The document discusses plans for a carbon transportation hub in Rotterdam called CINTRA. CINTRA would collect carbon dioxide from multiple industrial emitters via pipelines and barges, liquefy it, and transport it to offshore sinks such as depleted gas fields for storage. The hub concept aims to drive down costs by combining multiple carbon dioxide flows and linking pipeline systems. An initial launching scheme is proposed involving a power plant, hydrogen plant, and offshore enhanced oil recovery project in Denmark.
The document discusses the Distinguished Lecturer Program run by the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE). It is primarily funded by member donations and industry support. The program brings in expert lecturers to discuss topics like global warming, fossil fuels, and the linkage between human activity and climate change. The document outlines some of the key debates in this area between those who believe human activity is the primary driver of climate change and those who are more skeptical of this view.
Far East Energy - Corporate Presentation January 2014Company Spotlight
Far East Energy Corporation is a leading developer of coalbed methane resources in China. The company's large block in Shouyang has high permeability and gas content, making it one of the few large CBM blocks in China with this important characteristic. The block has over 440 Bcf of net proved and probable reserves and a post-tax NPV of over $2 billion based on a long term gas sales contract with favorable pricing. The block benefits from excellent infrastructure including multiple pipelines and markets with over 325 MMcf/d of potential offtake capacity, positioning Far East Energy for strong production and cash flow growth.
This document discusses Painted Pony Energy's position as a leading natural gas supplier in British Columbia for potential LNG exports to Asia. Key points:
- Painted Pony has a large, high-quality Montney gas asset base in BC that is well-positioned to supply proposed West Coast LNG export facilities.
- The company has increased production and reserves through continued development of its multi-layer Montney resource play, and is pursuing further growth through capital expenditures.
- Painted Pony utilizes cost-saving completion techniques and has a risk management strategy to hedge natural gas prices, supporting continued organic growth.
Dr. Per Christer Lund, Counsellor Science and Technology Norwegian Embassy in Tokyo, gave a briefing on CCS in Norway at the Global CCS Institute Japan study meeting in Tokyo on October 29, 2012
Green technology frontiers; Carbon capture and storage (CCS)Gassnova SF
Several large-scale CCS projects are underway worldwide to demonstrate the full CCS chain. Norway is a leader in CCS due to its technical expertise and early projects like Sleipner that has stored CO2 underground for over 16 years. The Norwegian state enterprise Gassnova oversees CCS demonstration projects in Norway, including the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad which tests carbon capture technologies. Gassnova also manages the planning for a full-scale
Increasing interest by governments worldwide on reducing CO2 released into the atmosphere form a nexus of of opportunity with enhanced oil recovery which could benefit mature oil fields in nearly every country. Overall approximately two-thirds of original oil in place (OOIP) in mature conventional oil fields remains after primary or primary/secondary recovery efforts have taken place. CO2 enhanced oil recovery (CO2 EOR) has an excellent record of revitalizing these mature plays and can dramatically increase ultimate recovery. Since the first CO2 EOR project was initiated in 1972, more than 154 additional projects have been put into operation around the world and about two-thirds are located in the Permian basin and Gulf coast regions of the United States. While these regions have favorable geologic and reservoir conditions for CO2 EOR, they are also located near large natural sources of CO2.
In recent years an increasing number of projects have been developed in areas without natural supplies, and have instead utilized captured CO2 from a variety of anthropogenic sources including gas processing plants, ethanol plants, cement plants, and fertilizer plants. Today approximately 36% of active CO2 EOR projects utilize gas that would otherwise be vented to the atmosphere. Interest world-wide has increased, including projects in Canada, Brazil, Norway, Turkey, Trinidad, and more recently, and perhaps most significantly, in Saudi Arabia and Qatar. About 80% of all energy used in the world comes from fossil fuels, and many industrial and manufacturing processes generate CO2 that can be captured and used for EOR. In this 30 minute presentation a brief history of CO2 EOR is provided, implications for utilizing captured carbon are discussed, and a demonstration project is introduced with an overview of characterization, modeling, simulation, and monitoring actvities taking place during injection of more than a million metric tons (~19 Bcf) of anthropogenic CO2 into a mature waterflood.
Longer versions of the presentation can be requested and can cover details of geologic and seimic characterization, simulation studies, time-lapse monitoring, tracer studies, or other CO2 monitoring technologies.
The Cameron LNG liquefaction project in Hackberry, Louisiana will develop natural gas liquefaction and export facilities next to its existing LNG terminal. The $10 billion project will include three liquefaction trains each with capacity of 4.5 million tonnes per year. It has received all necessary approvals and will create thousands of construction and permanent jobs. First commercial operation of the three trains is scheduled for 2019.
Undertaking Modelling of Flooding due to Wave Overtopping using the MIKE by D...Stephen Flood
Undertaking Modelling of Flooding due to Wave Overtopping using the MIKE by DHI Software Suite - Dr Suzie Clarke (DHI)
This presentation outlines the basis for one of the methodologies that can be followed in order to simulate the flooding of coastal areas due to overtopping of coastal defences by extreme or storm wave conditions. It is not expected that the slides are exhaustive in detail, nor present the only approach, but are provided to give basic guidance for all experience levels. Care is advised when following this methodology and all results should be subjected to reasonable checking.
Read the full Executive Summary here - http://s3.amazonaws.com/dhiuk_blog_storage/UGM_2014/Overtopping-with-BW-Guidance-Executive-Summary.pdf
Eia kpt deep water container port - reportzubeditufail
This document provides an environmental impact assessment report for the proposed Pakistan Deep Water Container Port (PDWCP) project located off the coast of Karachi, Pakistan. Key points:
1) The PDWCP project involves constructing breakwaters, dredging an approach channel and basin, and reclaiming land to develop a new deepwater container terminal that can accommodate larger ships.
2) Three alternatives were considered for the project location, with the preferred option being a new site east of the existing Keamari Groyne that provides the most direct channel access.
3) Potential environmental impacts of the project are assessed, along with mitigation measures. Key impacts include effects of dredging and disposal on water quality
CCUS in the USA: Activity, Prospects, and Academic Research - plenary presentation given by Alissa Park at the UKCCSRC Cardiff Biannual Meeting, 10-11 September 2014
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtreeSteve Wittrig
Brad Crabtree, "The critical role of CCS and EOR in managing US carbon emissions" in "CO2 Summit II: Technologies and
Opportunities", Holly Krutka, Tri-State Generation & Transmission Association Inc. Frank Zhu, UOP/Honeywell Eds, ECI Symposium Series, (2016). http://dc.engconfintl.org/co2_summit2/3
CCS Assessment in the Philippines - Carlo Arcilla and Raymond TanGlobal CCS Institute
This presentation was given as part of the CCS Ready workshop which was held in association with the 6th Asia Clean Energy Forum (20 – 24 June, Manila)
The workshop discussed the range of measures and best practices that can be implemented to prompt the design, permitting and construction of CCS projects when designing or building a new fossil fuelled energy or industrial plant.
The workshop hosted participants of the Asian Development Banks’ Regional Technical Assistance Program who updated the group on the outcomes of their individual projects.
This presentation provides an update on the current project being undertaken under the Asian Development Bank’s Regional Technical Assistance Program which aims to conduct an analysis of the potential for CCS, culminating in a road map for a CCS demonstration project in the Philippines.
Identifying By-passed Pay and New Reservoirs by Jeff Bayless of NutechDaniel Matranga
The document summarizes an analysis of a Gulf of Mexico reservoir using thin bed well log analysis and 3D geological modeling. Previous models underestimated oil reserves. New analysis using thin bed processing identified additional net pay and increased original oil in place estimates by 40%. The updated model recommends 3 new wells and 2 recompletions to further develop the field based on improved resolution of reservoir properties and connectivity.
CCS Projects Integration Workshop - London 3Nov11 - ROAD - CCS project integr...Global CCS Institute
This presentation was given at the Global CCS Institute/CSLF meeting on CCS Project Integration that was held in London on 3 November 2011. The aim of the meeting was to share experiences on CCS project integration; and to identify priority integration topics that need further attention to facilitate CCS project development and deployment.
You can view more presentations from the event at http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/community/blogs/authors/klaasvanalphen/2011/11/25/presentations-global-ccs-institutecslf-meeting-ccs
Riverside Energy Ltd is an Australian company exploring underground coal gasification (UCG) and conventional coal mining opportunities in the UK. It holds six granted UCG licenses and two applications in areas with large coal resources and infrastructure. UCG converts coal into syngas in situ and has the potential to help meet UK energy demands while reducing carbon emissions. Riverside plans to raise funds for a pilot UCG project and eventual commercialization, and also has near-term opportunities in conventional coal mining.
Falkland Oil and Gas has an active drilling program planned for 2015, with the goal of exploring and developing oil and gas resources in the Falkland Islands. They have secured a rig, the Eirik Raude, to drill 5 wells starting in Q1 2015. These wells are targeting over 1.3 billion barrels of prospective oil and gas resources across Falkland Oil and Gas' licences. The company has completed seismic data collection and interpretation to identify and de-risk drilling prospects. Their portfolio includes both high-impact exploration in the South Falkland basin as well as appraisal and development opportunities in the Sea Lion field in the North Falkland basin. Falkland Oil and Gas is fully funded
This document discusses impediments to developing Indonesia's gas reserves. It identifies infrastructure limitations like delays building a pipeline from Kalimantan to Java. Contract expiries and lack of policy on their renewal have reduced development. Technology issues include lack of subsea well use and solutions for high CO2 gas. Recommendations include investigating pipeline delays, resolving contract expiry policy, re-licensing smaller fields, supporting new technologies, and establishing a dedicated coal bed methane authority.
The document discusses emissions to air from ships and strategies for reducing air pollution beyond regulatory compliance. It outlines various air pollutants emitted from ships, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and sulfur oxides (SOx), and regulations from the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to limit these emissions. Methods for reducing ship emissions are discussed, including using low-sulfur fuel, exhaust gas cleaning systems, and operational measures like slow steaming. The document emphasizes that reducing emissions requires approaches throughout the combustion process, from fuel preparation to exhaust cleaning.
2013 iea - potential for CO2 storage in oil gas shale reservoirsSteve Wittrig
The document discusses potential implications of gas production from shales and coals for geological storage of CO2. It finds that exploiting gas from shales and coals increases permeability and injectivity, potentially enhancing CO2 storage capacity. However, large-scale demonstration is still needed to confirm CO2 storage capabilities and capacities. Overlap between potential shale gas areas and saline aquifer storage sites may be considerable geographically but less so in 3D, so both resources could be used with care. Injectivity issues like coal swelling upon CO2 injection require further research.
This presentation discusses the CINGSA natural gas storage facility and gas supply in Cook Inlet, Alaska. CINGSA began injections in 2012 and will allow storage of 11 billion cubic feet of gas to meet 45% of winter demand. While drilling activity has increased, production continues to decline, potentially leading to a supply shortfall by 2015. Importing liquefied natural gas (LNG) or compressed natural gas (CNG) is being evaluated as a way to ensure adequate supply until other options such as exploration or a new pipeline are developed. A decision on imports is expected in early 2013.
These slides were presented for the webinar CO2 EOR and the transition to carbon storage which was presented by Dr Ernie Perkins, a geologist based in Alberta, Canada, with over 20 years experience in carbon dioxide sequestration and acid gas/EOR.
Ernie currently works for both the Global CCS Institute and Alberta Innovates Technology Futures and presented an informative and educational dive into the realities and science of EOR.
The webinar can be viewed by visiting the Global CCS Institute website (http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/community/events/2011/08/17/co2-eor-and-transition-carbon-storage).
ELEMENTS OF A ROBUST CARBON CAPTURE, UTILIZATION, AND STORAGE BUSINESS MODELiQHub
(1) OGC Climate Investments has invested over $1 billion to accelerate greenhouse gas emissions reductions through carbon capture, utilization, storage, and other climate solutions. (2) Their CCUS portfolio includes investments in technologies to capture and utilize CO2 in cement and polyurethane production as well as projects involving gas-fired power, LNG, and industrial CCS with storage. (3) Evaluating CCUS projects requires considering technical and economic factors related to CO2 capture, transport via pipeline, and storage in geological reservoirs.
This document provides an overview of CO2 transportation for carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects, with a focus on CO2 pipeline transportation. It discusses past experience with CO2 pipelines, mainly in North America. It also covers safety and risk considerations for CO2 pipelines, including hazards from CO2 releases and impacts of impurities. The document examines factors that affect pipeline integrity such as corrosion, hydrate formation, and hydrogen embrittlement. It also discusses fracture propagation modeling and the need to account for solid CO2 formation during releases due to Joule-Thomson cooling. The presentation concludes by emphasizing the need for quantitative failure consequence assessment to fully evaluate CO2 pipeline hazard profiles.
The document discusses the goals and activities of the U.S. Department of Energy's carbon sequestration program. The program aims to develop technologies to capture and store carbon dioxide emissions from power plants and industrial facilities. This includes developing techniques to separate, transport and store CO2 underground, with a goal of reducing energy costs by less than 10%. The program also works to better characterize underground geological storage sites and ensure 99% of injected CO2 remains securely stored. A key part of the program is funding large-scale field projects through Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships to demonstrate carbon capture and storage technologies.
The document discusses the European CCS Demonstration Project Network. [1] It summarizes Europe's energy roadmap which indicates that CCS will make up 24-32% of EU electricity by 2050 and that new coal plants after 2025 will require CCS. [2] The network aims to share knowledge between large-scale CCS demonstration projects in areas like storage monitoring, modeling, and regulatory frameworks. [3] The goal is to facilitate commercial CCS investments within 15 years through collaborative learning.
This document provides an overview and update of the Caledonia Clean Energy Project (CCEP). It summarizes that CCEP aims to build a 570MW gasification power plant in Grangemouth, Scotland that would capture 94% of CO2 emissions from coal. It would transport the captured CO2 via existing pipelines to offshore storage. The project is currently finalizing a grant agreement and work program to further develop preliminary design and feasibility over 18 months. Long term, CCEP aims to be the anchor project for a full integrated CCS system in Scotland capturing from multiple sources and storing in multiple offshore locations while enabling enhanced oil recovery.
The document describes a 10 year research program in the Netherlands called CATO and CATO-2 that investigated carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies across the full CCS chain. The programs included applied and fundamental research, involved over 40 partners from industry, academia, and government, and had a budget of around 65 million Euros. Some key areas of research included developing lower-cost CO2 capture technologies, chemical looping combustion, post-combustion capture, CO2 transportation and storage, and monitoring technologies. The research programs helped advance CCS technologies and build expertise in the Netherlands toward the goal of implementing large-scale CCS demonstration projects.
This document discusses the potential role of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) in supporting carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) projects. It provides an overview of the CDM and describes how a CCS methodology was submitted for approval but the CDM Executive Board decided CCS project eligibility requires agreement from COP/MOP. Methodological issues for CCS projects are discussed as well as the requirements for registering a CCS project under the CDM. The document argues that the CDM can help increase returns for CCS projects and attract financing by generating saleable emissions credits.
AN INVESTOR VIEW OF POST-COMBUSTION CO₂ CAPTUREiQHub
This document provides an overview of challenges and opportunities for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) infrastructure investment. It discusses Wolf Carbon Solutions' existing CCUS hubs in Canada and proposed hub in the US. Key challenges highlighted include the high cost of post-combustion carbon capture from power generation and industrial sources. Risks for long-term CCUS infrastructure stakeholders include regulatory permitting delays, construction cost overruns, variability in carbon dioxide supply volumes, and uncertainty around long-term energy costs and carbon pricing policies. Alignment with carbon dioxide emitters is also important to de-risk infrastructure investments.
Summit Power Group is a developer of clean energy projects including carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. Sasha Mackler discussed Summit's focus on developing CCS projects to provide CO2 for enhanced oil recovery and produce low-carbon electricity. Mackler outlined two of Summit's major CCS projects - the Texas Clean Energy Project, a coal gasification facility that will capture 3 million tons of CO2 per year, and the Captain Clean Energy Project in the UK, which will capture over 3.8 million tons of CO2 per year from an integrated gasification combined cycle facility. Mackler noted that while CCS technologies are commercially viable, successful large-scale projects are still needed to demonstrate the business case for implementing C
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) aims to reduce CO2 emissions from large sources like power plants. It involves three steps: CO2 capture using technologies like post-combustion, pre-combustion, or oxy-fuel combustion; transportation mostly via pipelines; and geological storage in oil/gas reservoirs, unmineable coal beds, or saline aquifers. Challenges include the costs of infrastructure and risk of leakages from transportation or storage affecting the environment. CCS could help mitigate climate change but drawbacks need to be addressed.
This document discusses the Society of Petroleum Engineers Distinguished Lecturer Program. It provides the following key details in 3 sentences:
The SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program is funded primarily by the SPE Foundation through member donations and Offshore Europe. It allows industry professionals to serve as lecturers on topics like CO2 storage and CO2-EOR. Additional support is provided by AIME to further the program's educational mission.
Apec workshop 2 presentation 3 c burton global status of ccs-ccusGlobal CCS Institute
This document discusses carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies. It provides an overview of CCUS, the current global status, and why CCUS is seen as vital for meeting greenhouse gas reduction goals. It also summarizes the technology assessment, policy and market assessment, and understanding and acceptance assessment sections regarding CCUS deployment opportunities and challenges.
This document discusses carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology and provides context about the Qatar Carbonates and Carbon Storage Research Centre (QCCSRC). Some key points:
- CCS involves capturing carbon dioxide emissions from large point sources and storing it deep underground. It is seen as vital for reducing emissions from fossil fuel use.
- QCCSRC is a 10-year, $70 million research program focused on storing CO2 in carbonate rock formations. Carbonate reservoirs present unique challenges compared to sandstone reservoirs commonly studied.
- The research center involves collaboration between Qatar Petroleum, Shell, and Imperial College London. It aims to provide the science needed for safe, permanent CO2 storage in carbonate
This document discusses carbon capture and storage (CCS) as an approach to mitigating climate change. It describes the three main steps of CCS: capture of carbon dioxide from large emission sources like power plants; transport of the captured CO2; and underground storage. Several operational CCS plants are highlighted as examples. The document examines the costs and energy requirements of CCS technologies currently, but notes costs are expected to decline over time. It also explores the potential role of CCS in reconciling development of hydrocarbon resources with emission reduction goals.
On 28 October UKCCSRC Director Jon Gibbins and ECR member Rudra Kapila spoke at a meeting with the University of Edinburgh 'Engineers Without Borders' group. This focused on CCS applications in developing countries, where Rudra's practical experience of CCS engagement in India and wider climate negotiations was particularly relevant. While CCS was a somewhat unusual topic for EWB the shared concerns about dangerous climate change made for a very interesting discussion.
Global CCS Institute - Day 2 - Keynote - CCS Progress in CanadaGlobal CCS Institute
The panel discussed the costs and opportunities of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects using the Pioneer CCS project as a case study. The Pioneer project would have captured 1 million tonnes of CO2 per year from a coal plant for storage. It was estimated to cost $1.3 billion Canadian dollars overall but anticipated $500 million in revenues, for a net cost of $800 million or $80 per tonne of CO2 captured. Capture facilities accounted for 73% of total costs. The project was ultimately cancelled due to an inability to secure firm contracts for CO2 storage and emissions reductions.
Webinar : Setting up a Belgian Hydrogen Council - 10 novembreCluster TWEED
Saviez-vous que le gouvernement fédéral belge vient d'actualiser sa Vision & sa Stratégie Hydrogène ce mois d'octobre 2022 ? Saviez-vous qu'il soutient également l’initiative de WaterstofNet et du Cluster TWEED (via son écosystème H2Hub Wallonia) de créer un Belgian Hydrogen Council afin de regrouper les forces pour positionner nos entreprises belges à l’étranger et pour conseiller les différents gouvernements en Belgique.
Northern Lights: A European CO2 transport and storage project Global CCS Institute
The Global CCS Institute hosted the final webinar of its "Telling the Norwegian CCS Story" series which presented Northern Lights. This project is part of the Norwegian full-scale CCS project which will include the capture of CO2 at two industrial facilities (cement and waste-to-energy plants), transport and permanent storage of CO2 in a geological reservoir on the Norwegian Continental Shelf.
Northern Lights aims to establish an open access CO2 transport and storage service for Europe. It is the first integrated commercial project of its kind able to receive CO2 from a variety of industrial sources. The project is led by Equinor with two partners Shell and Total. Northern Lights aims to drive the development of CCS in Europe and globally.
Webinar: Policy priorities to incentivise large scale deployment of CCSGlobal CCS Institute
The Global CCS Institute released a new report highlighting strategic policy priorities for the large-scale deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS). The Institute’s report also reviews the progress achieved until now with existing policies and the reasons behind positive investment decisions for the current 23 large-scale CCS projects in operation and construction globally.
Telling the Norwegian CCS Story | PART II: CCS: the path to a sustainable and...Global CCS Institute
The document discusses carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the cement industry in Norway. It provides background on HeidelbergCement, one of the world's largest producers of building materials. It details a CCS project at Norcem's cement plant in Brevik, Norway, which aims to capture 400,000 tons of CO2 per year. The captured CO2 would be transported by ship and stored permanently underground in geological formations in the North Sea. The project represents an opportunity for CCS technology to be commercialized at a large scale. However, it depends on support through the FEED study process and a decision by the Norwegian Parliament and HeidelbergCement in 2020.
Telling the Norwegian CCS Story | PART I: CCS: the path to sustainable and em...Global CCS Institute
In 2018, the Norwegian government announced its decision to continue the planning of a demonstration project for CO2 capture, transport and storage. This webinar focuses on the Fortum Oslo Varme CCS project. This is one of the two industrial CO2 sources in the Norwegian full-scale project.
At their waste-to-energy plant at Klemetsrud in Oslo, Fortum Oslo Varme produces electricity and district heating for the Oslo region by incinerating waste. Its waste-to-energy plant is one of the largest land-based sources of CO2 emissions in Norway, counting for about 20 % of the city of Oslo’s total emissions. The CCS project in Oslo is an important step towards a sustainable waste system and the creation of a circular economy. It will be the first energy recovery installation for waste disposal treatment with full-scale CCS.
Fortum Oslo Varme has understood the enormous potential for the development of a CCS industry in the waste-to-energy industry. The company is working to capture 90 % of its CO2 emissions, the equivalent of 400 000 tons of CO2 per year. This project will open new opportunities to reduce emissions from the waste sector in Norway and globally. Carbon capture from waste incineration can remove over 90 million tons of CO2 per year from existing plants in Europe. There is high global transfer value and high interest in the industry for the project in Oslo.
The waste treated consists of almost 60 % biological carbon. Carbon capture at waste-to-energy plants will therefore be so-called BIO-CCS (i.e. CCS from the incineration of organic waste, thereby removing the CO2 from the natural cycle).
Find out more about the project by listening to our webinar.
Decarbonizing Industry Using Carbon Capture: Norway Full Chain CCSGlobal CCS Institute
Industrial sectors such as steel, cement, iron, and chemicals production are responsible for over 20 percent of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. To be on track to meet greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets established as part of the Paris Climate Accord, all sectors must find solutions to rapidly decarbonize, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is the only path for energy-intensive industries.
This webinar will explore how one country, Norway, is working to realize a large-scale Full Chain CCS project, where it is planning to apply carbon capture technology to several industrial facilities. This unique project explores capturing CO2 from three different industrial facilities - an ammonia production plant, a waste-to-energy plant, and a cement production facility. Captured CO2 will be then transported by ship to a permanent off-shore storage site operated as part of a collaboration between Statoil, Total, and Shell. When operational, Norway Full Chain CCS will capture and permanently store up to 1.5 million tons of CO2 per year.
During this webinar, Michael Carpenter, Senior Adviser at Gassnova, will provide an overview of the Norway Full Chain CCS, and discuss the value that Norway aims to derive from it. The key stakeholders working on this exciting project, and how they cooperate, will be also discussed. Gassnova is a Norwegian state enterprise focusing on CCS technology, which manages the Norway Full Chain CCS project.
Cutting Cost of CO2 Capture in Process Industry (CO2stCap) Project overview &...Global CCS Institute
The CO2StCap project is a four year initiative carried out by industry and academic partners with the aim of reducing capture costs from CO2 intensive industries (more info here). The project, led by Tel-Tek, is based on the idea that cost reduction is possible by capturing only a share of the CO2emissions from a given facility, instead of striving for maximized capture rates. This can be done in multiple ways, for instance by capturing only from the largest CO2 sources at individual multi-stack sites utilising cheap waste heat or adapting the capture volumes to seasonal changes in operations.
The main focus of this research is to perform techno-economic analyses for multiple partial CO2 capture concepts in order to identify economic optimums between cost and volumes captured. In total for four different case studies are developed for cement, iron & steel, pulp & paper and ferroalloys industries.
The first part of the webinar gave an overview of the project with insights into the cost estimation method used. The second part presented the iron & steel industry case study based on the Lulea site in Sweden, for which waste-heat mapping methodology has been used to assess the potential for partial capture via MEA-absorption. Capture costs for different CO2 sources were compared and discussed, demonstrating the viability of partial capture in an integrated steelworks.
Webinar presenters included Ragnhild Skagestad, senior researcher at Tel-Tek; Maximilian Biermann, PhD student at Division of Energy Technology, Chalmers University of Technology and Maria Sundqvist, research engineer at the department of process integration at Swerea MEFOS.
The Global CCS Institute and USEA co-hosted a briefing on the importance of R&D in advancing energy technologies on June 29 2017. This is the presentation given by Ron Munson, Global Lead-Capture at the Global CCS Institute.
The Global CCS Institute and USEA co-hosted a briefing on the importance of R&D in advancing energy technologies on June 29 2017. This is the presentation given by Alfred “Buz” Brown, Founder, CEO and Chairman of ION Engineering.
The Global CCS Institute and USEA co-hosted a briefing on the importance of R&D in advancing energy technologies on June 29 2017. This is the presentation given by Tim Merkel, Director, Research and Development Group at Membrane Technology & Research (MTR)
Mission Innovation aims to reinvigorate and accelerate global clean energy innovation with the objective to make clean energy widely affordable. Through a series of Innovation Challenges, member countries have pledged to support actions aimed at accelerating research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) in technology areas where MI members believe increased international attention would make a significant impact in our shared fight against climate change. The Innovation Challenges cover the entire spectrum of RD&D; from early stage research needs assessments to technology demonstration projects.
The Carbon Capture Innovation challenge aims to explore early stage research opportunities in the areas of Carbon Capture, Carbon Utilization, and Carbon Storage. The goal of the Carbon Capture Innovation Challenge is twofold: first, to identify and prioritize breakthrough technologies; and second, to recommend research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) pathways and collaboration mechanisms.
During the webinar, Dr Tidjani Niass, Saudi Aramco, and Jordan Kislear, US Department of Energy, provided an overview of progress to date. They also highlighted detail opportunities for business and investor engagement, and discuss future plans for the Innovation Challenge.
This webinar discussed two studies on achieving a low-carbon economy in the United States: the Risky Business Project and the U.S. Mid-Century Strategy Report. Four pathways were examined that could reduce US carbon emissions by 80% by 2050 through different technology mixes, including high renewables, high nuclear, high carbon capture and storage, and mixed resources. All pathways required upfront investments but achieved both emissions reductions and fuel savings over time. Implementation challenges included the pace of power plant construction, expanding the electric grid and building electric vehicle infrastructure. The webinar compared the pathways and findings to the U.S. Mid-Century Strategy Report.
Webinar Series: Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum Part 1. CCUS in the Uni...Global CCS Institute
The Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (CSLF) is a Ministerial-level international climate change initiative that is focused on the development of improved cost-effective technologies for carbon capture and storage (CCS). As part of our commitment to raising awareness of CCS policies and technology, CSLF, with support from the Global CCS Institute, is running a series of webinars showcasing academics and researchers that are working on some of the most interesting CCS projects and developments from around the globe.
This first webinar comes to you from Abu Dhabi – the site of the Mid-Year CSLF Meeting and home of the Al Reyadah Carbon Capture, Utilization & Storage (CCUS) Project. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is one of the world’s major oil exporters, with some of the highest levels of CO2 emissions per capita. These factors alone make this a very interesting region for the deployment of CCUS both as an option for reducing CO2 emissions, but also linking these operations for the purposes of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operations.
In the UAE, CCUS has attracted leading academic institutes and technology developers to work on developing advanced technologies for reducing CO2 emissions. On Wednesday, 26th April, we had the opportunity to join the Masdar Institute’s Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering, Mohammad Abu Zahra to learn about the current status and potential for CCUS in the UAE.
Mohammad presented an overview of the current large scale CCUS demonstration project in the UAE, followed by a presentation and discussion of the ongoing research and development activities at the Masdar Institute.
This webinar offered a rare opportunity to put your questions directly to this experienced researcher and learn more about the fascinating advances being made at the Masdar Institute.
Energy Security and Prosperity in Australia: A roadmap for carbon capture and...Global CCS Institute
On 15 February, a Roadmap titled for Energy Security and Prosperity in Australia: A roadmap for carbon capture and storage was released. The ACCS Roadmap contains analysis and recommendations for policy makers and industry on much needed efforts to ensure CCS deployment in Australia.
This presentation focused on the critical role CCS can play in Australia’s economic prosperity and energy security. To remain within its carbon budget, Australia must accelerate the deployment of CCS. Couple with this, only CCS can ensure energy security for the power sector and high-emissions industries whilst maintain the the vital role the energy sector plays in the Australian economy.
The webinar also detailed what is required to get Australia ready for widespread commercial deployment of CCS through specific set of phases, known as horizons in strategic areas including storage characterisation, legal and regulatory frameworks and public engagement and awareness.
The Roadmap serves as an important focal point for stakeholders advocating for CCS in Australia, and will provide a platform for further work feeding into the Australian Government’s review of climate policy in 2017 and beyond.
It is authored by the University of Queensland and Gamma Energy Technology, and was overseen by a steering committee comprising the Commonwealth Government, NSW Government, CSIRO, CO2CRC Limited, ACALET - COAL21 Fund and ANLEC R&D.
This webinar was presented by Professor Chris Greig, from The University of Queensland.
Webinar Series: Public engagement, education and outreach for CCS. Part 5: So...Global CCS Institute
The fifth webinar in the public engagement, education and outreach for CCS Series will explore the critically important subject of social site characterisation with the very researchers who named the process.
We were delighted to be able to reunite CCS engagement experts Sarah Wade and Sallie Greenberg, Ph.D. to revisit their 2011 research and guidance: ‘Social Site Characterisation: From Concept to Application’. When published, this research and toolkit helped early CCS projects worldwide to raise the bar on their existing engagement practices. For this webinar, we tasked these early thought leaders with reminding us of the importance of this research and considering the past recommendations in today’s context. Sarah and Sallie tackled the following commonly asked questions:
What exactly is meant by social site characterisation?
Why it is important?
What would they consider best practice for getting to understand the social intricacies and impacts of a CCS project site?
This entire Webinar Series has been designed to share leading research and best practice and consider these learnings as applied to real project examples. So for this fifth Webinar, we were really pleased to be joined by Ruth Klinkhammer, Senior Manager, Communications and Engagement at CMC Research Institutes. Ruth agreed to share some of her experiences and challenges of putting social site characterisation into practice onsite at some of CMC’s larger research projects.
This Webinar combined elements of public engagement research with real world application and discussion, explore important learnings and conclude with links to further resources for those wishing to learn more. This a must for anyone working in or studying carbon capture and storage or other CO2 abatement technologies. If you have ever nodded along at a conference where the importance of understanding stakeholders is acknowledged, but then stopped to wonder – what might that look like in practice? This Webinar is for you.
Managing carbon geological storage and natural resources in sedimentary basinsGlobal CCS Institute
To highlight the research and achievements of Australian researchers, the Global CCS Institute, together with Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research and Development (ANLEC R&D), will hold a series of webinars throughout 2017. Each webinar will highlight a specific ANLEC R&D research project and the relevant report found on the Institute’s website.
This is the eighth webinar of the series and will present on basin resource management and carbon storage. With the ongoing deployment of CCS facilities globally, the pore space - the voids in the rock deep in sedimentary basins – are now a commercial resource. This is a relatively new concept with only a few industries utilising that pore space to date.
This webinar presented a framework for the management of basin resources including carbon storage. Prospective sites for geological storage of carbon dioxide target largely sedimentary basins since these provide the most suitable geological settings for safe, long-term storage of greenhouse gases. Sedimentary basins can host different natural resources that may occur in isolated pockets, across widely dispersed regions, in multiple locations, within a single layer of strata or at various depths.
In Australia, the primary basin resources are groundwater, oil and gas, unconventional gas, coal and geothermal energy. Understanding the nature of how these resources are distributed in the subsurface is fundamental to managing basin resource development and carbon dioxide storage. Natural resources can overlap laterally or with depth and have been developed successfully for decades. Geological storage of carbon dioxide is another basin resource that must be considered in developing a basin-scale resource management system to ensure that multiple uses of the subsurface can sustainably and pragmatically co-exist.
This webinar was presented by Karsten Michael, Research Team Leader, CSIRO Energy.
Mercury and other trace metals in the gas from an oxy-combustion demonstratio...Global CCS Institute
To highlight the research and achievements of Australian researchers, the Global CCS Institute together with ANLEC R&D will hold a series of webinars throughout 2017. Each webinar will highlight a specific ANLEC R&D research project and the relevant report found on the Institute’s website. This is the seventh webinar of the series and presented the results of a test program on the retrofitted Callide A power plant in Central Queensland.
The behaviour of trace metals and the related characteristics of the formation of fine particles may have important implications for process options, gas cleaning, environmental risk and resultant cost in oxy-fuel combustion. Environmental and operational risk will be determined by a range of inter-related factors including:
The concentrations of trace metals in the gas produced from the overall process;
Capture efficiencies of the trace species in the various air pollution control devices used in the process; including gas and particulate control devices, and specialised systems for the removal of specific species such as mercury;
Gas quality required to avoid operational issues such as corrosion, and to enable sequestration in a variety of storage media without creating unacceptable environmental risks; the required quality for CO2 transport will be defined by (future and awaited) regulation but may be at the standards currently required of food or beverage grade CO2; and
Speciation of some trace elements
Macquarie University was engaged by the Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research and Development Ltd (ANLEC R&D) to investigate the behaviour of trace elements during oxy-firing and CO2 capture and processing in a test program on the retrofitted Callide A power plant, with capability for both oxy and air-firing. Gaseous and particulate sampling was undertaken in the process exhaust gas stream after fabric filtration at the stack and at various stages of the CO2 compression and purification process. These measurements have provided detailed information on trace components of oxy-fired combustion gases and comparative measurements under air fired conditions. The field trials were supported by laboratory work where combustion took place in a drop tube furnace and modelling of mercury partitioning using the iPOG model.
The results obtained suggest that oxy-firing does not pose significantly higher environmental or operational risks than conventional air-firing. The levels of trace metals in the “purified” CO2 gas stream should not pose operational issues within the CO2 Processing Unit (CPU).
This webinar was presented by Peter Nelson, Professor of Environmental Studies, and Anthony Morrison, Senior Research Fellow, from the Department of Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University.
Webinar Series: Public engagement, education and outreach for CCS. Part 4: Is...Global CCS Institute
Teesside Collective has been developing a financial support mechanism to kickstart an Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) network in the UK. This project would transform the Teesside economy, which could act as a pilot area in the UK as part of the Government’s Industrial Strategy.
The final report– produced by Pöyry Management Consulting in partnership with Teesside Collective – outlines how near-term investment in CCS can be a cost-effective, attractive proposition for both Government and energy-intensive industry.
The report was published on Teesside Collective’s website on 7 February. You will be able to view copies of the report in advance of the webinar.
We were delighted to welcome Sarah Tennison from Tees Valley Combined Authority back onto the webinar programme. Sarah was joined by Phil Hare and Stuart Murray from Pöyry Management Consulting, to take us through the detail of the model and business case for Industrial CCS.
This webinar offered a rare opportunity to speak directly with these project developers and understand more about their proposed financial support mechanism.
Laboratory-scale geochemical and geomechanical testing of near wellbore CO2 i...Global CCS Institute
To highlight the research and achievements of Australian researchers, the Global CCS Institute together with ANLEC R&D will hold a series of webinars throughout 2016 and 2017. Each webinar will highlight a specific ANLEC R&D research project and the relevant report found on the Institute’s website. This is the sixth webinar of the series and presented the results of chemical and mechanical changes that carbon dioxide (CO2) may have at a prospective storage complex in the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia.
Earth Sciences and Chemical Engineering researchers at the University of Queensland have been investigating the effects of supercritical CO2 injection on reservoir properties in the near wellbore region as a result of geochemical reactions since 2011. The near wellbore area is critical for CO2 injection into deep geological formations as most of the resistance to flow occurs in this region. Any changes to the permeability can have significant economic impact in terms of well utilisation efficiency and compression costs. In the far field, away from the well, the affected reservoir is much larger and changes to permeability through blocking or enhancement have relatively low impact.
This webinar was presented by Prof Sue Golding and Dr Grant Dawson and will provide an overview of the findings of the research to assist understanding of the beneficial effects and commercial consequences of near wellbore injectivity enhancement as a result of geochemical reactions.
Webinar Series: Public engagement, education and outreach for CCS. Part 3: Ca...Global CCS Institute
The third webinar in the public engagement, education and outreach for CCS Series digged deeper, perhaps multiple kilometres deeper, to explore successful methods for engaging the public on the often misunderstood topic of carbon (CO2) storage.
Forget bad experiences of high school geology, we kick-started our 2017 webinar program with three ‘rock stars’ of CO2 storage communication – Dr Linda Stalker, Science Director of Australia’s National Geosequestration Laboratory, Lori Gauvreau, Communication and Engagement Specialist for Schlumberger Carbon Services, and Norm Sacuta, Communication Manager at the Petroleum Technology Research Centre who all joined Kirsty Anderson, the Institute’s Senior Advisor on Public Engagement, to discuss the challenges of communicating about CO2 storage. They shared tips, tools and some creative solutions for getting people engaged with this topic.
This entire Webinar Series has been designed to hear directly from the experts and project practitioners researching and delivering public engagement, education and outreach best practice for carbon capture and storage. This third webinar was less focused on research and more on the real project problems and best practice solutions. It is a must for anyone interested in science communication/education and keen to access resources and ideas to make their own communications more engaging.
Water use of thermal power plants equipped with CO2 capture systemsGlobal CCS Institute
The potential for increased water use has often been noted as a challenge to the widespread deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Early studies, that are widely referenced and cited in discussions of CCS, indicated that installation of a capture system would nearly double water consumption for thermal power generation, while more recent studies show different results. The Global CCS Institute has conducted a comprehensive review of data available in order to clarify messages around water consumption associated with installation of a capture system. Changes in water use estimates over time have been evaluated in terms of capture technology, cooling systems, and how the data are reported.
Guido Magneschi, Institute’s Senior Advisor – Carbon Capture, and co-author of the study, presented the results of the review and illustrated the main conclusions.
Don’t Get Left Behind: Leveraging Modern Product Management Across the Organi...Aggregage
https://www.productmanagementtoday.com/frs/27009164/don-t-get-left-behind--leveraging-modern-product-management-across-the-organization
The challenge of delivering the right product at the right time while aligning with strategic objectives is more pressing than ever. Product management is evolving and gaining greater recognition as the means to creating this connection.
Join our upcoming webinar and learn how to streamline your product development processes, infuse product thinking across the organization, and bridge the gap between vision and delivery. During this webinar, we will discuss the nuances of product management in a rapidly evolving landscape, and provide insights into fostering collaboration, managing complexity, and driving efficient execution from strategy to delivery.
You’ll walk away from this webinar with insights into how you can:
• Increase customer value by strengthening alignment across your organization.
• Reduce costs by making small bets and cross organizational funding decisions.
• Ensure a synthesis between planning and implementation to quickly deliver value.
Innovation Hub_ Spotlight on Toms River's Role as a Beacon for Entrepreneuria...Philip M Caputo
As explained by Philip M Caputo, Tom's River New Jersey, is rapidly emerging as a vibrant hub of innovation and entrepreneurship. With its strategic location, supportive community, and rich history of resilience, this town is transforming into a beacon for entrepreneurial endeavors. Toms River fosters a dynamic environment where ideas flourish, and businesses thrive, from tech startups to creative enterprises.
تأسست مجموعة العرجاني عام 2010 لتكون داعمللاقتصاد المصري بمختلف مجالاته على سبيل المثال لا الحصر الاستيراد والتصدير والخدمات اللوجيستية والتطوير العقاري والتشييد والبناء والنقل والتنمية الزراعية والخرسانة الجاهزة.
أهم شركات مجموعة العرجاني :
شركة أبناء سيناء للتجارة والمقاولات: تعمل في مشاريع البنية التحتية والتجارة في أفريقيا والشرق الأوسط.
شركة أبناء سيناء للبناء والتشييد: متخصصة في البناء وتوظيف فرق عمل متميزة.
شركة مصر سيناء: تركز على استصلاح الأراضي وتعدين الرخام.
شركة NRD: تطور تقنيات بناء جديدة تناسب الظروف البيئية.
شركة إيتوس: متخصصة في الحراسة والأمن.
مؤسسة سيناء للخير: تهدف لدعم المجتمع من خلال المشاريع الخيرية.
شركة أورجاني للتطوير: تعمل في التطوير العقاري وإدارة الفنادق.
شركة إيجي ميكس: تنتج الخرسانة الجاهزة.
Patrick Dwyer resides in Miami, Florida where he proudly founded the Dwyer Family Foundation. Formerly with Merrill Lynch, Patrick has a long, successful career as a wealth advisor for high-net-worth clients. He currently works for Boston Private, and he gives his time to a number of charitable organizations including Telluride Science Research Center and Key Biscayne Community Foundation. He received his MBA at the University of Miami.
Satta matka guessing Kalyan result sattamatka➑➌➋➑➒➎➑➑➊➍
KALYAN MATKA | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA TIPS | SATTA MATKA | MATKA.COM | MATKA PANA JODI TODAY | BATTA SATKA | MATKA PATTI JODI NUMBER | MATKA RESULTS | MATKA CHART | MATKA JODI | SATTA COM | FULL RATE GAME | MATKA GAME | MATKA WAPKA | ALL MATKA RESULT LIVE ONLINE | MATKA RESULT | KALYAN MATKA RESULT | DPBOSS MATKA 143 | MAIN MATKA
Initial Resource Estimate:
74.9Moz at 980 G/T AgEq
Focused on Discovering High-grade, Quality Ounces.
The initial resource estimate on the high-grade silver “Waterpump Creek” zone of our 100% owned carbonate replacement deposit (CRD) was published in February 2024.
Our intact mineral system encompasses the past producing Illinois Creek gold-silver mine, the Waterpump Creek deposit, and the Honker gold prospect, which make up the CRD system in focus. 25 kilometers northeast of the Illinois Creek CRD are the Round Top copper and the TG North CRD prospects. All prospects were originally discovered by Anaconda Minerals Co. in the 1980's. Since 2010, WAM reassembled the Anaconda land package and has been actively exploring the district. WAM’s 100% owned claims cover 73,120 acres (114.25 square miles).
WAM brings together a team of seasoned professionals. Our strategic approach is underpinned by innovative exploration techniques and a deep understanding of the geological intricacies of the region.
Foodgasm Restaurant & Bar: A Vegetarian Oasis Where Flavor Explodes
Foodgasm Restaurant & Bar isn't your average vegetarian joint. We're a vibrant hub where innovative vegetarian cuisine meets a lively atmosphere, creating an unforgettable dining experience.
In today's competitive business environment, a well-defined marketing strategy is essential for
any organization aiming to achieve long-term success. A marketing strategy serves as a
comprehensive plan that outlines an organization's overall game plan for reaching prospective
consumers and turning them into loyal customers. It encompasses a company's value
proposition, key brand messaging, data on target customer demographics, and other highlevel elements. A robust marketing strategy is grounded in understanding the market,
analyzing consumer behavior, and identifying the most effective ways to communicate the
value of the company's products or services.
Zodiac Signs and Fashion: Dressing to Suit Your Astrological Stylemy Pandit
Discover how the 12 Zodiac Signs influence your fashion style with MyPandit! From bold Aries to dreamy Pisces, find out how to dress to suit your astrological personality.
United Kingdom's Real Estate Mogul: Newman George Leech's Impact on the Swiss...Newman George Leech
Understand the profound impact Newman George Leech has had on the Swiss real estate sector, managing €500 million in assets, while operating from the United Kingdom.
Michael Tetteroo and Cees van der Ben - CCS Projects – Presentation at the Global CCS Institute Members’ Meeting: 2011
1. Carbon IN TRAnsport
Launching project scheme
Implementation of LLSC study key findings
Melbourne
October 4th, 2011
Cees van der Ben & Michael Tetteroo
2. Note
This document and all information contained herein are the property
of
VOPAK, Anthony Veder, Gasunie & Air Liquide
and are Strictly Confidential
It may not be copied or used without the written permission of
VOPAK, Anthony Veder, Gasunie & Air Liquide
04-10-11 2
3. Rotterdam Climate Initiative (RCI)
city region CO2 reduction targets
-50%
vs 1990
by 2025
CCS plays a mayor role in the Dutch national reduction targets in
general and in the Rotterdam targets in particular.
04-10-11 3
4. NW-Europe allows for short links
between sources and sinks
Several depleted gas fields become available and in due time
incl. future aquifers: 50+ years of storage capacity for Europe.
04-10-11 4
5. Driving down costs
Sharing infra structure:
simultaneously handling CO2
from multiple parties
Combining CO2 flows lies in the
nature of CCS:
Power generation is responsible for 65%* of all green house gas emissions
OECD/IEA Ref. Scenario
2006 2030
Majority of sources
Total [TWh] 18921 33265 (+76%) are comparable
Coal 41% 44% regarding:
Nuclear 15% 10%
• Flow & conditions
Renewables 18% 23%
• Compositions
• Characteristics
• Demands
*): Reference Scenario in 2005 & 2030: resp. 61% & 68 % in CO2 eq. terms
6. CINTRA logistic concept
• Bulk making/breaking for off shore CO2 storage
• Intermediate Storage
• Combine and link pipeline systems and barging/shipping routes: 4 routes
• Provide independent custody transfer metering (for ETS)
• Network building block (at rivers and coast lines)
• Optimum CO2 : -50 ˚C, 7 bara
04-10-11 6
7. CINTRA’s CO2 Hub Partners
• Transport from the Emitters via pipelines or
barges
• Collection of CO2 to the CO2 Hub
• Loading of sea vessels / injection in trunk line
for transport to depleted offshore gas fields.
• Liquefaction at the Emitter’s
site or at the CO2 Hub
• Temporary Storage of CO2
• Connecting Hub to offshore
trunk line or transfer to
vessel
• Locking the sea vessel to a floating turret or loading tower
linked with the sub-sea system of the depleted gas/oil field
• Injecting the CO2 into the porous rocks (depleted gas or oil
field or aquifers, at required temp’s and pressures
• As an alternative, mooring near a platform for discharging
the CO2 into a depleted field via the platform utilities
04-10-11 7
8. CO2 Hub Concept Advantages
• Multiple emitters linked with multiple sinks , increasing reliability of
CO2 take-away
• Modular design allows easy volume related ramp up
• Variable destinations with liquid logistics
• Cost reduction through EOR
• Reduced project risk without onshore pipelines and onshore storage
04-10-11 8
9. How does it work
• MOVIE – will be shown during
presentation
04-10-11 9
10. Hub Concept Organic Growth Model:
Asset build up follows the volume build-up
Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 Source n
3
1
2 2
1. Early scheme: single source flow too 3. Final mature scheme:
small to justify off shore pipe multiple sources & sinks, both
2. Intermediate scheme: two combined depleted reservoirs and EOR
flows do allow for an off shore pipe at production wells
=> ship moves into alternative CO2 or
LPG service
2 3
3
1
2
Potentially
Ship now could ship that
become pipe used to sail
line for 2 on sink 1 Sink 3: EOR
Sink 1 Sink 1 Sink 2 Sink n
sources at oil field
04-10-11 10
11. Potential CO2 Sinks
Other EOR
300 Mton CO2 K12B Projects
capacity
Taqa
40 Mton CO2
capacity
CO2 from
other ports
• First targeted sink: Dan Field Danish Continental Shelf, EOR Project Maersk Oil
• Hub forms a reliable CO2 source for EOR projects, allowing for a stable off take
• More contacts with other sink operators at the North Sea
• Potential CO2 from other ports will drive down costs for all participants further
04-10-11 11
12. Rotterdam distance to sinks
• Dutch sinks are all within
the 400 km range
• Rotterdam Ideally located
for North Sea distribution
• Offshore EOR potential
significant
04-10-11 12
13. CO2 Hub
Legal/Contractual Framework
Providing a One-Stop-Shop
Transfer of CO2 title
SH SH SH SH
Emitter Rotterdam Cintra Sink Operator
Necessary
sub-contracting Compression Bulk making Sea
for other Liquefaction
specialized & Transport and terminal Transport
services
• CO2 title transfers from Emitter to sink Operator
• Transport organized via Service Level Agreements
04-10-11 13
14. CO2 Hub
Legal/Contractual Framework
• Emitters as CINTRA’s customers
• ETS allowances for Emitter
• CINTRA as multi-customer independent operator
no title to CO2
• CINTRA Transportation Agreements: long term take-
or-pay contracts
• TA’s and SLA’s based on repeatable formula
• Impartiality and transparency towards customers
• CINTRA has one TA per emitter, backed up by one
SLA per JV partner each
04-10-11 14
15. Stakeholder Management
Purpose:
mitigate risks associated with negative public perception for CCS
Type of Risks:
1. Negative image for companies involved
2. Delay in time
3. Extra costs / investments to be made
beyond a first class SHE strategy
Steps to come to Stakeholder Strategy:
• Step 1: - Actor and network analysis
• Step 2: - Inventarization communications and information options
• Step 3: - Link actual communication option to key stakeholders
• Step 4: - Execution in line with project development
04-10-11 15
17. Connecting Hinterland
Barges to CO2 Hub
Hub
Emitter
Emitter
• Liquefaction of CO2 at site
• River barges transport liquid CO2
over Rhine
• Cargoes from several sources can be
combined: economies of scale
Emitter
• Capacity on Rhine is abundant vs.
pipeline hardly feasible
04-10-11 17
18. Current project status
• Launching emitters:
– Coal fired power plant + post combustion capture 1.1 MTA
– Hydrogen plant 0.4 MTA
• Launching sink: Maersk off shore EOR operation
• Launching scope:
– On shore pipeline: 25 km, 40 bar
– Terminal: 2.0 MTA liquefaction capacity, 20 kcbm LCO2 storage
– Ships: 2 x 12 kcbm with onboard conditioning equipment
– Off loading: double buoy system
• Timing:
– LOI’s in place: Q4 2011
– FID: Q3 2012
– RFO: Q2 2015
– Challenge: synchronize timing & permitting
• Expected 2025 throughput: total 8 MTA of which 15 MTA via barge
04-10-11 18
19. Launching Scheme
Dan Field on the Danish
sector of the North Sea is
operated by Maersk Olie
og Gas AS on behalf DUC
– Dansk Undergrunds
Consortium.
Dan
• 1.5 MTA of CO2
• Rotterdam Denmark
• EOR
CINTRA
04-10-11 19
20. GCCSI LLSC study
lessons learned to date
General
• Start engineering at the sink
• Minimize CO2 composition requirements
• Combining multiple emitters in one network is technically feasible.
• No metallurgical/corrosion issues found other than water => dry the
CO2 at the source
SHE
• No items of concern encountered
• Low vessel collision risk due to high LCO2 density
• On shore pipeline through busy areas: 40 bar
Compression
• Up to 100 bar: bull gear compressor ; beyond: pump
• Moderate ambient temperatures: no power consumption difference
between conventional compression or
compression/liquefaction/pumping.
Pipeline
• In dense phase in order to minimize costs
04-10-11 20
21. GCCSI LLSC study
lessons learned to date
Costs: contract duration
Pipeline system tariffs are hurt the most by short term contracts
04-10-11 21
23. GCCSI LLSC study
lessons learned to date
Costs
• CO2 transportation is to be considered as a regular infra
structural project: 20+ year contract durations
• CO2 liquefaction’s energy intensity is relatively low =>
cost break even distances are
1. for on shore pipe versus barge: 200 km (and not 1500 km)
2. for off shore pipe versus ship: 150 km (and not 750 km)
• Depending on flow and distance the transportation costs
may vary from 20 to 120 €/ton
• Combining multiple emitters in one system is paramount
to make CCS affordable, especially for industrial
(smaller) emitters
04-10-11 23
24. GCCSI LLSC study
lessons learned to date
Legislation
• Biggest remaining uncertainties:
– CO2 custody transfer: who, when and to whom
– Monitoring requirements in the mean time
Barging/shipping
• No CO2 venting/re-liquefaction in transit
• Barge max. LOA 135 m → 150 m in the future
• Max barge size Ruhrgebiet → R’dam: 7500 tonnes (Ruhrgebiet →
Karlsruhe: 6000 tonnes)
• Required ship sizes: 10,000 - 30,000 m3
• Ship min. required off loading temperature: 0 ˚C
• sea water suffices as heat source for LCO2 “vaporization”
Ship off loading
• HP pressure CO2 unmanned off loading: technically feasible at acceptable
uptimes in deep and shallow water.
• Depleted reservoir’s existing wells require retubing
• Ship → sink batch injection technically feasible, multiple wells likely to be
required flow wise.
• Tubing: low temperature material of construction.
04-10-11 24
25. The offshore scope - shipping
450
• Depleted gas field NS 400
• Stand alone operation
Ship manifold pressure (bara)
350
•Stay above hydrate formation bottom hole 300
temperature: 13 ˚C 250
• Challenges: all solvable 200
Intermittent flow 150
Pressure over sink life time: 100
50
150 – 400 bar at well head
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time line (years)
3.5
Ship transport capacity [mmt/yr]
3
2.5
2
30,000 cbm ship
1.5
1
10,000 cbm ship
0.5
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
950
0
• Loading & discharge 2000 t/hr Distance [nm]
• Sailing speed 15 kts
• Voyage related spare 1 day
25
04-10-11 25