Skip to main content

Federal judges in Texas and Washington handed down two opposing rulings on the abortion pill mifepristone on Friday, jeopardizing access to the drug and putting the US Food and Drug Administration in a legally impossible situation.

In Texas, US District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk suspended the FDA’s approval of mifepristone. Kacsmaryk’s decision was riddled with false statements about medication abortion and the risks of mifepristone, which has been used by millions of women since it was first approved by the FDA 23 years ago. His order won’t take effect for seven days, allowing the federal government time to appeal. Within hours of the decision, both the US Justice Department and a manufacturer of mifepristone announced plans to challenge the ruling.

In Washington state, US District Judge Thomas Rice issued a separate ruling ordering the FDA to maintain the status quo for mifepristone by not blocking its availability.

For now, access to the drug remains unchanged. The anti-abortion movement has been trying to restrict access to medication abortion since before Roe v. Wade was overturned. While past attempts to challenge the FDA’s approval process were all summarily rejected, now the availability of the drug will ultimately be decided by higher courts.

The Texas lawsuit and the plaintiffs’ demand for a nationwide injunction represent the increasing aggressiveness of the anti-abortion movement to take aim at abortion access not only in conservative states controlled by Republicans, but also in deep blue states run by Democrats.

Follow here for all of Vox’s news, updates, and analysis on this developing story.

  • Nicole Narea

    Nicole Narea

    What two years without Roe looks like, in 8 charts

    FactsOnTheGround_Final_01
    FactsOnTheGround_Final_01
    Joan Wong, Paige Vickers/Vox; Getty Images

    For 49 years after Roe v. Wade, Americans had the right to obtain an abortion if they became pregnant. Then, two years ago, with Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court put an end to it.

    The Biden administration and some blue states — supported by a network of nonprofits focused on reproductive care — aggressively sought to compensate, while many red states enacted near-total bans on abortion.

    Read Article >
  • Anna North

    Anna North

    What is misoprostol? Crucial questions about the other abortion drug.

    Misoprostol, pictured, is a common ulcer drug that has been used for years in tandem with mifepristone. It can work on its own, too.
    Misoprostol, pictured, is a common ulcer drug that has been used for years in tandem with mifepristone. It can work on its own, too.
    Misoprostol, pictured, is a common ulcer drug that has been used for years in tandem with mifepristone. It can work on its own, too.
    Photo illustration by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

    A series of legal challenges working their way through the federal courts and now taken up by the Supreme Court has raised questions about the future of access to mifepristone, an abortion medication that is used in more than half of all US abortions with high effectiveness and few severe side effects.

    Mifepristone is the first of two drugs usually prescribed together to induce an abortion. The second, misoprostol, however, can be used to terminate a pregnancy on its own. The fate of mifepristone has been in limbo since April, and abortion providers have since scrambled to prepare for a new set of logistics and side effects that might accompany misoprostol-only abortion — all while evaluating the legal risks of providing a medication that is now sure to face increased scrutiny.

    Read Article >
  • Rachel M. Cohen

    Rachel M. Cohen, Keren Landman, MD and 1 more

    9 questions about abortion in America, answered

    A large hazy cloud dissipates in areas to reveal Misoprostol tablets, a woman crying, the Supreme Court building, a positive pregnancy test, dollar signs, early embryo cells, a figure in a hospital gown, women standing together, the words “Roe v. Wade,” and protest signs.
    A large hazy cloud dissipates in areas to reveal Misoprostol tablets, a woman crying, the Supreme Court building, a positive pregnancy test, dollar signs, early embryo cells, a figure in a hospital gown, women standing together, the words “Roe v. Wade,” and protest signs.
    Paige Vickers/Vox

    It’s been one year since the Supreme Court ruled in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that there was no constitutional right to an abortion in the US — a decision that overturned Roe v. Wade and 49 years of precedent.

    Since then, states have moved to restrict abortion rights. People seeking to end pregnancies across a wide geographic swath of America have wholly or nearly lost the right to do so. Doctors have said that the restrictions endanger their ability to care for patients. New battlegrounds have emerged over medication abortion, the most common form of abortion in the United States. And abortion, always a contentious political and social issue, has become a defining issue in national politics.

    Read Article >
  • Ian Millhiser

    Ian Millhiser

    The Supreme Court’s new abortion pill decision, explained

    Demonstrators rally in support of abortion rights at the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, April 15, 2023.
    Demonstrators rally in support of abortion rights at the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, April 15, 2023.
    Demonstrators rally in support of abortion rights at the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, April 15, 2023.
    Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

    The Supreme Court handed down a brief order on Friday in Danco Laboratories v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, a lawsuit asking the federal judiciary to effectively ban mifepristone, a drug used in more than half of all abortions in the United States.

    The most immediate impact of the Court’s new order is that the justices voted to stay lower court decisions that would have cut off access to mifepristone, at least for the time being. That means that mifepristone remains available, and that patients who live in states where abortion is legal may still obtain the drug in the same way they would have obtained it if this lawsuit had never been filed.

    Read Article >
  • Ian Millhiser

    Ian Millhiser

    The Supreme Court hits pause on the abortion pills lawsuit

    A crowd of people, seen from head-height, some holding signs in the air made from cardboard and paper with various slogans related to abortion, all in front of the white-pillared Supreme Court building.
    A crowd of people, seen from head-height, some holding signs in the air made from cardboard and paper with various slogans related to abortion, all in front of the white-pillared Supreme Court building.
    Protesters on both sides of the abortion question hold signs outside the Supreme Court building on January 22, 2023, in Washington, DC.
    Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images

    Justice Samuel Alito handed down a brief order Friday that temporarily hits pause on a high-profile lawsuit seeking to ban mifepristone, a drug used in more than half of all abortions in the United States. The most immediate upshot of this order is that mifepristone remains legal and fully available — for now.

    Alito’s order, known as an administrative stay, does not necessarily mean that the very conservative Supreme Court will resist the temptation to ban mifepristone. Appellate courts often issue such administrative stays in order to buy themselves time to fully consider the case, without being forced to rush because of an arbitrary deadline.

    Read Article >
  • Ellen Ioanes

    How to understand competing medication abortion rulings

    A protester standing in a crowd in front of the Supreme Court holds a cardboard sign supporting the abortion medications mifepristone and misoprostol.
    A protester standing in a crowd in front of the Supreme Court holds a cardboard sign supporting the abortion medications mifepristone and misoprostol.
    Pro-abortion and anti-abortion activists rally near the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on January 22, 2023.
    Celal Gunes/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

    Federal judges in Texas and Washington handed down two opposing rulings on the abortion pill mifepristone on Friday, jeopardizing access to the drug and putting the US Food and Drug Administration in an impossible situation.

    Matthew Kacsmaryk, a conservative federal district court judge in Texas, issued a long-awaited ruling Friday evening calling for the FDA to stay its approval of mifepristone, which has been deemed safe and legal for 23 years, while Thomas Rice, a federal court judge in Washington state, swiftly issued a directly contradictory decision.

    Read Article >
  • Ian Millhiser

    Ian Millhiser

    What happens now after that Trump judge banned abortion pills?

    In front of the Supreme Court buildings, with its white columns, a crowd holds up signs including one reading, “We will set each other free.”
    In front of the Supreme Court buildings, with its white columns, a crowd holds up signs including one reading, “We will set each other free.”
    Pro-abortion rights and anti-abortion activists rally near the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on January 22, 2023.
    Celal Gunes/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

    If you’ve followed the fight over where and whether abortion should remain legal in the United States, you’ve probably heard the name “Matthew Kacsmaryk.”

    Kacsmaryk is a former lawyer for a religious right law firm, who was appointed by then-President Donald Trump to a federal court in Texas. On Friday, he issued a decision ordering the Food and Drug Administration to withdraw its approval of mifepristone, a medication used in more than half of all abortions within the United States.

    Read Article >