Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2007, History Australia
a book written three authors, they create their arguments on the basis of three different views. However, at the end of their arguments, all three authors come to a solid agreement on motion of addressing how history can be biased or hard to understanding. People must have clean understanding of such thesis that include; The values and truth-seeking of history, addressing the current controversies about objective knowledge, the cultural diversity and the political imperative of a democratic education that can lead people to only see one side of history. 1 Furthermore, adding a context of historical favoritism in the formation of biases reference, the three authors' also address, that for any scholar to learn and understanding from the past, they are required to conduct a full interrogation of what they have been taught or told by anyone. 2 History also contains two different battles in how historical facts are through ether by relativism and skepticism perceptive In skepticism a philosophical stance is an opposite of relativism in which historical context has a proven fact of sources to reclaim it argument and not that of scientific theory. 3 By applying these historical philosophies people can reshape the paradox of
South East Asia Research, 14, 2006, 339-359.
The challenge of Lao historiographyThis article examines the political dimension of historiography in contributing to the Lao nation-state building project, with particular reference to institutional and social forms of Lao political culture, the role of minority groups during the Revolution and the lingering shadow of the country’s aristocratic past. Reference is made to several key issues in current Lao historiography. The article also raises the issue of the respective political responsibilities of Lao and foreign historians in helping to construct a national history.
Journal of World History
A Global History of Modern Historiography. By Georg G. Iggers and Q. Edward Wang with contributions from Supriya Mukherjee2011 •
TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia
Continuing, Re-Emerging, and Emerging Trends in the Field of Southeast Asian History2013 •
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
History of Intellectual Culture
Review of Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography by Jouni-Matti KuukkanenBijdragen en Mededelingen betreffende de Geschiedenis der Nederlanden
Is There a Future for History?: On the Need for a Philosophy of History and Historiography2012 •
Brill’s Encyclopedia of Buddhism
[Buddhist] Historiography: Thailand2015 •
História da Historiografia
Do Theorists of History Have a Theory of History? Reflections on a Non-Discipline2019 •
The Politics of History as a School Subject in Hong Kong, 1960s-2000 (doctoral dissertation, University of Hong Kong))
Chapter 2: Historiographical Discussion2000 •
International Journal of Historical Archaeology
The transition to history in Southeast Asia: An introduction1998 •
History and Theory
Review of Kuukkanen's Postnarrativist Philosophy of Historiography2016 •
JATI – Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Special Issue
“Some Remarks on the Current State and Possible Future of Southeast Asian Studies”2010 •