Calling the cops: Policing in California schools
Black teachers: How to recruit them and make them stay
Lessons in Higher Education: California and Beyond
Superintendents: Well paid and walking away
Keeping California public university options open
College in Prison: How earning a degree can lead to a new life
Starting next March, California school districts will be required to post a plan on their websites outlining how they will provide instruction to students within 10 school days of an emergency that keeps children from attending classes. They should also make contact with students and families within five days of the emergency. Last week, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the education trailer bill as part of the 2024-25 budget.
The plan must be operative by July 1, 2025.
Local educational agencies — school districts, charter schools and county offices of education — that do not develop an instructional continuity plan as part of their school safety plan will not be eligible to recover lost state attendance funding if schools close or a significant number of students are unable to attend because of an emergency.
In a separate action, the trailer bill also addresses chronic absenteeism by authorizing school districts to provide attendance recovery programs during school breaks, weekends or after school, to allow students to make up for up to 10 days of school missed for any reason. Beginning next July, districts that offer the programs will be able to recover state funds lost when students in the program were previously absent from school.
The legislation comes four years after California schools closed for more than a year because of a worldwide pandemic. Since then, chronic absenteeism rates have more than doubled. Wildfires and flooding also have closed schools across the state with increasing frequency in recent years.
“Given the effects of public health emergencies and the significant and growing number of natural disasters that the state has faced in recent years, there is an increased need for local educational agencies to provide instructional continuity for pupils when conditions make in-person instruction infeasible for all or some pupils,” according to the trailer bill.
The instructional continuity plan must describe how districts will provide in-person or remote instruction to students, including potentially temporarily reassigning them to other school districts. Students who are reassigned during an emergency will not have to comply with any residency requirements for attendance in that district.
The legislation has changed dramatically since the May budget revision, which would have given districts five days to offer students instruction after an emergency, and penalized them financially if they didn’t.
The revisions are due, in part, to heavy opposition from a coalition of nine education organizations, including the California Teachers Association, California School Boards Association and California County Superintendents.
“There are countless instances where the physical infrastructure and human capacity necessary to comply with this requirement does not exist: roads, landlines, internet connectivity, access to devices, access to shelter, family and staff displacement, etc.,” said California County Superintendents in a May letter to the chairs of the Senate and Assembly budget committees. “When this occurs, a LEA may find it impossible to offer remote instruction.”
Derick Lennox, senior director for governmental relations and legal affairs for the association said, “There was the feeling that the state does not understand the challenges that schools face to locate and serve the basic needs of their students and families during a serious emergency.”
As an alternative, the coalition asked for a proactive planning process without financial penalties, and lawmakers agreed, Lennox said.
El Dorado County Superintendent of Schools Ed Manansala said that the proactive, constructive tone of the new legislation is more productive than the punitive tack legislators took in the original version.
Manansala said it isn’t feasible to expect schools to deliver instruction 10 days after schools close in an emergency.
El Dorado County has had at least 70 wildfires of varying sizes between 2004 and 2023, the largest being in August 2021, according to CalFire. It burned 221,835 acres and razed Walt Tyler Elementary School in Grizzly Flats.
“We had teachers and students that were being displaced out of their communities,” Manansala said.
Mendocino County Superintendent of Schools Nicole Glentzer first experienced the extended closure of schools in 2017 when a fire burned 36,000 acres.
Glentzer, who worked at nearby Ukiah Unified School District at the time, had to evacuate her home. She moved into the district office and went to work making decisions about school closures. The district’s schools were closed for five days.
Since then, the county on the state’s north coast has been ravaged by numerous fires, including two of the nation’s largest, which together burned more than 1.41 million acres in multiple counties in 2018 and 2020.
Schools in Mendocino County also have been closed recently because of flooding and power outages.
Glentzer said that while she is satisfied with the revamped language in the legislation, she cringes when she hears that small districts, with small staffs, are expected to come up with plans similar to larger districts. The Mendocino County Office of Education will help the 12 school districts in its county by providing sample plans and templates, she said.
State chronic absentee numbers have skyrocketed from 12.1% in 2018-19 to 30% in 2021-22, according to an analysis of California data. Chronic absenteeism rates are determined by the number of students who miss at least 10% of school days in a given year.
Attendance recovery programs like the one required by the new legislation can help districts reduce their chronic absenteeism and regain the average daily attendance funding lost when students miss school. The programs must be taught by credentialed teachers and be aligned to grade-level standards and to each student’s regular instructional program, according to the legislation.
Attendance recovery programs can be funded through the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program at school sites where the after-school or summer enrichment programs are being offered and operated by the school district.
“In my mind, it’s a whole theme that the administration and Legislature are going for, around addressing chronic absenteeism — one of the top issues facing students today,” Lennox said. “And, they basically outlined a few different strategies to do it.”
California’s community colleges are barred by state law from offering bachelor’s degrees in fields like education and nursing, even in remote areas without a four-year university. That’s not the case in Washington.
Why open a new district-run police department? “We need to take our safety to another level.”
The Los Angeles Unified School District has reinstated police to two of its campuses — continuing an ebb and flow in its approach to law enforcement.
Oakland Unified remains committed to the idea that disbanding its own police force can work. Staff are trained to call the cops as a last resort.
Comments (2)
Comments Policy
We welcome your comments. All comments are moderated for civility, relevance and other considerations. Click here for EdSource's Comments Policy.
Eric Premack 2 weeks ago2 weeks ago
The new plan mandate ducks what is, for most school districts, the largest impediment to rapid response to emergencies: California's burdensome and excessive collective bargaining laws. As noted in the comment by "el," each emergency is unique and developing an in-depth plan to address every situation in advance is impossible. This leaves school administrators, even "unsung superstars" hamstrung when labor unions drag their feet at the bargaining table for weeks or months and severely … Read More
The new plan mandate ducks what is, for most school districts, the largest impediment to rapid response to emergencies: California’s burdensome and excessive collective bargaining laws.
As noted in the comment by “el,” each emergency is unique and developing an in-depth plan to address every situation in advance is impossible. This leaves school administrators, even “unsung superstars” hamstrung when labor unions drag their feet at the bargaining table for weeks or months and severely delayed and compromised schools’ ability to respond rapidly to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Unless and until legislation addresses this elephant in the living room, the primary challenges will remain.
el 3 weeks ago3 weeks ago
Is this really a good use of our time? What we've learned from these disasters is that we have no idea what will happen, that our administrators are unsung superstars at thinking on their feet, and that even if we can access that plan when there's no power and no internet and barely phone service and we can't access the site that none of its assumptions will be all that useful. Staff and students will be kicked … Read More
Is this really a good use of our time?
What we’ve learned from these disasters is that we have no idea what will happen, that our administrators are unsung superstars at thinking on their feet, and that even if we can access that plan when there’s no power and no internet and barely phone service and we can’t access the site that none of its assumptions will be all that useful.
Staff and students will be kicked out of their homes, possibly in shelters or possibly far away with friends or relatives. Hotels will be full. In just one of these incidents, our superintendent struggled to save $40,000 worth of food in the refrigerators and freezers, to at least get it to a disaster relief site where it wouldn’t just rot.
Then there was that other time when a fire had us in an evacuation warning area for 6 weeks.
At the end of the day, we rely on the thoughtful, clever people we hire as administrators, who get far too little credit for all the on-the-fly problem solving they do, especially the ones working for small districts. And if you don’t have a clever administrator, no plan will save you.
When families are evacuated, we don’t control where they go, and some have to travel pretty far to get to a place where they are safe and comfortable. We have no system to track that really, and no money or time to build one.
Having the state or county offices make some sort of generalized plan/study of “here are some ideas and things you may need to consider,” sure. Do it on the legislature’s dime.
Also, friends, why doesn’t the legislature provide funding for every school to have emergency backup power? That would be hugely useful to schools and the surrounding community, even the firefighters. It would be of use in so many situations. It’s especially important for rural schools that are likely on wells and don’t have potable water in a power outage. This generalized plan, let’s consider what schools probably need to have on site for disaster preparation- and fund it.
Our district offices are already overburdened by plans and reports. Adding another – and unfunded at that – IS NOT HELPING.