Texas Republican Primary Election Results

Updated June 25, 2024, 4:17 PM ET

Winner

Donald J. Trump wins the Texas Republican primary.

Race called by The Associated Press.

Republican Primary
Candidate	Votes	Percent	Delegates
Donald J. TrumpD. TrumpTrump	1,808,269	77.8%	150
Nikki HaleyN. HaleyHaley	405,472	17.5%	No delegates
UncommittedUncommittedUncommitted	45,568	2.0%	No delegates
Total reported	2,323,019

93% of delegates allocated (150 of 161)

Where votes have been reported and where votes remain

These maps show the leading candidates’ margins in the vote reported so far, and estimates for which candidate leads in the remaining votes that we expect from each place.

Votes reported

Estimated votes remaining

We stopped updating our estimates. This map is now archived.

Votes reported and estimated votes remaining
County	Trump	Haley	Uncommitted	Total votes	Percent of votes in	Estimated remaining votes
Jim Hogg	86%	11%	2%	57	49%	<100
Eastland	87%	8%	1%	2,849	75%	950
Harris	76%	20%	2%	202,544	79%	53,000
Travis	59%	36%	2%	52,611	81%	12,000
Hays	71%	22%	1%	18,100	83%	4,000
Lubbock	78%	17%	1%	30,055	84%	6,000
Ellis	80%	16%	2%	23,012	85%	4,000
El Paso	82%	14%	1%	20,581	86%	3,000
Galveston	80%	16%	2%	33,793	87%	5,000
Nueces	80%	16%	2%	21,326	87%	3,000
Tarrant	73%	24%	1%	145,351	88%	19,000
Montgomery	81%	15%	2%	82,227	90%	9,000
Brazoria	81%	14%	2%	34,077	90%	4,000
Smith	81%	14%	2%	30,525	90%	3,000
Williamson	71%	24%	2%	55,518	91%	5,000
Dallas	66%	29%	2%	104,972	92%	9,000
Bexar	74%	22%	1%	104,841	93%	7,000
Collin	70%	25%	2%	100,589	>95%	<5,000
Denton	73%	22%	2%	93,382	>95%	<4,500
Fort Bend	75%	19%	2%	56,548	>95%	<3,000
Parker	82%	14%	2%	32,782	>95%	<1,500
Bell	76%	18%	3%	30,214	>95%	<1,500
McLennan	75%	19%	3%	29,827	>95%	<1,500
Comal	79%	17%	2%	27,040	>95%	<1,500
Johnson	82%	14%	2%	22,624	>95%	<1,000
Grayson	80%	15%	3%	22,545	>95%	<1,000
Brazos	69%	22%	3%	21,105	>95%	<1,000
Randall	79%	15%	3%	21,034	>95%	<1,000
Guadalupe	81%	16%	2%	20,621	>95%	<1,000
Taylor	73%	20%	4%	19,423	>95%	<1,000
Jefferson	82%	14%	2%	18,797	>95%	<900
Hidalgo	87%	9%	1%	17,903	>95%	<900
Kaufman	82%	13%	2%	16,531	>95%	<800
Orange	87%	9%	2%	15,309	>95%	<800
Midland	80%	15%	2%	15,287	>95%	<800
Tom Green	78%	17%	2%	15,067	>95%	<800
Cameron	86%	11%	1%	14,697	>95%	<700
Hunt	82%	13%	2%	14,172	>95%	<700
Hood	80%	16%	2%	13,955	>95%	<700
Wise	86%	10%	2%	13,139	>95%	<700
Henderson	85%	12%	1%	12,407	>95%	<600
Bowie	84%	11%	2%	12,339	>95%	<600
Gregg	81%	14%	2%	12,221	>95%	<600
Kerr	80%	16%	2%	11,600	>95%	<600
Bastrop	79%	16%	2%	11,074	>95%	<600
Angelina	85%	11%	2%	10,880	>95%	<500
Van Zandt	88%	9%	1%	10,852	>95%	<500
Kendall	77%	18%	2%	10,671	>95%	<500
Victoria	81%	14%	3%	10,637	>95%	<500
Liberty	89%	7%	2%	10,568	>95%	<500
Nacogdoches	75%	17%	4%	9,698	>95%	<500
Burnet	79%	17%	2%	9,688	>95%	<500
Hardin	89%	8%	1%	9,677	>95%	<500
Potter	79%	15%	3%	9,352	>95%	<500
Ector	86%	11%	0%	9,152	>95%	<500
Harrison	85%	11%	1%	8,968	>95%	<500
Wichita	81%	16%	1%	8,951	>95%	<500
Lamar	84%	11%	3%	8,925	>95%	<500
Wood	86%	11%	2%	8,860	>95%	<400
Anderson	86%	10%	2%	8,283	>95%	<400
Walker	81%	14%	2%	8,282	>95%	<400
Jasper	88%	8%	2%	8,130	>95%	<400
Chambers	87%	8%	3%	7,934	>95%	<400
Polk	84%	11%	3%	7,878	>95%	<400
Cooke	83%	13%	2%	7,849	>95%	<400
Wilson	84%	12%	2%	7,828	>95%	<400
Washington	80%	14%	3%	7,805	>95%	<400
Medina	84%	12%	1%	7,650	>95%	<400
Rusk	86%	10%	2%	7,385	>95%	<400
Upshur	88%	9%	2%	6,803	>95%	<300
Fannin	84%	11%	3%	6,751	>95%	<300
Navarro	84%	12%	2%	6,600	>95%	<300
Cherokee	87%	10%	2%	6,547	>95%	<300
Llano	77%	18%	2%	6,462	>95%	<300
Palo Pinto	80%	14%	4%	6,411	>95%	<300
Coryell	82%	13%	3%	6,335	>95%	<300
Erath	84%	13%	2%	6,181	>95%	<300
Hopkins	85%	11%	2%	6,129	>95%	<300
San Jacinto	87%	9%	2%	5,987	>95%	<300
Wharton	86%	10%	2%	5,926	>95%	<300
Waller	84%	11%	2%	5,862	>95%	<300
Bandera	83%	13%	2%	5,807	>95%	<300
Hill	84%	13%	2%	5,780	>95%	<300
San Patricio	83%	13%	2%	5,767	>95%	<300
Grimes	86%	10%	2%	5,739	>95%	<300
Fayette	82%	14%	2%	5,737	>95%	<300
Brown	85%	10%	2%	5,702	>95%	<300
Atascosa	84%	11%	3%	5,643	>95%	<300
Cass	88%	8%	2%	5,619	>95%	<300
Austin	85%	12%	2%	5,472	>95%	<300
La Vaca	88%	8%	2%	5,287	>95%	<300
Matagorda	85%	10%	3%	5,155	>95%	<300
Panola	89%	7%	2%	5,128	>95%	<300
Colorado	84%	12%	2%	4,694	>95%	<100
Aransas	80%	15%	3%	4,638	>95%	<100
Webb	88%	7%	2%	4,522	>95%	<100
Shelby	88%	8%	2%	4,499	>95%	<100
Lampasas	82%	13%	2%	4,398	>95%	<100
Milam	84%	12%	2%	4,242	>95%	<100
Montague	86%	10%	2%	4,193	>95%	<100
Uvalde	80%	13%	4%	3,915	>95%	<100
Caldwell	79%	16%	2%	3,863	>95%	<100
Tyler	88%	9%	2%	3,859	>95%	<100
Bee	77%	14%	5%	3,799	>95%	<100
Bosque	84%	12%	2%	3,710	>95%	<100
Robertson	83%	12%	3%	3,623	>95%	<100
Leon	89%	8%	1%	3,564	>95%	<100
Titus	86%	10%	1%	3,517	>95%	<100
Burleson	87%	9%	2%	3,495	>95%	<100
Calhoun	80%	12%	4%	3,418	>95%	<100
Hockley	83%	12%	3%	3,282	>95%	<100
Limestone	88%	9%	1%	3,258	>95%	<100
Gonzales	83%	12%	2%	3,221	>95%	<100
Blanco	80%	16%	1%	3,184	>95%	<100
De Witt	84%	10%	3%	3,153	>95%	<100
Hutchinson	86%	9%	1%	3,119	>95%	<100
Lee	86%	10%	2%	3,115	>95%	<100
Val Verde	85%	11%	2%	3,113	>95%	<100
Howard	87%	10%	1%	3,046	>95%	<100
Trinity	88%	9%	1%	3,022	>95%	<100
Newton	87%	9%	2%	3,010	>95%	<100
Freestone	87%	9%	1%	2,973	>95%	<100
Jones	85%	11%	2%	2,949	>95%	<100
Gray	86%	8%	3%	2,937	>95%	<100
Callahan	84%	11%	3%	2,705	>95%	<100
Jackson	89%	7%	2%	2,687	>95%	<100
Kleberg	78%	15%	4%	2,659	>95%	<100
Comanche	86%	10%	2%	2,552	>95%	<100
Red River	89%	8%	2%	2,541	>95%	<100
Clay	85%	11%	2%	2,452	>95%	<100
Sabine	91%	6%	2%	2,433	>95%	<100
Hamilton	82%	13%	2%	2,431	>95%	<100
Somervell	82%	14%	1%	2,397	>95%	<100
Moore	84%	10%	4%	2,322	>95%	<100
Live Oak	87%	9%	2%	2,293	>95%	<100
Rains	87%	10%	2%	2,292	>95%	<100
Franklin	84%	12%	2%	2,260	>95%	<100
Archer	86%	9%	3%	2,247	>95%	<100
Gaines	89%	7%	2%	2,153	>95%	<100
Nolan	78%	15%	3%	2,137	>95%	<100
Jack	89%	8%	2%	2,122	>95%	<100
Coleman	88%	8%	2%	2,101	>95%	<100
Camp	85%	11%	3%	2,096	>95%	<100
Jim Wells	88%	8%	2%	2,075	>95%	<100
Wilbarger	84%	11%	3%	1,988	>95%	<100
Madison	89%	7%	2%	1,987	>95%	<100
Falls	85%	10%	2%	1,981	>95%	<100
Andrews	85%	9%	2%	1,956	>95%	<100
Ward	84%	8%	4%	1,924	>95%	<100
Morris	86%	9%	2%	1,896	>95%	<100
Scurry	84%	12%	2%	1,842	>95%	<100
Goliad	85%	11%	2%	1,786	>95%	<100
Dawson	80%	11%	7%	1,777	>95%	<100
McCulloch	86%	9%	3%	1,750	>95%	<100
Stephens	86%	10%	1%	1,710	>95%	<100
San Saba	86%	10%	2%	1,691	>95%	<100
Marion	87%	9%	2%	1,655	>95%	<100
Pecos	82%	10%	4%	1,639	>95%	<100
Mills	86%	10%	2%	1,604	>95%	<100
Refugio	79%	12%	6%	1,581	>95%	<100
Delta	83%	12%	3%	1,574	>95%	<100
Wheeler	88%	6%	3%	1,543	>95%	<100
San Augustine	91%	6%	2%	1,481	>95%	<100
Lamb	87%	10%	1%	1,431	>95%	<100
Ochiltree	87%	8%	3%	1,422	>95%	<100
Carson	84%	10%	2%	1,399	>95%	<100
Kimble	84%	12%	2%	1,374	>95%	<100
Terry	85%	11%	2%	1,296	>95%	<100
Mason	79%	16%	2%	1,280	>95%	<100
Yoakum	84%	10%	4%	1,269	>95%	<100
Brewster	77%	17%	3%	1,265	>95%	<100
Hansford	87%	7%	3%	1,224	>95%	<100
Maverick	94%	4%	1%	1,219	>95%	<100
Martin	85%	8%	4%	1,154	>95%	<100
Hartley	84%	11%	3%	1,051	>95%	<100
Mitchell	87%	9%	3%	990	>95%	<100
Haskell	84%	10%	4%	983	>95%	<100
Parmer	85%	9%	3%	962	>95%	<100
Swisher	81%	12%	4%	922	>95%	<100
Lynn	85%	11%	3%	921	>95%	<100
Coke	86%	10%	2%	899	>95%	<100
Crosby	76%	15%	5%	882	>95%	<100
Real	87%	11%	1%	872	>95%	<100
Garza	84%	10%	2%	857	>95%	<100
Floyd	82%	11%	4%	853	>95%	<100
Childress	86%	11%	2%	848	>95%	<100
Sutton	84%	12%	2%	747	>95%	<100
Hemphill	83%	12%	3%	721	>95%	<100
Bailey	85%	9%	2%	716	>95%	<100
Frio	92%	5%	1%	707	>95%	<100
Lipscomb	86%	8%	4%	701	>95%	<100
Donley	87%	10%	2%	690	>95%	<100
Edwards	82%	13%	2%	689	>95%	<100
Kinney	80%	16%	1%	673	>95%	<100
Shackelford	84%	12%	3%	669	>95%	<100
Fisher	87%	9%	2%	661	>95%	<100
Castro	83%	13%	2%	649	>95%	<100
Dallam	87%	8%	2%	641	>95%	<100
Concho	82%	14%	2%	634	>95%	<100
Dickens	83%	11%	3%	634	>95%	<100
Jeff Davis	67%	26%	5%	629	>95%	<100
Menard	77%	16%	5%	629	>95%	<100
Baylor	89%	8%	1%	619	>95%	<100
Collingsworth	83%	12%	2%	613	>95%	<100
Knox	85%	11%	3%	595	>95%	<100
Crockett	84%	11%	2%	588	>95%	<100
Armstrong	83%	10%	2%	585	>95%	<100
Winkler	87%	9%	1%	582	>95%	<100
Upton	88%	7%	2%	571	>95%	<100
Crane	89%	8%	2%	561	>95%	<100
Hall	91%	7%	1%	524	>95%	<100
Hardeman	89%	9%	2%	500	>95%	<100
Oldham	86%	8%	4%	481	>95%	<100
Reagan	83%	9%	3%	468	>95%	<100
Schleicher	88%	8%	2%	463	>95%	<100
Briscoe	86%	8%	3%	461	>95%	<100
Sherman	87%	10%	1%	461	>95%	<100
Willacy	94%	4%	1%	441	>95%	<100
Roberts	89%	6%	2%	404	>95%	<100
Irion	88%	8%	1%	402	>95%	<100
Sterling	83%	12%	4%	394	>95%	<100
Glasscock	90%	6%	1%	369	>95%	<100
Throckmorton	88%	9%	1%	363	>95%	<100
Motley	91%	6%	2%	329	>95%	<100
Stonewall	90%	5%	2%	302	>95%	<100
Reeves	93%	5%	1%	300	>95%	<100
Zapata	89%	5%	2%	249	>95%	<100
Duval	87%	10%	2%	246	>95%	<100
McMullen	87%	11%	<1%	241	>95%	<100
Kent	30%	65%	<1%	231	>95%	<100
Borden	90%	8%	<1%	226	>95%	<100
Dimmit	90%	9%	1%	211	>95%	<100
Terrell	88%	9%	2%	194	>95%	<100
La Salle	92%	6%	0%	169	>95%	<100
Zavala	95%	3%	1%	151	>95%	<100
Brooks	91%	5%	2%	129	>95%	<100
Presidio	85%	6%	3%	120	>95%	<100
Culberson	90%	7%	1%	105	>95%	<100
King	93%	6%	1%	95	>95%	—
Rockwall	75%	18%	3%	19,680	100%	—
Gillespie	78%	17%	2%	8,189	100%	—
Houston	88%	9%	1%	4,188	100%	—
Young	84%	10%	3%	3,750	100%	—
Hale	81%	12%	4%	3,229	100%	—
Karnes	83%	10%	4%	2,770	100%	—
Deaf Smith	77%	13%	5%	1,925	100%	—
Runnels	85%	10%	3%	1,879	100%	—
Hudspeth	78%	12%	5%	659	100%	—
Cottle	85%	8%	3%	447	100%	—
Starr	90%	6%	2%	443	100%	—
Cochran	82%	11%	3%	407	100%	—
Foard	81%	14%	3%	375	100%	—
Loving	76%	9%	8%	89	No data	—
Kenedy	86%	14%	0%	28	No data	—

We stopped updating our estimates. These graphics and estimates are now showing archived data.

Live forecast

This is our current best estimate for the outcome of this race. We look at the votes that have been reported so far and adjust our estimate based on what we expect from the votes that remain. Read more about how it works.

Estimated margin

Trump +60

Trump +57 to Trump +62

Estimating the final vote shares for Trump and Haley

This chart shows the range of estimates for the leading candidates’ shares of the final vote. As more votes are reported, the ranges should narrow as our statistical model becomes more confident.

Estimated and reported final vote share
Candidate	Reported vote share	Estimate of final vote share	Needle chart
Donald J. TrumpD. TrumpTrump	78%	78% 76% to 79%
Nikki HaleyN. HaleyHaley	18%	18% 17% to 19%

How our estimates changed over time

Once a state has counted all its votes, our estimated margin and the reported margin will match. As a rule, when our estimated margin is steady in the presence of new data, our forecast is more trustworthy.

How our final margin estimate has changed so far

NYT estimate Reported vote share

Share of expected turnout reported

What’s powering our forecast right now?

Our election model makes use of three indicators in creating an estimate of the final result.

Pre-election polls

Our model

14%

Actual results

86%

Pre-election polls: At the start of the night, our estimate is based on pre-election polls, results of past elections and demographic data.
Our model: As results come in, we compare actual results in places that have mostly completed reporting to our pre-election estimates to create a statistical model for the remaining vote.
Actual results: As a county reports more of its vote, those actual results will gradually supersede our previous estimates.

Share of vote by county

What to expect

Most polls close at 8 p.m. Eastern time, but polls in the state’s westernmost counties close at 9 p.m. Eastern time. In the 2022 state primaries, first results were reported at 8:10 p.m. Eastern time, and the last update of the night was at 3:21 a.m. Eastern time with 93 percent of votes reported.

Voters do not register by party, but they could only participate in one party’s primary. The state offered an early voting period, and a valid excuse was required to vote absentee by mail.

Texas is one of five states on Tuesday holding presidential primaries as well as its state primary, which will include races for state and congressional offices. If no candidate receives a majority of the vote in a state primary race, the top two candidates will advance to a May runoff.

Sign up to get notified when results are in. The On Politics newsletter is your guide to the 2024 elections. Get it sent to your inbox.