Download PDF
J Wrist Surg 2024; 13(03): 230-235
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771045
Scientific Article

Trajectory of Recovery following ORIF for Distal Radius Fractures

Gabriel Larose 
1   Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
,
Darren M. Roffey
1   Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2   Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
,
Henry M. Broekhuyse
1   Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2   Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
,
Pierre Guy
1   Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2   Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
,
Peter O'Brien
1   Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2   Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
,
Kelly A. Lefaivre
1   Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2   Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
› Author Affiliations Funding/Sponsorship This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Distal radius fractures are commonly seen among the elderly, though studies examining their long-term outcomes are limited.

Purpose The aim of this study was to describe the 5-year trajectory of recovery of distal radius fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

Methods Patients with distal radius fractures (AO/OTA 23.A-C) treated by ORIF were prospectively studied. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score was measured at baseline (preinjury recall) and postoperatively at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years. Clinically relevant change in PRWE score was assessed using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

Results A total of 390 patients were included, of which 75% completed 5-year follow-up. Mean baseline PRWE score was 1.25 (standard deviation, SD: 2.9). At 6 months, mean PRWE score was at its highest up to 20.2 (SD: 18.4; p < 0.01). A significant improvement in mean PRWE score was observed at 1 year down to 15.2 (SD: 17.6; p < 0.01); 44% of patients were still one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 1 year. Further significant improvement in mean PRWE score occurred at 5 years down to 9.4 (SD: 13.4; p < 0.01); 29% of patients remained one MCID outside of their baseline PRWE score at 5 years.

Conclusion Recovery after ORIF for distal radius fractures showed significant worsening after surgery, followed by significant improvements up to 1 year and between years 1 and 5, albeit to a lesser extent. Statistically and clinically relevant wrist pain and disability persisted at 5 years. Future research should examine different treatment modalities and include a nonoperative treatment arm for comparison.

Level of Evidence Prognostic level II.

Keywords

radius - fracture - wrist - PRWE - MCID - patient-reported outcome measure - trajectory - disability - ORIF - trauma

Informed Consent

Necessary and appropriate informed consent was obtained from all patients before enrollment.


Institutional Ethical Committee Approval (for All Human Studies)

The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and received ethics approval from the clinical research ethics board at our institution.




Publication History

Received: 06 February 2023

Accepted: 15 June 2023

Article published online:
13 July 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Azad A, Kang HP, Alluri RK, Vakhshori V, Kay HF, Ghiassi A. Epidemiological and treatment trends of distal radius fractures across multiple age groups. J Wrist Surg 2019; 8 (04) 305-311
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Shauver MJ, Yin H, Banerjee M, Chung KC. Current and future national costs to medicare for the treatment of distal radius fracture in the elderly. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (08) 1282-1287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fogel N, Mertz K, Shapiro LM, Roe A, Denduluri S, Kamal RN. Outcome metrics in the treatment of distal radius fractures in patients aged above 50 years: a systematic review. Hand (N Y) 2022; 17 (1_suppl): 43S-49S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Anzarut A, Johnson JA, Rowe BH, Lambert RGW, Blitz S, Majumdar SR. Radiologic and patient-reported functional outcomes in an elderly cohort with conservatively treated distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2004; 29 (06) 1121-1127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Arora R, Gabl M, Gschwentner M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Lutz M. A comparative study of clinical and radiologic outcomes of unstable colles type distal radius fractures in patients older than 70 years: nonoperative treatment versus volar locking plating. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 (04) 237-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Grewal R, MacDermid JC, Pope J, Chesworth BM. Baseline predictors of pain and disability one year following extra-articular distal radius fractures. Hand (N Y) 2007; 2 (03) 104-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Modarresi S, Suh N, Walton DM, MacDermid JC. Depression affects the recovery trajectories of patients with distal radius fractures: a latent growth curve analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2019; 43: 96-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Brogren E, Hofer M, Petranek M, Dahlin LB, Atroshi I. Fractures of the distal radius in women aged 50 to 75 years: natural course of patient-reported outcome, wrist motion and grip strength between 1 year and 2-4 years after fracture. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011; 36 (07) 568-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lalone E, MacDermid J, Grewal R, King G. Patient reported pain and disability following a distal radius fracture: a prospective study. Open Orthop J 2017; 11: 589-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Thorninger R, Wæver D, Pedersen J. et al. Objective outcome measures continue to improve from 6 to 12 months after conservatively treated distal radius fractures in the elderly-a prospective evaluation of 50 patients. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (09) 1831
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rozental TD, Blazar PE, Franko OI, Chacko AT, Earp BE, Day CS. Functional outcomes for unstable distal radial fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation or closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (08) 1837-1846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ingall EM, Bernstein DN, Shoji MM, Merchan N, Harper CM, Rozental TD. Using the QuickDASH to model clinical recovery trajectory after operative management of distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2020; 3 (01) 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cheema AS, O'Brien PJ, Broekhuyse HM, Lefaivre KA. Measuring outcomes over time in distal radius fractures: a comparison of generic, upper extremity-specific and wrist-specific outcome measures. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2020; 2 (05) 272-276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 MacDermid JC. Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand Ther 1996; 9 (02) 178-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Marsh J, Bryant D, MacDonald SJ. Older patients can accurately recall their preoperative health status six weeks following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (12) 2827-2837
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bryant D, Norman G, Stratford P, Marx RG, Walter SD, Guyatt G. Patients undergoing knee surgery provided accurate ratings of preoperative quality of life and function 2 weeks after surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59 (09) 984-993
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ramoutar DN, Lefaivre K, Broekhuyse H, Guy P, O'Brien P. Mapping recovery in simple and complex tibial plateau fracture fixation. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B (08) 1009-1014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10 (04) 407-415
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Neufeld ME, Broekhuyse HM, OʼBrien PJ, Guy P, Lefaivre KA. The longitudinal short-, medium-, and long-term functional recovery after unstable pelvic ring injuries. J Orthop Trauma 2019; 33 (12) 608-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ko SJ, OʼBrien PJ, Guy P, Broekhuyse HM, Blachut PA, Lefaivre KA. Trajectory of short- and long-term recovery of tibial shaft fractures after intramedullary nail fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31 (10) 559-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Middleton SD, Guy P, Roffey DM, Broekhuyse HM, O'Brien PJ, Lefaivre KA. Long term trajectory of recovery following pilon fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2022; 36 (06) e250-e254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Walenkamp MMJ, de Muinck Keizer R-J, Goslings JC, Vos LM, Rosenwasser MP, Schep NWL. The minimum clinically important difference of the patient-rated wrist evaluation score for patients with distal radius fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (10) 3235-3241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57 (10) 1008-1018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41 (05) 582-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sleat GKJ, Lefaivre KA, Broekhuyse HM, O'Brien PJ. Predicting completion of follow-up in prospective orthopaedic trauma research. OTA Int 2019; 2 (04) e047
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Zelle BA, Buttacavoli FA, Shroff JB, Stirton JB. Loss of follow-up in orthopaedic trauma: who is getting lost to follow-up?. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29 (11) 510-515
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Mulders MAM, Kleipool SC, Dingemans SA. et al. Normative data for the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire. J Hand Ther 2018; 31 (03) 287-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar