Abstract

Background

We retrospectively analyzed 26 persistently asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) carriers.

Methods

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics from the 26 asymptomatic patients with positive results for SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid testing were obtained.

Results

Twenty-two patients (84.6%) correlated with clustering occurrence. The median period from contact to diagnosis and the last positive nucleic acid test was 19 (8–24 days) and 21.5 days (10–36 days), respectively. The median period from diagnosis to negative nucleic acid test was significantly different between patients with normal or atypical chest computed tomography (CT) findings (n = 16, 61.5%; 7.5 days [2–20 days]) and patients with typical ground-glass or patchy opacities on CT (n = 10, 38.5%; 12.5 days [8–22 days]; P < .01). Seven patients (70.0%) with initial positive nucleic acid test results had a negative result simultaneously with improved CT findings. Obvious improvement in CT findings was observed in 3 patients (30.0%) despite positive nucleic acid test results.

Conclusions

In asymptomatic patients, changes in biochemical and inflammatory variables are small and changes on chest CT can occur. It is worth noting that the long existence of SARS-CoV-2 in some asymptomatic patients and false-negative results need to be considered in SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causation agent of a novel respiratory infectious coronavirus disease (termed COVID-2019), which has disseminated quickly among people. Since its initial outbreak in Wuhan, China was reported in December 2019, there have been 1 279 722 cases worldwide up to April 7, 2020 [1, 2]. COVID-19 is highly contagious with rapid transmission, and people are general susceptible to this new coronavirus.

Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection may show COVID-19-related symptoms. Asymptomatic carriers have also been found [3]. For instance, there are reports documenting a substantial fraction of truly asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 from the Diamond Princess Cruise ship (approximately 18%) and Japanese evacuees out of Wuhan [4, 5]. There are a few other case reports in various journals in Table 1 [3, 6–10]. These reports mainly focus on the estimated asymptomatic proportion, mode of transmission, some radiological findings, and solutions to identify and isolate asymptomatic patients. Emerging evidence suggests that patients with clinical manifestations are contagious, with analysis of their clinical characteristics [11, 12]. However, there are few studies that report the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of asymptomatic patients. A few studies have described the clinical characteristics of asymptomatic patients, but some of the asymptomatic patients in these studies were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis but later developed symptoms, so they cannot truly represent the clinical characteristics of asymptomatic patients [13, 14]. In this study, we identified a total of 26 persistently asymptomatic patients with positive test results for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid to determine the clinical characteristics and asymptomatic carrier transmission of COVID-19 infection.

Table 1.

Asymptomatic Cases Reports in Various Journals

JournalResearch FocusLocationReference
N Engl J MedTransmission of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contactGermanyRothe et al [3]
BMJIdentifying and isolating asymptomatic peopleItalian VillageDay [6]
Lancet Infect DisRadiological findings in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patientsWuhan, ChinaShi et al [7]
J Nucl MedNuclear medicine services in asymptomatic patientsBrescia, ItalyAlbano et al [8]
Lancet Infect DisAsymptomatic cases in a family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infectionGuangdong, ChinaPan et al [9]
Int J Infect DisDelivery of infection from asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 in a familial clusterChengdu, ChinaYe et al [10]
JournalResearch FocusLocationReference
N Engl J MedTransmission of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contactGermanyRothe et al [3]
BMJIdentifying and isolating asymptomatic peopleItalian VillageDay [6]
Lancet Infect DisRadiological findings in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patientsWuhan, ChinaShi et al [7]
J Nucl MedNuclear medicine services in asymptomatic patientsBrescia, ItalyAlbano et al [8]
Lancet Infect DisAsymptomatic cases in a family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infectionGuangdong, ChinaPan et al [9]
Int J Infect DisDelivery of infection from asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 in a familial clusterChengdu, ChinaYe et al [10]

Abbreviations: 2019-nCoV, novel coronavirus; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Table 1.

Asymptomatic Cases Reports in Various Journals

JournalResearch FocusLocationReference
N Engl J MedTransmission of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contactGermanyRothe et al [3]
BMJIdentifying and isolating asymptomatic peopleItalian VillageDay [6]
Lancet Infect DisRadiological findings in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patientsWuhan, ChinaShi et al [7]
J Nucl MedNuclear medicine services in asymptomatic patientsBrescia, ItalyAlbano et al [8]
Lancet Infect DisAsymptomatic cases in a family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infectionGuangdong, ChinaPan et al [9]
Int J Infect DisDelivery of infection from asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 in a familial clusterChengdu, ChinaYe et al [10]
JournalResearch FocusLocationReference
N Engl J MedTransmission of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contactGermanyRothe et al [3]
BMJIdentifying and isolating asymptomatic peopleItalian VillageDay [6]
Lancet Infect DisRadiological findings in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patientsWuhan, ChinaShi et al [7]
J Nucl MedNuclear medicine services in asymptomatic patientsBrescia, ItalyAlbano et al [8]
Lancet Infect DisAsymptomatic cases in a family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infectionGuangdong, ChinaPan et al [9]
Int J Infect DisDelivery of infection from asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 in a familial clusterChengdu, ChinaYe et al [10]

Abbreviations: 2019-nCoV, novel coronavirus; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

METHODS

Study Design

A total of 26 hospitalized patients with a SARS-CoV-2 epidemiological history and positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test results were identified to analyze the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19-infected asymptomatic carriers. These patients’ sputum and throat swabs were sampled for SARS-CoV-2 confirmation and tested using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. An epidemiological history was defined as a close contact with a diagnosed or possible case of COVID-19 or had a history of residence in or travel to Wuhan. Informed consent was obtained from each registered patient, and this study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University.

Data Collection

Detailed information regarding the epidemiological history and information of other family members of each patient was obtained. We also collected information regarding patient age, sex, previous medical history, clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, chest computed tomography (CT) scans, treatment measures, and prognosis.

Statistical Analysis

Normally distributed continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation and were compared using the t test. Nonnormally distributed data are described as the median and were analyzed using the rank-sum test of 2 groups. Categorical variables are show as percentages. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 22.0.

RESULTS

Basic Information

A total of 26 patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection were collected in this study: 16 (61.5%) were men and 10 (38.5%) were women. The median age was 29.5 years (2 to 80 years), and the age of 18 patients (69.2%) ranged from 20 to 60 years. Two patients had a history of smoking (both for over 20 years), with an average of 20 cigarettes per day. Two patients had a history of hypertension and 1 patient had coronary heart disease.

Epidemiological History

Regarding the source of the infection, 6 patients (23.0%) has a history of travel to Wuhan, with no clear contact with a source of infection. Exact contacts with confirmed or possible patients were found in 18 cases (69.2%), and the contact history was unknown in 2 patients (7.8%). Among patients with a clear source of infection, 10 cases (55.6%) had previously talked to or had a meal with a confirmed COVID-19 patient, and 8 cases (44.4%) lived with a confirmed patient. The sources of infection in these cases included confirmed patients with clinical symptoms (n = 16, 88.8%), a possible COVID-19 patient with clinical symptoms (n = 1, 5.6%), and a confirmed patient without clinical symptoms (n = 1, 5.6%). In addition, 22 cases (84.6%) were found to be correlated with a local cluster. The close contacts of these 26 enrolled patients were traced, and only 2 SARS-CoV-2-infected patients were identified.

In the 6 patients with a recent history of travel to Wuhan, the median period from leaving Wuhan to a COVID-19 diagnosis was 16 days (14–19 days). In 18 patients with a clear source of infection, the median period from contact with a confirmed or possible case to the confirmed to diagnosis was 19 days (8–24 days). This period was longer than 14 days in 14 cases (77.8%) and over 20 days in 4 cases (22.2%) (Figure 1).

Timeline of 26 asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 carriers (from contact with or exposure to the infection source/return home from Wuhan to discharge from hospital).
Figure 1.

Timeline of 26 asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 carriers (from contact with or exposure to the infection source/return home from Wuhan to discharge from hospital).

Laboratory Examinations

The initial leukocyte counts were slightly lower than the normal value in 2 patients, slightly higher in 1 patient, and normal in the other patients. The lymphocyte count was normal in 26 patients. Regarding coagulation function, there was an elevated platelet count in 4 patients, higher prothrombin time in 1 patient, and increased D-dimer in 4 patients. Procalcitonin was slightly elevated in 3 cases, all of which were less than 1 ng/mL, and C-reactive protein was normal in 26 patients. In addition, investigations revealed 3 patients with reduced albumin, 4 patients with mildly abnormal transaminase, and 2 patients with slightly elevated creatinine levels. Five patients had slightly lower serum sodium concentration and 1 patient had higher serum potassium concentration. Lactate dehydrogenase and creatine kinase levels were slightly elevated in 3 patients and 1 patient, respectively. There was no statistical significance between the initial and following results for all the above indicators (P > .05).

Nucleic Acid Result Change

Being SARS-CoV-2-free was defined as 2 consecutive negative nucleic acid results with an interval of at least 24 hours. The period from diagnosis to being confirmed SARS-CoV-2-free was within 10 days in 15 patients, within 20 days in 23 patients, and more than 20 days in 3 patients (20 days, 20 days, and 22 days, respectively). The exact time of contact with a confirmed or possible COVID-19 case was clear in 18 patients. The median period from contact to the last positive COVID-19 nucleic acid test was 21.5 days (10 to 36 days), and in 4 patients this was over 30 days. In a case originating from Wuhan, the period from leaving Wuhan to the last positive COVID-19 nucleic acid test was 35 days (Figure 1). There were positive test results for SARS-CoV-2 after a negative result in 2 patients. In particular, in 1 patient, the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests repeatedly had positive and negative results (Figure 1).

Chest Computed Tomography Characteristics

Chest CT scans were performed an average of 3–4 days after the initial CT examination, and each patient had at least 2 CT scans. The results of the first CT scan of the 26 patients were as follows: 9 patients (34.6%) with normal CT scans, 10 patients (38.5%) with typical manifestations (patch-like, ground-glass opacities distributed in the extrapulmonary zone), 7 patients with changes in a unilateral lung, and 3 patients with changes in bilateral lungs. In 7 patients (26.9%), CT scans showed atypical CT manifestations (chronic inflammation and small cord shadows), including a small strip shadows in 3 patients, small nodular shadows in 1 patient, thickened bronchial vascular bundles in 2 patients, and a small manifestation of chronic inflammation in 1 patient.

In patients with normal CT scans on admission, the chest CT manifestations did not significantly change during hospitalization, and 7 patients with atypical CT manifestations also showed no significant changes on chest CT scans. For patients with typical chest CT manifestations, improved chest CTs were observed in 7 patients and 3 patients showed improvement after an initial progression of lesions (Figure 2).

(A) Chest computed tomography (CT) changes from admission to discharge in case 14 multiple patchy ground-glass opacities can be seen in the right lung on February 6, 2020. (B) The infection progressed more than before on February 11, 2020. (C) On February 16, 2020, the signs of viral pneumonia in the right lung improved slightly, and on February 26, 2020, the chest CT improved (D).
Figure 2.

(A) Chest computed tomography (CT) changes from admission to discharge in case 14 multiple patchy ground-glass opacities can be seen in the right lung on February 6, 2020. (B) The infection progressed more than before on February 11, 2020. (C) On February 16, 2020, the signs of viral pneumonia in the right lung improved slightly, and on February 26, 2020, the chest CT improved (D).

Correlations Between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Nucleic Acid Changes and Chest Computed Tomography Changes

Patients with normal or atypical chest CT findings had a relatively short period from diagnosis to continuous negative COVID-19 nucleic acid results, with a median period of 7.5 days (2–20 days). In patients with typical patchy or ground-glass opacities, the median period was 12.5 days (8–22 days). This difference was statistically significant (P < .01). Of the 10 patients with typical chest CT manifestations, 7 patients showed improved chest CT results that synchronized with the negative SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test result, whereas 3 patients had a marked improvement in CT results without a negative SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test result.

Evidence of Dissemination From Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Carriers

Evidence 1

Case 1 was a 30-year-old man who lived in Wuhan, Hubei for a long time. After returning home from Wuhan on January 23, 2020, he lived with his wife, children, and father. His nucleic acid test was positive on February 11, 2020, but there were no clinical symptoms. His chest CT scan showed a few chronic inflammatory changes that were not correlated with COVID-19 infection. His wife, child, and father were examined. Both the wife and child had negative nucleic acid test results. However, his father (case 2) had a positive nucleic acid test result, with no symptoms and no abnormalities in chest CT. Except for case 1, case 2 had no history of contact with any other confirmed or possible COVID-19 patients over the previous 14 days (Figure 3).

Transmission evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 carriers 1 (Please refer to figure 4 for legend).
Figure 3.

Transmission evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 carriers 1 (Please refer to figure 4 for legend).

Evidence 2

Case 3 was a 25-year-old man who lived in Hubei for a long time. He returned home on January 20, 2020, and then lived with his father and mother. The patients had no history of contact with any confirmed or possible COVID-19 patients in the 14 days before diagnosis. On January 25, his mother began to have fever, cough, and chest tightness. Three days later, on January 28, his father began to have fever, cough, sputum, and sore throat. The patients had positive nucleic acid test results on February 3. After the parents were diagnosed, case 3 was hospitalized and isolated for inspection. Case 3 experienced no clinical symptoms throughout this period, although his nucleic acid test result was positive on February 4 and his chest CT showed a slightly increased density in the basal segment of the lower left lung (Figure 4).

Transmission evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 carriers 2.
Figure 4.

Transmission evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 carriers 2.

Treatment Strategy

All patients were isolated and treated with 1 or more antiviral drugs. Recombinant human alpha-1b interferon nebulized inhalation (5 million U bid for adults and 3 million U bid for children) was administered in 25 cases. Twenty-two patients received oral lopinavir/ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg bid for adults, 200 mg/50 mg qd for children). Five adult patients were treated with oral arbidol (200 mg tid), and 1 patient developed purulent tonsillitis during hospitalization and was treated with antibiotics.

Prognosis of Asymptomatic Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019

One patient developed nausea during hospitalization, which may have been caused by lopinavir/ritonavir. Another case developed a transient fever, which was related to suppurative tonsillitis. This patient felt better after antibiotic treatment. Neither of the 2 symptoms was associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The remaining cases were asymptomatic during hospitalization. Discharge criteria for COVID-19 were as follows: (1) normal body temperature for more than 3 days; (2) significantly improved respiratory symptoms; (3) significantly improved chest radiography; and (4) 2 consecutive negative SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test results (sampling interval at least 1 day). All 26 patients were discharged from the hospital. The period from admission to discharge ranged from 10 to 24 days, with a median of 13 days.

Discussion

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, a new coronavirus that recently appeared, has rapidly spread across many countries and regions around the world. This new coronavirus is reported to be more contagious than atypical pneumonia (SARS) and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus [15–17]. The clinical symptoms of COVID-19 were mainly mild to moderate disease, but there is still mortality of 3.2% [11]. Isolating sources of infection is an important measure to control this current epidemic [2, 18]. Infected individuals with clinical symptoms can be tracked according to their clinical symptoms, whereas those who are asymptomatic, especially those without an epidemiological history, are difficult to track. These asymptomatic cases may also capable of transmitting SARS-CoV-2, which could cause difficulties in COVID-19 prevention and control. At present, there are few studies of asymptomatic disease, most of which focus on the proportion of asymptomatic patients and the evidence of asymptomatic transmission. The description of clinical features of asymptomatic patients is technically a description of asymptomatic disease at the time of diagnosis, with some patients going on to develop symptoms. There is also little research on asymptomatic epidemiology. The infectiousness and effect of the asymptomatic epidemiological characteristics and disease clinical characteristics of dynamic change are not clear. Therefore, this study focused on persistently asymptomatic cases of COVID-19.

By tracing and isolating the contacts of people who were diagnosed or possible COVID-19 patients, this study identified a total of 26 asymptomatic patients. Asymptomatic carriers were found to be of any age, mainly concentrated in the 20- to 60-year age range, and are characterized by local clusters. Disease transmission from 2 asymptomatic patients was included in this study. Infected patients may have clinical symptoms or may be asymptomatic. The study found that asymptomatic cases were mostly infected by symptomatic patients, and a few were infected by asymptomatic patients. Only 2 asymptomatic of the 26 enrolled asymptomatic patients infected others. Therefore, we speculate that asymptomatic carriers may be less infectious than symptomatic patients.

In asymptomatic carriers, there was a long period between contact with the infection source to diagnosis, with a median of 19 days. These asymptomatic carriers were identified only when they contacted diagnosed or possible COVID-19 patients, suggesting the difficulty in detecting these asymptomatic carriers. The period from diagnosis to negative nucleic acid test tests was within 20 days for 23 (88.5%) patients (Figure 1). The duration of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic patients is unclear. The median period from contact with diagnosed or possible cases to the last positive nucleic acid test was 21.5 days (10–36 days). Most patients will miss the real last positive assays because nucleic acid tests for SARS-CoV-2 were not performed every day, so this time might be shorter than the actual time. The period was longer than 30 days in 4 patients, 1 of whom talked with a COVID-19 patient for 1 hour, without contact with any other confirmed or possible patients contacted after that. It was 35 days from the contact of the infectious source to the last positive nucleic test (Figure 1). In addition, this period of 35 days was for a patient with a Wuhan-related history (Figure 1). Therefore, asymptomatic patients may carry SARS-CoV-2 for more than 1 month, suggesting that this virus is carried in asymptomatic patients for a long period.

In 2 patients, there was a positive nucleic acid test after an initial negative result, and 1 patient had recurrent alternation of positive and negative results. This phenomenon may be caused by false-negative results of assays, and detection can be affected by factors including the specimens, reagents, and operations. Thus, positive nucleic acid tests cannot be used as the only criterion for COVID-19 diagnosis. Standardized operation and repeated verifications are required to improve the positive rate. Patients with normal chest CTs had a shorter period from diagnosis to being SARS-CoV-2-negative than those with typical CT changes. In some patients, conversion of nucleic acid test results from positive to negative was synchronized with an improvement in chest CT findings, but this change may also occur later than the improvement on CT. Therefore, CT improvement cannot be used to indicate that a patient is not infectious.

Indices of blood cell counts, liver and renal function, and inflammation in asymptomatic patients did not change significantly during the disease. Reduced lymphocyte and leukocyte counts are characteristics of clinically symptomatic COVID-19, but these changes were not common in the asymptomatic patients in this study. Chest CT in asymptomatic patients can be normal or present with typical ground-glass opacities, usually limited to a unilateral lung but sometimes occurring in bilateral lungs. Three patients with asymptomatic infections developed lung infections during treatment and then improved. Although these asymptomatic patients appear normal, some relatively light damage may have already been produced.

This study also has some limitations. For example, only 26 patients were included in this study. In addition, this retrospective analysis did not include daily nucleic acid tests for SARS-CoV-2. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Conclusions

In summary, asymptomatic infections can occur at any age and appear to be correlated with local clusters of diseases. Asymptomatic transmission may be less contagious but should still be recognized as an infection source for COVID-19 transmission. There were no significant changes in the biochemical and inflammatory variables in these patients. However, changes on chest CT may occur in these patients. It is necessary to note that SARS-CoV-2 can be present for a long time in some asymptomatic patients; the change in nucleic acid test results from positive to negative in some patients may not occur synchronously with the CT improvement; and false negatives of the nucleic acid test for SARS-CoV-2 may occur.

Notes

Funding. No funding was received for this study.

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest.

References

1.

Lu
H
,
Stratton
CW
,
Tang
YW
.
The Wuhan SARS-CoV-2—What’s next for China
.
J Med Virol
2020
; doi: 10.1002/jmv.25738.

2.

Li
Q
,
Guan
X
,
Wu
P
, et al. 
Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia
.
N Engl J Med
2020
; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316.

3.

Rothe
C
,
Schunk
M
,
Sothmann
P
, et al. 
Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany
.
N Engl J Med
2020
;
382
:
970
1
.

4.

Nishiura
H
,
Kobayashi
T
,
Suzuki
A
, et al. 
Estimation of the asymptomatic ratio of novel coronavirus infections (COVID-19)
.
Int J Infect Dis
2020
; doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.020.

5.

Mizumoto
K
,
Kagaya
K
,
Zarebski
A
,
Chowell
G
.
Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020
.
Euro Surveill
2020
; doi: 10.2807/1560–7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000180.

6.

Day
M
.
Covid-19: identifying and isolating asymptomatic people helped eliminate virus in Italian village
.
BMJ
2020
;
368
:
m1165
.

7.

Shi
H
,
Han
X
,
Jiang
N
, et al. 
Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study
.
Lancet Infect Dis
2020
;
20
:
425
34
.

8.

Albano
D
,
Bertagna
F
,
Bertolia
M
, et al. 
Incidental findings suggestive of COVID-19 in asymptomatic patients undergoing nuclear medicine procedures in a high prevalence region
.
J Nucl Med
2020
; doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.246256.

9.

Pan
X
,
Chen
D
,
Xia
Y
, et al. 
Asymptomatic cases in a family cluster with SARS-CoV-2 infection
.
Lancet Infect Dis
2020
;
20
:
410
1
.

10.

Ye
F
,
Xu
S
,
Rong
Z
, et al. 
Delivery of infection from asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 in a familial cluster
.
Int J Infect Dis
2020
; doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.042.

11.

Guan
WJ
,
Ni
ZY
,
Hu
Y
, et al. 
Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China
.
N Engl J Med
2020
; doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.

12.

Liu
K
,
Fang
YY
,
Deng
Y
, et al. 
Clinical characteristics of novel coronavirus cases in tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province
.
Chin Med J (Engl)
2020
; doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000744.

13.

Yanrong
W
,
Yingxia
L
,
Lei
L
,
Xianfeng
W
,
Nijuan
L
,
Li
L
.
Clinical outcome of 55 asymptomatic cases at the time of hospital admission infected with SARS-coronavirus-2 in Shenzhen, China
.
J Infect Dis
2020
;
221
:
1770
4
.

14.

Hu
Z
,
Song
C
,
Xu
C
, et al. 
Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing, China
.
Sci China Life Sci
2020
; doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1661-4.

15.

Peeri
NC
,
Shrestha
N
,
Rahman
MS
, et al. 
The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned
.
Int J Epidemiol
2020
; doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa033.

16.

Zhong
NS
,
Zheng
BJ
,
Li
YM
, et al. 
Epidemiology and cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Guangdong, People’s Republic of China, in February, 2003
.
Lancet
2003
;
362
:
1353
8
.

17.

Munster
VJ
,
Koopmans
M
,
van Doremalen
N
,
van Riel
D
,
de Wit
E
.
A novel coronavirus emerging in China - Key questions for impact assessment
.
N Engl J Med
2020
;
382
:
692
4
.

18.

Sohrabi
C
,
Alsafi
Z
,
O’Neill
N
, et al. 
World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)
.
Int J Surg
2020
;
76
:
71
6
.

Author notes

Y. P., X. Y., X. D., Q. L., X. L., T. Q., M. W., and M. J. contributed to the work equally and should be regarded as co-first authors.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)