J
Scientists are extremely concerned about this rat's “dck.”
And for good reason — this, and several other nonsensical AI-generated images were openly credited to Midjourney in a peer-reviewed science paper published by the Frontiers Journal this week. The gibberish annotations and grotesquely inaccurate images it included are one example of the risks that generative AI poses to the accuracy of academic research.
Frontiers has responded and removed the offending paper:
Our investigation revealed that one of the reviewers raised valid concerns about the figures and requested author revisions. The authors failed to respond to these requests. We are investigating how our processes failed to act on the lack of author compliance with the reviewers’ requirements.
Most Popular
Most Popular
Google’s next streaming player looks nothing like the Chromecast
Amazon’s paid Alexa is coming to fill a $25 billion hole dug by Echo devices
One of the rarest NES games of all time goes up for auction today
Meta releases the biggest and best open-source AI model yet
Rivian CEO says CarPlay isn’t going to happen