Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Last of the wild revisited: assessing spatial patterns of human impact on landscapes in Southern Patagonia, Chile

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human activities are continuously expanding at a global scale and having an increasing effect on the remaining natural ecosystems in remote areas, such as the Magellan Region of southern Patagonia, Chile. In addition to extensive livestock holdings, aquaculture and tourism are advancing into formerly undisturbed areas, and insufficient information on the spatial scope and intensity of these alterations is available to inform and support conservation policies. The aim of this study was to spatially analyse the degree, scope and spatial distribution of anthropogenic alterations. Accordingly, two spatially explicit indexes, the degree of anthropogenic alteration (DAA) and human influence index (HII), have been applied. The results show a significant spatial overestimation of the remaining undisturbed natural areas. Despite low population densities and extensive conservation designations, a major share of the total area has been anthropogenically altered. Depending on the measure type, between 53.1 % (DAA) and 68.1 % of the area (HII) needs to be considered as influenced by human activity in some way. Our findings challenge previous studies by the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS and CIESIN in Last of the wild project, version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): last of the wild dataset (Geographic), NASA socioeconomic data and applications center (SEDAC), Palisades, 2005). Their worldwide assessment of pristine natural environments indicated that a much smaller part of the Magellan region has been subject to human influence. The chosen methodologies represent an opportunity to detect and monitor human influence at small spatial scales, which has heretofore remained unnoticed. Because such alterations are becoming more frequent in remote regions, the assessment approaches presented here provide important information on human–environment interactions to support land-use and nature conservation policy design. In addition, small-scale structures and different types of economic activities are considered to support policies that can protect the remaining natural areas from human encroachment. Moreover, implications of the proposed methodology for biodiversity conservation policy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JE (1991) A conceptual framework for evaluating and quantifying naturalness. Conserv Biol 5(3):347���352. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00148.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier PL (2000) The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conserv Biol 14(2):373–381. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98362.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bomans K, Steenberghen T, Dewaelheyns V, Leinfelder H, Gulinck H (2010) Underrated transformations in the open space–the case of an urbanized and multifunctional area. Landsc Urban Plan 94(3–4):196–205. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuste J, Haase D, Elmqvist T (2013) Urban landscapes and ecosystem services. In: Wratten S, Sandhu H, Cullen R, Costanza R (eds) Ecosystem services in agricultural and urban landscapes. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 83–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2000) Convention on biological diversity. http://www.cbd.int/convention/guide/default.shtml. Accessed 5 Nov 2014

  • CONAF-CONAMA (2006) Catastro de uso del suelo y vegetación, región de Magallanes y Antártica Chilena. Monitoreo y actualización, Santiago

  • Crutzen PJ (2002) The “anthropocene”. J Phys IV France 12(10):1–5. doi:10.1051/jp4:20020447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Smedt P (2010) The use of impact assessment tools to support sustainable policy objectives in Europe. Ecol Soc 15(4):30–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Edarra Indurain A (1997) Botanica ambiental aplicada: las plantas y el equilibrio ecologico de nuestra tierra, 2nd edn. EUNSA, Pamplona

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis EC, Ramankutty N (2008) Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ 6(8):439–447. doi:10.1890/070062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis EC, Kaplan JO, Fuller DQ, Vavrus S, Klein Goldewijk K, Verburg PH (2013) Used planet: a global history. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(20):7978–7985. doi:10.1073/pnas.1217241110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopædia Britannica Online (EBO), s. v. “Patagonia”, Accessed 19 Aug 2015, http://www.britannica.com/place/Patagonia-region-Argentina

  • Evans TP, Kelley H (2008) Assessing the transition from deforestation to forest regrowth with an agent-based model of land cover change for south-central Indiana (USA). Geoforum 39(2):819–832. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski M (1998) Society’s metabolism. J Ind Ecol 2(1):61–78. doi:10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcés E (2009) Tierra del Fuego Como paisaje cultural extremo. Conserva 13:95–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez Orea D (2002) Ordenacion territorial. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbühel CM, Haberl H, Schandl H, Winiwarter V (2003) Socioeconomic metabolism and colonization of natural processes in SangSaeng Village: material and energy flows, Land use, and cultural change in Northeast Thailand. Hum Ecol 31(1):53–86. doi:10.1023/A:1022882107419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gucinski, H. (2001) Forest roads: a synthesis of scientific information. DIANE Publishing

  • Hannah L, Carr JL, Lankerani A (1995) Human disturbance and natural habitat: a biome level analysis of a global data set. Biodivers Conserv 4(2):128–155. doi:10.1007/BF00137781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helming K, Diehl K, Kuhlman T, Jansson T, Verburg PH, Bakker M, Pérez-Soba M, Jones L, Verkerk PJ, Tabbush P, Morris JB, Drillet Z, Farrington J, LeMouél P, Zagame P, Stuczynski T, Siebielec G, Sieber S, Wiggering H (2011) Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting Land use, part B: application of the analytical framework. Ecol Soc 16(1):27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Roy DB, Thompson K (2002) Hemeroby, urbanity and ruderality: bioindicators of disturbance and human impact. J Appl Ecol 39(5):708–720. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00746.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter M Jr (1996) Benchmarks for managing ecosystems: are human activities natural? Conserv Biol 10(3):695–697. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10030695.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L (2005) La huella Urbana y ecológica de Magallanes. Una mirada sobre nuestra insostenibilidad. Rev Urbano 8:28–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L (2008) Turismo en la Patagonia: una Amenaza para la Integridad Ecológica del Medio Natural. Cuad Invest Urbanística 56:122

    Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L (2012) Patagonia, Antropización de un Territorio natural. Cuad Invest Urbanística 83:86

    Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L (2014) Measuring urban ecosystem functions through “Technomass”—a novel indicator to assess urban metabolism. Ecol Indic 42:10–19. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inostroza L (2015) El mito de pristinidad y los usos efectivos del territorio de la región de Magallanes, Patagonia Chilena: forestal, minería y acuicultura. Estud Geográficos LXXVI:141–175

  • Instituto Geográfico Militar (IGM) (1983) Geografía de Chile Tomo II Geomorfología, Santiago de Chile

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (2005) Ciudades, Pueblos, Aldeas y Caseríos. Available at: http://www.ine.cl/canales/usuarios/cedoc_online/censos/pdf/censo_2002_publicado_junio_2005.pdf

  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (1987) The IUCN position statement on translocation; introductions, reintroductions and re-stocking, approved by the 22nd Meeting of the IUCN Council, Gland, Switzerland, 4 September 1987. http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/pubs/policy/index.htm. Accessed 5 Nov 2014

  • Jacobi JD, Scott JM (1985) An assessment of the current status of native upland habitats and asso- ciated endangered species on the island of Hawai’i. In: Stone CP, Scott JM (eds) Hawai’I’s terrestrial ecosystems: preservation and management. University of Hawaii Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, Honolulu, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • König HJ, Schuler J, Suarma U, McNeill D, Imbernon J, Damayanti F, Dalimunthe SA, Uthes S, Sartohadi J, Helming K, Morris J (2010) Assessing the impact of land use policy on urban-rural sustainability using the FoPIA approach in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Sustainability 2(7):1991–2009. doi:10.3390/su2071991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König HJ, Uthes S, Schuler J, Zhen L, Purushothaman S, Suarma U, Sghaier M, Makokha S, Helming K, Sieber S, Chen L, Brouwer F, Morris J, Wiggering H (2013) Regional impact assessment of land use scenarios in developing countries using the FoPIA approach: findings from five case studies. J Environ Manage 127(Supplement):S56–S64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König HJ, Zhen L, Helming K, Uthes S, Yang L, Cao X, Wiggering H (2014) Assessing the impact of the sloping land conversion programme on rural sustainability in Guyuan, Western China. Land Degrad Dev 25(4):385–396. doi:10.1002/ldr.2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (1999) Natürlichkeit, Naturnähe und Hemerobie als Bewertungskriterien. Handbuch für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege (eds W. Konold, R. Böcker & U. Hampicke), V-2·1, pp. 1–18. Ecomed, Landsberg, Germany

  • Lambin EF, Baulies X, Bockstael N, Fischer G, Krug R, Leemans EF, Moran EF, Rindfuss RR, Sato Y, Skole D, Turner II, BL, Vogel C (1999) Land-use and land-cover change (LUCC): implementation strategy. IGBP Report no. 48 IHDP Report no. 10. IGBP, Bonn

  • Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes OT, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George PS, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skånes H, Steffen W, Stone GD, Svedin U, Veldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu J (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Change 11(4):261–269. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaRosa D, Lorz C, König HJ, Fürst C (2014) Spatial information and participation in socio-ecological systems: experiences, tools and lessons learned for land-use planning. IForest Biogeosci For 7:386–389. doi:10.3832/ifor0093-007

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesslie R, Malsen M (1995) National wilderness inventory handbook of procedures, content and usage, 2nd edn. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra (Australia)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leu M, Hanser SE, Knick ST (2008) The human footprint in the west: a large-scale analysis of anthropogenic impacts. Ecol Appl 18(5):1119–1139. doi:10.1890/07-0480.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Verburg PH, Lv S, Wu J, Li X (2012) Spatial analysis of the driving factors of grassland degradation under conditions of climate change and intensive use in Inner Mongolia. China. 12:461–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood M, Worboys G, Kothari A (Eds.) (2012) Managing protected areas: a global guide. Routledge

  • Loidi J (1994) Phytosociology applied to nature conservation and land management. In: Song Y, Dierschke H, Wang X (eds) Applied vegetation ecology. East China Normal University Press, Shangai, pp 17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado A (2004) An index of naturalness. J Nat Conserv 12(2):95–110. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2003.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado A, Redondo C, Carralero I (2004) Ensayando un índice de naturalidad en Canarias. In: Fernández-Palacios JM, Morici C (eds) Ecología insular. Asociación Española de Ecología Terrestre, Las Palmas (Canary Islands), pp 413–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules C, Usher MB (1981) Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biol Conserv 21(2):79–109. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(81)90073-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meaza G, Cardiñanos JA (2000) Valoración de la vegetación. In: Meaza G (ed) Metodología y prácticade la biogeografía. Edicionesdel Serbal, Barcelona, pp 199–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Meshesha DT, Tsunekawa A, Tsubo M, Ali SA, Haregeweyn N (2014) Land-use change and its socio-environmental impact in Eastern Ethiopia’s highland. 14:757–768

    Google Scholar 

  • MOP Ministerio de Obras Públicas (1994) Atlas ambiental de Chile, Santiago de Chile

  • Moss C (2008) Patagonia: a cultural history. Signal books, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Munsi M, Malaviya S, Oinam G, Joshi PK (2010) A landscape approach for quantifying land-use and land-cover change (1976–2006) in middle Himalaya. 10: 145–155

  • Myers N (1995) Environmental unknowns. Science 269(5222):358–360. doi:10.1126/science.269.5222.358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palomo I, Martin-Lopez B, Zorrilla-Miras P, Garcia Del Amo D, Montes C (2014) Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. 14: 237–251

  • Pisano E (1990) Labilidad de los ecosistemas terrestres Fuego-patagónicos. An Inst Patagonia 19(1):17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontius RG, Cornell JD, Hall CAS (2001) Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: application and validation for Costa Rica. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85(1–3):191–203. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00183-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidsma P, König H, Feng S, Bezlepkina I, Nesheim I, Bonin M, Sghaier M, Purushothaman S, Sieber S, van Ittersum MK, Brouwer F (2011) Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable development in developing countries. Land Use Policy 28(3):604–617. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters KH, Wickham JD (2003) How far to the nearest road? Front Ecol Environ 1(3):125–129. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0125:HFTTNR]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J (2004) Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecol Econ 48(4):369–384. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G (2002) The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52(10):891. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter R (2001) The impact of tourism on the patagonian coast, Argentina. Int J Hosp Tour Adm 1(3–4):53–71. doi:10.1300/J149v01n03_04

    Google Scholar 

  • SERNAGEOMIN (2010) Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería. http://sigeo.sernageomin.cl/. Accessed 21 Feb 5 Mar 2010

  • Sistema Nacional de Información Ambiental (SINIA). http://www.sinia.cl/1292/w3-article-26200.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2015

  • Sukopp H, Hejny S, Kowarik I (eds) (1990) Urban ecology. Plants and plant communities in urban environments. SPA Publishing House Academic Publications, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Theberge JB (1989) Guidelines to drawing ecologically sound boundaries for national parks and nature reserves. Environ Manag 13(6):695–702. doi:10.1007/BF01868309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning K, König H, Schößer B, Helming K, Sieber S (2008) Ex-ante impact assessments (IA) in the European Commission—an overview. In: Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 17–33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL (1997) The sustainability principle in global agendas: implications for understanding land-use/cover change. Geogr J 163(2):133–140. doi:10.2307/3060176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungaro F, Zasada I, Piorr A (2014) Mapping landscape services, spatial synergies and trade-offs. A case study using variogram models and geostatistical simulations in an agrarian landscape in North-East Germany. Ecol Indic 46:367–378. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH, van de Steeg J, Veldkamp A, Willemen L (2009) From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. J Environ Manage 90(3):1327–351335. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277(5325):494–499. doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) Columbia University (2005). Last of the wild project, version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): last of the wild dataset (Geographic). Palisades, NY: NASA socioeconomic data and applications center (SEDAC). http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/wildareas-v2-last-of-the-wild-geographic. Accessed 08 April 2014

  • Wilkie D, Shaw E, Rotberg F, Morelli G, Auzel P (2000) Roads, development and conservation in the Congo Basin. Conserv Biol 14:1614–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Li HQ, Wang R-S, Paulussen J, He Y, Wang M, Wang B-H, Wang Z (2006) Monitoring and predicting land use change in Beijing using remote sensing and GIS. Landsc Urban Plan 78(4):322–333. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zasada I, Loibl W, Köstl M, Piorr A (2013) Agriculture under urban influence: a spatial analysis of farming systems in the EU. Eur Countrys 5(1):71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtzstr. 10, 01062, Dresden, Germany

    Luis Inostroza

  2. Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Avenida Alemania, 01090, Temuco, Chile

    Luis Inostroza

  3. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374, Müncheberg, Germany

    Ingo Zasada & Hannes J. König

Authors
  1. Luis Inostroza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ingo Zasada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hannes J. König
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Inostroza.

Additional information

Editor: Xiangzheng Deng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inostroza, L., Zasada, I. & König, H.J. Last of the wild revisited: assessing spatial patterns of human impact on landscapes in Southern Patagonia, Chile. Reg Environ Change 16, 2071–2085 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0935-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0935-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation