Abstract
The vascular endothelial growth factor pathway plays a key role in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. In the multicenter, double-blind phase 3 FRUTIGA trial, 703 patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who progressed on fluorouracil- and platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive fruquintinib (an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1/2/3; 4 mg orally, once daily) or placebo for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off, plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1/8/15 per cycle). The study results were positive as one of the dual primary endpoints, progression-free survival (PFS), was met (median PFS, 5.6 months in the fruquintinib arm versus 2.7 months in the placebo arm; hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.48–0.68; P < 0.0001). The other dual primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not met (median OS, 9.6 months versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.81–1.13; P = 0.6064). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia. Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel as a second-line treatment significantly improved PFS, but not OS, in Chinese patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and could potentially be another treatment option for these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03223376.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41591-024-02989-6/MediaObjects/41591_2024_2989_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41591-024-02989-6/MediaObjects/41591_2024_2989_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41591-024-02989-6/MediaObjects/41591_2024_2989_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The study protocol and statistical analysis plan are available in the Supplementary Information. De-identified participant data that underlie the results reported in this article can be made available to investigators for research purposes on a case-by-case basis after the time of this publication. Requests for access to data should be addressed to P.T. (panfengt@hutch-med.com) for consideration. The response to data access requests will be made within 4 weeks of receipt.
References
World Health Organization. GLOBOCAN 2020. Population fact sheets, China. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/160-china-fact-sheets.pdf (2020).
World Health Organization. GLOBOCAN 2020. Cancer fact sheets, stomach. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/7-Stomach-fact-sheet.pdf (2020).
Morgan, E. et al. The current and future incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in 185 countries, 2020-40: a population-based modelling study. eClinicalMedicine 47, 101404 (2022).
Manabe, N., Matsueda, K. & Haruma, K. Epidemiological review of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in Asian countries. Digestion 103, 29–36 (2022).
NCCN Guidelines. Gastric cancer. Version 3 https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/gastric.pdf (2023)
The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO). Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer (Chinese version). https://www.doc88.com/p-71573256934319.html (2023).
Zhu, X. D. et al. XELOX doublet regimen versus EOX triplet regimen as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: an open-labeled, multicenter, randomized, prospective phase III trial (EXELOX). Cancer Commun. 42, 314–326 (2022).
Lordick, F. et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 33, 1005–1020 (2022).
Wang, F. H. et al. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2021. Cancer Commun. 41, 747–795 (2021).
Zhao, X. et al. Comparing effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel plus raltitrexed vs. paclitaxel alone in second-line palliative chemotherapy for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II clinical trial. Cancer Biol. Med. 20, 682–688 (2023).
Hicklin, D. J. & Ellis, L. M. Role of the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor growth and angiogenesis. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 1011–1027 (2005).
Nienhuser, H. & Schmidt, T. Angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic therapy in gastric cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 43 (2017).
Sun, Q. et al. Discovery of fruquintinib, a potent and highly selective small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR 1, 2, 3 tyrosine kinases for cancer therapy. Cancer Biol. Ther. 15, 1635–1645 (2014).
Zhang, Y. et al. A phase Ib/II study of fruquintinib in combination with paclitaxel as the second-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Commun. 43, 150–153 (2023).
Xu, R. H. et al. Efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel with or without ramucirumab as second-line therapy for the treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW-Asia): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 6, 1015–1024 (2021).
Arai, H. & Nakajima, T. E. Recent developments of systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Cancers 12, 1100 (2020).
Li, J. et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of apatinib in patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 1448–1454 (2016).
Shitara, K. et al. Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 392, 123–133 (2018).
Shitara, K. et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with first-line, advanced gastric cancer: the KEYNOTE-062 phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 6, 1571–1580 (2020).
Muro, K. et al. Subgroup analysis of East Asians in RAINBOW: a phase 3 trial of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 31, 581–589 (2016).
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature 513, 202–209 (2014).
Chen, J. C., Chang, Y. W., Hong, C. C., Yu, Y. H. & Su, J. L. The role of the VEGF-C/VEGFRs axis in tumor progression and therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 88–107 (2012).
Jeon, Y. et al. The role of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy after failure of nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 14, 2346–2353 (2023).
Kankeu Fonkoua, L. A. et al. Outcomes on anti-VEGFR-2/paclitaxel treatment after progression on immune checkpoint inhibition in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 149, 378–386 (2021).
Masetti, M. et al. Efficacy of ramucirumab combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line therapy. Int. J. Cancer 15, 1224–1235 (2024).
Sasaki, A. et al. Improved efficacy of taxanes and ramucirumab combination chemotherapy after exposure to anti-PD-1 therapy in advanced gastric cancer. ESMO Open 4, e000775 (2020).
Cao, J. et al. A phase I study of safety and pharmacokinetics of fruquintinib, a novel selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor −1, −2, and −3 tyrosine kinases in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 78, 259–269 (2016).
Hironaka, S. et al. Randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 4438–4444 (2013).
Dasari, A. et al. Fruquintinib versus placebo in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (FRESCO-2): an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study. Lancet 402, 41–53 (2023).
Li, J. et al. Effect of fruquintinib vs placebo on overall survival in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: the FRESCO randomized clinical trial. JAMA 319, 2486–2496 (2018).
Wilke, H. et al. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 15, 1224–1235 (2014).
US Food and Drug Administration. Multiple endpoints in clinical trials guidance for industry. October 2022. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/multiple-endpoints-clinical-trials-guidance-industry, https://www.a.gov/media/162416/download (2022).
Allison, P. D. Survival analysis using SAS: a practical guide, second edition. SAS Institute (2010).
Jadwiga, B. Extensions of Cox model for non-proportional hazards purpose. Ekonometria 3, 85–101 (2014).
Lin, R. S. et al. Alternative analysis methods for time to event endpoints under non-proportional hazards: a comparative analysis. Stat. Biopharm. Res. 12, 187–198 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the National Science and Technology Major Project (project no. 2019ZX09301012), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Science, Technology and Innovation Action Plan, project no. 17431900100) and HUTCHMED Limited. We appreciate all participants in this trial, including patients, their families and caregivers and the staff and investigators at all the study sites. We also thank the members of the IDMC. Medical writing and editorial support were provided by J. Y. Lee of Parexel, which was funded by HUTCHMED Limited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.T., S.F., W.S. and R.-H.X. provided substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study. The funder and R.-H.X. had the responsibility of study oversight. F.W., L.S., W.G., T.L., J.L., S.Q., Y.B., Z.C., J.W., Y.P., Y.S., F. Zhao, Y.C., F.Y., K.G., T.Z., H.P., H.Z., F. Zhou, Y.Q., L.Y., W.M., Q.L., W.D., W.L., S.W., Y.T., D.M., X.Y., Y.D., Y.Y., M.L., W.H., D.C., G.L., P.T. and R.-H.X. contributed to the data collection. Q.L., P.T. and S.F. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. Q.L., P.T., S.F., M.S. and W.S. provided administrative support. P.T. and R.-H.X. had full access to all the data in the study and contributed to the verification of the data. F.W., Q.L., P.T., S.F., M.S., W.S. and R.-H.X. participated in writing the manuscript draft. All authors participated in reviewing the manuscript and provided final approval for the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Q.L., P.T., S.F., M.S. and W.S. are employees of HUTCHMED Limited. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Medicine thanks Aurélien Latouche, Florian Lordick and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Saheli Sadanand, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 The graphical approach used to control the type I error at a two-sided level of 0.049a for the analyses of the dual primary endpoints progression-free survival and overall survival.
aThe stopping boundaries for interim (50% information) and final analyses were computed with Lan-DeMets approximation to the O’Brien-Fleming boundary.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of (A) progression-free survival and (B) overall survival in the non-diffuse G/GEJ adenocarcinoma patients with lymph node metastases (intention-to-treat set).
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, IDMC charter and List of investigators and participating sites.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, F., Shen, L., Guo, W. et al. Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized phase 3 FRUTIGA trial. Nat Med (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02989-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-02989-6