First of all, yes it is with other countries and second I’m saying this because its also chinese garbage
No, the United States is not a brutal totalitarian dictatorship.
First of all, yes it is with other countries and second I’m saying this because its also chinese garbage
Cannot imagine being this confidently & factually wrong.I'm laughing because the allegation that the US is in any way worse than China when it comes to human rights is so absurd and risible that it's all I can do. Please do some research into what the Chinese have done to Vietnam. Also what they're currently doing to the Uyghurs. Also what happened in Tiananmen Square (though not on TikTok, of course, where such topics are aggressively suppressed).
Those should be banned in the US as wellYes, but not any social media apps. Facebook, Twitter, Truthsocial, Instgram, Snapchat, Pinterest, Reddit, Quora, and TikTok itself are banned in China.
The flaw in this brilliant idea is thinking that the US government wants an educated populous. Panem et circenses.I have a radical idea. The US government could EDUCATE its citizens (don’t laugh) by releasing evidence to support the idea that TikTok/China are spying (I know there’s evidence out there, but let’s hear it from the bully pulpit). Then RECOMMEND that the citizenry uninstall the app. Done. Give us the information and the choice to make our own decisions.
Those should be banned in the US as well
ByteDance can self-fornicate. We are under no obligation to allow a company which is controlled by a hostile foreign government to continue to operate in the US. If they won't sell, then shut down their access to the US by whatever means necessary.
Exactly, even if TikTok is banned and if TikTok is the insidious spying platform for China, that is alleged. China can still get all the same data just by buying it from MetaBanning is an extreme measure that doesn’t need to be taken. Instead there should be regulations that apply to how ALL apps use personal data. If these companies choose to make their apps conform to the regulations they can stay in business. Targeting specific companies accomplishes nothing.
This has been a thing since 2020 bro don’t try and deflectIn case you all missed it, Romney already gave the game away and admitted that the ban happened to curb pro-Palestine sentiment: https://www.axios.com/local/salt-la...blinken-tiktok-ban-israel-palestinian-content
Turns out all of that posturing about national security was BS that politicians sold to the American public to justify their blatantly unconstitutional actions!
Right!Fine, it can stay as soon as China lifts the ban on a ton of apps developed by US companies.
Well it’s not all about private data, it’s also about propaganda and controlling the narrative.Exactly, even if TikTok is banned and if TikTok is the insidious spying platform for China, that is alleged. China can still get all the same data just by buying it from Meta
Yeah it’s been a thing since 2020 and all of a sudden it’s top priority and gets pushed through. Gee I wonder why. 🤔This has been a thing since 2020 bro don’t try and deflect
US can take any action no matter how outrageous? I didn’t prove that insane assertion at all, I said the exact opposite. I specifically said the protective measure has to match the risk level. You’re making a new point, that the US government gets to decide. Setting aside for a second that this is a problem that goes back to the beginning of time—who gets to decide anything on behalf of a group of people—what exactly are you proposing? Dismantle governments? If so, this discussion is about a lot more than banning an app, and this is probably not the appropriate forum for it.Thank you for proving my point, your line of reasoning can be used to defend any action the US takes, no matter how outrageous. After all, who gets to decide what response is proportional? We have people in this very thread showing their whole ass and saying that slaughtering over 34,000 humans, most of them women and children, is a proportional and justified response to an act of violence that killed 1200 people. We had the Bush admin justify the complete overthrow of another sovereign nation because of 9/11. I don’t trust the government, any government, to determine appropriate and proportional responses.
Why yes I am in fact in favor of disbanding governments and stuff like this is a good example of why. State monopolies on violence is never, ever a good thing.US can take any action no matter how outrageous? I didn’t prove that insane assertion at all, I said the exact opposite. I specifically said the protective measure has to match the risk level. You’re making a new point, that the US government gets to decide. Setting aside for a second that this is a problem that goes back to the beginning of time—who gets to decide anything on behalf of a group of people—what exactly are you proposing? Dismantle governments? If so, this discussion is about a lot more than banning an app, and this is probably not the appropriate forum for it.
Oh no, alternative views! Ban it, burn it with fire!Laughable
China doesn't allow multiple social apps in China or if it does censors them.
TikTok should be banned right now, not in a year.
China spreading misinformation and an alternative view of history for the Hamas supporting brain dead students in the U.S., as well as being the platform for forming protests
The problem with that is if the company is beholden to a foreign authoritarian adversary state, US regulations don’t mean much to it. If the foreign state chooses, it can force the company to get around regulations if there‘s any possible way. And there’s always a way.Banning is an extreme measure that doesn’t need to be taken. Instead there should be regulations that apply to how ALL apps use personal data. If these companies choose to make their apps conform to the regulations they can stay in business. Targeting specific companies accomplishes nothing.
Haha right. That’s a joke right?There's a ton of American companies/apps in China.
Plus isn't the whole high horse "we're not China"(even though we're worse)?
The problem with that is if the company is beholden to a foreign authoritarian adversary state, US regulations don’t mean much to it. If the foreign state chooses, it can force the company to get around regulations if there‘s any possible way. And there’s always a way.
Why people waste their time with this app is sad.
What principle is being abandoned? This isn’t a discussion about something like the use of torture. Selling a particular product is not a basic human right. Many products are illegal to sell because of the risk they pose, or even just because of sanctions.We abide by the laws we pass. That’s the unique idea that the United States was founded on. We don’t have individuals make critical decisions on the fly. We deliberate. We evaluate. And most of all we follow the rule of law. Are others going to take advantage of that? Sure. But that isn’t a reason to give up or to abandon our national principles.
What principle is being abandoned? This isn’t a discussion about something like the use of torture. Selling a particular product is not a basic human right. Many products are illegal to sell because of the risk they pose, or even just because of sanctions.
That’s not what I understand is happening, but I agree it needs to go through proper channels.People are calling for TikTok to be instantly banned. As if one person can just do that in America. It doesn’t work like that here. It has to be passed through congress, signed by the executive and then enforced.
And again, the issue isn’t TikTok. The issue is a complete lack of regulation around apps. That’s what allows companies like BiteDance and Meta to do this stuff in the first place.
That's right, doesn't every other app provide personal info on all its users to the Chinese military?While ignoring every other app that does similar things?
That's right, doesn't every other app provide personal info on all its users to the Chinese military?