![FED federal reserve of USA sybol and sign.](https://cdn.statically.io/img/static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1308151210/image_1308151210.jpg?io=getty-c-w750)
Bet_Noire
- The Federal Reserve is reportedly weighing a rule change that could reduce the amount of money the U.S.'s eight largest banks are required to set aside to bolster their reserves to weather a major downturn.
- The move would save the banks billions of dollars, all together, and notch a win for the industry by easing capital requirements, Reuters reported on Tuesday, citing four people with knowledge of the matter.
- The change applies to how the regulator calculates an extra layer of capital imposed at the U.S.'s global systemically important banks, or GSIBs, for their GSIB surcharge, which was introduced in 2015 in reaction to the 2008 financial crisis.
- The eight U.S. banks subject to the GSIB surcharge are JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM), Citigroup (NYSE:C), Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS), Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC), BNY Mellon (NYSE:BK), and State Street (NYSE:STT).
- The Fed is considering updating coefficients used in calculating the surcharge to take into account economic growth to more accurately reflect the size of the banks relative to the global economy, Reuters said, citing the four people.
More on Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, etc.
- Bank of America Should Outperform On Core Growth In '25-'26, But Is That Priced In?
- Goldman Sachs Q2 Earnings Preview: Can The Rally Keep Going?
- Citigroup Q2 Earnings Preview: Extended Gains Seem Possible
- Bank of America upgraded to Neutral at Piper on inflecting net interest income
- Citigroup to cease operations in Haiti