Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
64,281
32,080


With the introduction of OLED displays, a thinner design, and more in the M4 iPad Pro, we thought it was worth taking another look at Samsung's flagship OLED tablet, the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra, to see how the two compare and which one might be the better purchase for you.


Both tablets offer excellent OLED displays, though the Tab S9 Ultra's 14.6-inch 16:10 display is better optimized for video consumption than the iPad Pro's 13-inch 4:3 display. The wider aspect ratio on the Tab S9 Ultra means widescreen video content fits much better on the display, offering a larger content view with much less letterboxing than on the iPad Pro.

The Tab S9 Ultra's display is rated just a bit brighter than the iPad Pro's, but in real-world usage the difference isn't noticeable. HDR content on the Tab S9 Ultra can get a bit too bright, however, washing out other content. The iPad Pro also does a better job of handling glare, and that's not even accounting for the Nano-Texture option available on higher-end iPad Pro configurations.

The iPad Pro and Tab S9 Ultra have similarly thin profiles, with the iPad Pro's new design making it just a hint thinner than Samsung's offering, but the difference feels negligible. The Tab S9 Ultra maxes out at 1TB of built-in storage while the iPad Pro goes up to 2TB, but Samsung includes a microSD slot that makes it simple to pop in extra storage at a much lower cost than boosting the integrated storage on an iPad Pro.

Apple removed the Ultra Wide camera in the latest iPad Pro, leaving only the standard Wide camera for capturing video content. Samsung includes both styles of camera on the Tab S9 Ultra, but we don't think most people should be using their iPads for capturing video anyway.

Where Apple really sets itself apart on the hardware side with iPad Pro is the redesigned Magic Keyboard, which offers a premium feel, solid typing performance, an excellent trackpad, and an additional USB-C port for charging the iPad. Samsung's first-party keyboard accessory for the Tab S9 Ultra looks and feels good, and the typing experience is pleasant, but the trackpad is simply awful.

One note in favor of Samsung's keyboard is that it can be separated into two pieces, leaving the back cover attached to the tablet for protection. While Apple has a keyboard design like this for cheaper iPads, the Magic Keyboard can not be removed from the iPad Pro without also removing the back cover.

Alongside the new iPad Pro, Apple introduced a new Apple Pencil Pro with more advanced capabilities including new gestures and Find My support, but Samsung has the S Pen that also offers excellent integration with Android. Significantly for stylus adoption, the S Pen is included in the box with the Tab S9 Ultra, while the Apple Pencil Pro is an extra $129 purchase for iPad Pro owners.

As with most purchasing decisions for Apple and Android, it's likely to come down to platform preference. If you're already thoroughly invested in the Apple ecosystem, you're probably going to want to go with the iPad Pro to reap all of the benefits that come with Apple's tight integration. But if you're looking for something a bit different, Samsung's Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra offers some great features and a huge display at a price that well undercuts the iPad Pro.

Would you consider picking up a Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra, or is the iPad Pro a better fit for your needs? Let us know in the comments below.

Article Link: Apple's M4 iPad Pro vs. Samsung's Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
 

Digital Dude

macrumors 65816
I’ve been using iPads for years, but it’s always a bit cumbersome with iOS. I always feel like I’m trying to play a violin inside a phone booth. I picked up the S9 ultra last Christmas and I really-really wanted to keep it. Unfortunately, I struggled with logging onto websites because I’m so used to using Face ID. Likewise, not even Samsung‘s own apps seem to work without bugs. It’s simply not optimized for the tablet at all in my opinion. You have to use third-party apps to get the darn thing to work. Certainly, iOS 17.x once again introduced more bugs that I didn��t have before the update, so it’s almost a draw. 🤷‍♂️

Now I have a fairly new M2 iPad Pro, but frankly, I can’t tell much difference between the M1 iPad Pro I was running during my comparison. I’m looking forward to the S10 ultra from Samsung to see if they’ve addressed any of my concerns. 🤞

One more thing; the included Samsung S Pen is much more pleasant to use than the Apple Pencil. It feels a lot more natural versus the Apple Pencil, whereby I feel like I’m signing my name on a piece of ice.
 
Last edited:

waltermitty

macrumors member
Apr 25, 2010
69
14
I tried the S9 Ultra, and returned it for a normal sized S9. It was simply too large for anything but desk use. The reason I chose an Android tablet over an iPad is for Firefox in Desktop mode with uBlock Origin for ad blocking. My phone is an iPhone, and my computers are MBP and iMac, but for a media consumption tablet it's nice not to be utterly restricted by Apple. I'll add that the screen and speakers on the S9 are fantastic.
 

Smittywerben

macrumors member
Mar 26, 2024
53
206
Neither is small enough to do what the iPad mini does, neither is powerful enough to do what the Mac does, neither runs windows like the surface does. So when I have to have all three of those other things, what's left for this one to do? Be a portable tv for streaming services? Seems like a spendy option for watching low quality videos.
16PM is going to be the new iPad mini.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.