skip to main content
research-article

Bored mondays and focused afternoons: the rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace

Published: 26 April 2014 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    While distractions using digital media have received attention in HCI, understanding engagement in workplace activities has been little explored. We logged digital activity and continually probed perspectives of 32 information workers for five days in situ to understand how attentional states change with context. We present a framework of how engagement and challenge in work relate to focus, boredom, and rote work. Overall, we find more focused attention than boredom in the workplace. Focus peaks mid-afternoon while boredom is highest in early afternoon. People are happiest doing rote work and most stressed doing focused work. On Mondays people are most bored but also most focused. Online activities are associated with different attentional states, showing different patterns at beginning and end of day, and before and after a mid-day break. Our study shows how rhythms of attentional states are associated with context and time, even in a dynamic workplace environment.

    Supplementary Material

    MP4 File (p3025-sidebyside.mp4)

    References

    [1]
    Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quaterly, 2000, 24 (4). 665--694.
    [2]
    Begole, J. B., Tang, J. C., Smith, R. B. and Yankelovich, N., Work rhythms: analyzing visualizations of awareness histories of distributed groups. in Proceedings CSCW'02, (2002), 334--343.
    [3]
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row, NY, 1990.
    [4]
    Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E. and Wilhite, S., A diary study of task switching and interruptions. in Proceedings CHI'04, (2004), 175--182.
    [5]
    Dane, E. Paying attention to mindfulness and its effect on task performance in the workplace. Journal of Management, 2011, 37 (4). 997--1018.
    [6]
    Danziger, S., Levav, J. and Avnaim-Pessoa, L. Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proc of the Nat'l Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108 (17). 6889--6892.
    [7]
    Gonzalez, V. M. and Mark, G., "Constant, Constant, Multi-tasking Craziness": Managing Multiple Working Spheres. Proceedings CHI'04, (2004), 113--120.
    [8]
    Gross, S., Semmer, N.K., Meier, L.L., Kalin, W., Jacobshagen, N. and Tschan, F. The effects of positive events at work on after-work fatigue: They matter most in face of adversity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2011, 96 (3). 654--664.
    [9]
    Hektner, J., Schmidt, J. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007.
    [10]
    Iqbal, S. T. and Horvitz, E., Disruption and Recovery of Computing Tasks: Field Study, Analysis and Directions. in Proceedings of CHI'07, (2007), 677--686.
    [11]
    Karlson, A. K., Iqbal, S. T., Meyers, B., Lee, K., Ramos, G. and Tang, J., Mobile Task Flow in Context: A Screenshot Study of Smartphone Usage. Proceedings of CHI'10, (2010), 2009--2018.
    [12]
    Lefevre, J. Flow and the quality of experience during work and leisure. in Czikszentmihalyi, M. and Czikszentmihalyi, I. eds. Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
    [13]
    Macey, W. and Schneider, B. The meaning of employee engagement. Indust and Organ'l Psych, 2008, 1. 3--30.
    [14]
    Mark, G., Iqbal, S., Czerwinski, M., and Johns, P. (2014). Capturing the Mood: Facebook and Face-toFace Encounters in the Workplace. Proceedings of CSCW'14, Baltimore, MD, ACM Press.
    [15]
    Mark, G., Voida, S. and Cardello, A. "A Pace Not Dictated by Electrons": An Empirical Study of Work Without Email Proc. of CHI'12, (2012), 555--564.
    [16]
    Massimini, F. and Carli, M. The systematic assessment of flow in everyday experience. in Czikszentmihalyi, M. and Czikszentmihalyi, I. eds. Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
    [17]
    Posner, J., Russell, J. A. and Peterson, B. S. The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 2005, 17. 715--734.
    [18]
    Russell, J. A. A circumplex model of affect. J of Personality and Soc Psychology, 1980, 39. 1161--1178.
    [19]
    Schallberger, U. The influence of personality characteristics on self reports of working conditions. Zeit. f. Experimentelle Psych, 1995, 42 (1). 111--131.
    [20]
    Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Rom, V. and Bakker, A. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 2002, 3. 71--92.
    [21]
    Scherer, K. R., Banziger, T. and Roesch, E. A Blueprint for Affective Computing: A sourcebook and manual. Oxford University Press, 2010.
    [22]
    Stone, A. A., Hedges, S. M., Neale, J. M. and Satin, M. S. Prospective and crosssectional mood reports offer no evidence of a "Blue Monday" phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 49. 129--134.
    [23]
    Tice, D., Baumister, R., Shmuei, D. and Muraven, M. Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2007, 43 (3). 379--384.
    [24]
    Tschan, F., Banziger, T. and Roesch, E. Discrete emotions in interaction with superiors: Some are more role-related, some are more relationship related. in Rigotti, T., Korek, S. and Otto, K. eds. Gesund mit und ohne Arbeit (S. 289--304), Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, 2010, 289--304.
    [25]
    Webster, J. and Ho, H. Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. Data Base for the Advancement in Information Systems, 1997, 28 (2). 63--77.
    [26]
    Weick, K. and Sutcliffe, K. Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Org Sci, 2006, 17. 514--524.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Meeting Effectiveness and Inclusiveness: Large-scale Measurement, Identification of Key Features, and Prediction in Real-world Remote MeetingsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373708:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Sensible and Sensitive AI for Worker Wellbeing: Factors that Inform Adoption and Resistance for Information WorkersProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642716(1-30)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Circle Back Next Week: The Effect of Meeting-Free Weeks on Distributed Workers’ Unstructured Time and Attention NegotiationProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642175(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Bored mondays and focused afternoons: the rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2014
        4206 pages
        ISBN:9781450324731
        DOI:10.1145/2556288
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 26 April 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. attention
        2. computer logging
        3. empirical study
        4. engagement
        5. experience sampling
        6. focus
        7. multi-tasking
        8. workplace

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        CHI '14
        Sponsor:
        CHI '14: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 26 - May 1, 2014
        Ontario, Toronto, Canada

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 465 of 2,043 submissions, 23%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)213
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Meeting Effectiveness and Inclusiveness: Large-scale Measurement, Identification of Key Features, and Prediction in Real-world Remote MeetingsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373708:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
        • (2024)Sensible and Sensitive AI for Worker Wellbeing: Factors that Inform Adoption and Resistance for Information WorkersProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642716(1-30)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)Circle Back Next Week: The Effect of Meeting-Free Weeks on Distributed Workers’ Unstructured Time and Attention NegotiationProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642175(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2024)Observer Effect in Social Media UseProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642078(1-20)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
        • (2023)Towards Tailoring Just-in-time Adaptive Intervention Systems for Workplace Stress Reduction: Exploratory Analysis of Intervention Implementation (Preprint)JMIR Mental Health10.2196/48974Online publication date: 17-May-2023
        • (2023)Future of Workplace Conversational AI-driven Personal Assistants: Promises and PerilsProceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation10.1145/3632754.3632939(133-135)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
        • (2023)Integrating Gaze and Mouse Via Joint Cross-Attention Fusion Net for Students' Activity Recognition in E-learningProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36108767:3(1-35)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2023
        • (2023)Sensing Wellbeing in the Workplace, Why and For Whom? Envisioning Impacts with Organizational StakeholdersProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36102077:CSCW2(1-33)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
        • (2023)Scanning or Simply Unengaged in Reading? Opportune Moments for Pushed News Notifications and Their Relationship with Smartphone Users' Choice of News-reading ModesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042687:MHCI(1-26)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
        • (2023)Challenges in Using Skin Conductance Responses for Assessments of Information Worker ProductivityProceedings of the 2023 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3594738.3611360(33-38)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2023
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media