Abstract
Human activities are continuously expanding at a global scale and having an increasing effect on the remaining natural ecosystems in remote areas, such as the Magellan Region of southern Patagonia, Chile. In addition to extensive livestock holdings, aquaculture and tourism are advancing into formerly undisturbed areas, and insufficient information on the spatial scope and intensity of these alterations is available to inform and support conservation policies. The aim of this study was to spatially analyse the degree, scope and spatial distribution of anthropogenic alterations. Accordingly, two spatially explicit indexes, the degree of anthropogenic alteration (DAA) and human influence index (HII), have been applied. The results show a significant spatial overestimation of the remaining undisturbed natural areas. Despite low population densities and extensive conservation designations, a major share of the total area has been anthropogenically altered. Depending on the measure type, between 53.1 % (DAA) and 68.1 % of the area (HII) needs to be considered as influenced by human activity in some way. Our findings challenge previous studies by the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS and CIESIN in Last of the wild project, version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): last of the wild dataset (Geographic), NASA socioeconomic data and applications center (SEDAC), Palisades, 2005). Their worldwide assessment of pristine natural environments indicated that a much smaller part of the Magellan region has been subject to human influence. The chosen methodologies represent an opportunity to detect and monitor human influence at small spatial scales, which has heretofore remained unnoticed. Because such alterations are becoming more frequent in remote regions, the assessment approaches presented here provide important information on human–environment interactions to support land-use and nature conservation policy design. In addition, small-scale structures and different types of economic activities are considered to support policies that can protect the remaining natural areas from human encroachment. Moreover, implications of the proposed methodology for biodiversity conservation policy are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson JE (1991) A conceptual framework for evaluating and quantifying naturalness. Conserv Biol 5(3):347–352. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00148.x
Angermeier PL (2000) The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conserv Biol 14(2):373–381. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98362.x
Bomans K, Steenberghen T, Dewaelheyns V, Leinfelder H, Gulinck H (2010) Underrated transformations in the open space–the case of an urbanized and multifunctional area. Landsc Urban Plan 94(3–4):196–205. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.004
Breuste J, Haase D, Elmqvist T (2013) Urban landscapes and ecosystem services. In: Wratten S, Sandhu H, Cullen R, Costanza R (eds) Ecosystem services in agricultural and urban landscapes. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 83–104
CBD (2000) Convention on biological diversity. http://www.cbd.int/convention/guide/default.shtml. Accessed 5 Nov 2014
CONAF-CONAMA (2006) Catastro de uso del suelo y vegetación, región de Magallanes y Antártica Chilena. Monitoreo y actualización, Santiago
Crutzen PJ (2002) The “anthropocene”. J Phys IV France 12(10):1–5. doi:10.1051/jp4:20020447
de Smedt P (2010) The use of impact assessment tools to support sustainable policy objectives in Europe. Ecol Soc 15(4):30–39
Edarra Indurain A (1997) Botanica ambiental aplicada: las plantas y el equilibrio ecologico de nuestra tierra, 2nd edn. EUNSA, Pamplona
Ellis EC, Ramankutty N (2008) Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ 6(8):439–447. doi:10.1890/070062
Ellis EC, Kaplan JO, Fuller DQ, Vavrus S, Klein Goldewijk K, Verburg PH (2013) Used planet: a global history. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(20):7978–7985. doi:10.1073/pnas.1217241110
Encyclopædia Britannica Online (EBO), s. v. “Patagonia”, Accessed 19 Aug 2015, http://www.britannica.com/place/Patagonia-region-Argentina
Evans TP, Kelley H (2008) Assessing the transition from deforestation to forest regrowth with an agent-based model of land cover change for south-central Indiana (USA). Geoforum 39(2):819–832. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.03.010
Fischer-Kowalski M (1998) Society’s metabolism. J Ind Ecol 2(1):61–78. doi:10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61
Garcés E (2009) Tierra del Fuego Como paisaje cultural extremo. Conserva 13:95–108
Gomez Orea D (2002) Ordenacion territorial. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid
Grünbühel CM, Haberl H, Schandl H, Winiwarter V (2003) Socioeconomic metabolism and colonization of natural processes in SangSaeng Village: material and energy flows, Land use, and cultural change in Northeast Thailand. Hum Ecol 31(1):53–86. doi:10.1023/A:1022882107419
Gucinski, H. (2001) Forest roads: a synthesis of scientific information. DIANE Publishing
Hannah L, Carr JL, Lankerani A (1995) Human disturbance and natural habitat: a biome level analysis of a global data set. Biodivers Conserv 4(2):128–155. doi:10.1007/BF00137781
Helming K, Diehl K, Kuhlman T, Jansson T, Verburg PH, Bakker M, Pérez-Soba M, Jones L, Verkerk PJ, Tabbush P, Morris JB, Drillet Z, Farrington J, LeMouél P, Zagame P, Stuczynski T, Siebielec G, Sieber S, Wiggering H (2011) Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting Land use, part B: application of the analytical framework. Ecol Soc 16(1):27–34
Hill MO, Roy DB, Thompson K (2002) Hemeroby, urbanity and ruderality: bioindicators of disturbance and human impact. J Appl Ecol 39(5):708–720. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00746.x
Hunter M Jr (1996) Benchmarks for managing ecosystems: are human activities natural? Conserv Biol 10(3):695–697. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10030695.x
Inostroza L (2005) La huella Urbana y ecológica de Magallanes. Una mirada sobre nuestra insostenibilidad. Rev Urbano 8:28–40
Inostroza L (2008) Turismo en la Patagonia: una Amenaza para la Integridad Ecológica del Medio Natural. Cuad Invest Urbanística 56:122
Inostroza L (2012) Patagonia, Antropización de un Territorio natural. Cuad Invest Urbanística 83:86
Inostroza L (2014) Measuring urban ecosystem functions through “Technomass”—a novel indicator to assess urban metabolism. Ecol Indic 42:10–19. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.035
Inostroza L (2015) El mito de pristinidad y los usos efectivos del territorio de la región de Magallanes, Patagonia Chilena: forestal, minería y acuicultura. Estud Geográficos LXXVI:141–175
Instituto Geográfico Militar (IGM) (1983) Geografía de Chile Tomo II Geomorfología, Santiago de Chile
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (2005) Ciudades, Pueblos, Aldeas y Caseríos. Available at: http://www.ine.cl/canales/usuarios/cedoc_online/censos/pdf/censo_2002_publicado_junio_2005.pdf
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (1987) The IUCN position statement on translocation; introductions, reintroductions and re-stocking, approved by the 22nd Meeting of the IUCN Council, Gland, Switzerland, 4 September 1987. http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/pubs/policy/index.htm. Accessed 5 Nov 2014
Jacobi JD, Scott JM (1985) An assessment of the current status of native upland habitats and asso- ciated endangered species on the island of Hawai’i. In: Stone CP, Scott JM (eds) Hawai’I’s terrestrial ecosystems: preservation and management. University of Hawaii Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit, Honolulu, pp 1–21
König HJ, Schuler J, Suarma U, McNeill D, Imbernon J, Damayanti F, Dalimunthe SA, Uthes S, Sartohadi J, Helming K, Morris J (2010) Assessing the impact of land use policy on urban-rural sustainability using the FoPIA approach in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Sustainability 2(7):1991–2009. doi:10.3390/su2071991
König HJ, Uthes S, Schuler J, Zhen L, Purushothaman S, Suarma U, Sghaier M, Makokha S, Helming K, Sieber S, Chen L, Brouwer F, Morris J, Wiggering H (2013) Regional impact assessment of land use scenarios in developing countries using the FoPIA approach: findings from five case studies. J Environ Manage 127(Supplement):S56–S64
König HJ, Zhen L, Helming K, Uthes S, Yang L, Cao X, Wiggering H (2014) Assessing the impact of the sloping land conversion programme on rural sustainability in Guyuan, Western China. Land Degrad Dev 25(4):385–396. doi:10.1002/ldr.2164
Kowarik I (1999) Natürlichkeit, Naturnähe und Hemerobie als Bewertungskriterien. Handbuch für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege (eds W. Konold, R. Böcker & U. Hampicke), V-2·1, pp. 1–18. Ecomed, Landsberg, Germany
Lambin EF, Baulies X, Bockstael N, Fischer G, Krug R, Leemans EF, Moran EF, Rindfuss RR, Sato Y, Skole D, Turner II, BL, Vogel C (1999) Land-use and land-cover change (LUCC): implementation strategy. IGBP Report no. 48 IHDP Report no. 10. IGBP, Bonn
Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes OT, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George PS, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skånes H, Steffen W, Stone GD, Svedin U, Veldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu J (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Change 11(4):261–269. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
LaRosa D, Lorz C, König HJ, Fürst C (2014) Spatial information and participation in socio-ecological systems: experiences, tools and lessons learned for land-use planning. IForest Biogeosci For 7:386–389. doi:10.3832/ifor0093-007
Lesslie R, Malsen M (1995) National wilderness inventory handbook of procedures, content and usage, 2nd edn. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra (Australia)
Leu M, Hanser SE, Knick ST (2008) The human footprint in the west: a large-scale analysis of anthropogenic impacts. Ecol Appl 18(5):1119–1139. doi:10.1890/07-0480.1
Li S, Verburg PH, Lv S, Wu J, Li X (2012) Spatial analysis of the driving factors of grassland degradation under conditions of climate change and intensive use in Inner Mongolia. China. 12:461–474
Lockwood M, Worboys G, Kothari A (Eds.) (2012) Managing protected areas: a global guide. Routledge
Loidi J (1994) Phytosociology applied to nature conservation and land management. In: Song Y, Dierschke H, Wang X (eds) Applied vegetation ecology. East China Normal University Press, Shangai, pp 17–30
Machado A (2004) An index of naturalness. J Nat Conserv 12(2):95–110. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2003.12.002
Machado A, Redondo C, Carralero I (2004) Ensayando un índice de naturalidad en Canarias. In: Fernández-Palacios JM, Morici C (eds) Ecología insular. Asociación Española de Ecología Terrestre, Las Palmas (Canary Islands), pp 413–438
Margules C, Usher MB (1981) Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: a review. Biol Conserv 21(2):79–109. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(81)90073-2
Meaza G, Cardiñanos JA (2000) Valoración de la vegetación. In: Meaza G (ed) Metodología y prácticade la biogeografía. Edicionesdel Serbal, Barcelona, pp 199–272
Meshesha DT, Tsunekawa A, Tsubo M, Ali SA, Haregeweyn N (2014) Land-use change and its socio-environmental impact in Eastern Ethiopia’s highland. 14:757–768
MOP Ministerio de Obras Públicas (1994) Atlas ambiental de Chile, Santiago de Chile
Moss C (2008) Patagonia: a cultural history. Signal books, Oxford
Munsi M, Malaviya S, Oinam G, Joshi PK (2010) A landscape approach for quantifying land-use and land-cover change (1976–2006) in middle Himalaya. 10: 145–155
Myers N (1995) Environmental unknowns. Science 269(5222):358–360. doi:10.1126/science.269.5222.358
Palomo I, Martin-Lopez B, Zorrilla-Miras P, Garcia Del Amo D, Montes C (2014) Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. 14: 237–251
Pisano E (1990) Labilidad de los ecosistemas terrestres Fuego-patagónicos. An Inst Patagonia 19(1):17–26
Pontius RG, Cornell JD, Hall CAS (2001) Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: application and validation for Costa Rica. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85(1–3):191–203. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00183-9
Reidsma P, König H, Feng S, Bezlepkina I, Nesheim I, Bonin M, Sghaier M, Purushothaman S, Sieber S, van Ittersum MK, Brouwer F (2011) Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable development in developing countries. Land Use Policy 28(3):604–617. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.009
Riitters KH, Wickham JD (2003) How far to the nearest road? Front Ecol Environ 1(3):125–129. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0125:HFTTNR]2.0.CO;2
Robinson J (2004) Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecol Econ 48(4):369–384. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.017
Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G (2002) The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience 52(10):891. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2
Schlüter R (2001) The impact of tourism on the patagonian coast, Argentina. Int J Hosp Tour Adm 1(3–4):53–71. doi:10.1300/J149v01n03_04
SERNAGEOMIN (2010) Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería. http://sigeo.sernageomin.cl/. Accessed 21 Feb 5 Mar 2010
Sistema Nacional de Información Ambiental (SINIA). http://www.sinia.cl/1292/w3-article-26200.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2015
Sukopp H, Hejny S, Kowarik I (eds) (1990) Urban ecology. Plants and plant communities in urban environments. SPA Publishing House Academic Publications, The Hague
Theberge JB (1989) Guidelines to drawing ecologically sound boundaries for national parks and nature reserves. Environ Manag 13(6):695–702. doi:10.1007/BF01868309
Tscherning K, König H, Schößer B, Helming K, Sieber S (2008) Ex-ante impact assessments (IA) in the European Commission—an overview. In: Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 17–33
Turner BL (1997) The sustainability principle in global agendas: implications for understanding land-use/cover change. Geogr J 163(2):133–140. doi:10.2307/3060176
Ungaro F, Zasada I, Piorr A (2014) Mapping landscape services, spatial synergies and trade-offs. A case study using variogram models and geostatistical simulations in an agrarian landscape in North-East Germany. Ecol Indic 46:367–378. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.039
Verburg PH, van de Steeg J, Veldkamp A, Willemen L (2009) From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. J Environ Manage 90(3):1327–351335. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.005
Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277(5325):494–499. doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494
Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) Columbia University (2005). Last of the wild project, version 2, 2005 (LWP-2): last of the wild dataset (Geographic). Palisades, NY: NASA socioeconomic data and applications center (SEDAC). http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/wildareas-v2-last-of-the-wild-geographic. Accessed 08 April 2014
Wilkie D, Shaw E, Rotberg F, Morelli G, Auzel P (2000) Roads, development and conservation in the Congo Basin. Conserv Biol 14:1614–1622
Wu Q, Li HQ, Wang R-S, Paulussen J, He Y, Wang M, Wang B-H, Wang Z (2006) Monitoring and predicting land use change in Beijing using remote sensing and GIS. Landsc Urban Plan 78(4):322–333. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.10.002
Zasada I, Loibl W, Köstl M, Piorr A (2013) Agriculture under urban influence: a spatial analysis of farming systems in the EU. Eur Countrys 5(1):71–88
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor: Xiangzheng Deng.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Inostroza, L., Zasada, I. & König, H.J. Last of the wild revisited: assessing spatial patterns of human impact on landscapes in Southern Patagonia, Chile. Reg Environ Change 16, 2071–2085 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0935-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0935-1