“A day of shame” for the British state
The biggest scandal in the history of the NHS is at last properly acknowledged
![People impacted by the contaminated blood scandal gather in Westminster ahead of the release of the final report.](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/content-assets/images/20240525_BRP002.jpg)
DEREK MARTINDALE was 23 in 1985, when he was told that he had HIV and 12 months to live. He survived but his younger brother Richard, who also contracted the virus, did not. After Richard died in 1990 Mr Martindale asked to see his brother’s body one last time but was refused. Such was the fear of AIDS that hospital staff had already stitched closed his brother’s nose, mouth and eyes.
Mr Martindale is one of more than 30,000 Britons who were infected with HIV and hepatitis C through treatment in the National Health Service (NHS) in the 1970s and 1980s; around 3,000 of them have died to date. Mr Martindale was also the first victim to testify at the public inquiry into the infected-blood scandal, which was set up after decades of delays in 2017. And on May 20th this year he was in a conference centre in central London to hear Sir Brian Langstaff, the chair of that inquiry, present his final report.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Blood, debt and tears”
Britain May 25th 2024
- Could the Labour Party blow its big opportunity?
- What’s behind Britain’s earthworm cataclysm?
- “A day of shame” for the British state
- The sorry story of children in care in England
- When is a non-alcoholic drink alcohol-free?
- Rishi Sunak’s snap election is odd and illogical—much like him
- The world’s first museum of homelessness
More from Britain
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20240713_BRP503.jpg)
What does Labour’s win mean for British foreign policy?
Continuity on NATO and Ukraine, and hopes for a reset with Europe
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.economist.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=1424,quality=80,format=auto/media-assets/image/20240713_BRP502.jpg)
How did pollsters do in predicting the British election?
The biggest miss since 1992