large part, that is not due to the public servants who work in government; it is because there is no plan, no design, and no sense of urgency to drive toward shared goals. We will fix that problem, as described above, but there are additional steps that we can take to make our regulatory environment more efficient and effective. For example, we need to develop a “Responsible Officer System (ROS)” so that one individual would be responsible for prompt and reasonable determination of regulatory decisions. In order for government to fulfill its role as a customer-service organization, it must provide its customers–its citizens–a clear point of responsibility and accountability. Just as individual citizens calling into a “customer-service” line have experienced the frustration of being shuttled through an endless line of faceless people, none of whom can actually address their problem, so too are our businesses daily faced with the frustration of doing business with a faceless bureaucracy, that lacks any predictability or accountability. We need to change the culture of our regulatory system. That reform would include the following:

  • A Responsible Officer System (ROS) for Regulatory Reform. Every permit application would have assigned to it a Responsible Officer, who would be responsible for navigating internally with the other regulators in an efficient and effective manner and delivering a prompt response to the applicant.
  • Presumptive time limits. All permits should have a presumptive time to decision, with a clear and effective process to elevate issues to a supervisory level whenever those time limits are exceeded.
  • Ombudsman. An ombudsman should exist in every agency to elevate customer concerns and identify trends that identify systemic issues.
  • Customer service. Customer-service training should be conducted in all agencies.
  • Technology and Innovation. Technology should be sued to improve performance and timelines. Systems that work collaboratively with applicant systems should be prioritized to enhance efficiencies.
  • Council Role. The Council on Economic Development will make recommendations every 6 months as to regulatory reforms that would improve economic growth without impeding the safety, welfare, and quality of life of Pennsylvanians.

Government is a customer-service business. If a customer (the citizens of Pennsylvania) isn’t being served, then the business (the state government) has to be changed. None of these reforms require expensive investments. They require discipline and accountability and professionalism, and that is what we will restore to Pennsylvania.

7. Workforce
To grow Pennsylvania and be competitive, our workforce and education programs on The Map must align (both geographically and substantively) with current and future job needs, not be left to wither under stagnant structures because the state government can’t initiate solutions.

Let’s stop the endless discussion about “trade school versus college” and create a solution that solves multiple problems at once. For example, let’s bring together our good trade schools and our Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (“PASSHE”) schools and develop new collaborative 2-year certificate programs designed around the in-demand jobs that already have been identified by a multitude of well-conducted studies across the state. That way, our students actually attend college and also obtain the ability to get a good paying job that utilizes the technical skills they learned during those two years. In addition, let’s allow qualified 11th and 12th graders to obtain college credit by participating in those programs, just as some of our high school juniors and seniors can now participate in college-level classes for academic credit. That way, a student could finish 12th grade with an ability to have a college experience and walk right into a solid in-demand job. This would address the universal desire for a college credential and experience while also bringing students into our underutilized PASSHE schools and help maintain those campuses throughout Pennsylvania. In addition, it would help people earn money for further education, rather than being saddled with huge student debt for decades to come.

To develop curricula that deliver people ready for in-demand jobs, we should foster a system where adjunct faculty members from the private sector are actively involved in developing and/or conducting workforce development programs. Too often, those programs are on autopilot, teaching outmoded skills to unmotivated students. We need to have job creators actively involved in real time in the development and provision of workforce programs, with a specific targeted job opportunity within the view of the program participant.

Under the auspices of the Governor’s office, we also should convene an annual Governor’s Workforce Summit, which would include representatives of the top job-producers in the state, as well as workforce providers and academia. The goal of the Summit would be to identify the job needs for the coming year and to confirm that the programs and academic organizations have curricula in place that will prepare job seekers for those available positions. The Summit also would provide linkages that would foster ongoing active involvement between programs and the business sector.

We also are missing a huge workforce opportunity by overlooking our veterans. Many of our Pennsylvania sons and daughters are serving in the US Military, the majority of them highly trained and disciplined, often with a military spouse who is the same. We should have an organized system of reaching out to those service men and women with Pennsylvania roots, matching their military job codes with the job codes of our in-demand jobs. There currently are thousands of open jobs here in the Commonwealth, and it is the right thing to do – for both our state and for our country – to actively encourage our service men and women to come home to Pennsylvania, and bring with them all of the skills, training, discipline, and commitment to mission that will guarantee their successful transition to civilian life here at home in Pennsylvania.

Finally, our workforce programs must include our young people. We cannot simply tell them about the freedom and dignity that comes from receiving a paycheck. We need to demonstrate that to them. Over the last several years, the Learn & Earn program in Western Pennsylvania has provided thousands of paid summer jobs to kids from many different communities. The founding of that system required the organization of the foundation, business, academic, provider and government communities, but that union produced a quality program for our young people. Programs like that could and should exist in every community in Pennsylvania. And a Governor who has experienced those programs from the inside would also be aware of the changes that are necessary at the state level to facilitate improvement in those programs, including uniform credentialing standards, the creation of “resumes” for kids who participate over multiple summers, and the organized ability to move kids through increasingly more sophisticated job opportunities over sequential summers.

Evaluating workforce training and education by ensuring that our programs are up to date with demand and provide an existing ROI will keep us competitive and keep jobs in PA. It will also provide bright futures for our families and young people and be a material part of delivering on the promise of Pennsylvania for all our citizens. Instead of passively legislating on trite labels and outmoded ideas, let’s keep our kids and jobs in Pennsylvania by providing real and meaningful options to do so. One way to keep people in PA is identifying citizens serving in the military and giving them credentials for skills developed in the military so as to move them into the workforce back home.

8. Education
Two fundamental principles will improve education in Pennsylvania: (1) allow parents and students to choose; and (2) empower teachers to teach.

Education choice: The need for choice is based on two simple truths about people, including both kids and parents:

1. Not all kids are alike; different kids will thrive in different environments, and they need more than one option to find the place that is best for them to excel.
2. Parents know what environment is best for their children. Some kids will do better in a large institution; some will do better in a small setting or in a values-based school; some will do well in a structured environment, while others will thrive in a creative self-driven educational setting. We need options that enable parents to exercise that choice, including charter schools, Educational Savings Accounts and expanded EITC and OSTC programs, which provide the additional benefits of leveraging private dollars and maximizing local knowledge of institutional strengths.
Empowering Teachers. We all can remember the specific name of a teacher or coach who made an impact on our lives decades ago. That’s because good teachers transform lives forever. Teachers need to be provided the resources, security, and stability necessary to teach in a focused classroom, without the distractions that degrade their ability to exercise their gifts. We need to provide appropriate funding, but we cannot fall into the trap of assuming that throwing money at a problem solves it: some of our highest per-pupil costs are in our lowest performing schools. We need to look comprehensively at operational opportunities that allow teachers to teach critical skills in a focused and effective way and to fund programs that deliver results for our students.

The students must be at the core of everything we do. Our schools exist for the benefit of our kids, and that benefit must be the sole metric that drives our school policy. All investments in schools should be dependent on continued improvement in student outcomes. That is not to say that we will be blind to the fact that some schools face greater challenges with their populations. But we can no longer accept the excuse that some of our children cannot receive an effective education until we solve poverty, or fix the breakdown of the family, or the violence that plagues the communities of too many of our students. We will no longer be willing to sacrifice a generation of our children by accepting those excuses. We must meet our children–all our children–where we find them and develop multi-faceted educational solutions that give them the opportunity to exercise their God-given talents and live a life of independence, dignity, and purpose, regardless of the circumstances into which they were born.

To develop those solutions:

  • We should launch an Education 2020 Initiative, which would unite under one umbrella the many public/private-sector efforts underway to improve education and develop specific recommendations for legislative action or private MOU-based alignments that increase educational access and quality in all of our communities, both rural and urban, by 2020;
  • Pre-K education should be available to any child who wants it; funding would be provided through matching grants to local community organizations that know the providers and can work in collaboration with local educational entities on educational standards;
  • Reading proficiency at grade level should be required to advance past 3rd grade. In some workforce programs today, up to 30% of the high school graduates cannot read; and behavioral issues and dropout rates in high school are directly attributable to the frustration and boredom of being unable to participate meaningfully on a curriculum increasingly dependent on reading. We should correct these problems before they develop by admitting that we help no child by “advancing” them toward a downward spiral;
  • 3rd-grade proficiency should include computer proficiency. The basics of computers are every bit as critical in today’s world as reading and writing were in our parents’ generation, and they will become ever more important in the new information and tech economy. We need an educational system that prepares our students for the future, not for yesteryear.
  • Community service should be an integrated part of our educational curriculum. Not only does it provide valuable real-world experience for the students, but it also instills in them the importance of contributing to our communities, one of the core values of a “Commonwealth” (originally from “Common weal” meaning the good of all). It also provides a way for education dollars to benefit many other sectors of our community and thereby maximizes the benefit of tax dollars;
  • Pennsylvania should provide one week of sales tax amnesty for back-to-school supplies to help families prepare their kids to succeed;
  • We should increase opportunities for “soft-skills training,” including by increasing access to programs for music and the arts in schools. Many students learn from their sports team experiences the critical job skills of teamwork, personal responsibility, creativity, leadership, on-time performance, deadlines, and ownership of an issue. Others learn those skills on a performance stage or in an art studio. We have done a good job of maintaining those important skills training opportunities on our sports fields–less so in our arts programs. We need to recognize that, like sports programs, arts programs develop key soft skills necessary to our new economy;
  • At the higher education level, we need to reward at budget time those institutions that find ways to reduce student tuition without adversely affecting the student experience, by more robust expense management and operational efficiencies. We also should work with those institutions to facilitate the commercialization of their R&D and to more effectively integrate those technologies with our growing tech and advanced manufacturing sectors.
  • Finally, we need to be forthright about the fact that pensions are siphoning off what politicians characterize as “education dollars.” For example, more than 60 cents of every new dollar of “education” spending goes to fund teacher pensions. Most Pennsylvanians think that the education increases touted by politicians are going into the classroom. Not so. We need to be more forthright about how and where our education dollars are being spent, so we can be smarter and more creative about how to actually improve the classroom experience, including by leverage the business sector to come into classrooms with educational programming in a more organized manner.

9. Right to Work
As a matter of both competition and conscience, Pennsylvanians should have the right to work at the employer of their choosing, without having to pay money to a union that they choose not to join.

As a matter of competition, we lose not only potential but existing businesses to other states because those states have passed right-to-work legislation.

As a matter of conscience, no one should be required to pay dues to a union they don’t believe serves their interests, in order to have the right to work in a workplace of their choice.

Our union workforce brings many benefits to the workplaces in the Commonwealth, including in training, safety, and identification of operational efficiencies and innovation. There are many ways that unions and businesses can work together to advance the economic growth of Pennsylvania. But violating individual conscience and liberty to work are not among them.

10. Restore Budget Discipline and Transparency
Most everyone is required to live on a budget: businesses do, families and individuals do, so why do our politicians think they are different?

Since Governor Wolf took office, the Pennsylvania budget process has been a chaotic mess. In fact, this Governor has not signed a single budget in the three years that he has been in office, and in two of those three years, the budget that he allowed to lapse into law without his signature was so overdue that it placed severe burdens on those organizations, like homeless shelters, schools, and social service agencies, that care for our most vulnerable citizens, and had to turn away clients because they had no way of knowing whether they would receive funding or not.

This recent budget cycle was the most disastrous of all, resulting in a credit downgrade that left Pennsylvania with one of the worst credit ratings in the entire nation. As every citizen knows, a bad credit rating means that borrowing costs more. So what did Pennsylvania politicians do? They decided to borrow over 1.5 billion, which cost taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars more in debt service costs, virtually mortgaging our children’s future. And Governor Wolf is now talking about borrowing even more. The “no tax increases” Harrisburg trumpets are a fiction; the reality is that massive borrowing, done AFTER we killed our debt rating, will cost us money that will need to be paid by the taxpayers.

This year’s budget also raided dedicated funds that had been earmarked for important purposes, like improving our roads and bridges. This robbing Peter to pay Paul happened in 11th hour sessions, months overdue, with the panic of education and social service funding crises looming in the near future, in 900-page legislation that was rushed through with no opportunity for careful assessment or transparency.

And, worst of all, rather than being a budget that is based on taxes derived from our citizens making things, and building things and growing things, this budget is ever more dependent on our citizens smoking, drinking, gambling and, soon, smoking pot. What have we become? And all for what?

For the third year in a row, the Governor has not actively helped to trim spending, or actively participated in the budget process at all. That lack of leadership has resulted on a downward trajectory for our entire state, when by all rights, we should be growing faster than any other state in the nation.

Lack of leadership and lack of transparency in Harrisburg has brought our great state to its knees, and we are being stampeded like cattle over the financial cliff. It is time that we, as citizens said … enough. We need to fundamentally transform how our budgets are created and how our government is run.

On the Budget, as Governor, I would:

  • Veto any spending bill that came without a balanced revenue plan
  • Work collaboratively to develop the Governor’s initial budget
  • Design and keep everyone on time deadlines for on-time balanced budget
  • Not allow “crisis mode” budgets in 11th hour 900-page legislation
  • End the game in which only the “insiders” really know what is in their bill
  • Ensure that spending is consistent with the 10-year plan reflected in The Map
  • Disallow “quick fix” solutions that downgrade our credit score
  • Engage in a 2-year planning cycle to avoid annual crises

Finally, we need to bring Transparency back to state government. We need a top-to-bottom audit of Government spending, which includes an inventory of the state’s real estate assets. Just about everyone can identify a state facility in their community that is underutilized or wasted entirely. Identifying more productive and collaborative uses for existing state properties, or divesting them entirely should be a priority.

Departmental consolidation and the increased use of technology to deliver superior customer service at reduced cost should be pursued by a dedicated Task Force, led by a senior member of the Governor’s staff who has expertise in the technology sector. Public-private partnerships should be actively sought so that we do not have government agencies reinventing the wheel when on the shelf solutions already exist. The technology used every day in the private sector throughout Pennsylvania government is generations behind, and we need to fix that problem by leveraging the expertise and resources of the private sectors already familiar with these systems.

Finally, every agency should be tasked with reducing expenses 3% every year, without adversely affecting the customer experience. The success in achieving this metric should be rewarded at budget time, with priority given to those programs that have effectively controlled their cost structures.

Conclusion
There are many other issues that need to be addressed in our Commonwealth, and those will be the subject of additional pieces in the months to come. But providing an economic environment that generates good private-sector jobs for Pennsylvanians is the first order of business for government. That requires two basic things: a clear business plan and a sound budget process. And the vision, resolve, and experience to deliver on both.

A great American statesman once said: “Destiny is not a matter of chance; it is a matter of choice.” It is time for us to exercise the choice to reclaim our destiny from the politicians. As citizens, and as mothers and fathers, and as businesspeople, and as community leaders, and as people of faith, and as those who understand the remarkable neighbors who work every day to make our communities better, it is time for us to step forward and demand a government that is worthy of all of us, and that will put aside all the gamesmanship, and noise and posturing and, instead, focus every day on delivering on the limitless promise of Pennsylvania.

It was on the Pennsylvania battlefield of Gettysburg that Abraham Lincoln recognized the bravery of those who fought there so that “government of the people, by the people and for the people shall not perish from the earth.” It is time for the people of Pennsylvania to reclaim their government from the politicians and to restore to reality what Lincoln so justly honored: government of the people, by the people and for the people. [24]

—Laura Ellsworth for Governor[25]

Republican Party Paul Mango

Economic Growth for All Pennsylvanians
While national economic recovery has created a “rising tide” lifting the economic fortunes of states nationwide, Pennsylvania is being left behind. The Commonwealth’s unemployment rate remains above the national average, and annual employment growth under the Wolf administration is well below 1%. While manufacturing employment has increased nationally by 7% since 2010, it has declined in Pennsylvania.[1]

Harrisburg’s lack of action on critical issues creates economic uncertainty precluding private sector investment in the Commonwealth. We have one of the worst credit ratings in the nation, ahead of only Connecticut, New Jersey and Illinois.[2] We are ranked #49th in the quality of our transportation infrastructure[3] despite having the highest gasoline tax in the nation. We have what is essentially the highest corporate state tax rate and the highest unemployment tax in the Country, and we do not permit business start-ups and cyclical businesses to fully recognize their losses and investments in job creation. Meanwhile, our citizens are leaving the Commonwealth for greater job opportunities elsewhere. We have a net outward migration of our population, largely composed of new college graduates. In 2016, Pennsylvania lost population for the first time since 1985.[4]

This performance is even more frustrating given the Commonwealth’s many advantages. We are called the “Keystone State” for a reason. We are geographically proximate to some of the world’s richest commercial markets in the northeastern U.S., which includes well over 100 million people. Our waterways grant us access to the Atlantic Ocean, Great Lakes, and the Gulf of Mexico. We sit on the largest single deposit of shale gas in the nation. Our colleges and universities are global leaders in a variety of technologies. Our farmland is among the most fertile in the nation. We have the history and natural beauty to become a major tourist destination. The opportunity for tremendous growth and prosperity is within our grasp, yet we have failed to seize it. We can – and must – do better.

My vision for the economic success of the Commonwealth comprises the following:

  • A Global Powerhouse in Energy Production
  • The World’s Leader in Robotics, Advanced and Additive Manufacturing, and Artificial Intelligence
  • A Global Center for Cell Biology and Drug Discovery
  • The Agricultural Breadbasket to the Nation and World
  • An Attractive Center for Tourism, and an Outdoor Enthusiast’s Paradise

We can turn each of these five opportunities into thriving, vibrant job creators for all of Pennsylvania, and bring back hundreds of thousands of the middle-class, high-tech, and white-collar jobs lost in the last decades. How? Inspirational leadership, sound policy and modern administration of government—three things I will bring to Harrisburg. As Governor, my greatest focus will be on taking all of the blessings bestowed upon the Commonwealth and transforming them into prosperity for all Pennsylvanians. This will require six actions:

  • Create a Corporate Tax Structure Encouraging, Rather than Discouraging, Business Development, Entrepreneurship, and Growth in Jobs and Wages
  • Alleviate Harrisburg’s Enormous Regulatory Burden and Anti-business Culture
  • Support Home Ownership by Eliminating School Property Taxes and Empowering Counties to Eliminate County Property Taxes
  • Develop a Skilled Work Force to Meet the Needs of a Changing Economy
  • Rebuild Our Strategic Infrastructure
  • Promote Our Great Advantages to Those Across the U. and the Globe

Taxes
Create a Corporate Tax Structure Encouraging, Rather than Discouraging, Business Development, Entrepreneurship, and Growth in Jobs and Wages.

This would start by lowering what is essentially the highest corporate tax rate in the Country from 9.99% to the equivalent of the personal income tax rate of 3.07%. Second, we would permit entrepreneurs starting businesses, and those in cyclical businesses, to “carry forward” all of their operating losses from year to year. Third, we would restructure the policies and processes governing our unemployment tax rate, which is the highest in the US.[1] In doing so, I will ensure the tasks of job creation and wage increases are recognized as the foundation upon which Pennsylvanians can support their families and achieve economic success, not simply sources of tax receipts for Harrisburg to squander.

Our employment growth during the Wolf administration has been less than half the national rate of job growth and that of most other states.[2] Reducing the corporate tax burden over two to three years would allow the Commonwealth to establish a strategic advantage relative to other states, while restoring the job growth necessary to address our fiscal pressures. With job growth similar to that which the rest of the Country is experiencing, these changes to the tax structure would pay for themselves. This is within our grasp.

Support Home Ownership by Eliminating School Property Taxes and Empowering Counties to Eliminate County Property Taxes.

Today, homeowners, and especially seniors, living in Pennsylvania face rising school property taxes and the very real fear of being evicted from their homes. This is unacceptable in America and it's unacceptable in Pennsylvania. That's why I support the complete elimination of school property taxes. As Governor, I will sign legislation that eliminates school property tax once and for all, making certain that our citizens can be secure in their own homes. Homeowners, and especially our seniors, should not be forced into selling just because they can no longer afford property taxes. It is time to once again respect the right of home ownership in Pennsylvania. Additionally, I support the County Commissioners Association of PA (CCAP) call for Tax Fairness for counties. This plan would allow counties to substitute a sales and/or income tax for county property taxes. This is an option because counties vary dramatically throughout the state. This would benefit homeowners and businesses alike.

Spending
Pennsylvanians are tired of the out of control spending in Harrisburg. Accumulating deficits are a clear and present danger to our state. Our budget deficit is growing every year because of poor growth and higher government spending. No one in Harrisburg is talking about what will truly bring fiscal solvency—growing the economy. It is not realistic to consider attacking our structural deficits, that are forecast to exceed $2 billion annually, simply through tax increases or spending cuts alone.

Paul, a fiscal conservative, believes in reducing the budget deficit by growing jobs and wages, and by encouraging business start-ups and investment. Since his election, Governor Thomas “the Tax Engine” Wolf has discouraged growth and has favored tax increases instead to pay for out of control spending. He has proposed more than $8 billion in tax increases, including the largest single tax increase in the history of the Commonwealth. Because of poor leadership in Harrisburg and narrow political interests, the state pension system has become unsustainable. The average Pennsylvania family of four owes almost $20,000 to pay off the debt of the state pension fund.

Paul will support legislation that actually addresses this deficit and moves toward a 401K-style system for state employees and teachers. I will also support legislation to change the county municipal government code to allow counties and local governments to move to a defined contribution pensions system. A new pension plan would apply to all new hires and honor the commitment to all current state employees and teachers as well a local government employees

Energy & Technology
Pennsylvania has been dealt an unusually gifted hand, and now we just need the leadership to transform it into prosperity for every Pennsylvanian.

Energy: We have some of the largest, cheapest deposits of natural gas and coal in the world.

Technology: Our universities are engaged in advanced research that promises to transform the way we live, the way we work, and the way we deliver care.

Access and proximity to markets: we are the ONLY state in the nation with direct access to the Atlantic Ocean, the Great Lakes, and the Gulf of Mexico.

If we combine these three, we will create the high-tech jobs of the NEXT century, not the last one. We will once again become a global leader in manufacturing. We can become the Saudi Arabia of energy exports.

Reforming Harrisburg
Paul believes we need to fundamentally redefine the role Harrisburg plays in our lives, and the current liberal leadership is incapable of achieving this.

Look at the annual budget mess there: it is an embarrassment and is failing Pennsylvanians. The dysfunction in Harrisburg is making it tough on every Pennsylvania family. Harrisburg and its politicians are relics of the early 20th century model embracing large scale standardization, control, spending, and bureaucracy. In our diverse and highly dynamic society, the one size of intrusive government it represents no longer fits all. Neither the Federal, nor the State Government, is as adept at solving our most pressing challenges as our individual communities are. This is particularly applicable to the three biggest programs consuming 75%-80% of the Commonwealth’s budget: education, anti-poverty, and healthcare. All three of these are failing.

The fundamental conservative role of government in the 21st Century is no longer to deliver all these services, but to engage relevant community groups, then to stimulate innovation among them by inviting collaboration with private enterprise, it should then identify the innovations that work and, finally, transfer these innovations across the Commonwealth. This is how Harrisburg should do its job, rather than trying to do ours.

Veterans
As a West Point graduate, veteran of the 82nd Airborne Division, supporter of military-related causes and the father of a daughter serving our country in Korea, Paul Mango understands the issues faced by Pennsylvania’s almost one million veterans.

Sadly, our government has failed our returning Veterans far too often. Paul will stand up for our military and Veteran community; he will focus on providing access to jobs through transition support with an emphasis on military credentialing and licensing. He will work closely with the leadership at the VA and support innovative programs that improve the level of healthcare for Veterans and their families, particularly those suffering from behavioral health illness that can lead to suicide. He will make sure that our military families are a priority and that their sacrifice and commitment is never forgotten.

Our current system of bureaucracies serving veterans is another example of bloated government organizations and how they fail. Pennsylvania ranks near the bottom in programs and support services for our Veterans and their families. Paul will ensure that Veteran-focused services in Pennsylvania are a priority and that they will be recognized as the best our country has to offer. It's time to deliver for the men and women that have served our country so selflessly, and Paul Mango is the leader that will get the job done!

Education
Pennsylvanians want their children to have a great education; after all that’s the key to getting a great job and having a great future.

But our state government takes our property taxes and, in the case of many of our urban areas, forces us to send our children to schools it knows are failing. We spend over $300,000 per high school graduate in many of our school districts, and half of the graduates in some of these districts are not proficient in algebra, or cannot read at a 9th grade level. Less than 30% of Governor Wolf’s increases in education funding have gone toward teaching our children.

Paul Mango will ensure every one of our children has the choice and the means to obtain a good education. Pennsylvania families must be empowered to make choices for their children’s success.

Healthcare
Paul believes every Pennsylvanian should have access to quality healthcare choices that are affordable, and that the government should not put itself between a patient and their doctor.

Paul has spent much of his adult life in the healthcare industry helping healthcare providers better serve their patients. Obamacare has been a disaster for Pennsylvanians. It has increased the cost of care and increased deductibles for families, eroded the quality of care, and taken away our health care choices. It has also harmed the Pennsylvania economy by destroying businesses and jobs. But Washington, DC isn’t going to solve Pennsylvania’s healthcare problems and that’s why we need Paul, who understands healthcare, to guide us through the uncertainty ahead.

Paul will focus on healthcare solutions that will treat advanced disease more effectively, focus on healthcare innovation, focus on prevention as well as treatment, and focus on encouraging all to participate in the healthcare market rather than mandating it. Paul believes in empowering Pennsylvanians to make their own healthcare choices.

Protecting Life
Paul is pro-life. He believes that the right to life—like the right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness—is of the highest importance.

As a husband and a father of five daughters, Paul will protect women’s access to healthcare while ending government funding for Planned Parenthood.

Second Amendment
Paul is a former Army paratrooper and a current member of the National Rifle Association.

He understands the importance of protecting the rights of responsible gun owners in Pennsylvania, and feels that the government has gone far enough in infringing on these rights. He believes in the right to bear arms and defend oneself, in hunting and recreation.

With Paul, Pennsylvania gun owners and sportsmen will have a Governor they can trust to protect their 2nd Amendment right to bear arms and hunt.

Sanctuary Cities
Paul will end the practice of sanctuary cities in Pennsylvania.

Harrisburg is failing Pennsylvanians on the most important role of public safety by allowing criminal illegal aliens to go unpunished in sanctuary cities. This isn’t only about enforcing the law, it’s about fairness. Any Pennsylvanian should be punished if they commit a crime whether they are legal or illegal, and certainly illegals shouldn’t be shown preferential treatment.

As a former Commissioned Army officer, Paul Mango understands the rule of law and how to keep Pennsylvanians safe and secure.

Opioid and Heroin Epidemic
Over 3,500 Pennsylvanians died from drug overdoses last year, more than died in traffic accidents.

And for every death there are many more overdoses that hurt Pennsylvania families. The opioid problem knows no economic or geographic boundary—it has affected Pennsylvanians across our state.

Paul will act swiftly and compassionately to end the epidemic by going after the suppliers of the drugs and improving treatment for addicts. He will also help law enforcement prosecute dealers, including reinstating mandatory minimum sentences for these dealers. [24]

—Mango for Governor[26]

Republican Party Scott Wagner

Campaign tactics and strategies

Campaign advertisements

Republican Party Laura Ellsworth

Support
"Turn it Off" - Ellsworth campaign ad, released May 2, 2018


Republican Party Paul Mango

Support
"New Day" - Mango campaign ad, released May 7, 2018
"Townhall" - Mango campaign ad, released May 7, 2018
"The Right Things To Do" - Mango campaign ad, released February 21, 2018
"We Need Your Help!" - Mango campaign ad, released February 20, 2018
"Advice" - Mango campaign ad, released January 16, 2018
"Help Is On the Way" - Mango campaign ad, released December 4, 2017
"FlyOver" - Mango campaign ad, released November 21, 2017
"Bigger Cause" - Mango campaign ad, released November 12, 2017
"Wolf at Work" - Mango campaign ad, released November 2, 2017
"Opposites" - Mango campaign ad, released September 15, 2017
"Ready to Serve" - Mango campaign ad, released September 15, 2017
Oppose
"Katharine" - Wagner campaign ad, released April 12, 2018
"Paul Mango:Liberal Phony" - Wagner campaign ad, released March 16, 2018
"Phony" - Wagner campaign ad, released March 13, 2018

Republican Party Scott Wagner

Support
"Garbageman" - Wagner campaign ad, released May 3, 2018
"Scott's Plan" - Wagner campaign ad, released January 30, 2018
"Tough" - Wagner campaign ad, released December 13, 2017
"My Story" - Wagner campaign ad, released March 9, 2017
Oppose
"Faded Neon" - Mango campaign ad, released April 5, 2018
"Unconscionable" - Mango campaign ad, released March 14, 2018
"30,000 Reasons" - Mango campaign ad, released February 20, 2018


Online presence

May 3, 2018

The following social media statistics were collected on May 3, 2018.

Facebook Twitter
Candidate Followers Likes Comments on last 10 posts Followers Following Tweets
Republican Party Ellsworth 2,675 2,558 30 480 92 336
Republican Party Mango 111,175 110,750 164 2,173 1 338
Republican Party Wagner 171,393 171,116 304 2,192 469 690

Campaign finance

Following are campaign finance reports obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State. The reports contain information on all raising and spending by the campaigns from the beginning of the campaign cycle until April 30, 2018.

Debates and forums

May 4 debate

On May 4, 2018, Laura Ellsworth (R), Paul Mango (R), and Scott Wagner (R) met for a debate in Lancaster.[27]

April 25 candidate forum

On April 25, 2018, Laura Ellsworth (R), Paul Mango (R), and Scott Wagner (R) met for a candidate forum in Lancaster County.[28]

March 5 debate

On March 5, 2018, the three declared Republican candidates met for a debate hosted by the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce. Laura Ellsworth (R), Paul Mango (R), and Scott Wagner discussed issues including:[29][30]

  • Budgeting: The candidates discussed the state's tax rates and budgeting practices. Ellsworth argued in favor of a reduction to the state's property tax rates and a property tax freeze for senior citizens, but was opposed to eliminating property taxes entirely: "If we remove all property taxes, we will not adequately fund education, and we will remove local control of education and it needs to stay local." Mango stated his support for a bill that would eliminate the education-related portion of the property tax and would raise the state's sales and income tax rates, and called for the elimination of property taxes. Wagner stated his support for the bill referred to by Mango and called for property taxes to be eliminated. Wagner also called on the state to adopt zero-based budgeting practices, in which state agencies are required to justify all expenses rather than only new ones. Wagner claimed that the adoption of zero-based budgeting could reduce the state's expenses by as much as $4 billion annually.
  • Education: The candidates discussed funding for public schools. Ellsworth argued that a state policy providing funding to alternatives to public schools had lessened the quality of the state's public education: "Right now, we have a system where we are asking school districts to basically slit their wrists and bleed themselves to pay for these alternatives for other children." Mango called on the state to increase access to alternatives to public education and stated his opposition to increased funding for public education: "I know that we're not going to throw any more good money after bad money." Wagner argued that the state's public schools had not adequately managed their funds and stated his opposition to increased funding for public education: "In the last four years, we've put almost $1 billion more into the school system...Not a nickel has hit the classrooms. It has gone to cover the pension, health care and salary increases that we have seen over the last four years."

March 1 debate

On March 1, 2018, the three declared Republican candidates met for a debate at Harrisburg Area Community College. Laura Ellsworth (R), Paul Mango (R), and Scott Wagner (R) discussed issues including:[31]

  • Bathroom access laws: Mango and Wagner discussed a bill that Wagner had voted in favor of as a member of the state Senate. The bill, which was not passed, would have allowed the state Human Relations Commission to investigate allegations of discrimination in housing and employment based on sexual orientation and gender identity or expression. Mango argued that a provision in the bill would have increased access to girls' locker rooms in the state's public schools: "He is not keeping our kids safe and secure...As I said, he is a dangerous, ineffective liberal insider just as Tom Wolf is." Wagner disputed Mango's claims about the bill: "this is the best time to call him 'lying Paul".
  • School safety: The candidates discussed school safety measures, with Ellsworth advocating for the installation of metal detectors and swipe-card security systems. Mango called for increased funding for school security and for screening for mental illness, as well as measures limiting access to firearms for those diagnosed with a mental illness. Wagner called for an armed officer to be stationed in every public school and for measures to ensure that background checks for prospective firearms buyers are thorough.

January 20 candidate forum

On January 20, 2018, the four declared Republican candidates met for a candidate forum in Pittsburgh. Laura Ellsworth, Paul Mango, Mike Turzai, and Scott Wagner discussed campaign finance, education funding, redistricting, and support for President Trump (R).

On campaign finance, Wagner and Ellsworth called for increased limits on political expenditures, with Wagner arguing that there should be increased limits on expenditures by lobbyists and Ellsworth calling for limits on contributions to political candidates as a whole. Turzai and Mango argued that political expenditures were a form of free speech and should not be further regulated. The candidates also disagreed on education funding. Ellsworth called for an increase in property tax credits to help offset the portion of property taxes which are used to fund schools. Mango countered by arguing in favor of modifying education funding so that schools are no longer funded by property taxes and called for the implementation of education savings accounts. Like Ellsworth, Turzai was opposed to the elimination of property taxes, calling for more charter schools and apportioning funding based on schools' performance. Wagner called for schools to no longer be funded by property taxes on an individual's primary residence and called for the expansion of vocational training programs.

Ellsworth called for the creation of a bipartisan redistricting commission, which Mango, Turzai, and Wagner stated their opposition to. All four candidates stated their opposition to the legalization of marijuana.[32]

October 19 candidate forum

On October 19, 2017, the three declared Republican candidates for governor met in Montgomery County for a candidate forum. Scott Wagner, Paul Mango, and Laura Ellsworth primarily discussed fiscal policy, with each offering differing proposals for managing the state's finances. Wagner called for fewer regulations on businesses and reduction of costs within the state government, while Mango argued that a comprehensive plan to boost the state's economic performance was required. Ellsworth argued in favor of requiring that a comprehensive budget plan be presented to the governor.[33]

Race ratings

See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Race ratings: Pennsylvania gubernatorial election, 2018
Race tracker Race ratings
November 5, 2018 October 30, 2018October 23, 2018October 16, 2018
The Cook Political Report Likely Democratic Likely DemocraticLikely DemocraticLikely Democratic
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales Likely Democratic Likely DemocraticLikely DemocraticLikely Democratic
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball Safe Democratic Safe DemocraticSafe DemocraticSafe Democratic
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every two weeks throughout the election season.


State overview

Partisan control

This section details the partisan control of federal and state positions in Pennsylvania heading into the 2018 elections.

Congressional delegation

State executives

  • As of May 2018, Democrats held five of 11 state executive positions, while six were held by nonpartisan officials.
  • The governor of Pennsylvania was Democrat Tom Wolf.

State legislature

Trifecta status

  • Pennsylvania was under divided government, meaning that the two parties shared control of the state government. Tom Wolf (D) served as governor, while Republicans controlled the state legislature.

2018 elections

See also: Pennsylvania elections, 2018

Pennsylvania held elections for the following positions in 2018:

Demographics

Demographic data for Pennsylvania
 PennsylvaniaU.S.
Total population:12,791,904316,515,021
Land area (sq mi):44,7433,531,905
Race and ethnicity**
White:81.6%73.6%
Black/African American:11%12.6%
Asian:3.1%5.1%
Native American:0.2%0.8%
Pacific Islander:0%0.2%
Two or more:2.1%3%
Hispanic/Latino:6.4%17.1%
Education
High school graduation rate:89.2%86.7%
College graduation rate:28.6%29.8%
Income
Median household income:$53,599$53,889
Persons below poverty level:15.9%11.3%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015)
Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Pennsylvania.
**Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.

As of July 2017, Pennsylvania had a population of approximately 12,800,000 people, with its three largest cities being Philadelphia (pop. est. 1.6 million), Pittsburgh (pop. est. 300,000), and Allentown (pop. est. 120,000).[34][35]

State election history

This section provides an overview of federal and state elections in Pennsylvania from 2000 to 2016. All data comes from the Pennsylvania Department of State.

Historical elections

Presidential elections, 2000-2016

This chart shows the results of the presidential election in Pennsylvania every year from 2000 to 2016.

Election results (President of the United States), Pennsylvania 2000-2016
Year First-place candidate First-place candidate votes (%) Second-place candidate Second-place candidate votes (%) Margin of victory (%)
2016 Republican Party Donald Trump 48.6% Democratic Party Hillary Clinton 47.9% 0.7%
2012 Democratic Party Barack Obama 52.1% Republican Party Mitt Romney 46.7% 5.4%
2008 Democratic Party Barack Obama 54.7% Republican Party John McCain 44.3% 10.4%
2004 Democratic Party John Kerry 51.0% Republican Party George Bush 48.5% 2.5%
2000 Democratic Party Al Gore 50.6% Republican Party George Bush 46.4% 4.2%

U.S. Senate elections, 2000-2016

This chart shows the results of U.S. Senate races in Pennsylvania from 2000 to 2016. Every state has two Senate seats, and each seat goes up for election every six years. The terms of the seats are staggered so that roughly one-third of the seats are up every two years.

Election results (U.S. Senator), Pennsylvania 2000-2016
Year First-place candidate First-place candidate votes (%) Second-place candidate Second-place candidate votes (%) Margin of victory (%)
2016 Republican Party Patrick Toomey 48.8% Democratic Party Katie McGinty 47.3% 1.5%
2012 Democratic Party Bob Casey 53.7% Republican Party Tom Smith 44.6% 9.1%
2010 Republican Party Patrick Toomey 51.0% Democratic Party Joe Sestak 49.0% 2.0%
2006 Democratic Party Bob Casey 58.7% Republican Party Rick Santorum 41.3% 17.4%
2004 Republican Party Arlen Specter 52.6% Democratic Party Joseph Hoeffel 42.0% 10.6%
2000 Republican Party Rick Santorum 52.4% Democratic Party Ron Klink 45.5% 6.9%

Gubernatorial elections, 2000-2016

This chart shows the results of the four gubernatorial elections held between 2000 and 2016. Gubernatorial elections are held every four years in Pennsylvania.

Election results (Governor), Pennsylvania 2000-2016
Year First-place candidate First-place candidate votes (%) Second-place candidate Second-place candidate votes (%) Margin of victory (%)
2014 Democratic Party Tom Wolf 54.9% Republican Party Thomas Corbett 45.1% 9.8%
2010 Republican Party Thomas Corbett 54.5% Democratic Party Dan Onorato 45.5% 9.0%
2006 Democratic Party Ed Rendell 60.4% Republican Party Lynn Swann 39.6% 20.8%
2002 Democratic Party Ed Rendell 53.4% Republican Party Mike Fisher 44.3% 9.1%

Congressional delegation, 2000-2016

This chart shows the number of Democrats and Republicans who were elected to represent Pennsylvania in the U.S. House from 2000 to 2016. Elections for U.S. House seats are held every two years.

Congressional delegation, Pennsylvania 2000-2016
Year Republicans Republicans (%) Democrats Democrats (%) Balance of power
2016 Republican Party 13 72.2% Democratic Party 5 27.8% R+8
2014 Republican Party 13 72.2% Democratic Party 5 27.8% R+8
2012 Republican Party 13 72.2% Democratic Party 5 27.8% R+8
2010 Republican Party 12 63.2% Democratic Party 7 36.8% R+5
2008 Republican Party 7 36.8% Democratic Party 12 63.2% D+5
2006 Republican Party 8 42.1% Democratic Party 11 57.9% D+3
2004 Republican Party 12 63.2% Democratic Party 7 36.8% R+5
2002 Republican Party 12 63.2% Democratic Party 7 36.8% R+5
2000 Republican Party 11 52.4% Democratic Party 10 47.6% R+1

Trifectas, 1992-2017

A state government trifecta occurs when one party controls both chambers of the state legislature and the governor's office.

Pennsylvania Party Control: 1992-2024
One year of a Democratic trifecta  •  Twelve years of Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.

Year 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Governor D D D R R R R R R R R D D D D D D D D R R R R D D D D D D D D D D
Senate R D R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
House D D D R R R R R R R R R R R R D D D D R R R R R R R R R R R R D D


Pivot Counties

See also: Pivot Counties by state

Three of 67 Pennsylvania counties—4.5 percent—are pivot counties. These are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 pivot counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.

Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008
County Trump margin of victory in 2016 Obama margin of victory in 2012 Obama margin of victory in 2008
Erie County, Pennsylvania 1.56% 16.03% 19.88%
Luzerne County, Pennsylvania 19.31% 4.81% 8.41%
Northampton County, Pennsylvania 3.78% 4.71% 12.30%

In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won Pennsylvania with 48.2 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 47.5 percent. In presidential elections between 1900 and 2016, Pennsylvania cast votes for the winning presidential candidate 76.7 percent of the time. In that same time frame, Pennsylvania supported Republican candidates for president more often than Democratic candidates, 53.3 to 43.3 percent. The state, however, favored Democrats in every presidential election between 2000 and 2012, but voted Republican in 2016.

Presidential results by legislative district

The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in Pennsylvania. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[36][37]

In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 89 out of 203 state House districts in Pennsylvania with an average margin of victory of 37.4 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 84 out of 203 state House districts in Pennsylvania with an average margin of victory of 37.3 points. Clinton won 19 districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections.
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 114 out of 203 state House districts in Pennsylvania with an average margin of victory of 20 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 119 out of 203 state House districts in Pennsylvania with an average margin of victory of 28.2 points. Trump won 17 districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections.

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Pennsylvania governor Republican primary 2018. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

Pennsylvania government:

Elections:

Ballotpedia exclusives:

External links

Footnotes

  1. Pennsylvania Department of State, "Unofficial Returns," accessed May 25, 2018
  2. 2.0 2.1 Penn Live, "Gubernatorial candidate Scott Wagner: Winning GOP endorsement 'is a big first step'," February 10, 2018
  3. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, "GOP Pittsburgh Lawyer Laura Ellsworth announces run for governor," October 10, 2017
  4. Laura Ellsworth for Governor, "Home," accessed March 22, 2018
  5. Laura Ellsworth for Governor, "Delivering on the Promise of Pennsylvania," accessed March 22, 2018
  6. PA Home Page, "Paul Mango enters republican race for PA governor," May 18, 2017
  7. Mango for Pennsylvania, "Home," accessed March 22, 2018
  8. Penn Live, "Scott Wagner says he's running for election because 'Wolf is a failed governor'," January 12, 2017
  9. Wagner for Governor, "Home," accessed March 22, 2018
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 Scott Wagner for Governor, "WAGNER ANNOUNCES YORK COUNTY ENDORSEMENTS," October 3, 2017
  11. Mango for Governor, "Tom Cotton," accessed January 4, 2018
  12. Laura Ellsworth for Governor, "Carly Fiorina Endorses Laura Ellsworth for Governor," April 24, 2018
  13. The Morning Call, "Steve Bannon picks a side in Pennsylvania governor's race," September 26, 2017
  14. City & State Pennsylvania, "Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan to endorse Wagner in gubernatorial race," July 19, 2017
  15. 15.00 15.01 15.02 15.03 15.04 15.05 15.06 15.07 15.08 15.09 15.10 15.11 15.12 15.13 15.14 15.15 15.16 15.17 PoliticsPA, "Mango Endorsed by 20 County Commissioners," March 23, 2018
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 PoliticsPA, "Exclusive: Mango Announces Endorsement From Four County Commissioners," July 25, 2017
  17. Mango for Governor, "Glen Meakem," accessed January 4, 2017
  18. The Unionville Times, "Endorsement: Ellsworth for GOP Gov. nomination," May 7, 2018
  19. Laura Ellsworth for Governor, "The Coatesville Times Endorsement: Ellsworth for GOP Gov. Nomination," May 7, 2018
  20. Laura Ellsworth for Governor, "The Philadelphia Inquirer: 'Laura Ellsworth: Best Choice for Governor in GOP Primary' Endorsement," May 4, 2018
  21. Laura Ellsworth for Governor, "Patriot-News/PennLive Endorsement: 'For Republican Primary Voters, Laura Ellsworth Is the Best Choice," May 4, 2018
  22. Mango for Pennsylvania, "Family Research Council Action PAC endorses Mango for Governor," accessed May 3, 2018
  23. Scott Wagner for Governor, "LUZERNE GOP ENDORSES WAGNER-BARTOS TICKET," November 28, 2017
  24. 24.0 24.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  25. Laura Ellsworth for Governor, "Delivering on the Promise of Pennsylvnia," December 18, 2017
  26. Mango for Pennsylvania, "Critical Issues," accessed February 26, 2018
  27. York Daily Record, "Pa. governor's race: Republican primary hopefuls speak up in final televised debate," May 4, 2018
  28. Lancaster Online, "Scott Wagner, Laura Ellsworth and Paul Mango debated Wednesday evening in Lancaster County," April 25, 2018
  29. U.S. News, "Republicans' Debate Exposes Big Differences in School Policy," March 6, 2018
  30. The Inquirer, "Pa. GOP governor candidates debate taxes, jobs and bathrooms in Philly," March 6, 2018
  31. York Daily Record, "Republican debate for Pa. governor's race confrontational between Wagner, Mango," March 1, 2018
  32. Trib Live, "Trump figures into Pennsylvania GOP gubernatorial debate," January 21, 2018
  33. WESA, "Pennsylvania GOP Governor Hopefuls Face Off For First Time," October 20, 2017
  34. United States Census Bureau, "Quick Facts - Pennsylvania," accessed January 3, 2018
  35. Pennsylvania Demographics, "Pennsylvania Cities by Population," accessed January 3, 2018
  36. Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
  37. Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017