Topic on User talk:Matlin

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Multichill (talkcontribs)

You seem to have added a lot of redundant incorrect claims like . Please clean up these incorrect edits. Will block if you're not responsive again.

Multichill (talkcontribs)

Never got any response. I'm reverting your batches and cleaning up your mess. I see you're already blocked. Let's keep it that way because this isn't working.

Matlin (talkcontribs)

It is wasting of good edits (on the verge of vandalism). Besides, there are still references to Q29999 in frwiki. Someone in the future (sooner or later) will repeat this batch, as I did many times. @Syced:, you should delete this too.

Ask @Emu: for immediate unblock, if I could edit, you can point me to the problematic batches that I will MANUALLY check, item by item.

He still blocks me for an unjustified reason (and so did you, but you have reflected on yourself - explaining it with a lack of time, but it's still better behavior than Emu or some administrators on Commons, which I appreciate).

Emu (talkcontribs)

As I said, I still think your block is necessary. The corresponding rationale in the blocking policy would be #1: local abuse because a pattern of local abuse has been established. I’m the fourth admin to block you for the same behavior so I somehow doubt that this is against policy. I might be wrong. Again, if you disagree, the right place would be to complain at WD:AN. Pinging me at random discussions won’t change much.

Reply to "Netherlands"