Rotten Tomatoes
Cancel Movies Tv shows Shop News Showtimes

One Night at McCool's Reviews

Full Review | Original Score: D | Sep 7, 2011

Disappointing, too violent, and not very funny.

Full Review | Original Score: 2/5 | Dec 26, 2010

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Nov 20, 2008

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Dec 6, 2005

Full Review | Original Score: 3/4 | Sep 30, 2005

...a breezy, nasty little film that delivers more than it promises.

Full Review | Original Score: B | Jan 29, 2005

Full Review | Original Score: 58/100 | Mar 16, 2004

No matter how bad a movie with A-list actors involved is, it will still be released - somewhere, sometime, to someone.

Full Review | Original Score: 1/5 | Mar 4, 2004

[Tyler] seems like she would be more at home playing a tomboy.

Full Review | Original Score: 1/4 | Aug 1, 2003

Full Review | Original Score: 3/5 | Dec 8, 2002

Full Review | Original Score: 4/5 | Oct 30, 2002

Full Review | Original Score: 58/100 | Jun 12, 2002

Full Review | Original Score: 2/4 | Mar 22, 2002

Messy but periodically funny.

Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/5 | Feb 28, 2002

Once the gimmick has worn out its welcome, the movie makes misstep after misstep until a final shootout of baffling stupidity.

Full Review | Original Score: 1.5/4 | Feb 26, 2002

An odd fish, this, although there's no denying the conviction the ruby-lipped temptress Liv Tyler brings to washing a car.

Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4 | Nov 16, 2001

If Rashomon were filmed through a shampoo bottle, you'd have some idea what to expect from the surprisingly mean-spirited comedy, One Night at McCool's.

Full Review | Original Score: C | Oct 24, 2001

Full Review | Original Score: 3/4 | Jul 16, 2001

I remember watching the opening scenes with an air of indifference, and I remember watching the climax very nearly in hysterics.

Full Review | Original Score: A- | Jun 15, 2001

Counting on the star of Brain Smasher: A Love Story for laughs is a sign of true desperation.

Full Review | Jun 2, 2001

Load More
Do you think we mischaracterized a critic's review?