Jack Hurd’s Post

The Cerrado, Brazil's vast wooded savanna, is excluded from the current scope of the EUDR. The president of the Federation of Indigenous Peoples of Mato Grosso visited Brussels to press the EU to ""improve"" its anti-deforestation law. The EUDR's definition of ""forest"" does not extend to other wooded ecosystems such as the Cerrado, which is a savannah. https://lnkd.in/eMuqzWGU #Cerrado #Brazil #Conversion #Deforestation #Forests #Savannahs #TropicalForests

Brazil's Indigenous people turn to EU to save their savanna

Brazil's Indigenous people turn to EU to save their savanna

france24.com

Christopher Stewart

Global Head, Sustainability Impact

1mo

The EU decided to legislate on deforestation, not on the conversion of ALL natural ecosystems, and adopted the FAO's very broad definition of forest (10% canopy cover, 5 meter height) which includes ecosystems that ecologists would rather call woody savannas and shrublands than forests. It does not protect 'non-woody' grasslands or wetlands, but according to Mapbiomas, the most reputable Brazilian land cover system, EUDR does cover about 26% of the Cerrado (28.3M ha - compare to about 1.9M ha of "forested" Cerrado lost between 2000 and 2020). Clearly, other mechanisms do need to be in place to conserve the world's grasslands and other non-woody natural ecosystems from conversion to agriculture. https://mapbiomas-br-site.s3.amazonaws.com/Nota%20T%C3%A9cnica/Nota_T%C3%A9cnica_UE_02.05.2022.pdf

Alexander Shenkin

Assistant Research Professor @ Northern Arizona University | Autonomous Ecology | SmartFan | SelvaFlux

2mo

A few photos from the cerrado in Nova Xavantina, Brazil: https://photos.app.goo.gl/Nz7JiBeN22Y31LqA7

I wasn't aware that the cerrado was excluded from EUDR. That seems a really bad idea, because it is obvious then where the maize, soybean and peanut production will shift to. This is where biodiversity conservation loses out to carbon-based policies.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics