A18 Pro vs A17 Pro

We compared two 6-core processors: Apple A18 Pro (with Apple A18 GPU graphics) and A17 Pro (Apple A17 GPU). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

The information below is partially based on leaks and rumors. We will update this page as we receive more accurate data.

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Apple A18 Pro
  • Supports 54% higher memory bandwidth (78.8 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 25%) AnTuTu 10 score – 1915K vs 1528K
  • Announced later
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
vs

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
A18 Pro +25%
1915345
1528179
CPU 568990 388177
GPU 660671 530610
Memory 310672 267182
UX 375012 342310
Total score 1915345 1528179

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A18 Pro +25%
3678
2953
Multi-Core Score
A18 Pro +21%
8974
7441
Asset compression - 260.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser - 169.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer - 178.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection - 173.5 images/sec
HDR - 232.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur - 27.9 images/sec
Photo processing - 79.1 images/sec
Ray tracing - 7.58 Mpixels/sec
Promotion

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
n/a
10008
Graphics test - 59 FPS
Score - 10008

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of A18 Pro and A17 Pro

CPU

Architecture 2x 3.89 GHz –
4x 2.2 GHz –
2x 3.78 GHz – Everest
4x 2.11 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 6 6
Frequency 3890 MHz 3780 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache - 16 MB
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count - 19 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Apple A18 GPU Apple A17 GPU
Architecture Apple Bionic GPU Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1450 MHz 1398 MHz
Execution units 6 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 768 768
FLOPS 2227.2 Gigaflops 2147.2 Gigaflops

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Neural Engine Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5T LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 78.8 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type NVMe NVMe
Max display resolution - 2796 x 1290
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 8K at 24FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 24FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X75 Snapdragon X70
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10000 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2024 September 2023
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - APL1V02

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
139 (84.2%)
26 (15.8%)
Total votes: 165

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A17 Pro and A18 Pro, or ask any questions
Avatar
A18 in better in 2025 July 1, 2024 at 09:15 AM
But on paper sd 8 gen 4 big improvement in in cpu and gpu in 2025, s25 ultra may be winner in 2025 if apple do nothing in chip next year , or need fast development 1nm chip if they wanna kill snapdragon
+1 Reply