Britain | Wiggly wormageddon

What’s behind Britain’s earthworm cataclysm?

Their numbers may have declined by a third

Common earthworm.
Photograph: Alamy

Charles Darwin liked an earthworm. What earthworms felt about Charles Darwin is less clear. For 40 years he studied them, thought about them and experimented on them. He exhaled on them to see if they disliked his breath (they didn’t) and held a poker to them to see if they minded the heat (they generally did). He wafted perfume and then paraffin in front of them, and he played them a whistle, a bassoon and the piano. They seemed nonplussed. He fed them mint (which they didn’t care for), cabbage (which they did) and other worms, halved (catholic in their tastes, they enjoyed their diet of worms).

Darwin recorded all this somewhat apologetically. To many people, he wrote, the subject of worms may “appear an insignificant one”. The modern world has tended to agree. Unlike “On the Origin of Species”, his book “The Formation of Vegetable Mould, Through the Action of Worms” is no longer a noted bestseller.

Explore more

This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Wormageddon”

Cash for kids: Why policies to boost birth rates don’t work

From the May 25th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Britain

What does Labour’s win mean for British foreign policy?

Continuity on NATO and Ukraine, and hopes for a reset with Europe

Blighty newsletter: Three (early) observations about Britain’s new government



More from Britain

What does Labour’s win mean for British foreign policy?

Continuity on NATO and Ukraine, and hopes for a reset with Europe



How shallow was Labour’s victory in the British election?

The British party system may be fragmenting but voters delivered a coherent message

Labour’s landslide victory will turn politics on its head

But even with a majority this big, running bad-tempered Britain will not be easy