This site uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Interlocking nail treatment of diaphyseal long-bone fractures in dogs

R. Tass Dueland From the Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 (Dueland, Johnson); the Department of Companion Animal and Special Species Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606 (Roe); Puget Sound Animal Hospital for Surgery, 636 7th Ave, Kirkland, WA 98033 (Engen); Surgical Referral Service, 169 Littleneck Rd, Centerport, NY 11721 (Lesser).

Search for other papers by R. Tass Dueland in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Kenneth A. Johnson From the Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 (Dueland, Johnson); the Department of Companion Animal and Special Species Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606 (Roe); Puget Sound Animal Hospital for Surgery, 636 7th Ave, Kirkland, WA 98033 (Engen); Surgical Referral Service, 169 Littleneck Rd, Centerport, NY 11721 (Lesser).

Search for other papers by Kenneth A. Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MVSc, PhD
,
Simon C. Roe From the Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 (Dueland, Johnson); the Department of Companion Animal and Special Species Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606 (Roe); Puget Sound Animal Hospital for Surgery, 636 7th Ave, Kirkland, WA 98033 (Engen); Surgical Referral Service, 169 Littleneck Rd, Centerport, NY 11721 (Lesser).

Search for other papers by Simon C. Roe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
,
Mark H. Engen From the Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 (Dueland, Johnson); the Department of Companion Animal and Special Species Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606 (Roe); Puget Sound Animal Hospital for Surgery, 636 7th Ave, Kirkland, WA 98033 (Engen); Surgical Referral Service, 169 Littleneck Rd, Centerport, NY 11721 (Lesser).

Search for other papers by Mark H. Engen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Arnold S. Lesser From the Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 (Dueland, Johnson); the Department of Companion Animal and Special Species Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606 (Roe); Puget Sound Animal Hospital for Surgery, 636 7th Ave, Kirkland, WA 98033 (Engen); Surgical Referral Service, 169 Littleneck Rd, Centerport, NY 11721 (Lesser).

Search for other papers by Arnold S. Lesser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD

Click on author name to view affiliation information

Objective

To determine results of using interlocking nails (IN) for fixation of diaphyseal long bone fractures in dogs.

Design

Multi-center prospective clinical trial.

Animals

134 dogs with diaphyseal fractures of the femur (n = 92), tibia (23), or humerus (19); 11 had previous unsuccessful treatments, and 103 had comminuted fractures of which 70 were classified as unstable.

Procedure

All fractures were stabilized with 6- or 8-mm-diameter IN with 3.5- or 4.5-mm screws, respectively. Cerclage wires and an autogenous bone graft were used at the surgeon's discretion. Participating surgeons provided information on age, sex, weight, and breed of the dog, details of the surgery, details of any intra- or postoperative complications, fracture healing time, and limb function.

Results

Eight dogs were lost to follow-up evaluation. In 105 of the remaining 126 dogs (83%), fractures healed without complications. For these 105 dogs, limb function was excellent (n = 90), good (12), fair (2), and poor (1). Complications developed for 21 dogs (17%); limb function after additional treatment was excellent (n = 10), good (2), fair (5), poor (1), or unreported (3). Interlocking nails broke in 9 dogs; breakage was attributed to fatigue failure because of use of too small an IN or because of insertion of the IN so that a screw hole was positioned at the fracture site.

Clinical Implications

The high success rate and low complication rate suggest that IN can be used to stabilize diaphyseal fractures in dogs. Good technique is necessary for optimal results. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;214:59–66).

Objective

To determine results of using interlocking nails (IN) for fixation of diaphyseal long bone fractures in dogs.

Design

Multi-center prospective clinical trial.

Animals

134 dogs with diaphyseal fractures of the femur (n = 92), tibia (23), or humerus (19); 11 had previous unsuccessful treatments, and 103 had comminuted fractures of which 70 were classified as unstable.

Procedure

All fractures were stabilized with 6- or 8-mm-diameter IN with 3.5- or 4.5-mm screws, respectively. Cerclage wires and an autogenous bone graft were used at the surgeon's discretion. Participating surgeons provided information on age, sex, weight, and breed of the dog, details of the surgery, details of any intra- or postoperative complications, fracture healing time, and limb function.

Results

Eight dogs were lost to follow-up evaluation. In 105 of the remaining 126 dogs (83%), fractures healed without complications. For these 105 dogs, limb function was excellent (n = 90), good (12), fair (2), and poor (1). Complications developed for 21 dogs (17%); limb function after additional treatment was excellent (n = 10), good (2), fair (5), poor (1), or unreported (3). Interlocking nails broke in 9 dogs; breakage was attributed to fatigue failure because of use of too small an IN or because of insertion of the IN so that a screw hole was positioned at the fracture site.

Clinical Implications

The high success rate and low complication rate suggest that IN can be used to stabilize diaphyseal fractures in dogs. Good technique is necessary for optimal results. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;214:59–66).

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 512 512 136
PDF Downloads 78 78 12
Advertisement