Sex is the only protected characteristic that is required to prove that providing appropriate services for that characteristic has to be shown to be "proportionate".
Even if you want to trust Labour, how can you when they have shown through their legislation that they just dont understand / dont care / dont empathise with women?
Labour destroyed the value of the EA for women with the GRA which over rides women’s protected characteristics – they didn’t care then, they don’t care now
IwantToRetire · 02/07/2024 20:00
Show more
InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 03/07/2024 19:40
What is your issue with the Equality Act? The EA states that service providers shouldn't discriminate on the basis of protected characteristics. For example a landlord shouldn't deny people housing because of their sex / race / age etc. The exemptions are to allow discrimination in certain circumstances, where proportionate. For example, a women's refuge can refuse entry to men, to protect women. There isn't a problem with the EA.
FallinUltra · 03/07/2024 20:20
On the off chance this is in good faith, there are two problems with the Equality Act.
The first problem is that it isn’t clear wether men with a GRC can use women’s single sex facilities and services, such as women’s refuges. The refuges don’t know whether they can legally exclude such men.
The second problem is the exceptions that allow discrimination on the basis of sex are optional. So even where a refuge understands that they can legally exclude men with GRCs, they will often be required to include them to acquire any funding. The funders, in turn, may be too intimidated by Stonewall and other trans lobby groups to fund any genuinely single sex services.
InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 03/07/2024 19:40
What is your issue with the Equality Act? The EA states that service providers shouldn't discriminate on the basis of protected characteristics. For example a landlord shouldn't deny people housing because of their sex / race / age etc. The exemptions are to allow discrimination in certain circumstances, where proportionate. For example, a women's refuge can refuse entry to men, to protect women. There isn't a problem with the EA.
PencilsInSpace · 03/07/2024 21:05
There isn't a right to women only services. The EA simply says it's not unlawful to provide them.
There is a right for women not to be discriminated against or harassed and the use of SSE is an obvious, explicitly lawful, means of preventing these.
Harassment is unwanted conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic that has the purpose or effect of violating your dignity, or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for you.
The nurses' case will be one to watch regarding this.
This reply has been deleted
This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines - previously banned poster.
IwantToRetire · 03/07/2024 21:08
There isn't a right to women only services. The EA simply says it's not unlawful to provide them.
Exactly - what this law did was say that what had been a natural practice is society of women only changing rooms, toilets or what ever, was no longer "natural". They could only exist is they were deemed legally to be "proportionate".
So intentionally or otherwise, the law upended social norms.
This reply has been deleted
This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines - previously banned poster.
This reply has been deleted
This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines - previously banned poster.
This reply has been deleted
This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines - previously banned poster.
This reply has been deleted
This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines - previously banned poster.
![](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.gov.uk/assets/static/govuk-opengraph-image-03837e1cec82f217cf32514635a13c879b8c400ae3b1c207c5744411658c7635.png)
The Reverend Canon J C Pemberton v The Right Reverend Richard Inwood, Former Acting Bishop of Southwell and Nottingham: UKEAT/0072/16/BA
Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment of Judge Eady on 7 December 2016.
https://www.gov.uk/employment-appeal-tribunal-decisions/the-reverend-canon-j-c-pemberton-v-the-right-reverend-richard-inwood-former-acting-bishop-of-southwell-and-nottingham-ukeat-0072-16-ba
Mumsnet Weekly Hot Threads
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
![Woman smiling and making heart symbol with her hands](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.mumsnet.com/assets/images/stock/heart.jpg)
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.