STAR voting

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search



Election Policy Logo.png

Electoral system
Electoral systems by state
Ranked-choice voting (RCV)
Academic studies on RCV
Election dates
Election agencies
Election terms

Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker

Public Policy Logo-one line.png

STAR (an acronym for Score Then Automatic Runoff) voting is an electoral system in which voters rate the candidates for a given office on a scale of zero to five, with zero indicating no support and five indicating maximum support. The scores for all candidates are then tabulated and the top highest-scored candidates advance to an automatic runoff, at which time a voter's full vote is assigned to whichever of the two candidates he or she scored highest. The candidate whom a greater number of voters gave a higher score in the runoff is declared the winner. STAR voting was developed in 2014 by the Equal Vote Coalition.[1]

Example

Imagine that five candidates are running for mayor in a hypothetical city. On their ballots, voters rank these candidates on a scale of zero to five, five indicating the maximum support. The ratings are tabulated as follows for all candidates.[2]

STAR voting example
Candidate Total score
Candidate A 420
Candidate B 240
Candidate C 130
Candidate D 100
Candidate E 50

Candidates A and B advance to the automatic runoff. At this point, each ballot is reassigned to whichever of the top two highest-scored candidates was ranked higher on that ballot. The winner is the candidate with the highest number of reassigned (post-initial tabulation) votes.[2]

A voter can give two or more candidates the same score. Should both of these candidates advance to the runoff, this would be counted as a vote of no preference between those two.[2]

Ballot measures

The following table provides a list of local ballot measures related to STAR voting:

StateYearBallot MeasureStatusYes VotesNo Votes
Oregon2024Eugene Measure 20-349Defeated 15,871 (36%)28,818 (64%)
Oregon2018Lane Measure 20-290Defeated 75,807 (48%)83,450 (52%)

See also

External links

Footnotes