What we really mean when we talk about student engagement.
Student engagement isn’t always about attention. Or compliance. Or even enjoyment. Imagine a math class where students are sitting quietly, diligently taking notes as a teacher speaks. Is this engagement? It might feel that way to the teacher, who is doing a lot of the work there. Picture a history class where students are working in groups to make posters, laughing and chatting as they do. Is this engagement? A lively classroom is encouraging, but not necessarily indicative of engagement. When we talk about engagement, what we’re really talking about is cognitive engagement. In other words: ❓ Who’s doing the thinking in a classroom? ❓ Who’s getting the intellectual workout? ❓ Are students engaging with what they are learning deeply and thoughtfully? High school students are at a developmental stage where their motivating interest is identity development. Adolescents have an intrinsic motivation to learn that deepens as they find purpose in what they’re learning. They’re hungry to pursue passions, question the world around them, and challenge the status quo as they attempt to identify their own values and beliefs. So we as educators can cognitively engage them by: 1) having high expectations of them, 2) providing learning opportunities that require them to meaningfully grapple with relevant topics (do the cognitive lift), and, 3) recognizing their need to be active participants in their own learning. This isn't easy. It requires a paradigm shift around curriculum, teaching, and classroom dynamics. And yet, if we don’t talk about cognitive engagement, we’re missing a huge opportunity to leverage purpose to get to rigor and truly prepare kids academically. That’s why we emphasize rigor and purpose being necessary for deeper learning—and that focusing on both is what’s missing from many PBL efforts. #pbl #education