Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized phase 3 FRUTIGA trial

Abstract

The vascular endothelial growth factor pathway plays a key role in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. In the multicenter, double-blind phase 3 FRUTIGA trial, 703 patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who progressed on fluorouracil- and platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive fruquintinib (an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1/2/3; 4 mg orally, once daily) or placebo for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off, plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1/8/15 per cycle). The study results were positive as one of the dual primary endpoints, progression-free survival (PFS), was met (median PFS, 5.6 months in the fruquintinib arm versus 2.7 months in the placebo arm; hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.48–0.68; P < 0.0001). The other dual primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not met (median OS, 9.6 months versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.81–1.13; P = 0.6064). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia. Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel as a second-line treatment significantly improved PFS, but not OS, in Chinese patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and could potentially be another treatment option for these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03223376.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Trial profile.
Fig. 2: PFS Kaplan–Meier estimates and subgroup analyses (intention-to-treat set, n = 703).
Fig. 3: OS Kaplan–Meier estimates and subgroup analyses (intention-to-treat set, n = 703).

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The study protocol and statistical analysis plan are available in the Supplementary Information. De-identified participant data that underlie the results reported in this article can be made available to investigators for research purposes on a case-by-case basis after the time of this publication. Requests for access to data should be addressed to P.T. (panfengt@hutch-med.com) for consideration. The response to data access requests will be made within 4 weeks of receipt.

References

  1. World Health Organization. GLOBOCAN 2020. Population fact sheets, China. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/160-china-fact-sheets.pdf (2020).

  2. World Health Organization. GLOBOCAN 2020. Cancer fact sheets, stomach. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/7-Stomach-fact-sheet.pdf (2020).

  3. Morgan, E. et al. The current and future incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in 185 countries, 2020-40: a population-based modelling study. eClinicalMedicine 47, 101404 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Manabe, N., Matsueda, K. & Haruma, K. Epidemiological review of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in Asian countries. Digestion 103, 29–36 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. NCCN Guidelines. Gastric cancer. Version 3 https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/gastric.pdf (2023)

  6. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO). Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer (Chinese version). https://www.doc88.com/p-71573256934319.html (2023).

  7. Zhu, X. D. et al. XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: an open-labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX). Cancer Commun. 42, 314–326 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lordick, F. et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 33, 1005–1020 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, F. H. et al. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2021. Cancer Commun. 41, 747–795 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, X. et al. Comparing effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel plus raltitrexed vs. paclitaxel alone in second-line palliative chemotherapy for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II clinical trial. Cancer Biol. Med. 20, 682–688 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hicklin, D. J. & Ellis, L. M. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 1011–1027 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nienhuser, H. & Schmidt, T. Angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic therapy in gastric cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 43 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun, Q. et al. Discovery of fruquintinib, a potent and highly selective small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR 1, 2, 3 tyrosine kinases for cancer therapy. Cancer Biol. Ther. 15, 1635–1645 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, Y. et al. A phase Ib/II study of fruquintinib in combination with paclitaxel as the second-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Commun. 43, 150–153 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, R. H. et al. Efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel with or without ramucirumab as second-line therapy for the treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW-Asia): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 6, 1015–1024 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arai, H. & Nakajima, T. E. Recent developments of systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Cancers 12, 1100 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, J. et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of apatinib in patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 1448–1454 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shitara, K. et al. Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 392, 123–133 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shitara, K. et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with first-line, advanced gastric cancer: the KEYNOTE-062 phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 6, 1571–1580 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Muro, K. et al. Subgroup analysis of East Asians in RAINBOW: a phase 3 trial of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 31, 581–589 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature 513, 202–209 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, J. C., Chang, Y. W., Hong, C. C., Yu, Y. H. & Su, J. L. The role of the VEGF-C/VEGFRs axis in tumor progression and therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 88–107 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeon, Y. et al. The role of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy after failure of nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 14, 2346–2353 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kankeu Fonkoua, L. A. et al. Outcomes on anti-VEGFR-2/paclitaxel treatment after progression on immune checkpoint inhibition in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 149, 378–386 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Masetti, M. et al. Efficacy of ramucirumab combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line therapy. Int. J. Cancer 15, 1224–1235 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sasaki, A. et al. Improved efficacy of taxanes and ramucirumab combination chemotherapy after exposure to anti-PD-1 therapy in advanced gastric cancer. ESMO Open 4, e000775 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cao, J. et al. A phase I study of safety and pharmacokinetics of fruquintinib, a novel selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor −1, −2, and −3 tyrosine kinases in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 78, 259–269 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hironaka, S. et al. Randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 4438–4444 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dasari, A. et al. Fruquintinib versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (FRESCO-2): an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet 402, 41–53 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li, J. et al. Effect of fruquintinib vs placebo on overall survival in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: the FRESCO randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319, 2486–2496 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilke, H. et al. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 15, 1224–1235 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. US Food and Drug Administration. Multiple endpoints in clinical trials guidance for industry. October 2022. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/multiple-endpoints-clinical-trials-guidance-industry, https://www.a.gov/media/162416/download (2022).

  33. Allison, P. D. Survival analysis using SAS: a practical guide, second edition. SAS Institute (2010).

  34. Jadwiga, B. Extensions of Cox model for non-proportional hazards purpose. Ekonometria 3, 85–101 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lin, R. S. et al. Alternative analysis methods for time to event endpoints under non-proportional hazards: a comparative analysis. Stat. Biopharm. Res. 12, 187–198 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Science and Technology Major Project (project no. 2019ZX09301012), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Science, Technology and Innovation Action Plan, project no. 17431900100) and HUTCHMED Limited. We appreciate all participants in this trial, including patients, their families and caregivers and the staff and investigators at all the study sites. We also thank the members of the IDMC. Medical writing and editorial support were provided by J. Y. Lee of Parexel, which was funded by HUTCHMED Limited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.T., S.F., W.S. and R.-H.X. provided substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study. The funder and R.-H.X. had the responsibility of study oversight. F.W., L.S., W.G., T.L., J.L., S.Q., Y.B., Z.C., J.W., Y.P., Y.S., F. Zhao, Y.C., F.Y., K.G., T.Z., H.P., H.Z., F. Zhou, Y.Q., L.Y., W.M., Q.L., W.D., W.L., S.W., Y.T., D.M., X.Y., Y.D., Y.Y., M.L., W.H., D.C., G.L., P.T. and R.-H.X. contributed to the data collection. Q.L., P.T. and S.F. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. Q.L., P.T., S.F., M.S. and W.S. provided administrative support. P.T. and R.-H.X. had full access to all the data in the study and contributed to the verification of the data. F.W., Q.L., P.T., S.F., M.S., W.S. and R.-H.X. participated in writing the manuscript draft. All authors participated in reviewing the manuscript and provided final approval for the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui-Hua Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Q.L., P.T., S.F., M.S. and W.S. are employees of HUTCHMED Limited. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Medicine thanks Aurélien Latouche, Florian Lordick and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Saheli Sadanand, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 The graphical approach used to control the type I error at a two-sided level of 0.049a for the analyses of the dual primary endpoints progression-free survival and overall survival.

aThe stopping boundaries for interim (50% information) and final analyses were computed with Lan-DeMets approximation to the O’Brien-Fleming boundary.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Kaplan-Meier estimates of (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival in the non-diffuse G/GEJ adenocarcinoma patients with lymph node metastases (intention-to-treat set).

Extended Data Table 1 Summary of the sensitivity analysis for progression-free survival (intention-to-treat set)
Extended Data Table 2 Subsequent antitumor therapy (intention-to-treat set)
Extended Data Table 3 Summary of the sensitivity analysis for overall survival (intention-to-treat set)
Extended Data Table 4 Post hoc analysis of overall survival with a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model (intention-to-treat set)
Extended Data Table 5 Post hoc analysis of overall survival adjusted for subsequent antitumor therapy (intention-to-treat set)
Extended Data Table 6 EORTC QLQ-C30 global quality-of-life standardized score at baseline and the end-of-treatment follow-up (intention-to-treat set)

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, IDMC charter and List of investigators and participating sites.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, F., Shen, L., Guo, W. et al. Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized phase 3 FRUTIGA trial. Nat Med (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02989-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02989-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing