Utah Constitutional Requirements for Education Funding Amendment (2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Utah Constitutional Requirements for Education Funding Amendment
Flag of Utah.png
Election date
November 5, 2024
Topic
Taxes and Education
Status
On the ballot
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

The Utah Constitutional Requirements for Education Funding Amendment is on the ballot in Utah as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024.[1]

A "yes" vote supports:

  • requiring taxes on intangible property and income to be used to maintain a public education funding framework, provided through state law, that (1) uses a portion of revenue growth for Uniform School Fund expenditures for changes in student enrollment and long-term inflation and (2) provides a budgetary stabilization account; and
  • allowing the state to use tax revenue for other purposes after education funding requirements are met.

A "no" vote opposes changing the allowed uses for income tax and intangible property tax revenue and opposes allowing the state to use tax revenue for other purposes after education funding requirements are met.


Another constitutional amendment is also on the 2024 ballot in Utah that would increase the constitutional limit on annual distributions from the State School Fund for public education from 4% to 5% of the fund. To read more about the amendment, click here.

Overview

What would the amendment change about education funding in Utah?

See also: Text of measure

Currently, under Section 5 of Article XIII of the Utah Constitution, all revenue from income taxes and intangible property taxes must be used to fund public education, higher education, children, and persons with disabilities.

The proposed amendment would remove the constitutional mandate on how revenues from these taxes are spent. The amendment would provide that taxes on intangible property and income be used to maintain a public education funding framework, provided through state law, that (1) uses a portion of revenue growth for Uniform School Fund expenditures for changes in student enrollment and long-term inflation and (2) provides a budgetary stabilization account. The amendment would allow tax revenue from intangible property and income to be used for other purposes once the requirements for public education funding are met.[2]

What are supporters and opponents saying about this amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

State Senator and amendment sponsor Dan McCay (R) said the amendment would "protect and provide continued constitutional protections but then allow for ... revenue in the income tax fund to be used for other state purposes once we fulfilled our responsibilities for growth, and for student enrollment and long-term inflation.” House Majority Leader Mike Schultz (R) said, "It’s time for us as a state to come together and figure out another way forward and how to balance our state’s budget. We have a constitutional duty to balance our state’s budget. We don’t get to make this decision. We can’t make this decision. This bill allows the citizens of the state to make the decision and I think that’s what we need to do."[3]

Utah House Democrats said, "We cannot support these measures to remove the constitutional earmark on public education funding because education funding is essential to our state’s future and should never be used as a bargaining chip. We strongly believe that education funding is non-negotiable and as Democrats, we believe we must continue to keep public education a priority. ... The language in [the amendment] is vague and the House Democrats worry that the way it is written will result in a significant loss of investment into public education, making education funding subject to the whims of political tides."[4]

How is this amendment related to repealing the state sales tax on food?

See also: House Bill 54, 2023

The Utah State Legislature passed House Bill 54, titled Tax Revisions, along partisan lines with Republicans voting in favor and Democrats voting against. Among other changes to taxes, the bill was designed to reduce the income tax rate for individuals and businesses from 4.85% to 4.65%. HB 54 was also designed to repeal the state sales tax on food beginning in 2025 if voters approve this constitutional amendment.[5]

Text of measure

Constitutional changes

See also: Utah Constitution

The amendment would amend Section 5 of Article XIII of the Utah Constitution. The following underlined text would be added and struck-through text would be deleted:[1]

Note: Use your mouse to scroll over the below text to see the full text.

Article XIII, Section 5. [Use and amount of taxes and expenditures.]

(1) (a) The Legislature shall provide by statute for an annual tax sufficient, with other revenues, to defray the estimated ordinary expenses of the State for each fiscal year.

(b) If the ordinary expenses of the State will exceed revenues for a fiscal year, the Governor shall: (i) reduce all State expenditures on a pro rata basis, except for expenditures for debt of the State; or (ii) convene the Legislature into session under Article VII, Section 6 to address the deficiency.

(2) (a) For any fiscal year, the Legislature may not make an appropriation or authorize an expenditure if the State's expenditure exceeds the total tax provided for by statute and applicable to the particular appropriation or expenditure.

(b) Subsection (2)(a) does not apply to an appropriation or expenditure to suppress insurrection, defend the State, or assist in defending the United States in time of war.

(3) For any debt of the State, the Legislature shall provide by statute for an annual tax sufficient to pay:

(a) the annual interest; and
(b) the principal within 20 years after the final passage of the statute creating the debt.

(4) Except as provided in Article X, Section 5, Subsection (5)(a), the Legislature may not impose a tax for the purpose of a political subdivision of the State, but may by statute authorize political subdivisions of the State to assess and collect taxes for their own purposes.

(5) All revenue from taxes on intangible property or from a tax on income shall be used to

(a) support the systems of public education and higher education as defined in Article X, Section 2; and
(b) to maintain a statutory public education funding framework that:
(i) uses a portion of revenue growth for expenditures from the Uniform School Fund for changes in student enrollment and long-term inflation; and
(ii) provides a budgetary stabilization account;
(b) (c) to support children and to support individuals with a disability.and
(d) to support other state needs after the fulfillment of the requirements in Subsection (5)(b).

(6) Proceeds from fees, taxes, and other charges related to the operation of motor vehicles on public highways and proceeds from an excise tax on liquid motor fuel used to propel those motor vehicles shall be used for:

(a) statutory refunds and adjustments and costs of collection and administration;
(b) the construction, maintenance, and repair of State and local roads, including payment for property taken for or damaged by rights-of-way and for associated administrative costs;
(c) driver education;
(d) enforcement of state motor vehicle and traffic laws; and
(e) the payment of the principal of and interest on any obligation of the State or a city or county, issued for any of the purposes set forth in Subsection (6)(b) and to which any of the fees, taxes, or other charges described in this Subsection (6) have been pledged, including any paid to the State or a city or county, as provided by statute.

(7) Fees and taxes on tangible personal property imposed under Section 2, Subsection (6) of this article are not subject to Subsection (6) of this Section 5 and shall be distributed to the taxing districts in which the property is located in the same proportion as that in which the revenue collected from real property tax is distributed.

(8) A political subdivision of the State may share its tax and other revenues with another political subdivision of the State as provided by statute.

(9) Beginning July 1, 2016, the aggregate annual revenue from all severance taxes, as those taxes are defined by statute, except revenue that by statute is used for purposes related to any federally recognized Indian tribe, shall be deposited annually into the permanent State trust fund under Article XXII, Section 4, as follows:

(a) 25% of the first $50,000,000 of aggregate annual revenue;
(b) 50% of the next $50,000,000 of aggregate annual revenue; and
(c) 75% of the aggregate annual revenue that exceeds $100,000,000.[6]

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Utah ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this measure, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Support

Supporters

Officials


Arguments

  • State Sen. and amendment sponsor Dan McCay (R): “[The amendment will] protect and provide continued constitutional protections but then allow for ... revenue in the income tax fund to be used for other state purposes once we fulfilled our responsibilities for growth, and for student enrollment and long-term inflation.”
  • State Rep. Mike Schultz (R): "It’s time for us as a state to come together and figure out another way forward and how to balance our state’s budget. We have a constitutional duty to balance our state’s budget. We don’t get to make this decision. We can’t make this decision. This bill allows the citizens of the state to make the decision and I think that’s what we need to do."


Opposition

Opponents

Officials

Organizations

  • Utah Education Association

Arguments

  • State Rep. Brian King (D): "That is an inadequate safeguard to ensure that the children of the state of Utah are going to receive the benefit that they currently receive from our income taxes."
  • State Rep. Neil Walter (R): "I believe that the constitutional earmark has not actually failed, but in large measure, we’re here because of its success. By definition, the earmark restricts access to certain types of state resources, revenue in this case, and it acts as a constraint that limits the size of state government and the growth of state government."
  • Utah House Democratic Caucus: "We cannot support these measures to remove the constitutional earmark on public education funding because education funding is essential to our state’s future and should never be used as a bargaining chip. We strongly believe that education funding is non-negotiable and as Democrats, we believe we must continue to keep public education a priority. The tax cuts in H.B. 54 do not outweigh the benefits of removing the earmark on education funding. The language in S.J.R. 10 is vague and the House Democrats worry that the way it is written will result in a significant loss of investment into public education, making education funding subject to the whims of political tides."
  • State Rep. Angela Romero (D-25): "I support UEA’s decision to oppose SJR10, because this proposed amendment to the Utah Constitution contradicts the crucial need to invest in our public education system. By voting against the proposed constitutional change, you will be protecting Utah’s public school system and ensuring that every child has the opportunity to receive a quality education."


Background

Constitutional requirements for education funding in Utah

Currently, under Section 5 of Article XIII of the Utah Constitution, individual income taxes, corporate income and franchise taxes, as well as taxes on intangible property are constitutionally mandated to fund public and higher education in Utah. Tax revenue from these sources funds public elementary and secondary schools as well as public universities and colleges. According to Section 2 of Article X of the Utah Constitution, the Utah Legislature may also designate additional education institutions to receive state funding.[7]

Amendment G, 2018

See also: Utah Constitutional Amendment G (2018)

In 2020, Utah voters approved Amendment G by a vote of 54% to 46% to allow the Utah State Legislature to use revenue from income taxes and intangible property taxes to "support children and to support individuals with a disability." Going into the 2020 election, under the Utah Constitution, tax revenue from income taxes and intangible property could only be used to fund education.

Utah income tax revenue, 2018-2022

The total tax revenue from individual income taxes for the fiscal year 2022 was $6.77 billion. The total revenue from the corporate franchise and income tax for the fiscal year 2022 was $937 million. The Education Fund also received tax revenue from other sources including driver education fees and mineral production withholding. The total tax revenue collected for the Education Fund in 2022 was $7,756,512,564 ($7.76 billion).[8]

Utah Individual and Corporate Income Tax Revenue, 2018-2022
Year Individual Income Tax Revenue Corporate Income Tax Revenue Total
2022 $6,771,925,739 $937,045,419 $7,708,971,158
2021 $6,110,511,295 $742,697,439 $6,853,208,734
2020 $3,985,400,426 $355,874,698 $4,341,275,124
2019 $4,320,042,492 $520,917,624 $4,840,960,116
2018 $3,998,995,761 $447,934,375 $4,446,930,136

House Bill 54 (2023)

Utah House Bill 54, titled Tax Revisions, was passed along partisan lines with Republicans voting in favor and Democrats voting against. The bill passed in the Senate by a vote of 22-6 and in the House by a vote of 50-11. Among other changes to taxes, the bill was designed to reduce the income tax rate and repeal the state sales tax on food. The provision related to repealing the sales tax on food is contingent on voter approval of the constitutional amendment in 2024.[9]

House Bill 54 was designed to reduce the individual and corporate income tax rate from 4.85% to 4.65%, resulting in a reduction in income tax revenue by $6,670,000 in 2023, $475,400,000 in 2024, and $396,800,000 in 2025. The bill was designed to repeal the state sales tax (1.75%) on food and food ingredients beginning in 2025 if SJR 10 is approved by voters. The fiscal impact statement for the bill said "Under this change, a household that spends $6,000 annually on food/food ingredients would see tax savings of approximately $105 per year. In total, it is estimated that this change would decrease sales tax liability for taxpayers by approximately $83.8 million in FY 2025 and $211.1 million in FY 2026. Impacts would vary by household depending on the amount of expenditures on food and food ingredients." The bill was also estimated to reduce income taxes for individuals and businesses by $6,670,000 in FY 2023, $475,400,000 in FY 2024, and $396,800,000 in FY 2025 in aggregate.[10]

Referred amendments on the ballot

From 2000 to 2022, the Utah State Legislature referred 40 constitutional amendments to the ballot. Voters approved 35 (87.50%) and rejected five (12.50%) of the referred amendments. All of the amendments were referred to the ballot for general elections during even-numbered election years. The average number of amendments appearing on the general election ballot was between three and four.

Legislatively-referred constitutional amendments, 2000-2022
Total number Approved Percent approved Defeated Percent defeated Annual average Annual minimum Annual maximum
40 35 87.50% 5 12.50% 4 1 7

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Utah Constitution

In Utah, both chambers of the state legislature need to pass a constitutional amendment by a two-thirds vote during one legislative session to refer an amendment to the ballot.

The amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 10 on February 17, 2023. On February 28, 2023, the state Senate approved the amendment in a vote of 22-6, with Republicans in favor and Democrats opposed, with one Republican member absent or not voting. On March 3, the House approved an amended version of the bill by a vote of 57-17 with one member absent or not voting. On the same day, the Senate concurred with the House's substitute bill in a vote of 22-6, with Republicans in favor and Democrats opposed, with one Republican member absent or not voting[1]

Vote in the Utah House of Representatives
March 3, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 50  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total57171
Total percent76.00%22.66%1.33%
Democrat0140
Republican5731

Vote in the Utah State Senate
March 3, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 20  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2261
Total percent89.66%0.00%10.35%
Democrat060
Republican2201

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Utah

Click "Show" to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Utah.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Utah State Legislature, "S.J.R. 10 Proposal to Amend Utah Constitution - Income Tax," accessed March 11, 2023
  2. Utah State Legislature, "S.J.R. 10 Proposal to Amend Utah Constitution - Income Tax," accessed March 11, 2023
  3. Deseret News, "Utah voters will decide whether to remove restrictions on income tax, which primarily funds public education," accessed March 14, 2023
  4. Utah Policy, "House Minority Caucus statement on HB54 & SJR10," accessed March 14, 2023
  5. Utah State Legislature, "House Bill 54," accessed March 14, 2023
  6. 6.0 6.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  7. Tax.Utah.Gov, "Fiscal Year 2018 report, pg. 15," accessed March 25, 2020
  8. Tax.Utah.Gov, "Fiscal Year 2022 report, pg. 36," accessed March 14, 2023
  9. Utah State Legislature, "House Bill 54," accessed March 14, 2023
  10. Utah State Legislature, "House Bill 54," accessed March 14, 2023
  11. Salt Lake County Clerk, “Election Day Vote Centers,” accessed April 24, 2023
  12. 12.0 12.1 [https://voteinfo.utah.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/42/2020/05/Voter-Registration-Form5-20.pdf Utah Lieutenant Governor: Elections, “State of Utah Voter Registration Form,” accessed April 24, 2023
  13. 13.0 13.1 Utah Lieutenant Governor, “Learn how to register to vote,” accessed April 24, 2023
  14. Vote.Utah.gov, "State of Utah Voter Registration Form," accessed April 24, 2023
  15. Utah State Legislature, “Section 207 Registration by provisional ballot,” accessed April 24, 2023
  16. 16.0 16.1 Justia, "Utah §20A-1-102(2022)," accessed April 24, 2023