What I don't understand is the English ( UK?) habit of occasionally using a past tense verb in a present tense sentence. I assume this has been raised before and I apologise ( my search function does not seem to work at all) but I was wondering why?
Example" I'm just stood her waiting for the bus".
I'm not sure I've seen the words "standing " or "sitting" very much at all on mumsnet. It appears to be always "stood" or "sat".
Just asking out of interest.
Just found this topic apologies in advance for my errors.
marmarmalade · 23/06/2024 03:51
Thisismynewusernamedoyoulikeit · 23/06/2024 06:40
It's the weird phrasal verbs that change things. "I have just eaten a sandwich" is perfectly standard English. It's the present perfect sense, used to talk about something in the recent past. Similarly, "I've just stood on a piece of Lego" is standard use of present perfect.
So onto non-standard. The words "have just" act as auxiliary verbs in the above sentences. Without these, the tense changes. "I stood on a piece of Lego" may have happened at any time in the past.
So there is some logic to changing the phrasal verb to change the meaning. "I am stood in the corner" is clearly is happening in the present tense, because of the phrasal verb "am." It is non-standard English, but it actual conveys a different meaning in certain dialects. It implies a lack of agency. Perhaps someone put you in the corner? Perhaps you feel powerless to move away? It certainly conveys a different meaning to "I am standing in the corner." This is widely understood in some parts of the UK.
Non-standard English is not wrong if it conveys meaning. It is not a sign of lack of intelligence or pitiful education. Many people use non-standard English, knowing full well it's not a technically correct construction of the language. Yes, it makes things hard for foreign language learners, or even people who move from one English-speaking country to another. But it isn't lamentable or a sign that English people are bad at their own language. All languages develop over time. The formal codifying of language is a quite modern invention, and one that does not have a method for keeping up with changes in language over time.
maudelovesharold · 23/06/2024 15:11
What you can never correctly say is "I am stood in the corner".
You could, if it was a reply to someone asking “What happens every time you get something wrong?”
CoalTit · 23/06/2024 17:59
"It's the weird phrasal verbs that change things. "I have just eaten a sandwich" is perfectly standard English. ....
So onto non-standard. The words "have just" act as auxiliary verbs...
Non-standard English is not wrong if it conveys meaning... Many people use non-standard English, knowing full well it's not a technically correct construction of the language. ...
'When I use a word, Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean'.
@Thisismynewusernamedoyoulikeit, you have a different definition of a phrasal verb from everybody else, and a slightly different definition of auxiliary, and of verb ("just' is an adverb). It really does impede your communication.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.