Alejandro's Reviews > Frankenstein
Frankenstein
by
by
![665584](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p2/665584.jpg)
Beware; for I am fearless, and therefore powerful.
Well, finally I read the original novel after watching infinite film adaptations, variations of the theme and even odd approaches to the topic.
I was sure that I would enjoy a lot the novel but sadly, compelled to write an honest review, I have to say that barely I was able to give it a 3-star rating, that I think it's the fairest rating that I can give to the book.
The original premise is astonishing, the following impact in popular culture is priceless and certainly the story "behind-of-the-scenes" of the creation of the novel is fascinating.
However, the actual writing of the book is tedious, the narration style is odd and the rhythm of the story is too slow.
THE GOOD
The creation of life has been a subject that captured the imagination of man, along with the chance of beating death and/or getting back from the dead. Mary Shelley, the writer, was able to show an impressive premise that not only is one of the early instances of horror novels but also easily one of the first examples in science-fiction/steampunk works since the process to give "life" to The Creature is through science instead of recurring to magic or some kind or paranormal force.
The socio-cultural impact of this novel has been monumental in all kind of media. Some remarkable examples are the 1931's film adaptation with Boris Karloff; the filmed sequel Bride of the Frankenstein of 1935, the 1974's fantastic parody Young Frankenstein with Gene Wilder, Mel Brooks and Peter Boyle; the 1985's twist movie The Bride with Sting and Jennifer Beals; the 1994's film adaptation with Robert De Niro; the two adaptations of Frankenweenie by Tim Burton in 1984 & 2012; and even the outstanding current TV series (2014- ) Penny Dreadful which includes this theme on its merged story.
How the novel was created could be covered as a "reality TV show" nowadays: "So You Think You Write Horror: Pros versus Rookies"...watch it only here on GRTV!!! Since all began with a friendly contest, of who can write the best ghost story, between four friends: Percy Shelly (Mary's husband, a famous poet & novelist), Lord Byron (another famous poet), John Polidori and of course, Mary. And the winners are... The rookies!!! Since while Percy Shelley and Lord Byron were acomplished writers, they weren't able to come up with something to compete against Polidori's The Vampyre and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.
Also, there is the tale of how Mary Shelley came up with the basic idea of the book. She claimed that she had a dream showing the lab with the mad scientist giving life to a hideous creature through the power of a lightning. I won't question her version. I only want to point out the existence of an actual Frankenstein's Castle, located in a town of Germany where, besides several paranormal stories about it, there is a local rumour, that a fellow with the name of Johann Conrad Dippel was a supposed alchemist that created a monster using a bolf of lightning (Where did I heard something just like this? Where?!), even a related rumour tells that this legend was told to Mary's step-mother by none other that the very Grimm Brothers!!! (Ah? Ah?! Try to came up with a cooler legend!). However, Mary always declared that she wasn't aware of that castle and the legends tied to it. Let's take out the part of the step-mother and the Grimm Brothers. It's virtually impossible to believe that Mary Shelley never heard, in some way, about the existence of Frankenstein's Castle and the particular tale of Dippel.
Without irrespecting the memory of Mary Shelley, this is just like the story of Diablo Cody, winner of an Oscar for Best "Original" Screenplay for the film Juno of 2007. The main theme of this film is about a teen pregancy. However, in 2005, there was a South Korean film titled Jenny, Juno that it was a romantic dramedy movie about teen pregnancy too. Diablo Cody declared that she never heard before of that South Korean film. Sure, because Juno is such a common name in America that it was an innocent coincidence. (By the way, Juno is the name's boyfriend in the South Korean's movie, instead of the female Juno performed by Ellen Page).
American Juno and South Korean Jenny, Juno have totally different stories, different approaches to the subject and even different reactions to the event along with different endings. The only dang similarity is that both are about teen pregnancies. I am not accusing Diablo Cody of plagiarism. That's not the point. I only say that was so hard for her to admit that she watched or heard about the South Korean film and that gave her an inspiration for her own screenplay?
In the same way, was so hard for Mary Shelley to admit that she got in contact in some way with the legend of Dippel and the Frankenstein's Castle and she used it as inspiration for her own original book?
TIP: If you are using legends, books and/or movies as your own inspiration for your work... change the dang names!!! At least that will make harder to make the connections and even making a more plausible deniability!!!
I could not understand why men who knew all about good and evil could hate and kill each other.
THE BAD
The writing of the book is tedious, or to be more accurate is a too slow burner that it took too much to get into the real story and even worse, once the "action" started, you have again intervals of tedium. It's indeed a roller coaster but in a bad sense, since you took too much time in the tedious way up and the moments of intensity are like split-seconds on the way down.
The narration style is odd since the book begins with some letters written by a ship's captain, and the first four letters are boring filler stuff non-relevant to the actual story, and until the fifth letter the story really started. However, later of that, the narration changed to the "voice" of Dr. Victor Frankenstein, but again, our good mad scientist takes too much time to get to the point telling a lot of non-relevant boring details, even worse, it's told in the most tedious "tone of voice" that you can imagine. Without emotion or trying to entertain to the reader. The chapters of the Creature are more entertained but also, sometimes you wonder how possible is that this monster so submitted to rage and murder is able to articule so well his part of the story.
So, between that the novel is slow burner, and the moments of real horror with awful deaths are so scarce and presented so quick that you can't even develop the proper emotion on that moments, I wasn't able to enjoy this book as I expected that I would. However, I can't deny the relevant place that this novel has in the history of literature and its impact in multiple ways of the spectrum.
Accursed creator! Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust?
Well, finally I read the original novel after watching infinite film adaptations, variations of the theme and even odd approaches to the topic.
I was sure that I would enjoy a lot the novel but sadly, compelled to write an honest review, I have to say that barely I was able to give it a 3-star rating, that I think it's the fairest rating that I can give to the book.
The original premise is astonishing, the following impact in popular culture is priceless and certainly the story "behind-of-the-scenes" of the creation of the novel is fascinating.
However, the actual writing of the book is tedious, the narration style is odd and the rhythm of the story is too slow.
THE GOOD
The creation of life has been a subject that captured the imagination of man, along with the chance of beating death and/or getting back from the dead. Mary Shelley, the writer, was able to show an impressive premise that not only is one of the early instances of horror novels but also easily one of the first examples in science-fiction/steampunk works since the process to give "life" to The Creature is through science instead of recurring to magic or some kind or paranormal force.
The socio-cultural impact of this novel has been monumental in all kind of media. Some remarkable examples are the 1931's film adaptation with Boris Karloff; the filmed sequel Bride of the Frankenstein of 1935, the 1974's fantastic parody Young Frankenstein with Gene Wilder, Mel Brooks and Peter Boyle; the 1985's twist movie The Bride with Sting and Jennifer Beals; the 1994's film adaptation with Robert De Niro; the two adaptations of Frankenweenie by Tim Burton in 1984 & 2012; and even the outstanding current TV series (2014- ) Penny Dreadful which includes this theme on its merged story.
How the novel was created could be covered as a "reality TV show" nowadays: "So You Think You Write Horror: Pros versus Rookies"...watch it only here on GRTV!!! Since all began with a friendly contest, of who can write the best ghost story, between four friends: Percy Shelly (Mary's husband, a famous poet & novelist), Lord Byron (another famous poet), John Polidori and of course, Mary. And the winners are... The rookies!!! Since while Percy Shelley and Lord Byron were acomplished writers, they weren't able to come up with something to compete against Polidori's The Vampyre and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.
Also, there is the tale of how Mary Shelley came up with the basic idea of the book. She claimed that she had a dream showing the lab with the mad scientist giving life to a hideous creature through the power of a lightning. I won't question her version. I only want to point out the existence of an actual Frankenstein's Castle, located in a town of Germany where, besides several paranormal stories about it, there is a local rumour, that a fellow with the name of Johann Conrad Dippel was a supposed alchemist that created a monster using a bolf of lightning (Where did I heard something just like this? Where?!), even a related rumour tells that this legend was told to Mary's step-mother by none other that the very Grimm Brothers!!! (Ah? Ah?! Try to came up with a cooler legend!). However, Mary always declared that she wasn't aware of that castle and the legends tied to it. Let's take out the part of the step-mother and the Grimm Brothers. It's virtually impossible to believe that Mary Shelley never heard, in some way, about the existence of Frankenstein's Castle and the particular tale of Dippel.
Without irrespecting the memory of Mary Shelley, this is just like the story of Diablo Cody, winner of an Oscar for Best "Original" Screenplay for the film Juno of 2007. The main theme of this film is about a teen pregancy. However, in 2005, there was a South Korean film titled Jenny, Juno that it was a romantic dramedy movie about teen pregnancy too. Diablo Cody declared that she never heard before of that South Korean film. Sure, because Juno is such a common name in America that it was an innocent coincidence. (By the way, Juno is the name's boyfriend in the South Korean's movie, instead of the female Juno performed by Ellen Page).
American Juno and South Korean Jenny, Juno have totally different stories, different approaches to the subject and even different reactions to the event along with different endings. The only dang similarity is that both are about teen pregnancies. I am not accusing Diablo Cody of plagiarism. That's not the point. I only say that was so hard for her to admit that she watched or heard about the South Korean film and that gave her an inspiration for her own screenplay?
In the same way, was so hard for Mary Shelley to admit that she got in contact in some way with the legend of Dippel and the Frankenstein's Castle and she used it as inspiration for her own original book?
TIP: If you are using legends, books and/or movies as your own inspiration for your work... change the dang names!!! At least that will make harder to make the connections and even making a more plausible deniability!!!
I could not understand why men who knew all about good and evil could hate and kill each other.
THE BAD
The writing of the book is tedious, or to be more accurate is a too slow burner that it took too much to get into the real story and even worse, once the "action" started, you have again intervals of tedium. It's indeed a roller coaster but in a bad sense, since you took too much time in the tedious way up and the moments of intensity are like split-seconds on the way down.
The narration style is odd since the book begins with some letters written by a ship's captain, and the first four letters are boring filler stuff non-relevant to the actual story, and until the fifth letter the story really started. However, later of that, the narration changed to the "voice" of Dr. Victor Frankenstein, but again, our good mad scientist takes too much time to get to the point telling a lot of non-relevant boring details, even worse, it's told in the most tedious "tone of voice" that you can imagine. Without emotion or trying to entertain to the reader. The chapters of the Creature are more entertained but also, sometimes you wonder how possible is that this monster so submitted to rage and murder is able to articule so well his part of the story.
So, between that the novel is slow burner, and the moments of real horror with awful deaths are so scarce and presented so quick that you can't even develop the proper emotion on that moments, I wasn't able to enjoy this book as I expected that I would. However, I can't deny the relevant place that this novel has in the history of literature and its impact in multiple ways of the spectrum.
Accursed creator! Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust?
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Frankenstein.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 30, 2014
– Shelved as:
to-read
July 30, 2014
– Shelved
August 13, 2014
–
Started Reading
August 17, 2014
– Shelved as:
novel
August 17, 2014
– Shelved as:
horror
August 17, 2014
– Shelved as:
romance
August 17, 2014
– Shelved as:
science-fiction
August 17, 2014
– Shelved as:
steampunk
August 17, 2014
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 53 (53 new)
message 1:
by
Carol
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Aug 17, 2014 05:45PM
![Carol](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1546364878p1/7668522.jpg)
reply
|
flag
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Yes, sorry, it wouldn't be honest if I hadn't mention it.
![Ivonne Rovira](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1339470651p1/3803671.jpg)
![Otherwyrld](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1354381293p1/10781757.jpg)
Have you read Dracula (without checking your books lists) - I found it to be a much better book than I expected
![Florencia](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1648327992p1/21575078.jpg)
Thank you for your honesty; I think I'll read this book but not very soon.
![Carol](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1546364878p1/7668522.jpg)
Yes, sorry, it wouldn't be honest if I hadn't mention it."
Glad I read your informative review!
![Carmen](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1412617445p1/25353295.jpg)
It's hard to get into these old classic horrors - because what was shocking and interesting at the time they were written is boring and mundane nowadays.
Again, great review! And I agree with you that authors should just admit where they got their inspiration! There's no shame in it.
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Hi, Otherwyrld! Yes, I agree that sometimes some books due the era when it was written can't impact in the expected way to the readers. That's sad, since I think that a good story should impact the same way not matter whenver is read. No, I haven't read "Dracula", I opted to read before "Carmilla" and it was an effect similar to this "Frankenstein", but hey! I still am planning to read "Dracula" :) I can't promise how much I'd like it, but I am willing to try it ;) I just need to fit it in my messy TBR list ;)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Hi, Florencia! ;) Don't worry, I understand the intention on your "yay" ;) Hehehehe. Thank you so much for your appraisals :) Oh, yes, I think that nobody with common sense decides to read some book with the anticipation that he/she will hate the book, it could be just dumb. In my case, as I explained I didn't hate it, just found it tedious, and it's maybe because it's one of the pioneers in the field of horror. I am sure that if the book would be more shocking due the publication era, maybe it wouldn't never find someboyd willing to publish it. I am truly glad of finally read it, and I think that's the important. The factor that I didn't enjoy that much, well, it's just something out of our control.
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Yes, sorry, it wouldn't be honest if I hadn't mention it."
Glad I read your informa..."
And I am glad too of helping you :)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Hi, Carmen! :) Truly glad to know that you enjoyed so much this novel :) I plan to read "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" really soon, then we'll be able to compare notes ;) Hehehe. Yes, as I commented before with other fellow readers, two readers never read the same book, for one will be just amazing, and to other will be "waste of time" as you put it. It's nobody's fault. One can't control the emotions provoked by a book to each of us. At least, while I didn't enjoy the novel as I'd expected, I would never qualified it as "waste of time", I am glad of finally read the original novel of a story which impacted so much in our popular culture. If I didn't really like it? Well, it's out of my own control. I just expressed my honest impression about the novel. Nor intending to discourage any future potential reader of the book. Each of us should decide for ourselves which novels we want to read, we appreciate recommendations, but at the end, it's our own final decision what defines if we want to read any book and the following reading experience will be out of our control.
![Maria](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1641522431p1/9968594.jpg)
Great review as always Alejandro! :)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
That's a fact! :) In her introduction to the book, written by herself, she actually mentioned Darwin indicating that she had read his work as an influence. (I don't know why she never admitted the influences of other clearer sources).
Actually, her introduction was written so engaging, that I was sure at that point that I will have the thrill of my life reading the actual novel. Sadly, it wasn't the case but I am glad of finally read it.
Thank you so much for your very kind appraisals!
![Otherwyrld](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1354381293p1/10781757.jpg)
That's a fact! :) In her introduction to the book, writ..."
Could you elaborate? After all, Origin of Species wasn't published until 1859, over 30 years after Frankenstein was published. Did she have access to Darwin's unpublished material, or hear him speak, or what? I am curious about this seeming discrepancy.
![Maria](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1641522431p1/9968594.jpg)
"Erasmus Darwin had a sophisticated understanding of how species had evolved from a single-celled aquatic ancestor, and how both rocks and species were the result of millions of years of adaptation.....but he did not come to understand evolutionary processes through a detailed story of natural history"
Later on Percy Shelley telling Mary Shelley a discovery of Dr. Darwin in which "how in a paste of flour and water you can make tiny organisms increase in number and size, even without air, and they will come back to life when dried out. That is how life began he tells her. Not with a garden in Eden, but with tiny organisms in a pond"
The book also mentions the dream and about the 1831 edition of Frankestein in which Mary first talks about the experiments of Dr. Darwin which obviously enormously influenced her as well as his grandson Charles Darwin. I believe she refers to him (Erasmus) only as Dr. Darwin but Im unsure about that.
I hope this clarifies the comments made by Alejandro or myself regarding the influence of Darwin on Mary Shelley. :)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
You never dissapoint me, María ;)
Thanks a lot for your brilliant and illustrative explanation :)
![Otherwyrld](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1354381293p1/10781757.jpg)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Quite indeed :) Definitely he deserves be better known.
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
;) It happens to me all the time, a book that it's just about to be read... and zas! when I noticed I've read 10 books before of it.
So much books, so little time ;)
![Yzabel Ginsberg](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1442957782p1/549584.jpg)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Hahaha :P I know what you mean, I am quite fussy about adding the right edition of each novel, at least when I'm about actually to read it.
![Shaun](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1680305268p1/9779623.jpg)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
That's a good point, Shaun. It's very likely that the regular pacing of books at that time was normally slow. Still, while newer ones, I have read slow novels which I enjoyed so much since the narrative and/or the narrator's voice was engaging, but again you have a valid point about thinking about the style of the books at that moment.
Thanks a lot for your input :)
![Rachel the Book Harlot](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1412049533p1/4702450.jpg)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Certainly we think the same about this novel, Rachel :)
Thank you so much for your comments! :)
![Florence (Lefty) MacIntosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1346034704p1/10856439.jpg)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Hi, Florence! :) Truly appreciated your kind appraisals!
Certainly Mary's step-mother could be an interesting character to write about then! ;)
![Agnieszka](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1371835955p1/2446508.jpg)
I wasn’t too impressed by this novel too and rated it rather badly though to be honest read it eons ago . And in fact , I really don’t know what I remember from original novel and what from the movie . It’s all mixed in my memory now...
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
I wasn’t too impressed by this novel too and rated it rather badly though to be honest read it eons ago . And in fact , I really don’t know wh..."
I'm glad that you didn't miss the review ;) Hehehe.
Yes, I guess that the story has been so adapted through the years that now reading the original tale, ironically, isn't what expected fans of the core concept of the story.
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Until now I noticed this comment by you. Sorry for replying so late.
Truly glad that we share our views about the novel ;)
![Deb](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1642833537p1/5276322.jpg)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Hehehe ;) And I am pretty sure that I left out some other adaptation that I may watched in the past! ;)
Thank you for your kind appraisal about the review! :D
![Denise](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1389589754p1/8788453.jpg)
![Cherie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1322706779p1/6460330.jpg)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Thank you, Debbie!
P.S.
Sorry for replying until now. I just noticed that I had some comments on this review.
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Hi, Denise! Oh, never two people read the same book, so maybe you would love it again, but also, never you can read the same book twice, so maybe your second reading would be different, but maybe not worse, but even better. Who knows?
It's likely that if I read the book in 5 years I would see it different ;)
P.S.
Sorry for replying until now. I just noticed that I had some comments on this review.
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Hi, Cherie. It must be interesting to "hear" the book instead of reading it ;) Thanks for the tip :D
P.S.
Sorry for not replying until now. I just noticed that I had some comments in this review.
![Jim](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1503074220p1/3373220.jpg)
![Alejandro](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1328672389p1/665584.jpg)
Hehehe, certainly she took her time to advance in the story ;)
Thanks for your feedback!