Abstract
The current view of perceptual decision-making suggests that once a decision is made, only a single motor programme associated with the decision is carried out, irrespective of the uncertainty involved in decision making. In contrast, we show that multiple motor programmes can be acquired on the basis of the preceding uncertainty of the decision, indicating that decision uncertainty functions as a contextual cue for motor memory. The actions learned after making certain (uncertain) decisions are only partially transferred to uncertain (certain) decisions. Participants were able to form distinct motor memories for the same movement on the basis of the preceding decision uncertainty. Crucially, this contextual effect generalizes to novel stimuli with matched uncertainty levels, demonstrating that decision uncertainty is itself a contextual cue. These findings broaden the understanding of contextual inference in motor memory, emphasizing that it extends beyond direct motor control cues to encompass the decision-making process.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41562-024-01911-x/MediaObjects/41562_2024_1911_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41562-024-01911-x/MediaObjects/41562_2024_1911_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41562-024-01911-x/MediaObjects/41562_2024_1911_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41562-024-01911-x/MediaObjects/41562_2024_1911_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41562-024-01911-x/MediaObjects/41562_2024_1911_Fig5_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data required to evaluate the conclusions of the study are presented in the paper and in the Supplementary Information, and have been deposited on the OSF website (https://osf.io/n7z4q/)48.
Code availability
The code needed to reproduce all the figures has been deposited on the OSF website48 together with the data.
References
Ratcliff, R. & McKoon, G. The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput. 20, 873–922 (2008).
Gold, J. I. & Shadlen, M. N. The neural basis of decision making. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 535–574 (2007).
Palmer, J., Huk, A. C. & Shadlen, M. N. The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. J. Vis. 5, 376–404 (2005).
Heald, J. B., Lengyel, M. & Wolpert, D. M. Contextual inference underlies the learning of sensorimotor repertoires. Nature 600, 489–493 (2021).
Hirashima, M. & Nozaki, D. Distinct motor plans form and retrieve distinct motor memories for physically identical movements. Curr. Biol. 22, 432–436 (2012).
Howard, I. S., Wolpert, D. M. & Franklin, D. W. The value of the follow-through derives from motor learning depending on future actions. Curr. Biol. 25, 397–401 (2015).
Sheahan, H. R., Franklin, D. W. & Wolpert, D. M. Motor planning, not execution, separates motor memories. Neuron 92, 773–779 (2016).
Gandolfo, F., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. & Bizzi, E. Motor learning by field approximation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 3843–3846 (1996).
Nozaki, D., Kurtzer, I. & Scott, S. H. Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1364–1366 (2006).
Abekawa, N., Ito, S. & Gomi, H. Gaze-specific motor memories for hand-reaching. Curr. Biol. 32, 2747–2753.e6 (2022).
Resulaj, A., Kiani, R., Wolpert, D. M. & Shadlen, M. N. Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature 461, 263–266 (2009).
van den Berg, R., Zylberberg, A., Kiani, R., Shadlen, M. N. & Wolpert, D. M. Confidence is the bridge between multi-stage decisions. Curr. Biol. 26, 3157–3168 (2016).
Godden, D. R. & Baddeley, A. D. Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. Br. J. Psychol. 66, 325–331 (1975).
Shadmehr, R. & Brashers-Krug, T. Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J. Neurosci. 17, 409–419 (1997).
Shadmehr, R. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14, 3208–3224 (1994).
Scheidt, R. A., Reinkensmeyer, D. J., Conditt, M. A., Rymer, W. Z. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 853–862 (2000).
Houlihan, M., Campbell, K. & Stelmack, R. M. Reaction time and movement time as measures of stimulus evaluation and response processes. Intelligence 18, 289–307 (1994).
Howard, I. S., Wolpert, D. M. & Franklin, D. W. The effect of contextual cues on the encoding of motor memories. J. Neurophysiol. 109, 2632–2644 (2013).
Howard, I. S., Ingram, J. N., Franklin, D. W. & Wolpert, D. M. Gone in 0.6 seconds: the encoding of motor memories depends on recent sensorimotor states. J. Neurosci. 32, 12756–12768 (2012).
Heitz, R. P. The speed–accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Front. Neurosci. 8, 150 (2014).
Gold, J. I., Law, C. T., Connolly, P. & Bennur, S. The relative influences of priors and sensory evidence on an oculomotor decision variable during perceptual learning. J. Neurophysiol. 100, 2653–2668 (2008).
Gold, J. I. & Shadlen, M. N. Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands. Nature 404, 390–394 (2000).
Peixoto, D. et al. Decoding and perturbing decision states in real time. Nature 591, 604–609 (2021).
Okazawa, G., Hatch, C. E., Mancoo, A., Machens, C. K. & Kiani, R. Representational geometry of perceptual decisions in the monkey parietal cortex. Cell 184, 3748–3761.e18 (2021).
Goodwin, D. W., Powell, B., Bremer, D., Hoine, H. & Stern, J. Alcohol and recall: state-dependent effects in man. Science 163, 1358–1360 (1969).
Polyn, S. M. & Kahana, M. J. Memory search and the neural representation of context. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 24–30 (2008).
Heald, J. B., Lengyel, M. & Wolpert, D. M. Contextual inference in learning and memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 27, 43–64 (2023).
de Lange, F. P., Rahnev, D. A., Donner, T. H. & Lau, H. Prestimulus oscillatory activity over motor cortex reflects perceptual expectations. J. Neurosci. 33, 1400–1410 (2013).
Hanks, T. D., Ditterich, J. & Shadlen, M. N. Microstimulation of macaque area LIP affects decision-making in a motion discrimination task. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 682–689 (2006).
Selen, L. P., Shadlen, M. N. & Wolpert, D. M. Deliberation in the motor system: reflex gains track evolving evidence leading to a decision. J. Neurosci. 32, 2276–2286 (2012).
Kiani, R. & Shadlen, M. N. Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. Science 324, 759–764 (2009).
Basso, M. A. & Wurtz, R. H. Modulation of neuronal activity by target uncertainty. Nature 389, 66–69 (1997).
Komura, Y., Nikkuni, A., Hirashima, N., Uetake, T. & Miyamoto, A. Responses of pulvinar neurons reflect a subject’s confidence in visual categorization. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 749–755 (2013).
Nozaki, D., Yokoi, A., Kimura, T., Hirashima, M. & Orban de Xivry, J. J. Tagging motor memories with transcranial direct current stimulation allows later artificially-controlled retrieval. Elife 5, e15378 (2016).
Sun, X. et al. Cortical preparatory activity indexes learned motor memories. Nature 602, 274–279 (2022).
Chouinard, P. A., Leonard, G. & Paus, T. Role of the primary motor and dorsal premotor cortices in the anticipation of forces during object lifting. J. Neurosci. 25, 2277–2284 (2005).
Bédard, P. & Song, J. H. Attention modulates generalization of visuomotor adaptation. J. Vis. 13, 12 (2013).
Song, J. H. & Bédard, P. Paradoxical benefits of dual-task contexts for visuomotor memory. Psychol. Sci. 26, 148–158 (2015).
Herzfeld, D. J., Vaswani, P. A., Marko, M. K. & Shadmehr, R. A memory of errors in sensorimotor learning. Science 345, 1349–1353 (2014).
Mazzoni, P. & Krakauer, J. W. An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J. Neurosci. 26, 3642–3645 (2006).
Taylor, J. A., Krakauer, J. W. & Ivry, R. B. Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task. J. Neurosci. 34, 3023–3032 (2014).
Dawidowicz, G., Shaine, Y. & Mawase, F. Separation of multiple motor memories through implicit and explicit processes. J. Neurophysiol. 127, 329–340 (2022).
Schween, R., McDougle, S. D., Hegele, M. & Taylor, J. A. Assessing explicit strategies in force field adaptation. J. Neurophysiol. 123, 1552–1565 (2020).
Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T. & Movshon, J. A. The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. J. Neurosci. 12, 4745–4765 (1992).
Hagura, N., Haggard, P. & Diedrichsen, J. Perceptual decisions are biased by the cost to act. Elife 6, e18422 (2017).
Smith, M. A., Ghazizadeh, A. & Shadmehr, R. Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol. 4, e179 (2006).
Okazawa, G., Sha, L., Purcell, B. A. & Kiani, R. Psychophysical reverse correlation reflects both sensory and decision-making processes. Nat. Commun. 9, 3479 (2018).
Hagura, N. Decision uncertainty and contextual motor memory. OSF osf.io/n7z4q (2024).
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Koshimizu for help in the data collection process; members of the CiNet Motor Control Unit, HONDA R&D, and J. Heald for helpful insights during discussions. Part of this study was supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Kakenhi:20H00107, 21H00314) and the Japan Science and Technology Agency (ERATO: JPMJER1801) to N.H. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.H. conceived the study. K.O., A.Y., G.O., M.N., M.H. and N.H. designed the experiments. K.O. and N.H. collected the data. K.O., A.Y., G.O., M.H. and N.H. analysed the data. N.H. wrote the manuscript. K.O., A.Y., G.O., M.N., M.H. and N.H. reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
M.N. is an employee of Honda R&D Co. Ltd. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Human Behaviour thanks Firas Mawase, Luc Selen and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–4, with results and discussion in the legends.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ogasa, K., Yokoi, A., Okazawa, G. et al. Decision uncertainty as a context for motor memory. Nat Hum Behav (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01911-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01911-x