skip to main content
research-article

Focused, Aroused, but so Distractible: Temporal Perspectives on Multitasking and Communications

Published: 28 February 2015 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    A common assumption in studies of interruptions is that one is focused in an activity and then distracted by other stimuli. We take the reverse perspective and examine whether one might first be in an attentional state that makes one susceptible to communications typically associated with distraction. We explore the confluence of multitasking and workplace communications from three temporal perspectives -- prior to an interaction, when tasks and communications are interleaved, and at the end of the day. Using logging techniques and experience sampling, we observed 32 employees in situ for five days. We found that certain attentional states lead people to be more susceptible to particular types of interaction. Rote work is followed by more Facebook or face-to-face interaction. Focused and aroused states are followed by more email. The more time in email and face-fo-face interaction, and the more total screen switches, the less productive people feel at the day's end. We present the notion of emotional homeostasis along with new directions for multitasking research.

    References

    [1]
    Adler, R.F. and Benbunan-Fich, R. Self-interruptions in discretionary multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29 (4). 1441--1449.
    [2]
    Aral, S., Brynjolfsson, E. and Alstyne, M.W.V. Information Technology and Information Worker Productivity. Information Systems Research, 2011.
    [3]
    Barley, S., Meyerson, D. and Grodal, S. Email as a Source and Symbol of Stress. Organization Science, 2011, 22 (4). 887--906.
    [4]
    Buck, R. Social and emotional functions in facial expression and communication: The readout hypothesis. Biological Psychology, 1994, 38. 95--115.
    [5]
    Chrousos, G. and Gold, P. The concepts of stress and stress symptom disorders: Overview of physical and behavioral homeostatis. JAMA, 1992, 267 (9). 1244-
    [6]
    Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E. and Wilhite, S., A diary study of task switching and interruptions. in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2004), 175--182.
    [7]
    Dabbish, L., Mark, G., #237, Gonz, c.M., #225 and lez. Why do i keep interrupting myself?: environment, habit and self-interruption Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011, 3127--3130.
    [8]
    Ean, L.C. Face-to-face Versus Computer-mediated Communicaton: Exploring Employee's Preference of Effective Employee Communication Channel. International Journal for the Advancement of Science and Arts, 2010, 1 (2). 38--47.
    [9]
    Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1957.
    [10]
    Gonzalez, V.M. and Mark, G., "Constant, Constant, Multi-tasking Craziness": Managing Multiple Working Spheres. in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (Vienna, Austria, 2004), 113--120.
    [11]
    Grandey, A.A., Tam, A.P. and Brauburger, A.L. Affective States and Traits in the Workplace: Diary and Survey Data from Young Workers. Motivation and Emotion, 2002, 26 (1). 31--55.
    [12]
    Heider, F. Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 1944, 51 (6). 358374.
    [13]
    Hektner, J., Schmidt, J. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007.
    [14]
    Herzberg, F. The Motivation to Work. Transaction Publishers, 1993.
    [15]
    Hodges, S., Williams, L., Berry, E., Izadi, S., Srinivasan, J., Butler, A., Smyth, G., Kapur, N. and Wood, K. SenseCam: A Retrospective Memory Aid Ubicomp, 2006, 177--193.
    [16]
    Iqbal, S.T. and Horvitz, E., Disruption and Recovery of Computing Tasks: Field Study, Analysis and Directions. in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (San Jose, California, USA, 2007), 677--686.
    [17]
    Jin, J. and Dabbish, L.A. Self-interruption on the computer: a typology of discretionary task interleaving Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Boston, MA, USA, 2009, 1799--1808.
    [18]
    Kohler, W. Dynamics in Psychology. Liverright, New York, 1942.
    [19]
    Lewin, K. Defining the "Field at a Given Time.". Psychological Review, 1943, 50. 292--310.
    [20]
    Mark, G., Gonzalez, V.M. and Harris, J. No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work in Proceeding of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems ACM Press, Portland, Oregon, USA 2005, 321--330
    [21]
    Mark, G., Hausstein, D. and Klocke, U. The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Florence, Italy, 2008, 107--110.
    [22]
    Mark, G., Iqbal, S.T., Czerwinski, M. and Johns, P. Bored mondays and focused afternoons: the rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2014, 3025--3034.
    [23]
    Mark, G., Iqbal, S.T., Czerwinski, M. and Johns, P. Capturing the Mood: Facebook and Face-to-Face Encounters in the Workplace ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2014, (to appear).
    [24]
    Mark, G., Wang, Y. and Niiya, M. Stress and multitasking in everyday college life: an empirical study of online activity Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2014, 4150.
    [25]
    Neuberg, S.L., Kenrick, D.T. and Schaller, M. Human Threat Management Systems: Self-Protection and Disease Avoidance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2011, 35. 1042--1051.
    [26]
    O'Conaill, B. and Frohlich, D., Timespace in the workplace: dealing with interruptions. in CHI, (1995), 262--263.
    [27]
    Posner, J., Russell, J.A. and Peterson, B.S. The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 2005, 17. 715--734.
    [28]
    Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Rom, V. and Bakker, A. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 2002, 3. 7192.
    [29]
    Watson, D., Clark, A.L. and Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 56 (6). 1063--1070.
    [30]
    Wood, W. and Neal, D.T. A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological Review, 2007, 114 (4). 843--863.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Fragmented Moments, Balanced Choices: How Do People Make Use of Their Waiting Time?Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642608(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Circle Back Next Week: The Effect of Meeting-Free Weeks on Distributed Workers’ Unstructured Time and Attention NegotiationProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642175(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Hey StepByStep! Can you teach me how to use my phone better?International Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103195183:COnline publication date: 14-Mar-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Focused, Aroused, but so Distractible: Temporal Perspectives on Multitasking and Communications

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
        February 2015
        1956 pages
        ISBN:9781450329224
        DOI:10.1145/2675133
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 28 February 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. email
        2. face-to-face interaction
        3. facebook
        4. interruptions
        5. multitasking
        6. productivity

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Funding Sources

        Conference

        CSCW '15
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 161 of 575 submissions, 28%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CSCW '24

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)167
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Fragmented Moments, Balanced Choices: How Do People Make Use of Their Waiting Time?Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642608(1-14)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)Circle Back Next Week: The Effect of Meeting-Free Weeks on Distributed Workers’ Unstructured Time and Attention NegotiationProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642175(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)Hey StepByStep! Can you teach me how to use my phone better?International Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103195183:COnline publication date: 14-Mar-2024
        • (2023)Scanning or Simply Unengaged in Reading? Opportune Moments for Pushed News Notifications and Their Relationship with Smartphone Users' Choice of News-reading ModesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042687:MHCI(1-26)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
        • (2023)Nudging Users Towards Conscious Social Media UseProceedings of the 25th International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3565066.3608703(1-7)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2023
        • (2023)Get Distracted or Missed the Stop? Investigating Public Transit Passengers’ Travel-Based Multitasking Behaviors, Motives, and ChallengesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581391(1-14)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
        • (2023)Defining and Identifying Attention Capture Deceptive Designs in Digital InterfacesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580729(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
        • (2023)K-EmoPhone: A Mobile and Wearable Dataset with In-Situ Emotion, Stress, and Attention LabelsScientific Data10.1038/s41597-023-02248-210:1Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
        • (2022)Understanding How to Administer Voice Surveys through Smart SpeakersProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556066:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
        • (2022)TeamSpiritous - A Retrospective Emotional Competence Development System for Video-MeetingsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551176:CSCW2(1-28)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media