2

From what I read in Duden, Wictionary, and others, it looks like durchaus and völlig can be used as synonyms in most cases, but not always. It looks like völlig can always be replaced by durchaus, but not the other way round.

Therefore, what are the cases / contexts in which durchaus cannot be replaced by völlig?

0

2 Answers 2

3

First of all the formal difference: While durchaus is an adverb (built from the concatenation of two prepositions), völlig is an adjective. From a formal viewpoint that means völlig can be replaced by durchaus when in adverbial use only (for example, when völlig modifies another adjective as in the following example).

Das ist völlig richtig

Das ist durchaus richtig

Note, however, the replacement modifies the meaning - The second example expects an "aber" (like in most cases when durchaus is used), while the first one doesn't necessarily.

When used as an adjective, the replacement doesn't really work:

Das ist völliger Blödsinn

Das ist durchaus Blödsinn ...

(The "durchaus" example is a valid sentence, but the meaning is entirely different: "völliger Blödsinn" is "complete nonsense", but the second example translates to something along the lines of )

While this may be nonsense, .....

I would rather state that sometimes (but, in most cases, not) durchaus and völlig can be synonyms.

1
  • Thanks for your explanation! Commented Jan 24 at 9:37
3

They don't really mean the same thing at all.

"durchaus" = "indeed"

"völlig" = "completely"

That is, "völlig" (cognate with "fully") strengthens the part it modifies, it emphasizes that it is truly completely so.

"durchaus" is mainly for expressing contrasts with some other (expressed or implied) idea.

I did some web searching for practical uses of "durchaus" and found these:

1
  • That is an interesting and unusual comparison, thanks for pointing that direction out! Commented Jan 24 at 9:40

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.