skip to main content
research-article

Championing HCI education to CS undergraduates at a grassroots level: a case study in Egypt

Published: 01 November 2019 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    There is an increasing global interest in developing inclusive technologies that contribute to the social welfare of people in emerging economies. Egypt, a country facing socio-economic challenges, has been investing in an increasingly growing ICT infrastructure and human capital. The current ICT workforce is technically-oriented due to the increasing interest in global outsourcing. However, there is a need for a Computer Science (CS) workforce that is willing to engage with the bottom-of-the-pyramid users as a potential market. CS students should harness interdisciplinary skills that enable them to sympathize with users who have diverse backgrounds, perceptions, and digital literacies. Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) education programs could provide the necessary skills for local CS students to fulfill this workforce gap. Like many Arab and African countries, Egyptian higher education programs and industry have been slow in recognizing the value of HCI.
    In this article, I address how introducing HCI education to students in an Egyptian engineering institute can benefit industry. I discuss a series of action research cycles focusing on the learning design of a student-centered introductory HCI short course that successfully sensitized students to the role of end-users in technology design. The learning design was planned to circumvent the challenging fact that HCI was underrated by CS students. Formative assessment results and my reflections, as the instructor, are discussed as well.

    References

    [1]
    Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Clemmensen, T., & Guimaraes, T. G. (2017). Learning HCI across institutions, disciplines and countries: A field study of cognitive styles in analytical and creative tasks. In R. Bernhaupt, G. Dalvi, A. Joshi, D. K. Balkrishan, J. O'Neill, & M. Winckler (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2017: 16th IFIP TC13 International Conference, Mumbai, India, September 25-29, 2017, Proceedings, Part IV (pp. 198--217). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [2]
    Aberg, J. (2010). Challenges with teaching HCI early to computer students. In Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education - ITiCSE '10 (pp. 3--7). Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey: ACM.
    [3]
    Alabdulqader, E., Abokhodair, N., & Lazem, S. (2017). Human-computer interaction across the Arab world. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '17 (pp, 1356--1359). Denver, CO, USA: ACM.
    [4]
    Arnold, L. (2015). Action research for higher education practitioners: A practical guide. Retrieved from https://lydiaarnold.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/action-research-introductory-resource.pdf
    [5]
    Bidwell, N. J. (2016). Decolonising HCI and interaction design discourse. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 22(4), 22--27.
    [6]
    Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), pp. 7--74.
    [7]
    Bødker, S. (2016). Rethinking technology on the boundaries of life and work. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 20(4), 533--544.
    [8]
    Churchill, E. F., Bowser, A., & Preece, J. (2016). The future of hci education: A flexible, global, living curriculum. Interactions, 23(2), 70--73.
    [9]
    Ciolfi, L., & Cooke, M. (2006). HCI for interaction designers: Communicating "the bigger picture". Inventivity: Teaching Theory, Design and Innovation in HCI, Proceedings of HCIEd, 1, 47--51. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1eb3/a1b3c9871d0756f88625a6570829b55d4130.pdf
    [10]
    Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th Ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
    [11]
    Cousin, G. (2009). Researching learning in higher education: An introduction to contemporary methods and approaches. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [12]
    Fisher, D. H., Cameron, J., Clegg, T., & August, S. (2018). Integrating social good into CS education. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 130--131). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
    [13]
    Fleck, R., Cox, A. L., & Robison, R. A. V. (2015). Balancing boundaries: Using multiple devices to manage work-life balance. Proceedings of the ACM CHI'15 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3985--3988). Seoul, Republic of Korea: ACM.
    [14]
    Fullan, M. (2006). Change theory as a force for school improvement. In J. M. Burger, C. F. Webber, & P. Klinck (Eds.), Intelligent leadership: Constructs for thinking education leaders (Vol 6). Springer, Dordrecht.
    [15]
    Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), pp. 95--105.
    [16]
    Gibson, L., & Hanson, V. L. (2013). Digital motherhood: How does technology help new mothers? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 313--322). Paris, France: ACM.
    [17]
    Giglitto, D., Lazem, S., & Preston, A. (2018). In the eye of the student: An intangible cultural heritage experience, with a human-computer interaction twist. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (Paper No. 290). Montreal, QC, Canada: ACM.
    [18]
    Judge, T. K. K., Neustaedter, C., & Kurtz, A. F. (2010). The family window: The design and evaluation of a domestic media space. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2361--2370). Atlanta, GA, USA: ACM.
    [19]
    Khan, M. (2016). Teaching human computer interaction at undergraduate level in Pakistan. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), 14(5), 278--280.
    [20]
    Lazem, S. (2016). A case study for sensitising Egyptian engineering students to user-experience in technology design. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium on Computing for Development (pp. 12:1--12:10). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
    [21]
    Lazem, S., & Dray, S. (2018). Baraza! Human-computer interaction education in Africa. Interactions, 25(2), 74--77.
    [22]
    McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276--282.
    [23]
    Patterson, D. A. (2005). Rescuing our families, our neighbors, and ourselves. Communications of the ACM, 48(11), 29--31.
    [24]
    Polillo, R. (2009). Teaching HCI to undergraduate computing students : The quest for the golden rules. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/rpolillo/teaching-hci-to-undergraduate-computing-students-the-quest-for-the-golden-rules
    [25]
    Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction Design - Beyond Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Chichester, West Sussex, England. Retrieved from http://www.id-book.com/
    [26]
    Romme, A. G. L. (2004). Action research, emancipation and design thinking. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 14(6), 411--510.
    [27]
    Sari, E., & Wadhwa, B. (2015). Understanding HCI education across Asia-Pacific. Proceedings of the International HCI and UX Conference in Indonesia on - CHIuXiD '15 (pp. 65--68). Bandung, Indonesia: ACM.
    [28]
    Skatova, A., Bedwell, B., Shipp, V., Huang, Y., Young, A., Rodden, T., & Bertenshaw, E. (2016). The role of ICT in office work breaks. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16 (pp. 3049--3060). San Jose, CA, USA: ACM.
    [29]
    St-Cyr, O., MacDonald, C. M., Churchill, E. F., Preece, J. J., & Bowser, A. (2018). Developing a community of practice to support global HCI Education. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18 (Paper No. W25). Montreal, QC, Canada: ACM.
    [30]
    Stachowiak, S. (2013). Pathways for Change : 10 theories to inform advocacy and policy change efforts. The ORS Impact (October), 1--30.
    [31]
    Wu, J., Guo, S., Huang, H., Liu, W., & Xiang, Y. (2018). Information and communications technologies for sustainable development goals: State-of-the-art, needs and perspectives. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 20(3), 2389--2406.

    Index Terms

    1. Championing HCI education to CS undergraduates at a grassroots level: a case study in Egypt
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image Journal of Usability Studies
        Journal of Usability Studies  Volume 15, Issue 1
        November 2019
        62 pages

        Publisher

        Usability Professionals' Association

        Bloomingdale, IL

        Publication History

        Published: 01 November 2019
        Published in JUS Volume 15, Issue 1

        Author Tags

        1. CS education
        2. Egypt
        3. HCI education
        4. HCI4D
        5. emerging economies
        6. global south

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • 0
          Total Citations
        • 109
          Total Downloads
        • Downloads (Last 12 months)36
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        Full Access

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media