Download PDF
J Wrist Surg 2024; 13(03): 264-271
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777024
Emerging Technologies and New Technological Concepts

Wrist Motion Assessment in Tennis Players using Three-Dimensional Motion Capture and Dynamic Electromyography

Jacqueline S. Israel
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Hand Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Stacy R. Loushin
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Orthopedic Research, Mayo Clinic, Motion Analysis Laboratory, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Sabine U. Tetzloff
3   Racquet Sports Department, Rochester Athletic Club, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Todd Ellenbecker
4   Rehab Plus Sports Therapy Scottsdale, ATP Tour, Scottsdale, Arizona
,
Kenton R. Kaufman 
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Orthopedic Research, Mayo Clinic, Motion Analysis Laboratory, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Sanjeev Kakar 
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Hand Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported by the United States Tennis Association Scientific Committee.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Tennis players often present with ulnar-sided wrist pain, which may reflect repetitive stress and/or faulty mechanics. There is a role for investigating the biomechanics of tennis strokes and how they may relate to wrist pathology. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether three-dimensional motion capture technology and dynamic electromyography (EMG), when used to study groundstrokes in elite junior tennis players, reveals patterns of upper extremity motion that may correlate with the development of clinically relevant pathology.

Case Description Three-dimensional kinematic and EMG data were collected from two United States Tennis Association-ranked adolescent tennis players during groundstrokes. There were several observed differences in the two players' degree and timing of pronation/supination, ulnar/radial deviation, and flexion/extension during their strokes.

Clinical Significance Advanced motion capture technology facilitates a nuanced understanding of complex movements involved in groundstroke production. This methodology may be useful for identifying athletes who are at risk for injury and guiding rehabilitation for players experiencing pain.

Level of Evidence IV

Keywords

tennis biomechanics - tennis injury - motion capture - tennis kinematics - wrist pain - sports injuries

Ethics Statement

The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008.


Authors' Contributions

All the above-named authors were actively involved in the planning, enactment, and writing up of the study.


Ethical Approval

Not applicable.


Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to participating in the study.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 20 July 2022

Accepted: 20 October 2023

Article published online:
30 November 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 International Tennis Federation Global Tennis Report. August 2021. Accessed October 10, 2021 at: http://itf.uberflip.com/i/1401406-itf-global-tennis-report-2021/0?
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gil JA, Kakar S. Hand and wrist injuries in tennis players. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2019; 12 (02) 87-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Blackwell JR, Cole KJ. Wrist kinematics differ in expert and novice tennis players performing the backhand stroke: implications for tennis elbow. J Biomech 1994; 27 (05) 509-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fu MC, Ellenbecker TS, Renstrom PA, Windler GS, Dines DM. Epidemiology of injuries in tennis players. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2018; 11 (01) 1-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Montalvan B, Parier J, Brasseur JL, Le Viet D, Drape JL. Extensor carpi ulnaris injuries in tennis players: a study of 28 cases. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40 (05) 424-429 , discussion 429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Spicer PJ, Romesberg A, Kamineni S, Beaman FD. Ultrasound of extensor carpi ulnaris tendon subluxation in a tennis player. Ultrasound Q 2016; 32 (02) 191-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stuelcken M, Mellifont D, Gorman A, Sayers M. Wrist injuries in tennis players: a narrative review. Sports Med 2017; 47 (05) 857-868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Busuttil NA, Reid M, Connolly M, Dascombe BJ, Middleton KJ. A kinematic analysis of the upper limb during the topspin double-handed backhand stroke in tennis. Sports Biomech 2020; 21 (09) 1046-1064
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 King MA, Kentel BB, Mitchell SR. The effects of ball impact location and grip tightness on the arm, racquet and ball for one-handed tennis backhand groundstrokes. J Biomech 2012; 45 (06) 1048-1052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Woltring HJ. A Fortran package for generalized, cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation. Adv Eng Softw 1978; 1986 (08) 104-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wu G, van der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJ. et al; International Society of Biomechanics. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion–part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 2005; 38 (05) 981-992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Erpala F, Ozturk T. “Snapping” of the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon in asymptomatic population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22 (01) 387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kibler WB, Safran MR. Musculoskeletal injuries in the young tennis player. Clin Sports Med 2000; 19 (04) 781-792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar