Next Article in Journal
Plant Essential Oil Nanoemulgel as a Cosmeceutical Ingredient: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Dynamic Wrinkle Efficacy: Non-Invasive Peptides as the Future of Botox Alternatives
Previous Article in Journal
Itch-Relieving Cosmetics
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Comparative Efficacy and Safety of 250 μm versus 350 μm Long Microneedle Patch on Under-Eye Skin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Spotlight on the Potential of Microscopic Motile Algae as Novel Sources for Modern Cosmetic Products

by
Maya Stoyneva-Gärtner
1,
Blagoy Uzunov
1,* and
Georg Gärtner
2
1
Department of Botany, Faculty of Biology, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 8 blvd. Dragan Tsankov, 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Institut für Botanik, Universität Innsbruck, Sternwartestrasse 15, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cosmetics 2024, 11(4), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11040115
Submission received: 12 May 2024 / Revised: 3 June 2024 / Accepted: 25 June 2024 / Published: 9 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 10th Anniversary of Cosmetics—Recent Advances and Perspectives)

Abstract

:
The recognition and use of algae in the very trend-driven cosmetic industry is progressively increasing. Up to now, the main focus was on large seaweeds and a limited number of microalgae. However, motile microalgae, flagellates, remain underscored in this aspect, although some of them are utilized commercially. Flagellates from different taxonomic groups occupy various habitats and contain bioactive high-value multifunctional compounds, some of which are novel. Moreover, they may simultaneously produce different substances, which together with the development of downstream processing technologies, makes them a promising source for modern biotechnology. The present review covers data on 411 strains, 251 species from 110 genera from 6 phyla, and is oriented generally towards less explored flagellates. It demonstrates their great potential as bearers of interesting novel compounds that can be beneficially applied in modern cosmetics. Safety aspects of both sources and products are also discussed. Considering the gaps in the knowledge, the necessity to expand the research on both well-known and yet unexplored microalgae is shown, encouraging the development of upstreaming processes, including phycoprospecting. Last but not least, this paper outlines the role of living culture collections and of using good taxonomic expertise before running the biochemical tests, cultivation, and bioengineering experiments.

1. Introduction

Following the trends of modern lifestyle, the cosmetics industry currently is oriented towards natural bioactive ingredients, which appear to be not only of high cosmetic efficacy but are also less harmful compared to chemicals-based products [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] and may reduce the negative impact on the environment caused by synthetic substances [8]. Moreover, currently, a considerable amount of evidence points to the negative effects of the environmental stress driven by ultraviolet (UV) radiation and air pollution on skin and hair conditions, thus further reinforcing the need for safe natural substances that are able to effectively prevent or mitigate their deleterious effects [9,10]. Additionally, environmentally concerned consumers demand such safe personal care or cosmetic commodities to be obtained in novel eco-friendly and cost-effective processes in order to avoid over-exploiting of wild biological resources [1,11,12].
Therefore, the ever-expanding market led to the advancement of green technologies with the progressive search and exploration of novel compounds derived from different organisms [8,13]. The significantly boosted current interest in algae, which produces a great palette of useful bioactive substances [14], is compliant with this trend [9,10,15]. Over 15,000 novel compounds have been chemically determined [16] and many of these natural substances with antimicrobial, antifungal, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, antioxidant, anti-melanogenic, anti-aging, hypoglycemic, and immunosuppressive properties [1,2,3,4,5,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] are highly marketable. Cosmetic formulations may incorporate the whole algal cells or only some of the algal biologically active substances in face-, body-, hair-, dental- and personal-care products. In them, algae and their metabolites act as sunscreens, constituents in after-sun products, anti-wrinkle agents, moisturizers, texture-enhancing or thickening agents, tanning agents, whitening agents, and anti-cellulite agents [9,12]. Although very few of these novelties have been applied commercially [12], the number of such formulations is significantly expanding. In addition, nowadays some algal compounds are in the research focus due to their innovative applications in nanoproducts for modern cosmetics [19] and in the nutricosmetic formulations of combined food supplements and cosmeceuticals for improving skin care and delaying aging [24,25,26].
The term “algae” has no taxonomic standing but in an operational way embraces a large group (estimated between 30,000 and 1 million species [27]) of micro- and macroscopic, prokaryotic, and eukaryotic unicellular and multicellular organisms, which perform oxygenic photosynthesis since ca. 2 billion years and include ancestors of land plants [28,29,30]. Algae are characterized by great diversity regarding their lifestyle in different habitats, such as all aquatic environments (including hot springs), ice and snow, caves, soils, and all types of hard substrates like tree barks, rocks, walls, etc. [12,19,31]. Considering this variety of substrates and ecological conditions, algae bear different reproductive, cytological, biochemical, and morphological features that allow their adaptation and successful evolution.
Although in modern classification systems algal morphology is not used among the main taxonomical features, phycologists continue to use specific terms to describe the level of morphological differentiation of their thalli according to the morphological system developed by A. Pascher [28,32,33,34]. The morphological types include two main groups. First is the group of unicellular algae, which are divided according to their motile abilities and relevant ultrastructural features into four types: (1) flagellate (or also monadoid, or motile), which includes algae that are capable of active motion based on specific organelles named flagella; (2) palmelloid (or also capsular, or hemi-motile), which embraces algae in a common mucilage capsule that have ultrastructural organization of flagellate algae but have no flagella or bear false flagella (pseudoflagella) which allow motion only in extremophilic conditions; (3) rhizopodial (or, amoeboid), which is kept for algae that move by specific cytoplasmic protrusions, named rhizopods; and (4) coccal, which covers non-motile algae that do not bear specific motion organelles and are equipped with a thick, well-developed cell wall (Figure 1).
Algae in all these four types can live separately, as single cells, or can aggregate in colonies, or in so-called coenobia (specific colonies formed from sister cells with fixed cell numbers and fixed shapes) (Figure 1). In the cases of rhizopodial type, the cell aggregations are called plasmodia (Figure 1). The second large morphological group that embraces diverse multicellular algae, all of which are immotile, is not discussed in the present paper
Current reviews of the application of algal naturally derived products revealed the highest utilization of multicellular red, brown, and green marine macroalgae (seaweeds) [1,21], which offer different unique products of high biological value and can be directly collected from natural habitats [1,11,21,23,35]. Over the years, the scientific community also recognized the extreme potential of cultivated microalgae as producers of multipurpose biologically active compounds [21,22,23,35]. However, there are substantial differences in the prices of natural and synthetic substances, thus encouraging the development of cost-effective technologies to meet this major challenge for the microalgal application in human affairs [36]. Up to now, most of the studies and industries utilize a few microalgal species, while many of the representatives of the algal fascinating realm remain unexploited [12,19]. Among the best-known explored genera are the unicellular and coenobial coccal algae, such as Chlorella and Scenedesmus, respectively, or multicellular filamentous algae such as Arthrospira (Syn. Spirulina p.p.) and Aphanizomenon [37,38]. By contrast, flagellate algae are less studied and less utilized, except for a limited number of genera such as Chlamydomonas, Dunaliella, Euglena, Haematococcus, and Tetraselmis [1,37,39,40]. Due to rich information on their ingredients and utilization, they shall be generally briefly noticed in the current review, which is aimed to show the yet unexplored potential of other, less-elucidated flagellate microscopic algae to provide effective high-value ingredients for modern cosmetics.

2. Materials and Methods

The literature search was performed using the Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, Google Scholar, and SciFinder databases together with the authors’ personal scientific libraries and archives.
In addition to Latin names of species, genera and higher taxonomic categories, keywords included the names of chemical substances, relevant skin and hair disorders, and different biological activities. Research on algae as food or food supplements, important for nutricosmetics [24,25,26], and on algal extracts or substances relevant only to the medicine or food industries are not included although further research may show possibilities for their application in the cosmetic industry. Due to the limited volume of this paper, when possible, references to more general reviews were preferred.
The term “cosmetics” is used in its broadest sense, embracing also the term “cosmeceutical”, in accordance with our previous reviews [12,19].
The classification follows the ten evolutionary lines and relevant eleven phyla (Figure 2) [28,41] with noting of the current taxonomical proposals by Adl et al. [42]. The nomenclature follows Algaebase [43], with the synonyms shown in brackets at the first appearance of the relevant currently accepted Latin name. The taxonomic position in detail and the habitat, or locality, generally are indicated for each species or genus at its first appearance in the text.
The flagellate morphological type does not occur only in the blue-green and red algal lineages, as well as in the lines of glaucocystophytes and chlorarachniophytes (Figure 2); in Streptophyta it is known only for the peculiar genus Mesotigma and is the only known morphological type in the phyla Cryptohyta, Euglenophyta, and Haptophyta. In the other phyla flagellate, vegetative cells do not appear in all of the species but do appear in some of the classes [28,41].

3. Results

Data on the different natural substances found in more than 411 strains of 161 taxa (159 species, 1 subspecies, and 1 variety) from 110 genera of flagellate algae from 6 evolutionary lines, represented by the phyla Chlorophyta, Ochrophyta, Euglenophyta, Pyrrhophyta, Cryptophyta, and Haptophyta, are presented below in the text. For easier reading, in this review, generally only phyla are mentioned, but for the more specific large phylum Ochrophyta that embraces the whole yellow-brown lineage, here we shall note that data were found on its classes: (1) Synurophyceae (silica-scaled algae), Raphidophyceae (raphidophyceans), and Olisthodiscophyceae (olisthodiscophyceans), in which all cells are monadoid, (2) Chrysophyceae (golden algae), Pelagophyceae (pelagophyceans), and Pinquiophyceae (pinguiophyceans), in which flagellate type occurs together with other morphological types, and (3) Dictyochophyceae (more popular as silicoflagellates), peculiar and disputable regarding its taxonomic position and inclusion in Ochrophyta because in this algae flagellum exists in addition to their general rhizopodial cell organization [41].

3.1. Flagellate Algae as Natural Pigment Sources

The diverse pigments of algae, such as chlorophylls, carotenoids, and phycobilins, are increasingly gaining the attention of the scientific community [44]. Their numerous health-promoting properties are unmatched by synthetic compounds, making algal primary and secondary pigments applicable in many areas, including pharmaceuticals and cosmetics [29,45]. Currently, algae are considered “emerging sources of bioactive natural pigments” [46] since many of their light-harvesting substances used in photosynthesis are only algal specific [47,48] and are produced in cells in high amounts [49].

3.1.1. Chlorophylls

Algae produce different types of chlorophylls (a, b, c, d, f), which occur in different combinations in each of their evolutionary lines, with only chlorophyll a being common in all of them [28,41,44,50,51]. At the end of the sixties of the 20th century, chlorophyll e with specific absorption spectra algae was extracted from two yellow-green algae but was not described chemically [51,52]. Chlorophyll content varies significantly depending on the species, cultivation conditions, and age of the culture [53].
Chlorophyll compounds are applicable in skin-care cosmetics because they are able to stimulate tissue growth and have wound-healing, antioxidant, antibacterial, anticancer, antimutagenic, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory properties [29,49,54,55,56]. The green motile Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is a popular model organism, known also for its high chlorophyll content, which can be used in different industries, including cosmetics [14,29,57,58]. Another unicellular flagellate alga considered a chlorophyll source is the marine haptophyte Diacronema lutheri (Syn. Monochrysis lutheri, Pavlova lutheri) [29,57,58,59] in which a content of 0.47 pg cell−1 was achieved [59]. The total content of chlorophyl a, c1, and c2 in another marine haptophyte, Isochrysis galbana, was measured as 2.87 mg g−1 dry weight (DW) during its cultivation in 100 L polyethylene bags with seawater [60]. However, up to now, chlorophylls are produced on a commercial scale mainly from spinach, common nettle, lucerne, and corn, although the chlorophyll content (ca. 7%) of microalgae is many-fold greater [38]. Moreover, according to our best knowledge, there is no commercial production of any chlorophyll type from flagellate algae yet.

3.1.2. Carotenoids

Carotenoids are essential live molecules, wellknown as antioxidants that protect cells from photo-oxidation caused in general by overexposure to UV radiation and, therefore, are widely used as anti-aging and sunscreen agents [12,37,61]. Besides photo-aging, the free radicals formed during the process, and their oxygen-containing subset, reactive oxygen species (ROS) in particular, may eventually lead to skin cancer and inflammatory disorder [37,46,61]. Therefore, carotenoids have been studied and applied for health and cancer prevention or treatment, but also for solving almost all problems related to skin beauty.
The most popular and best studied for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunoprophylactic, and antitumor activities and their UVprotective role carotenoids include astaxanthin, lutein, fucoxanthin, canthaxanthin, zeaxanthin, β-cryptoxanthin, and ß-carotene [37,46]. Some of them, such as lutein, are already used as colorants in cosmetics [37] and have the possibility to improve skin elasticity, in addition to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, photoprotection, and anti-carcinogenic activities [62]. The value of lutein derived from algae for industry and for cosmetics in particular is great because in algae it occurs in free, non-esterified forms contrary to the lutein extracted from other sources, where it is ca. 95% esterified [12,23]. Together with lutein, canthaxanthin creates a tan color and has been used in skin tanning and suntan products [12,19,63,64]. Another multifunctional pigment is ß-cryptoxanthin, which has diverse health-promoting functions and may play a role in vitamin A function, but for cosmetics in particular is interesting as a skin-whitening agent [65] and as exhibiting anti-inflammatory properties [66]. Fucoxanthin is the only algal-specific natural pigment [47] among the abovementioned pigments. It has broad therapeutic activities and well-known antioxidant properties [67] that make it important for medicine, pharmacy, and agriculture, but it can also be employed as a functional ingredient in cosmetics [68]. The multifunctional ß-carotene (the precursor of vitamin A) is interesting for cosmetics due to its safety even at high doses and to its dermaprotective abilities against oxidative stress that allow it to not only slow down the skin aging processes and sun damage but also to inhibit proline oxidation in collagen, induced by UV radiation [69]. ß-carotene has strong anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties, especially in reducing the risk of developing skin cancer [29,69,70]. It has already been used in hair and personal care products, such as aftershave lotions and makeup [10,69,71,72], and in suntan formulations as well [12,69,71,72]. Application of encapsulated ß-carotene led to improvement of skin appearance by reducing roughness and increasing smoothness and also increased hydration with ca. 25% [69]. The same effect is achieved when it is applied in washing and hand-care creams [69]. In addition to all these multiple benefits, its importance for cosmetics comes from the fact that ca. 16% of ß-carotene permeates the skin, and its application may not only reduce skin pigmentation disorders (such as vitiligo, discolorations, post-acne discolorations, and melasma) but enhance their removal [69]. At the same time, an obstacle to its broader use is the well-established popular belief that this pigment permanently changes skin tone when applied topically since it is concentrated in the uppermost skin layers [69]. This is quite controversial since ß-carotene is able to inhibit melanogenesis and as such is useful in skin-whitening formulations [69]. However, the overall benefits allow this pigment to be pointed out as “one of the most valuable active ingredients used in cosmetics” [69] (p. 212). Microalgal zeaxanthin was suggested as useful in skin-whitening substituents due to its anti-tyrosinase activity [13,73]. Lycopene is another potent natural antioxidant, incorporated in personal care formulations as an antiaging agent, with possible application as a sunscreen and sunburn-preventing agent [12,19,63,64]. Astaxanthin is quite popular as a “superb antioxidant” because its antioxidant activity is stronger in comparison with other carotenoids, such as lutein, beta-carotene, and canthaxanthin [74,75] and it is shown to be 550 times more effective in scavenging ROS than vitamin E [36]. Therefore, astaxanthin is advantageous in many fields, including cosmetics, in which it is applicable as an anti-inflammatory and anticancer agent [1,76,77,78]. But in the cosmetics industry, it is best known as an attractive constituent in sunscreen and after-sun lotions for endurance and protection of the skin from premature aging and for the alleviation of skin photo-aging, because it reduces age spots and other blemishes or flakes by diminishment of ca. 40% of melanin amount in the trans-epidermal cells [12,13,29,36,78,79].
  • Astaxanthin in flagellate algae
Astaxanthin is commonly known as an abundant (45–72–92% of the total pigment pool) secondary pigment in the psychrophilic algae that cause red and orange snow events, namely Sanguina nivaloides (currently, according to Leya [80] to this species is transferred Chlamydomonas nivalis, with 91% astaxanthin content), Sanguina aurantia (72% astaxanthin content), Chlainomonas rubra, Chlainomonas sp. DR53, Chlainomonas sp. AS02, Chloromonas nivalis, Chloromonas hindakii, Chloromonas krienitzii, and Chloromonas polyptera [12,40,81,82,83,84,85]. However, in the absence of living cultures of Chlamydomonas nivalis [80] and of carotenogenic strains of Chlainomonas deposited into public collections [40], they cannot be regarded as promising sources of this important carotenoid [80]. On a commercial scale, currently, astaxanthin is obtained from 11 green microalgae [86] but out of them its main source is the widely spread green freshwater flagellate Haematococcus lacustris (Syn. Haematococcus pluvialis) [16,29,46,75,77,80,86,87,88,89,90]. In this alga, depending on the cultivation conditions, astaxanthin can reach 3.8–5.0% w/w [86] and even 8% of the cell DW [91]. However, experiments on intraspecific and interspecific variations of astaxanthin production demonstrated that cultivated strains had a lower productivity of this pigment compared to natural isolates of Haematococus lacustris, explainable by possible loss of photoprotective capacity during long-term cultivation [92]. The current study of the astaxanthin derived from Haematococcus lacustris clearly demonstrated that it can improve skin conditions in all layers not only in women but also in men after the combination of oral (6 mg per day) and topical (2 mL of 78.9 μM solution per day) applications [93]. Mechanisms for this improvement were clarified after a study of the effects of astaxanthin on the water channel aquaporin-3 (AQP3)—a protein of importance for skin moisture and function [94]. Two more species of the genus Haematococcus have been described not long ago from Europe, namely Haematococcus rubens and Haematoccus rubicundus [95]. Although both of them were proven as astaxanthin producers, Haematococcus rubicundus seemed to be more promising as a commercial source due to its higher specific growth rate in comparison with H. lacustris [92,95].
Some species of the unicellular flagellate genus Euglena from the separate euglenophyte evolutionary line (classified also in the supergroup Discoba in the Tree of Life [42]) can cause red water coloration (red blooms) in freshwater ponds and pools [40]. Such species are Euglena rubida and Euglena sanguinea, in which astaxanthin is the most abundant (ca. 69 and 75% of the total carotenoid content, respectively) [40,96,97]. In addition to astaxanthin, other valuable carotenoids were recorded in these species, such as mutatoxanthin (another major pigment in Euglena rubida [96]) or esters of astaxanthin precursors, adonixanthin, and adonirubin, which occurred in detectable amounts in Euglena sanguinea [97]. The high astaxanthin content boosts Euglena among the promising carotenogenic algae despite the absence of developed technology for industrial cultivation regarding carotenoid production [98,99]. However, many other experiments have been carried out to achieve its successful cultivation regarding high lipid production for biofuels (e.g., [99,100]). Currently, new genetic engineering methods for its industrial culturing for different biotechnological purposes have been developed [101]. One more freshwater euglenophyte alga, namely Trachelomonas volvocina, was proven to accumulate astaxanthin, but there are no available data on its production [40,102] and technologies for industrial cultivation. We note this, since the well-developed lorica around the cell of Trachelomonas may require specific techniques and more expenses for pigment extraction.
Red water blooms can also be formed by unicellular flagellate algae from a different evolutionary line—that of pyrrhophytes (known also as dinophytes, classified also in the SAR supergroup in the Tree of Life [42]). The best-known flagellate species (known as dinoflagellates) in this regard are the unicellular freshwater Tovelia sanguinea, which accumulates a high amount of astaxanthin esters and contains adonirubin and astacene [103], and Tovellia rubescens [104]. Although no industrial cultivation was achieved, both are included in the list of carotenogenic algae of Europe [40].
Astaxanthin was the main secondary carotenoid accumulated at the stationary growth stage of the unicellular marine haptophyte flagellate Diacronema vlkianum, in which the maximum carotenoid content was estimated as ca. 0.6–0.8% of cell DW [40,105,106].
  • ß-carotene, lycopene, ß-cryptoxanthin, lutein, zeaxanthin, and canthaxanthin in flagellate algae
Currently, ß-carotene is extracted from 14 green microalgal species, 4 of which are flagellates: 2 from the genus Tetraselmis (Tetraselmis wettsteinii, Tetraselmis sp.) and 2 from the genus Dunaliella (Dunaliella salina (Syn. Dunaliella bardawii), and Dunaliella tertiolecta) [37,75]. The extracts from Dunalliella have been most successfully scaled into industrial production [29,37,76,107,108,109,110,111]. In this case, the ecology of the genus Dunaliella, most species of which inhabit waters with high NaCl content, provides additional value due to the possibility for cultivation in salt waters in both low-tech extensive cultivation in lagoons and extensive cultivations in controlled conditions, thus helping to minimize the freshwater water footprint [107]. Moreover, Dunalilella salina was enlisted as a commercial source of zeaxanthin together with the snow flagellate Chlamydomonas nivalis and the coccal freshwater green Chlorella ellipsoidea [37]. Considering the current statement about the absence of living cultures of the extremophilic snow alga Chlamydomonas nivalis and its possible transformation to Sanguinea nivalis [80], it seems necessary to check taxonomically the strain(s) reported in the earlier literature. This note is valid for all further mentioning of Chlamydomonas nivalis in the text. Pigment studies also demonstrated the presence of ß-cryptoxanthin, particularly in Dunaliella salina [1,66], and pointed to lutein as another important pigment in different Dunaliella species [37,107]. In the extremophilic Dunaliella acidophila, which lives in freshwaters of low pH (0.2–2.5), lycopene and other major carotenoids (1.4% of the ethyl ether extract), namely, α-carotene, β-carotene, and γ-carotene, were found [112].
On a commercial scale, lutein and zeaxanthin are generally associated with some coccal algae from the green genera Chlorella s.l. and Scenedesmus s.l. [111]. However, seven green flagellates, namely Chlamydomonas acidophila, Chlamydomonas nivalis, Dunaliella tertiolecta, Pyramimonas urceolata, Pyramimonas sp., Tetraselmis wettsteinii, and Tetraselmis sp., were outlined as commercial lutein sources together with 21 green coccal microalgae [37]. In Chlamydomonas nivalis in particular, a lutein content of 15.6 mg 100 g−1 fresh mass has been reported [113]. Another species from the genus Chlamydomonas, the freshwater Chlamydomonas plantogloea, was also pointed out as a valuable lutein producer with an estimated content of 7.4 mg g−1 [114]. Achievement of high lutein productivity (5.08 mg L−1 d−1) under high light irradiation (625 μmol m−2 s−1) was also reported for the Chlamydomonas strain JSC4, thus demonstrating its great potential for outdoor cultivation [115]. High lutein amounts (4.24 mg g−1 and productivity of 3.25 mg L−1 per day) were achieved in the freshwater Chlamydomonas rehinardtii by controlling the cultivation conditions [39,116]. High lutein content (85.4 mg 100 g−1 DW) was detected in the marine green unicellular flagellate Tetraselmis suecica, which also contained significant amounts of α-carotene, ß-carotene, and violaxanthin [117]. From a marine strain of the same genus, namely Tetraselmis sp. CTP4, which was successfully produced in 100 m3 photobioreactors, the highest yield of lutein and β-carotene (ca. 622 and 618 µg g−1 DW, respectively) was achieved after a mechanical glass bead-assisted cell disruption [118]. Lutein is typical not only for green algae but is a pigment also found in another small evolutionary line—that of unicellular cryptophytes [62]. Considering their broad distribution, it seems promising to find commercially valuable strains among them.
Canthaxanthin was detected in samples that contain red phases of green flagellates inhabiting snow, such as the abovementioned Chlamydomonas nivalis [113]. It has been reported to only have been commercially obtained from some strains of Chlamydomonas nivalis and Haematococcus lacustris [37].
  • Fucoxanthin in flagellate algae
Fucoxanthin is an algal-specific pigment, typical for the yellow-brown evolutionary algal line (phylum Ochrophyta) and is commonly extracted on a commercial scale from large brown seaweeds (kelp), such as Laminaria japonica, Undaria pinnatifida, Hizikia fusiformis, Sargassum spp., and Fucus spp. [68,111]. In the last years, the interest in searching for new sources of this plentiful carotenoid has expanded to microalgae. They seemed to be a more reliable fucoxanthin source compared to macroalgae because of their shorter cultivation period, year-round production, and higher fucoxanthin content in comparison to kelp [67,68,119]. For example, this content has been estimated as 0.28–2.4 mg g−1 DW in macroalgae, while in ochrophyte saline microalgae, it is ca. 65 times higher (for details see [120]). Although the production of microalgal fucoxanthin is not yet economically feasible [29,67], the number of studies in this regard is gradually increasing. Most of them concern coccal microscopic algae, such as diatoms [67,121,122], but some also focus on the ochrophyte flagellates. Among them were (1) marine unicellular haptohytes Isochrysis zhangjiangensis [123], Isochrysis galbana [60,117,119,124,125,126], Isochrysis sp. CCMP1324 [127], Isochrysis sp. [128]), Tisochrysis lutea [129,130,131,132,133], Tisochrysis lutea strain CS-177/7 [120], Chrysotila carterae strain CCMP647 [120]), and Diacronema lutheri [134]; (2) unicellular golden Chromulina ochromonoides, Poterioochromonas malhamensis, Ochromonas sp. [135], (3) pelagophycean Sarcinochrysis marina [135], (4) olisthodiscophycean Olisthodiscus luteus (two strains) [135]; and (5) silica-scaled colonial Synura petersenii [135]. Moreover, fucoxanthin obtained from the golden flagellates Ochromonas danica, Ochromonas sp., from pelagophycean Sarcinochrysis marina, and from the haptophytes Isochrysis galbana, Isochrysis sp. and Prymensium parvum, has been used in commercial products [37,75,126]. In the cosmetic industry, for example, the fucoxanthin from Isochrysis galbana was exploited as a sunscreen [136].
The comparative experiments with six microalgae considering fucoxanthin production in different concentrations of NaCl showed that the lowest fucoxanthin producer, the unicellular haptophyte Chrysotila carteriae, at 35‰ salinity produces about 1.04 mg g−1, which was 60–80% more than that of halotolerant diatoms from the coccal genera Navicula and Amphora [120]. In Isochrysis galbana, the fucoxanthin comprised 1346 mg g−1 DW, accounting for ca. 76% of total carotenoids [117]. Tisochrysis can produce ca. 10 mg L−1 per day [129]. From Diacronema lutheri (“Pavlova lutheri strain OPMS 30543”) with productivity of ca. 5 mg L−1 per day, the maximum fucoxanthin titer of 17.8 mg L−1 was obtained using sodium nitrate medium [134]. Another microscopic unicellular flagellate from the same yellow-brown evolutionary line, such as the freshwater golden Poteriochromonas malhamensis, and especially its strain CMBB-1 [68] and the silica-scaled Mallomonas sp. SBV13 [137], has been pointed out to be valuable for commercial fucoxanthin production, showing productivity of 6 and 7 mg L−1 per day, respectively. The study of Poteriochoromnas malhamensis led to proposing a novel mode for fucoxanthin production by coupling extra illumination with heterotrophic high-cell-density fermentation to obtain a maximum fucoxanthin yield of 50.5 mg L−1 [68]. The first study of the golden unicellular flagellate Hibberdia magna seems very promising since it demonstrated high fucoxanthin content of ca. 13 mg g−1 DW [48].
Fucoxanthin was proved as the major carotenoid in the raphidophycean algae from the same yellow-brown evolutionary algal line. They are mentioned here separately because when species from all known rhaphidophycean genera have been examined; along with some other carotenoids, the unusual joint presence of zeaxanthin and violaxanthin was underlined by the researchers [138]. However, here we have to recall that such a common presence of both pigments (together with 35 other carotenoids) has been pointed out for another ochrophyte class, Eustigmatophyceae, which embraces only coccal algae [139] and is possible in blue-green and red evolutionary lines [28,41]. The current study confirmed the major role of fucoxanthin in strains of the marine Chattonella subsalsa, Chattonella marina, and Fibrocapsa japonica [140] but commercial production from these algae is not known.
  • Anthocyanins in flagellate algae
Anthocyanins, commonly known as strong antioxidants, and widely present in fruits and vegetables, are extremely rarely reported in algae [17]. They have been found for the first time in microalgae in small quantities in the peculiar Chlamydomonas agloeoformis, currently isolated from a freshwater high alpine lake in Ecuador [17].

3.1.3. Phycobilins

Phycobilins are accessory pigments, which absorb radiation between 400 nm and 700 nm (but mostly yellow light, 585–575 nm) [141,142]. They occur in three main unique types, such as phycocyanobilins (blue-colored), allophycocyanin, and phycoerythriobilins (red-colored), to each phycourobilin (yellow-colored), and phycoviolobilin (purple-colored, known also as cryptoviolin) were added [141,142]. Phycobilins are algal-specific pigments and even among algae are synthesized only in four evolutionary lines: blue-green, red, glaucocystophyte, and cryptophyte lines [28,41,142,143]. The first three of the types mentioned above appear in certain combinations and are included in specific microbodies, named phycobilisomes [28,41,141,144]. Phycobilisomes are not formed only in cryptophytes [28,41,141], and each organism contains only one type of phycobiliprotein [141]. In two cryptophyte strains, phycocyanins and phycoerythrins were combined with other bilins (bilin 618 and bilin 584), mesobiliverdin, and 15, 16 dihydrobiliversin [145,146].
For years, phycobilins have been applied mainly as fluorescent dyes due to their absorption abilities, but nowadays interest in them as food and nanotechnological, pharmaceutical, medicinal, and cosmetic substances, is increasing [62,141,142,143,147,148,149,150,151]. It has to be underlined that algal phycobilins are generally found in water-soluble protein-bound forms commonly known as phycobiliproteins (divided into phycoerythrins, allophycocyanin, and phycocyanins), which are commercially used. According to the current summarizing reviews [141,142,148], they are the only natural greenish or bluish colorants and are also pinkish-red colorants that can serve as safe alternatives of the synthetic ones, since no toxicity was recorded in studies using mice, rats, and human cell lines. Phycocyanin and phycoerythrin are constituents of hair and personal care products, in cosmetics and beauty products, and are used in lipsticks, eye-shadows, eyeliners, face make-up, and sun-protecting cream [10,62,143,148,152,153,154,155,156].
In addition, phycobilins have been proven as potent antioxidants able to scavenge ROS, inhibit lipid peroxidation, and chelate iron ions [141,144,157,158,159,160]. These properties may explain their multipurpose abilities, including the anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects [141] that serve for their potential application as anti-aging substances [161]. This, together with the discovery of their antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, dermaprotective, melagonesis-inhibiting, and wound-healing abilities [62,142,143,144,162,163,164,165], is of interest for modern cosmetics.
To date, mainly the phycobilins from the blue-green and red algal evolutionary lines have been explored [142,143,151,164], with less detailed research on the application of the cryptophyte phycobilins [166]. This is valid for the current state-of-the-art related to industrial algal cultivation for phycobilin production, in which, according to our best knowledge, flagellates are not involved despite their extraction and purification from cryptophytes have been successfully achieved [149]. However, currently, the interest in research on the group is rising [62,167].
According to their biliprotein type and its concentration (pg cell−1), cryptophyte genera were ordered as follows: (1) phycoerythrin containing Cryptomonas (2.3–40.4), Rhodomonas (2.6–13.9), Rhinomonas (3.3), Storeatula (14.6), Guillardia (0.9), Hanusia (1.9), Geminigera (6.6), Plagioselmis, and Teleaulax (no data); (2) phycocyanin containing Proteomonas (1.2–10.3), Chroomonas (6–12.2), Komma, and Flacomonas (no data); and (3) phycocyanin or phycoertryn containing Hemiselmis (PC615 and PC630—0.2–1.6, PC 577 or PE555–0.5) [62,168,169].
A comparative study of eight freshwater Cryptomonas strains (namely, Cryptomonas curvata CCAP 979/63, Cryptomonas erosa CPCC 446, Cryptomonas lundii CCAP 979/69, Cryptomonas marssonii CCAP 979/70, Cryptomonas ozolinii UTEX LB 2782, Cryptomonas pyrenoidifera NIVA 2/81, Cryptomonas pyrenoidifera CCAP 979/61 (previously Cryptomonas ovata), and Cryptomonas sp. CPCC 336) with two marine strains (Rhodomonas salina CCMP 757, Proteomonas sulcata CCMP 704) demonstrated much higher cellular phycoerythrin concentrations in Cryptomomas, suggesting that it may be a better source of phycoerythrin than the more extensively studied marine strains [167]. The marine Rhodomonas [155] and the freshwater Cryptomonas have been considered promising candidates, especially for the production of phycoerythrynes [155,169], whereas the whole genus Chroomonas has been reported as a great source of phycocyanin [62,169]. Since from each strain one phycobilin can be obtained, cryptophytes have significant advantages over all other phycobilin producers in which the phycobilisomes contain different pigments and need separation during the production process [62,155,167]. This, together with the lack of a developed cell wall, makes phycobilin processing easy and economically feasible [155]. The other advantages of cryptophytes can be found in the low molecular weight of their pigments compared to those from other algae, which increases their usability in fluorescent labeling [166] and in their ability to produce valuable fatty acids [167].

3.2. Flagellate Algae as Lipid Sources

Lipids are indispensable cell components and precursors to many important molecules. Microalgae accumulate high amounts of lipids (20–50% of the cell DW), mostly fatty acids and wax esters, during their growth [170,171]. Although hundreds of strains capable of such production have been reported, mainly regarding biofuel production [171], most of the studies were oriented towards coccal microalgae and far fewer concerned flagellates.
Comparative lipid analyses of ten oleaginous soil algal isolates, such as three cyanoprokaryotes, five unicellular coccal green algae, and two unidentified green flagellate species from the order Chlamydomonadales TGA3 and TGA5, demonstrated that green algae accumulate more lipids than cyanoprokaryotes [172]. Both flagellates, and the strain TGA3 in particular, were among the best-performing strains for open pond cultivation, exhibiting the highest growth rate 0.28 day−1 μexp, lipid accumulation (29.7 %), and biomass yield (134.17 ± 16.87 mg L−1 day−1) [172]. A high lipid content was proven also in green unicellular marine algae from the genus Tetraselmis [173]. In Tetraselmis strain KCTC 12236BP in particular, the highest lipid productivity of 36 mg L−1 per day was achieved during cultivation using yeast extract [173].
High lipid content was pointed out also for the freshwater golden unicellular flagellate Poteriochromonas malhamensis [68]. Experiments with another golden unicellular non-photosynthetic, but phagotrophic freshwater flagellate Ochromonas danica, fermented on ketchup, allowed a high cell yield (40%) to be achieved, with a total lipid content of 9.5 g L−1 DW with 38% maximum intracellular content [174].
Findings concerning value-added compounds from the specific lipid categories in flagellates are presented below following the updated LIPID MAPS comprehensive classification [175].

3.2.1. Fatty Acryls: Fatty Acids

Fatty acids comprise the major component of lipids, which can account for 20% to 50% of the dry biomass of microalgae, as was summarized in a review of the application of aeroterrestrial and extremophilic algae in cosmetics [19]. According to this review, in microalgae, 135 fatty acids have been recorded with a variety of applications as emollients, emulsifiers, softeners, and raw materials in soaps. An abundant total content of fatty acids (14% of ethyl ether extract) was discovered in the extremophilic Dunaliella acidophila [112]. The study of fatty acids in the marine unicellular raphidophycean flagellate Heterosigma akashiwo and two dinoflagellates (Alexandrium minutum and Karlodinium veneficum) in a bubble column photobioreactors under outdoor culture conditions revealed the highest biomass productivity (0.35 g·L−1 day−1), lipid productivity (80.7 mg lipid·L−1 day−1), and lipid concentration (252 mg lipid·L−1) for Alexandrium minutum [176].
An important type of lipids are polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), which occur normally in the skin epidermis and play key roles in the regulation of cell membrane fluidity, electron and oxygen transport, and cell and tissue thermal adaptation [16]. PUFAs are also able to prevent intracellular ice crystal formation playing a cryo-protective role [19,177]. In addition, evidence was collected that PUFAs produced by microalgae exhibit antibacterial, antiviral, antioxidant, and detoxifying capacities [75], and can mitigate several inflammatory and allergic reactions [19]. Therefore, PUFAs are significant for proper skin functioning and are used in cosmetics as surfactants in soaps and other skincare products, including those for wound healing and skin whitening [19].
PUFAs are beneficial also for hair care and it has been demonstrated that algal oil rich in omega 3 fatty acids provides deep nourishment to the hair follicles, can decrease dandruff production, reduce scratchy and itchy scalps and hair fall, and make hair stronger and healthier [13]. Of particular use in this regard are Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA, 22: 6n–3, or also 22:6ω3, 22:6) and Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA, 20: 5n–3, or also 20:5ω3, 20:5–3) produced by microalgae, which are desirable constituents regularly used in cosmetic commodities such as hair oils, hair serum, hair gels, and sprays [13].
The high content of unsaturated fatty acids (e.g., Linolenic acid C18:3 from Omega-3 group, and Linoleic Acid C18:2 and Arachidonic Acid C20:4 from Omega-6 group), 69% of total fatty acids, was achieved by changing the culturing conditions mentioned above for its high total lipid content Poteriochoroomonas malhamensis [68]. The chemical analysis of another golden unicellular flagellate, the freshwater Hibberdia magna, did not reveal high lipid content, but among its lipids, very valuable and diverse PUFAs were found in a non-negligible amount (more than 1 mg g−1 DW) [48]. They included three Omega 3 PUFAs (Alpha-linolenic Acid 18:3, Stearidonic Acid 18:4, EPA, and DHA) and four Omega 6 (Linoleic Acid, gamma-Linolenic Acid, Dihomo-γ-Linolenic Acid ethyl ester 20:3, and Docosapentanoic Acid C22:5ω6) [48].
A comparative study of 16 strains of the marine haptophyte genus Isochrysis revealed that the strains CL153180 and CCMP1324 are rich in DHA [127,178]. Earlier studies have demonstrated PUFAs in this genus as the predominant fatty acid group (37.93% of the total fatty acids) at 18 °C, and the predominance of saturated fatty acids at 26 °C [60].
Due to the high amount of Omega 3 (ω-3) fatty acids, Tisochrysis lutea is used for the production of human food complements and has been used for decades in aquaculture as feedstock for shellfish, oysters, and shrimps [179]. This microalga has a high content of long-chain PUFAs such as DHA [180] and stearidonic acid [179,181].
The percentage contribution of EPA to the total fatty acid content in different marine microalgae allows to point out microflagellates as safe, sustainable, and cheap sources of ω-3 PUFA although their EPA content was lower than those in the coccal green algal species (e.g., 45% in Mychonastes homosphaera, former Chlorella minutissima) [16]. In more detail, in the unicellular haptophytes Diacronema lutheri and Gephyrocapsa huxleyi (Syn. Coccolithus huxleyi, Emilianiya huxleyi), EPA comprises 19% and 17%, respectively, and in the unicellular marine Pseudopedinella sp. from the dictyochophycean class of the yellow-brown evolutionary line this percent is even higher—27% [16]. In the green unicellular flagellate Nephroselmis rotunda (Syn. Heteromastrix rotunda) EPA constitutes 28%, while in the unicellular cryptophytes Rhodomonas maculata (Syn. Cryptomonas maculata) and Chroomonas sp. it was 17% and 12%, respectively [16]. Examination of fatty acids in all known raphidophycean genera revealed the presence of 15 fatty acids, 5 of which were major, each of them constituting 8–21% of the total fatty acids [138]. Among them were Stearidonic acid and EPA, currently also confirmed as the main acids in the strains of Chattonella subsalsa, Chattonella marina, and Fibrocapsa japonica from the same class [140].
Regarding EPA, we would like to stress the well-known unusually high content of PUFAs in the members of the whole class Pinguiophyceae, and in its marine unicellular flagellate Phaeomonas parva and Phaeomonas sp. in particular [41,182,183,184]. This unusually high richness was the basis for choosing the class name using the Latin noun ‘pingue’ (=fat, grease). Amongst PUFAs, there is a strong predominance of EPA (23.5–56% of total fatty acids), which is typical for the class [41,182,183,184].
A comprehensive comparative study on the fatty acid composition was performed using 235 microalgal strains from all classes of Ochrophyta, Cryptophyta, and Haptophyta from the Microbial Culture Collection at the National Institute for Environmental Studies [183]. Among these strains, flagellates were spread as follows: (1) 8 golden algae; (2) 7 silica scaled; (3) 16 pelagophyceans; (4) 1 pinguiophycean; (5) 21 raphidophyceans; (6) 3 olisthodiscophyceans; (7) 18 cryptophytes; and (8) 43 haptophytes. EPA was found at >10% of the total fatty acid composition in 119 strains and DHA occurred in more than 10% of the total in 16 strains, most of which were haptophytes, and in two unidentified strains of pelagophycean algae. Strains from all ochrophyte classes, except golden algae and pelagophyceans, as well as the strains from cryptophyte algae, typically contained more EPA than DHA [183].
Other studies also confirm cryptophytes, such as the freshwater species from the genus Cryptomonas and marine species from genera Rhodomonas, Teleaulax and Proteomonas as good producers of the ω-3 PUFAs, and especially of EPA and DHA [185,186,187]. However, only some marine cryptophytes have been suggested for use in biotechnology [167,188], among which Chroomonas nordstedtii (Syn. Chroomonas mesostigmatica) was pointed for EPA extraction and Storeatula major—for both EPA and DHA [186].
The chemical analysis of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii demonstrated a content of ca. 20% of lipids [189]. They were composed of saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, or PUFAs with a length between 16 and 20 carbons, especially Alpha-linolenic Acid [39,190]. The current study of Chlamydomonas agloeformis revealed a high content of both saturated (particularly palmitic acid C16:0) and unsaturated fatty acids [17]. Considering the last ones, 50% of the total fatty acid content was constituted by two ω-3 fatty acids, namely Alpha-linolenic Acid and Linoleic acid (ca. 32% and 17%, respectively). These levels were much higher in comparison with their amount in another species of the same genus, Chlamydomonas planctogloea, characterized in an earlier study [114].
The amount of PUFAs and their detailed composition in extremophilic and aeroterrestrial algae regarding their utilization in cosmetics was currently reviewed [19]. Here, considering the potential of flagellates as PUFA sources for cosmetics, we shall recall that studies concerned cryophilic unicellular green Chloromonas alpina, Chloromonas hindakii, Chloromonas nivalis (incl. subsp. tatrae), Chloromonas polyptera, Chloromonas remiasii CCCryo 005–99, Chloromonas spp. and some uncultured species of the family Chlamydomonadaceae. In all of them, PUFAs (mostly ω3) were the major component of their total lipid content (45–50% of all fatty acids), predominating over saturated fatty acids (30–40%) and monounsaturated fatty acids (10–15%) [83,177,191,192,193].

3.2.2. Fatty Acryls: Fatty Acid Esters

Fatty acid esters comprise wax monoesters, wax diesters, lactones, etc. [175]. The sources and application of microalgal waxes in cosmetics were summarized [19], showing them as important and dermatologically well tolerated ingredients that may serve as texturizer agents for regulation of the viscosity of formulations and increasing their protective and lubricant properties for improving the rigidity, hardness, texture, and stability of lipsticks [194]. Waxes of flagellates are very poorly known, but one of the commercial sources of PUFAs and wax esters is Euglena gracilis [195]. Although its general content of lipids is not so high as in other microalgae, it has been stated by different authors that this euglenophyte flagellate has a competitive advantage due to the better wax esters/total lipid ratio (up to 0.8 g g−1), as lipids produced by most microalgae are typically fatty acids [196,197].
Lactones represent the second group of fatty acid esters and, by contrast with other organisms, including seaweeds, have been poorly studied in microscopic flagellates [19]. As in other algae, most research addressed the oxylipins (oxygenated derivatives of PUFA) due to their antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antiallergic activity and ability to alleviate damages caused by diverse kinds of stress, desiccation, wounds, and pathogen infections [19,198,199,200]. The endogenous lipoxygenase-derived oxylipins were determined in the green unicellular freshwater/soil Edaphochlamys debaryana (Syn. Chlamydomonas debaryana) [199]. In Dunaliella acidophila, three methyl esters were identified as new for algae: methyl (9Z,13E,15Z)-18-hydroxyoctadeca-9,13,15-trienoic acid, methyl (9S)-hydroxyoctadeca-10E, 12Z,15Z-trienoic acid and methyl (9Z,12R)-12-Hydroxyoctadec-9-enoate [112].

3.2.3. Fatty Acryls: Hydrocarbons and Triadylglycerols

Hydrocarbons are a separate class in the category of fatty acids that embraces isoprenoids (terpenoids) and alkanes/alkenes (commonly written as alka(e)nes) and have an essential role in preventing water loss of tissues [201,202]. Therefore, they are applied in different ingredients, including those used in cosmetics [203]. Hydrocarbons are better explored in higher plants and cyanoprokaryotes but less studied in eukaryotic microalgae. Among them, research was focused mainly on green algae and on the well-known model alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [19,201,202,204]. In this species, a C17 alkene, n-heptadecene, was detected and a new, light-dependent pathway to convert C16 and C18 fatty acids into alka(e)nes was pointed out in microalgae [201]. Currently, hydrocarbons and their possible biosynthetic pathways are gaining more attention combined with bioengineering attempts to increase their production mainly in relation to their importance in biofuels [201,202]. Additionally, regarding the role of hydrocarbons in carotenoid synthesis, the number of examined species is enlarging, including for example the green flagellate Haematococcus lacustris [205].
Triacylglycerols are a separate class of fatty acids [175]. Their content in Dunaliella acidophila reached 5.2% of the ethyl ether extract, including trilinolenin, triolein, trielaidin, and tristearin [112].

3.2.4. Glycerolipids

Glycerolipids include (1) mono-, di- and tri-substituted glycerols, from which the best-known are acylglycerols [175], and (2) betaine lipids [206]. Glycerolipids have anticancer, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory activities, which make them attractive in dermal cosmetics [19]. However, data on their content in flagellates are scarce, despite the presence of betaine lipids has been proved in the plastids of green microalgae [19]. In particular, in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, betaine lipids replace phospholipids, which is typical for most eukaryotes [207].

3.2.5. Glycerophospolipids

Glycerophospholipids commonly occur in microalgae as key components of cell membranes, which may participate in responses to stress and are used in cosmetic ingredients as excellent emulsifying agents that can stabilize oil–water emulsions [19,194,208,209]. Yet, few investigations are available on their content in flagellates, among which is that of Chloromonas hindakii [83]. Its detailed study demonstrated that the content of Alpha-linolenic acid was up to twice higher in phospholipids than in neutral lipids and glycolipids [83].

3.2.6. Sphingolipids

This lipid class embraces ceramides, phosphosphingolipids, glycosphingolipids, and some others, including protein adducts [175]. Sphingolipids have great industrial potential due to their significant role in maintaining cell membrane integrity and antibiotic (antimicrobial and antiviral) activity [19]. This is especially valid for ceramides, which are spread in the stratum corneum of the skin and are significant for protective skin functions, serving as barriers for undesirable water loss or ingress of potentially harmful substances [210]. Their role in the alleviation of atopic dermatitis [210,211], enhancement of psoriasis treatment [212], prevention of tumor formation [213], and reduction in UV-induced wrinkle formation in skin photoaging [214], as well as the increasing of gene expression related to ceramide delivery in normal human epidermal keratinocytes [215], makes them important and desirable ingredients in cosmetic formulations for topical application [19].
Although most investigations have been oriented towards marine green and red macroalgae [19,216], results obtained on the structure and functions of sphingolipids in microalgae, and in flagellates in particular, look very promising for their cosmetic utilization. Identification and quantitative profiling of ceramides and glycosphingolipids in total lipid extracts from three strains of dinoflagellates Alexandrium minutum, Prorocentrum donghaiense, and Karlodinium veneficum, and from three strains of haptophytes, Isochtysis galbana, Isochrysis zhanjiangensis and Pleurochrysis carterae, revealed miscellaneous composition of ceramides with structural diversity in different species [217]. Moreover, in both microalgal groups, sphingolid long-chain bases different from those in high plants were discovered. The total amount of sphingolipids ranged significantly from 0.45 to 53 nmol mg−1 DW, with similarly notable ranges in different classes: ceramides (0.03–7.37 nmol mg−1 DW), monosaccharide ceramides (0.08–14.85 nmol mg−1 DW), disaccharide ceramides (0.12–12.45 nmol mg−1 DW), and trisaccharide ceramides (0.06–7.41 nmol mg−1 DW), respectively [217]. A novel ceramide bearing a 2-hydroxy-15-methyl-3-octadecenoyl moiety was isolated as a cellular constituent in the marine epiphytic dinoflagellate Coolia monotis [218]. Glycosylceramides have been detected in the marine Tetraselmis sp. [219]. In freshwater unicellular flagellates, sphingolipids were studied in Ochromonas danica [220] and in Euglena gracilis, in which monohexosylceramides have been identified and recommended for use as moisturizers in cosmetics [221].

3.2.7. Sterol Lipids

Sterol lipids, commonly known as sterols, are a specific lipid group, produced by all types of organisms with essential roles in their cell membrane structures and functioning [19]. Of special interest for cosmetics are the antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial properties of the sterols [19,62]. Although plant sterols (phytosterols) in general are commercially obtained from higher plants, currently, algae and microalgae, in particular, are regarded as their promising source due to their great variety and health benefits [10,19,222].
Sterol diversity in microalgae was documented by different authors. Data were summarized on detailed sterol composition of marine microalgae from the following taxonomic groups that contain flagellates: Ochrophyta (Chrysophyceae, Synurophyceae, Dictyophyceae, Raphidophyceae), Pyrrhophyta, Cryptophyta, Haptophyta (Coccolithophyceae, Pavlovaphyceae), Euglenophyta, Chlorophyta (Chlorophyceae) [223,224]. The most studied were Diacronema lutheri, Isochrysis galbana, and Dunaliella salina, out of which Diacronema lutheri achieved a total sterol accumulation of 5.1%. DW was suggested as a source for commercial phytosterol production [225]. In the same study, another flagellate, Tetraselmis sp. M8, was pointed as a top phytosterol producer (0.4–2.6% DW).
In Dunaliella acidophila, the sterol content was 6.4% of the ethyl ether extract, comprising β-sitosterol, isofucosterol, 24-methylenlophenol, and (24S)-methyllophenol (isolated for the first time in green algae) together with new, unidentified sterols [112]. Some novel compounds with important bioactivities have also been discovered in euglenophytes. Astasin, extracted from the colorless euglenophyte Astasia longa, which contains ergosterol, xylopyranose, and oxalic acid, significantly inhibits the growth of human lymphoma HL-60 cells [226].
The examination of 19 cryptophytes revealed that the major sterol in these flagellates is brassicasterol (C28H46O), but four others different phytosterols, including crinosterol (also named epibrassicasterol, C28H46O), β-sitosterol (C29H50O) campesterol (C28H48O), and stigmasterol (C29H48O), were also identified [62]. Brasisicasterol can act in blood vessel formation and is considered to have wound-healing potential [227]. This compound has been reported as having skin conditioning properties used in anti-aging cosmetic products, moisturizers, sunscreen, and body wash [228,229]. Crinosterol can be also used as an anti-aging factor [229] but stigmasterol is still considered to be the most valuable due to its anti-inflammatory effects and health-promoting benefits [62,230,231]. Stigmasterol was identified as the major sterol of Isochrysis galbana [60].
Although the diversity was revealed, commercial sterol extraction from microalgae is in its infancy due to low sterol content [224].

3.3. Flagellate Algae as Polysaccharide Producers

Polysaccharides are important macromolecules, consisting of connected monosaccharide units, which have specific gelling, texturizing, thickening, and stabilizing properties valuable for different industries, and for cosmetics in particular [39,232]. Moreover, they are known to act as immunomodulators, antioxidants, antitumor drugs, anticoagulants, antibacterial, and antiviral agents [233,234]. Algae produce polysaccharides in significant amounts and are recognized as their abundant resource, especially concerning the families of exopolysaccharides and sulfated polysaccharides [39,235].
Regarding flagellates, the production of polysaccharides is extensively studied in Chlamydomonas [39]. The exopolysaccharides of two Chlamydomonas species, namely Chlamydomonas oblonga (Syn. C. mexicana), Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, and Lobochlamys segnis (Syn. Chlamydomonas sajao), contained 6 to 9 monomers, in which dominant sugars were glucose, galactose, fucose, rhamnose, and arabinose [39]. According to the same study, the sulfated polysaccharides of Chlamydomonas demonstrated notable activity against different pathogenic bacteria, including Streptococcus spp. Earlier, other noteworthy activities, such as antioxidant and efficient anticancer properties against HepG2, HeLa, melanoma B16, and MCF-7 have been demonstrated for the sulfate polysaccharides of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [236].
Cryptophytes are another group of flagellates, known for the ability to synthesize exopolysaccharides [167]. Although they produce large amounts of these compounds, they have received little attention in this regard [237,238,239]. The first isolation of exopolysaccharides from a temperate soil strain of the genus Cryptomonas revealed its structure with two fractions, the first with 12 and the second with 16 different linkages, with a predominance of 1,4-linked galacturonic acid and 1,3-linked galactose in both fractions [237]. By contrast, the isolation of a complex heteropolysaccharide with 23 different linkages in the weak acid fraction and 14 in the strong acid fraction from a tropical reservoir strain of Cryptomonas tetrapyrenoidosa revealed that major components of the first fraction were fucose, N-acetyl glucosamine, galactose, and mannose [238]. From a strain of Cryptomonas obovata, isolated from a tropical shallow oxbow lake, extracellular sulfated fucose-rich polysaccharide was obtained [239]. In addition to fucose (42%), it contained also N-acetyl-galactosamine (26%), rhamnose (15%), and glucuronic acid, mannose, galactose, xylose, and glucose in small amounts [239]. Here, the rich fucose content is noticed, especially considering the studies that demonstrated the potential of fucose-containing sulfated polysaccharides from algae as skin-cancer preventive factors [233] and as strong anticoagulants [62,234].
Paramylon (β-1,3-glucan), a glucose polymer that is similar to cellulose, is a specific intracellular storage product of euglenophyte algae that can constitute over 80% of the DW [195,197,240] with 16 g L−1 culture reported as one of the highest paramylon titers (e.g., [197,241]). Paramylon and other β-1,3-glucans have multiple bioactivities, among which their antimicrobial properties are of interest for cosmetics [197]. Moreover, it can be applied in cosmeceuticals since it has been demonstrated that topical treatment by paramylon can promote wound healing [242]. An increase in this effect was observed when both paramylon and hyaluronic acid at a concentration of 200 mg L−1 on rats were applied and was explained by the increased corneal epithelial cell migration and suppression of the acute inflammatory reaction by corneal alkali burns [242]. The commercial microalgal source of paramylon is Euglena gracilis [195], considered unique in this respect among other microalgae [101]. Numerous studies regarding possibilities to enhance paramylon production by using different cultivation techniques and cost-effective media have been published (for details, see [243]).
Another flagellate, capable of storing β-1,3-glucan in a soluble form, is Poterioochromonas malhamensis [244]. The accumulation of this valuable product in high enough amounts feasible for commercial production (up to 55% of the cell DW) was achieved during high-cell density cultivation under heterotrophic conditions [244].

3.4. Flagellate Algae as Alcohol Sources

Glycerol, known also as glycerine, is an organic osmolyte applied in different fields and widely used in cosmetic products, especially in hand creams for increasing skin moisture in long-lasting skin hydration [13,37]. It is concentrated in significant amounts in Dunaliella salina (e.g., 94.26 pg cell−1 [245]), but also in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [37].

3.5. Flagellate Algae as Phenolic Sources

Phenols (also known as phenolics), the largest group of plants’ secondary metabolites, are commonly divided into simple phenols and polyphenols, the last group in the classes of phenolic acids, flavonoids, isoflavonoids, stilbenes, lignans, and phenolic polymers [246]. Their quantity and composition vary in a broad range (e.g., 0 to 2820 mg GAE/100 [247]) depending on the species and growth conditions [17,53,247]. Polyphenols are important as cosmetic ingredients because they show chemical protecting mechanisms against damages caused by UV radiation and act against melanin formation [12,35,62,248,249]. One of the most frequently reported phenols derived by algae is verbascoside [250]. It is multifunctional, but its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities [251,252] are of special interest for inclusion in cosmetic products.
Although phenols of microalgae have been less explored in comparison with marine macroalgae [12], some authors suggest that the phenols are involved in the remarkable antioxidant activities of microalgae [250,253,254,255,256], generally associated with carotenoids (e.g., [257]). For example, there was evidence for a significant increase in the total phenolic content in the snow alga Chlamydomonas nivalis, after five to seven days of exposure to UV radiation [258]. An increase in polyphenols under light exposure has been demonstrated in experiments with Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [259]. Similar results after experiments with light exposure were obtained in a study of Chlamydomoans agloeaformis, in which the main phenolic component was verbascoside (158.17 ± 16.67 out of a total of 169.14 µg g−1 DW) with well-known antimicrobial properties, detected together with a good amount of flavonols (quercetin in particular), and flavan-3-ols (mainly epicatechin) and traces of phenolic acids and flavones [17]. The detected amounts of polyphenols were similar to the average total polyphenol content of 211 mg GAE/100 g DW reported after examination of 32 microalgal species, among which were the flagellates Tetraselmis suecica and Isochrysis sp. [256].
A specific flavonoid class, 2-styrylchromones (2-SC, C17H12O2), was discovered in extracts from the marine pelagophycean Chrysophaeum taylori [62].

3.6. Flagellate Algae as Sources of Enzymes and Peptides

Microalgae have great capacity to synthesize enzymes, and 16 microalgal species, mainly cyanoprokaryotes, have been enlisted as their industrial sources [260]. Only one of them was a flagellate, namely Poterioochromonas malhamensis, which is included in this list as a source for the α-galactosidase production. There is a bulk of studies related to the discovery of genes that code enzyme production in microalgae and reveal the activity of different enzymes at the laboratory scale, analyzed in detail in [260]. For example, α-amylase activity in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii was registered in culture conditions and genes for lipases were identified in the Chlamydomonas genome. α-amylase, oligo-1,6-glucosidase, and starch phosphorylase were identified in Dunaliella tertilecta, and α-amylase, β-amylase, and glycogen phosphorylase were found in Dunaliella parva. Dunaliella can also produce gluthathione, a low-molecular-weight thiol-tripeptide constituted by amino acids glycine, cysteine, and glutamic acid [37,261]. Gluthathione, with its high antioxidant capacity and antimelanogenic properties, gained popularity as a powerful sunscreen, skin protector from photo-aging, and skin-lightening agent, applied in many cosmetic products, mainly creams and lotions [37,261]. Since gluthathione is available on the market in oral, parenteral, and topical forms, it has to be noted that, up to now, safety has been proven only for its oral and topical application [261].
Tetraselmis suecica produces antimicrobial peptides with bactericidal effects against gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [262], some of which can affect skin wounds.

3.7. Flagellate Algae as Sources of Mycosporine-like Aminoacids (MAAS)

Mycosporine-like aminoacids (MAAs) are natural compounds biosynthesized by algae considered responsible for protection from UV radiation [263,264,265]. They have been identified in different groups of algae. It has to be underlined that algal MAAs have already resulted in commercially stable and effective skin-care UV-protective products [16,37,266]. Besides the sunscreen function and anti-aging abilities [62], MAAS can be strong antioxidants [16,265] and anti-cancer agents [62], and it has been suggested that some of them have anti-inflammatory effects [267]. Additionally, they can improve skin smoothness [62,268] and inhibit elastane decomposition and wrinkle formation [269]. All these effects significantly increase their potential for application in modern cosmeceuticals.
Comparative study on MAAs in 206 strains of 152 cultured marine microalgal species included the following number of flagellates from different taxonomic groups: (1) 4 raphidophyceans; (2) 35 haptophytes; (3) 1 euglenophyte; (4) 47 dinoflagellates; (5) 10 cryptophytes; and (6) 22 green algal strains. The highest amounts of these compounds in dinoflagellates, cryptophytes, haptophytes, and raphidophyceans were discovered [270]. The richest in UV absorptive compounds were the raphidophycean Fibrocapsa sp., the haptophyte Phaeocystis pochetii, and the dinoflagellates Alexandrium margalefi and Gymnodinium catenatum, whereas the green Tetraselmis chui had the lowest content comparable with this in the coccal colonial diatom Asterionella glacialis [270]. Moreover, the results obtained showed that concentrations of UV absorptive compounds differed strongly among species and strains, with the highest variation of diversity in the group of dinoflagellates. When field phytoplankton samples were also examined, it was concluded that the highest UV-screening capacity in both types of samples processed was demonstrated by dinoflagellates that are bloom-forming in nature (e.g., Gymnodinium catenatum, Alexandrium, Scrippsiella, Heterocapsa, and Woloszynskaya) followed by haptophytes (Chrysochromulina, Gephyrocapsa, Haptolina, Dicrateria, and Phaeocystis), cryptophytes (Chroomonas and Rhodomonas), and by raphidophyceans (Chattonella and Fibrocapsa). The same authors also found three yet-unknown MAAs in Gymnodinium catenatum in addition to the well-known mycosporine-glycine, porphyra 344, and shinorine. The main conclusions from this comprehensive study led to the understanding of the prevalence of MAAs in bloom-forming marine flagellates as the best “sun-adapted” phytoplankters [270], indicating their great potential for future research for effective sunscreen products.
Further study of 33 algal strains (31 marine, 1 freshwater, 1 soil species), 23 of which were flagellates, provided new data on the diversity and abundance of MAAs, pointing also to their application as potential source of natural alternatives to synthetic sunscreens [271]. In this study, shinorin was outlined as the most spread compound. MAAS were detected in 20 (60%) of all examined species and their frequent occurrence in high amounts as well as their diversity in dinoflagellates were proved. The highest MAAs concentrations (>6000 fg cell−1) were measured in the dinoflagellates of Kryptoperidinium foliaceum (Syn. Glenodinuim foliaceum) and Scripsiella acuminata (Syn. Scrippsiella trochoidea), followed by Karlodinium veneficum (Syn. Gymnodinium galatheanum, Gymnodinium venificum; >1500 fg cell−1) [271]. In addition, in the same study, the ability to synthesize MAAS was supposed for the first time for the heterotophic dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina. A novel UV-absorbing compound λmax 342 nm (peak 12) in the cultures of Gyrodinium sp. and Gymnodiniun spp. was found, and a relatively high amount of MAAs was measured in the cryptophyte Rhodomonas baltica (140 fg cell−1).
In 2007, a database on UV-absorbing mycosporines and MAAs reported in different organisms from aquatic and terrestrial habitats, including 44 strains of flagellate algae, was published [272]. Considering extremophilic algae, MAAs were found as produced in significant amounts by snow inhabitants [12]. They have been identified in the green flagellates inhabiting the snow surface, such as Chlamydomonas nivalis [37,273] or Chlamydomonas hedleyi from a non-indicated habitat [263]. In the samples from “reddish” and “greenish” snow collected near the penguin rockeries on King George Island, different amounts of MAAs were measured, coinciding with a different spectral profiling [274]. For example, the average MAA concentration in the reddish snow was lower (278.2 μg g−1) in comparison with that of the greenish snow (316.0 μg g−1), which showed a specific high absorbance between 450 and 600 nm. Interestingly, there was no difference in the composition of pigments and fatty acids between both samples [274].

3.8. Flagellate Algae as Vitamin Sources

Vitamin C (ascorbate) is a strong antioxidant [197] essential for collagen biosynthesis and currently becomes popular in anti-pigmentation skin treatment. It is accumulated in high amounts in Dunaliella [37]. Although the titer of ascorbate produced by Euglena gracilis strongly varies depending on the culture conditions (from 8 to 85 mg L−1), it is considered a valuable commercial source [197,275]. A significant amount (6.45 pg cell−1) of vitamin C in Cryptomonas maculata was reported [276].
Microalgae that produce vitamin E (tocopherol) are known to be included in photoprotective skin creams [37]. Earlier studies on the biochemical composition of microalgae demonstrated differences in their tocopherol content dependent on their taxonomic position and culture conditions (e.g., [277]). The best producers on a commercial scale are Dunaliella tertiolecta, Tetraselmis suecica, and Euglena gracilis [37]. The last species is valuable in exclusive production only of the α-tocoferol, the yield of which can be increased by long incubation times and the addition of a carbon source (ethanol) to the culture medium, with the highest achieved titer of 44.2 mg L−1 culture, or 1.1 mg g−1 DW [197]. However, there is no reported commercial production of tocopherol from Euglena gracilis [197]. HPLC investigations proved three flagellates as promising sources of this vitamin depending on the cultivation and method of extraction: Dunaliella (228 µg g−1 DW of α-tocopherol, 35 µg g−1 DW of γ-tocopherol, and 1 µg g−1 DW of δ-tocopherol), Tetraselmis (49–289 µg g−1 DW of α-tocopherol), and Isochrysis (101–302 µg g−1 DW of α-tocopherol, 5 µg g−1 DW of γ-tocopherol, and 2 µg g−1 DW of δ-tocopherol) [277]. More currently, a high yield of α-tocopherol (concentration of 5.22 mg/100 g DW) was obtained from the marine Isochrysis galbana cultivated in 100 L polyethylene bags with seawater [60]. In another haptophyte, Diacronema vlkianum, the maximum obtained level of α-tocopherol in laboratory conditions was 257.7 ± 21.6 μg g−1 DW at 18 °C [106].
Vitamin A is produced only by animals and its increased demand boosted a high search for the plant-derived provitamin A, which is the photosynthetic pigment ß-carotene [197]. Currently, one of the most important commercial sources of (pro)vitamins is Euglena gracilis [195,197]. However, large-scale cultivation of this flagellate requires supplying the media with the essential vitamins B1 and B12, which are expensive. It was suggested this limitation could be overcome by using co-cultures with microorganisms able to synthesize sufficient amounts of these vitamins [195,278]. Successful co-culturing for long time periods with a dramatical decrease in costs was achieved by adding the fungus Cladosporium westerdijkiae, and bacteria Lysinibacillus boronitolerans and Pseudobacillus badius [278]. Moreover, it was demonstrated that these cultures may enhance the harvesting of Euglena biomass through bio-flocculation [195,278].
Although some unresolved problems regarding the stability and sensitivity to environmental factors (heat, oxygen, and light), vitamins of the B group are common ingredients in different cosmetic products due to their versatile favorable effects on the skin [279,280]. Vitamin B1 (thiamine) has an antipruritic effect and is used in the treatment of rosacea and seborrhea together with riboflabin (vitamin B2), which has an anti-inflammatory effect [279,280]. Thiamine in a concentration of ca. 358.8 nmol g cell−1 was measured in the cryptophyte Rhodomonas salina [281]. Riboflavin is applied in cosmetic products as an excipient (natural colorant) [280]. Niacin (vitamin B3) is essential for skin health due to its multifunctional activities, such as being sebostatic, antipruritic, vasoactive, barrier- and photo-protective, lightening, anti-microbial, and anti-inflammatory [280,282]. It is useful in dermatological formulations for the treatment of skin aging, hyperpigmentation, light damage of the skin, acne, atopic dermatitis, melasma, psoriasis, pellagra, nonmelanoma, and skin cancer [280,282,283]. Pantothenic acid (vitamin B5) in the form of its alcohol analog, dexpanthenol, is a moisturizer, has anti-inflammatory properties, and influences fibroblast proliferation. Therefore, it is applied topically for care of damaged skin, wound healing, atopic dermatitis, and scar management [280,284]. Vitamin B6 in its methanol form, pyridoxine, and Vitamin B12 (cobalamin) are promising candidates for the treatment of atopical dermatitis due to the ability of B6 to stimulate filaggrin production in human epidermal keratinocytes [285], and to the suppression of cytokine production, cell proliferation enhancement, and modulation of lymphocyte activity by B12 [280,286]. Due to the reduction in nitric oxide production, B12 may be applied topically in the treatment of childhood eczema [287].
Some flagellates are important as common potential sources of different vitamins. Examples are Dunaliella tertiolecta, which contains vitamins B12, B2, E, and provitamin A, and Tetraselmis suecica, which is rich in vitamins B1, B3, B5, B6, and C [62].

3.9. Extracts of Flagellate Algae as Cosmetic Ingredients

During the literature search, we found information on different algal extracts that exhibited strong effects in skin and hair protection, improvement of appearance, or other treatment regarding beauty products or in treatment of skin and hair disorders, but their exact composition and active compound were not always indicated.
The exception is the freeze-dried methanolic extract of Chlamydomonas agloeformis with the following content of bioactive compounds: total phenols, 177.55 ± 25.94 mg GAE/100 g DW; flavonoids, 440.15 ± 152.38 mg CE/100 g DW; and flavonols, 203.80 ± 97.02 mg QE/100 g DW, examined for its antioxidant properties [17]. According to the results obtained, the extract was non-toxic and had a role in preventing oxidative damage to molecules [17], which suggested its potential as a safe ingredient in anti-aging cosmetic products. A peptide extract of Chlamydomonas acidophila for the prevention of skin disorders in cosmetics has already been patented under the international number WO2020/136283 A1 [288].
Acne is a multifactorial skin disease, visually expressed by eruptions on the skin surface that seriously affects the emotions, self-image, and self-esteem of the patients [289]. Therefore, the improvement of the skin appearance can seriously positively influence the lifestyle, and dermatological treatment of various acne lesions is important. The effectiveness of a hydrating product in topical treatment of acne-prone skin of adult women, which contained an extract of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, was proved [289]. In this case, the green algal extract was included to act as a cellular stimulant.
A novel, n-Hexane extract with a high content of palmitic acid was obtained from a specific strain of Haematococcus lacustris, isolated from the river Nile (deposited in the GenBank as Haematococcus lacustris isolate REH10 with accession number OK336515) [290]. This extract inhibited multi-antibiotic resistant pathogens with its strong activity being proved after examination of seven fractions of H. lacustris hexanolic extracts [290].
An extract from the robust marine Tetraselmis sp. CTP4, rich in carotenoids together with other bioactive substances, has been shown to diminish hyperpigmentation by reducing the size of melanocytes and reducing skin tension through stimulation of the growth of the epidermal tissue [10,118].
An extract of the bioluminescent marine dinoflagellate Noctiluca offered the skin a new source of radiance [13].
The methanol extract (BIO1631) of marine Isochrysis sp. Tahitian strain (T-Iso) was highly effective in increasing the number of hair follicles and in hair shaft elongation even at low concentrations and was suggested as a highly promising candidate for inclusion in a cosmetic active for the prevention of hair loss [291]. However, an opinion was published that such a product is unreliable for consumption in the human body considering the toxicity of methanol extract [13]. However, other Isochrysis sp. extracts have been applied in sunscreen formulation that contain organic and inorganic filters with SPF 15 to prevent UV transmission [13].

3.10. Flagellate Algae as Nanoparticle Sources

A current review of aeroterrestrial and extremophilic algae showed their potential for the production of lipid nanoparticles for use in cosmetic formulations [19]. However, to our best knowledge there is no commercial exploration of flagellates in this respect. According to our recent search, the only data on the potential application of flagellates in nanoproducts are provided on the ability of the green unicellular marine algae from the genus Platymonas to synthesize silver nanoparticles with antibacterial activity against pathogens, which are able to infect different wounds such as Vibrio alginolyticus, Bacillus flexus, and Streptococcus sp. [292].

3.11. Safety Aspects

The compounds included in this review are commonly considered safe and nontoxic, especially when applied topically. However, it is noteworthy to recall that some microalgae can produce toxic metabolites (algal toxins), which are a great safety concern due to their serious impact on human health (for details, see [31,293,294]). Since their detailed discussion is out of the scope of the present study, we shall enlist them briefly for completeness of data on the species producers of valuable cosmetic products. Up to now, toxins have been identified in flagellates from four of the taxonomic groups discussed in this paper, namely Euglenophyta, Pyrrhophyta, Haptophyta, and Ochrophyta (Class Raphidophyceae) (e.g., [293,294,295,296,297,298]. They have been reported for the following genera, mentioned in this paper: (1) Euglenophyte genera Euglena (some strains of Euglena sanguinea in particular, as well as strains of two more species of Euglena not mentioned in the text, such as Euglena socialbilis and Euglena stellata) and Trachelomonas (but only in the species Trachelomonas ellipsoideus and not in Trachelomonas volvocina noted here) are producers of euglenophycin, less than 20% of which may be released extracellularly mainly in old cultures of E. sanguinea [295,296]; (2) Haptophyte genus Prymnesium (Prymnesium parvum in particular) release prymnesins, which are categorized into at least three types—A, B, and C [298,299]; (3) Pyrrhophyte genera Alexandrium, Amphidinium, Gymnodinium, Gyrodinium, Prorocentrum and Pyrodinium—saxitoxins, gonyatoxins, pectenotoxins, yessotoxins, and okadaic acid [293,294,297]; (4) Raphidophyceans Chatonella (Chattonela marina and its variety antiqua), Fibrocapsa (Fibrocapsa japonica) and Heterosigma (Heterocapsa akashiwo) release brevetoxins [297]. However, euglenophycins and prymnesins were proved as producers of ichtyotoxins that cause fish mortalities without direct effect on humans, while for saxitoxins, gonyatoxins, yessotoxins, pectenotoxins, okadaic acid, and brevetoxins, the main exposure routes are through contaminated water, consumption of poisoned food, or respiration of infested aerosols. According to our best knowledge, negative effects of these toxins via topical application have never been reported, which in the state-of-the-art makes them harmless for cosmetical formulations. However, we would like to stress again the necessity of specific studies targeted on the toxicity of all novel sources and their products proposed for cosmetical formulations [19].

4. Discussion

The growing global cosmetic market is inevitably demanding innovative, more and more specific natural cosmetic ingredients that are not only beneficial in many aspects but are safe for human health and are obtained via eco-friendly processes from less conventional sources [6]. In this regard, microalgae become more and more attractive due to many reasons besides their abilities to function as living factories that provide year-round production and are fast-growing in various types of cultivation systems, including out-door cultivation and culturing in extremophilic conditions inimical for many other organisms (e.g., [13,67,68,119]). Their almost unknown world, especially of algae from some peculiar ecological and morphological groups, offers a rich palette of unexplored natural substances with unique, sometimes intricate structures and functions, and there is growing evidence of findings of novel algal metabolites that exhibit strong and often multipurpose biological activities [12,13,19]. Although there is progressively increasing interest in diving in this fascinating and promising realm, a very small part of algal metabolites from a limited number of algal species have been utilized at a commercial scale. This is especially valid for the microscopical algae from different evolutionary lines that are capable of active motion using specific organelles named flagella, and that inhabit various environments from conventional aquatic systems to hypersaline or acidophilic waterbodies, soils, or snow surfaces. Continued exploration of their structures, functions, and applications not only deepens our understanding of their diversity and improves the taxonomy, but also allows the discovery of new, valuable sources for modern biotechnologically based industries, including cosmetics. A great challenge for future exploitation of these flagellates lies not only in identifying their chemical composition but also in discovering the best-performing strains of these organisms in terms of growth and yields of the products of interest and finding proper ways for their cost-effective specific cultivation and harvesting, including sophisticated genome editing techniques. Based on our long-lasting phycological expertise, the present review summarized research broadly spread in different sources, which was sometimes poorly documented and even included controversial data on natural substances of microscopic flagellates and their potential applications in the field of modern cosmetics.
According to the data obtained, more than 411 strains of flagellates have been investigated. Their distribution according to the evolutionary lines and relevant phyla with clearly visible prevalence of studies of cryptophytes (27%) and haptophytes (23%) is shown in Figure 3.
The biodiversity of the examined flagellates, expressed by the number of species (incl. varieties and forms, and all unidentified species counted separately), is as follows: Chlorophyta—55, Cryptophyta—56, Pyrrhophyta—33, Haptophyta—65, Ochrophyta—37, and. Euglenophyta—5 (Figure 4). Regarding the taxonomic richness, it becomes evident that Haptophytes are the best-investigated groups, followed by almost equally investigated species of green algae and cryptophytes. However, considering the enormous diversity of green flagellates in nature incompatible with this of cryptophytes, this result can be interpreted differently—it shows that much more research on green flagellates is needed in the future. Lack of relevant information on the flagellate species from the phylum Streptophyta from the green evolutionary line (e.g., Mesostigma), as well as from some ochrophyte classes with a small number of flagellates (e.g., Bolidophyceae, Tribophyceae), also broadens the field for future research.
According to the results from the analysis of the distribution of examined algal genera by taxonomical phyla, the best studied were haptophytes and ochrophytes (Figure 5).
All the abovementioned differences in the biodiversity of investigated strains, species, and genera did not allow for only one phylum to be pointed to as the best clarified regarding bioactive compounds valuable for the cosmetic industry (Figure 6).
With respect to morphological features, it has to be stressed that all investigated algae were unicellular, except the colonial Dinobryon divergens Synura petersenii, Synura sphagnicola, Synura spinosa, and Uroglena americana, included in the investigations of algal fatty acids [183] and fucoxanthin (only Synura petersenii [135]).
The ecological affiliation of the examined microalgae is difficult to evaluate correctly since for some of the strains data on habitats are not available. However, according to the strains with provided data, it is possible to summarize that the best studied were flagellates from the phytoplankton of conventional aquatic environments (with the predominance of marine and brackish flagellates). One was marine epiphyte, much less were the extremophilic strains investigated (inhabitants of hypersaline waters, acidic freshwaters, or snow surface) and only four were strains obtained from the soil. All investigated extremophiles and three soil inhabitants belong to the green algae, to phylum Chlorophyta in particular, with only one soil strain of cryptophytes.
However, it has to be boldly underlined that these results are based only on Latin species or strain names enlisted in the available publications. Many of these strains are labeled as “unidentified”, pointing to a supposed group, or, in the best case, are given a generic name. In the absence of more taxonomic data, it is practically impossible to estimate the real biodiversity of examined microalgae. In many cases, the same is valid for the strains labelled with species names. However, we found data on labeled strains pointed to a given taxonomic group which contradicts the provided name. Whenever possible, we actualized the synonymy based on the names provided, but here we would like to confirm our previous statement that in the recent times of rapid classification and relevant nomenclatural changes, supplying biochemical data with those from genetic studies and with detailed morphological and ecological descriptions in future publications is strongly recommended [12,19]. Moreover, we would suggest proceeding taxonomically with each strain before publishing data on its biochemistry, cultivation, etc. The reliable identification will allow not only a feasible cultivation process to be realized [300,301] but also more precise and correct information on the sources of biologically active metabolites to be obtained.
Although the number of examined taxa at first glimpse seems to be high and satisfying, we would like to stress that it is quite low on the background of general microalgal diversity, and on the natural wealth of flagellate species and genera, in particular. The same is valid for the investigated strains and in this respect, the increasing importance of living culture collections with taxonomically correctly identified strains has to be underlined. The role of these living archives in screening and identifying valuable Indigenous strains, phycoprospecting [302], and thus in enhancing upstreaming bioprocessing, is practically irreplaceable.
The analysis of the results obtained shows not only the low number of investigated taxa but also the low number of certain investigated substances, grouped according to their presentation in the text (Table 1).
It has to be noted that for the analysis provided below, we counted total lipids, extracts, and data on nanoparticles as three separate types, and in the same way, as separate types, data were counted on pigments (chlorophylls, carotenoids, and phycobilins) due to their specificity. The low number of examined compounds concerns both their total number and the numbers investigated in each strain, or species. In most strains, 371, or 90%, only one compound type was investigated. Regarding species, logically, considering the popularity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a model organism, it is a leader according to the number of investigated main groups of substances (11) and is followed by Isochrysis galbana (9) and Euglena gracilis (7). Five compound groups have been investigated in Diacronema lutheri, Dunaliella salina, Poterioochromonas malhamensis, and Tetraselmis suecica, and four groups were investigated in Chlamydomonas agloeoformis, Dunaliella acidophila, Dunaliella tertiolecta, and Ochromonas danica. Since for many strains species names were not available, a more detailed analysis will be made on the basis of the genera below.
The summarized data on the number of compound types investigated in flagellate genera show results almost similar to those obtained from species analysis. The most examined different substance types of genera were Chlamydomonas (12), Isochrysis (11), and Tetraselmis (10), followed by Dunaliella (9), Euglena (7), Diacronema (6), and Poterioochromonas (5). Four types of compounds were investigated in Ochromonas and Rhodomonas, three groups have been studied in nine genera: Alexandrium, Chattonella, Chloromonas, Chroomonas, Chrysotilla, Cryptomonas, Fibrocapsa, Haematococcus, and Prymnesium, whereas two compounds were studied in 21 genera, In the remaining 86 genera (or 79%), only one compound type was investigated. According to the spread of these genera by taxonomic groups (Figure 7), it can be stated that the highest diversity of substances in flagellate algae was investigated in the green algae and haptophytes, followed by ochrophytes. By contrast, far fewer bioactive substances were examined in euglenophytes, dinoflagellates, and cryptophytes.
The analysis of data obtained on different substances shows that the best-studied compounds were the fatty acids (181 records, and among them PUFAs (with 161 records, mainly on EPA and DHA), and MAAs (with 131 records), followed by carotenoids (54 records, mainly fucoxanthin—21 records, astaxanthin—18 records, and lutein—13 records), phycobilins (25 records) and sphingolipids (10 records)). All other compound types have been poorly documented in flagellates, leaving a wide field for future research. Despite these generally scarce studies, it has to be noted that some novel compounds have been identified in the following types: phycobilins (3), fatty acid esters (3), polysaccharides (1), MAAs (3), sterols (3), and sphingolipids (1). Several more need feed chemical identification [112,145,146,218,226,239,270]. Additionally, noteworthy is the finding of anthocyanins, considered as spreading generally in higher plants, in one species of Chlamydomonas [17], and the abundance of easier and more cost-effectively obtained phycobilins in cryptophytes [62,155,167]. Since the chlorophyll content of microalgae is higher than in vascular plants [38], its commercial extraction in the future can be strongly recommended, Of special importance is the fact that many, if not all flagellates, produce more than one high-value substance, the combined effect of which may contribute to the higher efficacy of cosmetic formulations. For example, the combination of vitamin C and glutathione in Dunaliella [37,261] could enhance skin depigmentation in the fight against dark spots caused by aging or UV radiation. In this aspect, it is valuable to note the obtaining of interesting algal extracts with successful application in cosmetics [10,13,18,288,289,290]. Resulting from the laboratory studies, several strains have been outlined in addition to the already recognized species as promising sources for biotechnological utilization, including the field of cosmetics (Chlamydomonadales TGA3 and TGA5, Diacronema lutheri, Haematoccus rubicundus, Hibberdia magna, freshwater Chlamydomonas plantogloea, Chroomonas, Cryptomonas, Isochrysis galbana, Mallomonas sp. SBV13, Ochromonas danica, Poteriochromonas malhamensis CMBB-1, Rhodomonas, Tetraselmis, Tisochrysis, etc. [48,57,58,60,62,68,92,95,114,117,137,155,169,172,173,174]). It could be predicted that this number will increase with the development of proper cultivation technologies, conditions, and media to achieve faster growth and higher yields. Last but not least, our search proved that one and the same species can be used as a producer of different high-value compounds, which is important for cost-effective processing. According to the current knowledge, most of the examined flagellates and their isolated and cultivated strains can be considered as safe sources since they do not produce toxic compounds. Exceptions of some potentially toxin-producing strains and genera have been discussed in the text regarding the safety concern, but it has been underlined that the toxins produced still have not been reported as harmful for cosmetic formulations. However, considering the ability of algae to produce toxins, we underlined the need for tests on the toxicity of both producers and harvested compounds [19].
Different methods for obtaining algal metabolites during downstream bioprocessing have been developed (e.g., [39,49,60,86,87,91,92,101,106,107,115,116,134,173,195,243,244]), but only a few species have been commercially utilized contrasting to the great number of strains existing in the nature. More investigations are needed in the future with comparisons of the extraction yields from wet and dry biomasses using different combinations of cultivation, harvesting, and cell disruption methods. The literature analysis shows that most research in such technical aspect deals with already well-known genera and species, such as the widely recognized not only by the scientific community but also by the broad audience of consumer algae like Dunalliella salina, Haematococcus lacustris, and Euglena gracilis. Fewer studies concern other green and euglenophyte algae, as well as smaller algal groups, such as raphidophyceans, chrysophyceans, cryptophytes, haptophytes, and even dinoflagellates in regard to their commercial utilities. At the same time, considering the gaps in the knowledge, even expanding investigations of the abovementioned popular algae can be stimulated. But also, more efforts are necessary in the field of upstreaming processing, especially focused on phycoprospective discovery of new promising species and strains from yet unexplored genera.
All collected data show inevitably that microscopic flagellate algae offer significant potential for modern cosmetics, although more investigations regarding their availability, cosmetic efficacy, and safety may be encouraged as well as the development of stronger links between laboratory researchers and industrial technologists. However, it can be optimistically expected that the successful application in different cosmetic preparations of high-valued natural substances from the novel sources, highlighted in this review, could be achieved in the nearest decades.

5. Conclusions

The current review shows once more that algae are generating considerable interest in terms of value-added metabolites. Although there is a great deal of potential to be further investigated in the near future, a thorough exploration of the existing literature makes evident the promising abilities of yet poorly explored microscopic flagellate algae as beneficial commodities for modern cosmetics. The rising environmental stress from increased air pollution and stronger UV radiation causes skin and hair damage, and at the same time augments consumer demand for stronger preventive, protective, and repairing cosmetic products. All collected data highlight the microscopic flagellates as novel sources of such innovative biologically derived substances that serve as the best replacement to chemical entities available on the market with great possibilities for commercial utilization especially in less processed products. Their utility for developing modern cosmetic formulations that are tailor-made to actual consumer needs and desires is suggested.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.-G.; methodology, M.S.-G. and G.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.-G.; writing—review and editing, B.U. and G.G.; visualization, M.S.-G., B.U. and G.G.; supervision, G.G.; project administration, B.U.; funding acquisition, B.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study is financed by the European Union-NextGenerationEU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, project No. BG-RRP-2.004-0008.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Thiyagarasaiyar, K.; Goh, B.-H.; Jeon, Y.-J.; Yow, Y.-Y. Algae Metabolites in Cosmeceutical: An Overview of Current Applications and Challenges. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mago, Y.; Sharma, Y.; Thakran, Y.; Mishra, A.; Tewari, S.; Kataria, N. Next-Generation Organic Beauty Products Obtained from Algal Secondary Metabolites: A Sustainable Development in Cosmeceutical Industries. Mol. Biotechnol. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ariede, M.B.; Candido, T.M.; Jacome, A.L.M.; Velasco, M.V.R.; De Carvalho, J.C.M.; Baby, A.R. Cosmetic attributes of algae—A review. Algal Res. 2017, 25, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, H.-M.D.; Chen, C.-C.; Huynh, P.; Chang, J.-S. Exploring the potential of using algae in cosmetics. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 184, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Joshi, S.; Kumari, R.; Upasani, V.N. Applications of algae in cosmetics: An overview. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sotelo, C.G.; Blanco, M.; Ramos, P.; Vázquez, J.A.; Perez-Martin, R.I. Sustainable Sources from Aquatic Organisms for Cosmeceuticals Ingredients. Cosmetics 2021, 8, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Álvarez-Gómez, F.; Korbee, N.; Casas-Arrojo, V.; Abdala-Díaz, R.T.; Figueroa, F.L. UV Photoprotection, Cytotoxicity and Immunology Capacity of Red Algae Extracts. Molecules 2019, 24, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Muñoz-Miranda, L.A.; Iñiguez-Moreno, M. An extensive review of marine pigments: Sources, biotechnological applications, and sustainability. Aquat. Sci. 2023, 85, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saini, K.C.; Rani, A.; Gupta, S.K.; Sharma, P. Algae a Potential Source in Cosmetics: Current Status, Challenges, and Economic Implications. Indian J. Microbiol. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aslam, A.; Bahadar, A.; Liaquat, R.; Saleem, M.; Waqas, A.; Zwawi, M. Algae as an attractive source for cosmetics to counter environmental stress. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021, 772, 144905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fabrowska, J.; Leska, B.; Schroeder, G.; Messyasz, B.; Pikosz, M. Biomass and extracts of algae as materials for cosmetics. In Marine Algae Extracts, Processes, Products, and Applications; Kim, S., Chojnacka, K., Eds.; Wiley-VCH-Verl: Weinheim, Germany, 2015; pp. 681–706. [Google Scholar]
  12. Stoyneva-Gärtner, M.; Uzunov, B.; Gärtner, G. Enigmatic Microalgae from Aeroterrestrial and Extreme Habitats in Cosmetics: The Potential of the Untapped Natural Sources. Cosmetics 2020, 7, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gupta, P.L.; Rajput, M.; Oza, T.; Trivedi, U.; Sanghvi, G. Eminence of Microbial Products in Cosmetic Industry. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2019, 9, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Intha, T.; Sirikhachornkit, A. Pigment Production of Chlamydomonas Strains in Response to Norflurazon and ZnO Nanoparticles. Fermentation 2023, 9, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, S.; Kate, B.N.; Banerjee, U.C. Bioactive Compounds from Cyanobacteria and Microalgae: An Overview. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2005, 25, 73–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cardozo, K.H.M.; Guaratini, T.; Barros, M.P.; Falcão, V.R.; Tonon, A.P.; Lopes, N.P.; Campos, S.; Torres, M.A.; Souza, A.O.; Colepicolo, P.; et al. Metabolites from algae with economical impact. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2007, 146, 60–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grande, T.; Vornoli, A.; Lubrano, V.; Vizzarri, F.; Raffaelli, A.; Gabriele, M.; Novoa, J.; Sandoval, C.; Longo, V.; Echeverria, M.C.; et al. Chlamydomonas agloeformis from the Ecuadorian Highlands: Nutrients and Bioactive Compounds Profiling and In Vitro Antioxidant Activity. Foods 2023, 12, 3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. De Jesus Raposo, M.F.; de Morais, R.M.S.C.; de Morais, A.M.M.B. Health Applications of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Microalgae. Life Sci. 2013, 93, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stoyneva-Gärtner, M.; Uzunov, B.; Gärtner, G. Aeroterrestrial and Extremophilic Microalgae as Promising Sources for Lipids and Lipid Nanoparticles in Dermal Cosmetics. Cosmetics 2022, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Klaschka, U. Natural personal care products—Analysis of ingredient lists and legal situation. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2016, 28, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jahan, A.; Hmad, I.F.; Fatima, N.; Ansari, V.A.; Akhtar, J. Algal bioactive compounds in the cosmeceutical industry: A review. Phycologia 2017, 56, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ding, J.; Wu, B.; Chen, L. Application of Marine Microbial Natural Products in Cosmetics. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 892505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bux, F. (Ed.) Biotechnological Applications of Microalgae Biodiesel and Value-Added Products; CRC Press; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dini, I.; Laneri, S. Nutricosmetics: A brief overview. Phytother. Res. 2019, 33, 3054–3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dini, I.; Laneri, S. The New Challenge of Green Cosmetics: Natural Food Ingredients for Cosmetic Formulations. Molecules 2021, 26, 3921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dini, I. The Potential of Algae in the Nutricosmetic Sector. Molecules 2023, 28, 4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Guiry, M.D. How many algal species are there? J. Phycol. 2012, 48, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Stoyneva-Gärtner, M.P.; Uzunov, B.A. Bases of Systematics of Algae and Fungi; Publ. House JAMG: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sun, H.; Wang, Y.; He, Y.; Liu, B.; Mou, H.; Chen, F.; Yang, S. Microalgae-Derived Pigments for the Food Industry. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Demoulin, C.F.; Lara, Y.J.; Cornet, L.; François, C.; Baurain, D.; Wilmotte, A.; Javaux, E.J. Cyanobacteria evolution: Insight from the fossil record. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 140, 206–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gärtner, G.; Stoyneva-Gärtner, M.; Uzunov, B. Algal Toxic Compounds and Their Aeroterrestrial, Airborne and other Extremophilic Producers with Attention to Soil and Plant Contamination: A Review. Toxins 2021, 13, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pascher, A. Systematische Übersicht über die mit Flagellaten in Zusammenhang stehenden Algenreihen und Versuch einer Einreihung dieser Algenstämme in die Stämme des Pflanzenreiches. Beih. Zum Bot. Cent. 1931, 48, 317–332. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pröschold, T.; Leliaert, F. Systematics of the green algae: Conflict of classic and modern approaches. In Unravelling the Algae, 1st ed.; Brodie, J., Lewis, J., Eds.; CRC Press; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 123–153. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ettl, H.; Gartner, G. Syllabus der Boden-, Luft- und Flechtenalgen; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pimentel, F.B.; Alves, R.C.; Rodrigues, F.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Macroalgae-Derived Ingredients for Cosmetic Industry—An Update. Cosmetics 2018, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Marino, T.; Iovine, A.; Casella, P.; Martino, M.; Chianese, S.; Larocca, V.; Musmarra, D.; Molino, A. From Haematococcus pluvialis microalgae a powerful antioxidant for cosmetic applications. Chem. Eng. 2020, 79, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sathasivam, R.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F. Microalgae metabolites: A rich source for food and medicine. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 709–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rumin, J.; Nicolau, E.; Junior, R.G.d.O.; Fuentes-Grünewald, C.; Flynn, K.J.; Picot, L. A Bibliometric Analysis of Microalgae Research in the World, Europe, and the European Atlantic Area. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Masi, A.; Leonelli, F.; Scognamiglio, V.; Gasperuzzo, G.; Antonacci, A.; Terzidis, M.A. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: A Factory of Nutraceutical and Food Supplements for Human Health. Molecules 2023, 28, 1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chekanov, K. Diversity and Distribution of Carotenogenic Algae in Europe: A Review. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Temniskova, D.N.; Stoyneva, M.P. Algology; Pensoft: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2011; Volume 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  42. Adl, S.M.; Bass, D.; Lane, C.E.; Lukeš, J.; Schoch, C.L.; Smirnov, A.; Agatha, S.; Berney, C.; Brown, M.W.; Burki, F.; et al. Revisions to the classification, nomenclature, and diversity of eukaryotes. J. Euk. Microbiol. 2019, 66, 4–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase. World-Wide Electronic Publication; National University of Ireland: Galway, Ireland, 2024; Available online: https://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 26 April 2024).
  44. Chen, Z.; Wu, W.; Wen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.; Farid, M.S.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Capanoglu, E.; Zhao, C. Recent advances of natural pigments from algae. Food Prod. Process. Nutr. 2023, 5, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cao, K.; Cui, Y.; Sun, F.; Zhang, H.; Fan, J.; Ge, B.; Cao, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhu, X.; Wei, Z.; et al. Metabolic engineering and synthetic biology strategies for producing high-value natural pigments in Microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 68, 108236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Patel, A.K.; Albarico, F.P.J.B.; Perumal, P.K.; Vadrale, A.P.; Nian, C.T.; Chau, H.T.B.; Anwar, C.; Wani, H.M.U.D.; Pal, A.; Saini, R.; et al. Algae as an emerging source of bioactive pigments. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 351, 126910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mikami, K.; Hosokawa, M. Biosynthetic Pathway and Health Benefits of Fucoxanthin, an Algae-Specific Xanthophyll in Brown Seaweeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 13763–13781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Střížek, A.; Přibyl, P.; Lukeš, M.; Grivalský, T.; Kopecký, J.; Galica, T.; Hrouzek, P. Hibberdia magna (Chrysophyceae): A promising freshwater fucoxanthin and polyunsaturated fatty acid producer. Microb. Cell Factories 2023, 22, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sarkar, S.; Manna, M.S.; Bhowmick, T.K.; Gayen, K. Extraction of chlorophylls and carotenoids from dry and wet biomass of isolated Chlorella Thermophila: Optimization of process parameters and modelling by artificial neural network. Process. Biochem. 2020, 96, 58–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, M.; Schliep, M.; Willows, R.D.; Cai, Z.-L.; Neilan, B.A.; Scheer, H. A Red-Shifted Chlorophyll. Science 2010, 329, 1318–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, M. Chlorophylls d and f: Synthesis, occurrence, light-harvesting, and pigment organization in chlorophyll-binding protein complexes. Adv. Bot. Res. 2019, 90, 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Holt, A.S. 4—Recently Characterized Chlorophylls. In The Chlorophylls; Vernon, L.P., Seely, G.R., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1966; pp. 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Orr, V.; Rehmann, L. Improvement of the Nile Red fluorescence assay for determination of total lipid content in microalgae independent of chlorophyll content. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 2181–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ferruzzi, M.G.; Blakeslee, J. Digestion, absorption, and cancer preventative activity of dietary chlorophyll derivatives. Nutr. Res. 2007, 27, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zepka, L.Q.; Jacob-Lopes, E.; Roca, M. Catabolism and bioactive properties of chlorophylls. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2019, 26, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hosikian, A.; Lim, S.; Halim, R.; Danquah, M.K. Chlorophyll Extraction from Microalgae: A Review on the Process Engineering Aspects. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 2010, 391632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ferreira, V.d.S.; Sant’anna, C. Impact of culture conditions on the chlorophyll content of microalgae for biotechnological applications. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jurić, S.; Jurić, M.; Król-Kilińska, Ż.; Vlahoviček-Kahlina, K.; Vinceković, M.; Dragović-Uzelac, V.; Donsì, F. Sources, stability, encapsulation and application of natural pigments in foods. Food Rev. Int. 2022, 38, 1735–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Carvalho, A.P.; Monteiro, C.M.; Malcata, F.X. Simultaneous effect of irradiance and temperature on biochemical composition of the microalga Pavlova lutheri. J. Appl. Phycol. 2009, 21, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Durmaz, Y.; Donato, M.; Monterio, M.; Gouveia, L.; Nunes, M.; Gama Pereira, T.; Gokpinar, S.; Bandarra, N.M. Effect of Temperature on Growth and Biochemical Composition (Sterols, α-tocopherol, Carotenoids, Fatty Acid Profiles) of the Microalga, Isochrysis galbana. Isr. J. Aquac. Bamidgeh 2008, 60, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Egeland, E.S. Carotenoids. In The Physiology of Microalgae. Developments in Applied Phycology; Borowitzka, M., Beardall, J., Raven, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 6, pp. 507–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Abidizadegan, M.; Peltomaa, E.; Blomster, J. The Potential of Cryptophyte Algae in Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Applications. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 618836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mourelle, M.L.; Gómez, C.P.; Legido, J.L. The Potential Use of Marine Microalgae and Cyanobacteria in Cosmetics and Thalassotherapy. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Koller, M.; Muhr, A.; Braunegg, G. Microalgae as versatile cellular factories for valued products. Algal Res. 2014, 6, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mukai, K. β-Cryptoxanthin from Satsuma Mandarin and Its Multiple Functions. Adv. Exp. Med Biol. 2021, 1261, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yang, D.-J.; Lin, J.-T.; Chen, Y.-C.; Liu, S.-C.; Lu, F.-J.; Chang, T.-J.; Wang, M.; Lin, H.-W.; Chang, Y.-Y. Suppressive effect of carotenoid extract of Dunaliella salina alga on production of LPS-stimulated pro-inflammatory mediators in RAW264.7 cells via NF-κB and JNK inactivation. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Khaw, Y.S.; Yusoff, F.M.; Tan, H.T.; Noor Mazli, N.A.I.; Nazarudin, M.F.; Shaharuddin, N.A.; Omar, A.R.; Takahashi, K. Fucoxanthin Production of Microalgae under Different Culture Factors: A Systematic Review. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jin, H.; Guo, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, B.; Ma, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Yuan, D. Effective fucoxanthin production in the flagellate alga Poterioochromonas malhamensis by coupling heterotrophic high-cell-density fermentation with illumination. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1074850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Arct, J.; Meiloch, M. ß-carotene in skin-care. Pol. J. Cosmetol. 2016, 19, 206–213. [Google Scholar]
  70. Cezare-Gomes, E.A.; Mejia-Da-Silva, L.d.C.; Pérez-Mora, L.S.; Matsudo, M.C.; Ferreira-Camargo, L.S.; Singh, A.K.; de Carvalho, J.C.M. Potential of Microalgae Carotenoids for Industrial Application. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 188, 602–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Basily, H.S.; Nassar, M.M.; El Diwani, G.I.; Abo El-Enin, S.A. Exploration of using the algal bioactive compounds for cosmeceuticals and pharmaceutical applications. Egypt. Pharm. J. 2018, 17, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Leon, R.; Martin, M.; Vigara, J.; Vilchez, C.; Vega, J.M. Microalgae mediated photoproduction of b-carotene in aqueous organic two-phase systems. Biomol. Eng. 2003, 20, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Shen, C.-T.; Chen, P.-Y.; Wu, J.-J.; Lee, T.-M.; Hsu, S.-L.; Chang, C.-M.J.; Young, C.-C.; Shieh, C.-J. Purification of algal anti-tyrosinase zeaxanthin from Nannochloropsis oculata using supercritical anti-solvent precipitation. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2011, 55, 955–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Khoo, K.S.; Lee, S.Y.; Ooi, C.W.; Fu, X.; Miao, X.; Ling, T.C.; Show, P.L. Recent advances in biorefinery of astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 288, 121606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tang, D.Y.Y.; Khoo, K.S.; Chew, K.W.; Tao, Y.; Ho, S.-H.; Show, P.L. Potential utilization of bioproducts from microalgae for the quality enhancement of natural products. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 304, 122997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Shin, J.; Kim, J.-E.; Pak, K.-J.; Kang, J.I.; Kim, T.-S.; Lee, S.-Y.; Yeo, I.-H.; Park, J.H.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kang, N.J.; et al. A Combination of Soybean and Haematococcus Extract Alleviates Ultraviolet B-Induced Photoaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rao, A.R.; Sindhuja, H.N.; Dharmesh, S.M.; Sankar, K.U.; Sarada, R.; Ravishankar, G.A. Effective Inhibition of Skin Cancer, Tyrosinase, and Antioxidative Properties by Astaxanthin and Astaxanthin Esters from the Green Alga Haematococcus pluvialis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 3842–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Berman, J.; Zorrilla-López, U.; Farré, G.; Zhu, C.; Sandmann, G.; Twyman, R.M.; Capell, T.; Christou, P. Nutritionally important carotenoids as consumer products. Phytochem. Rev. 2015, 14, 727–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Butler, T.; Golan, Y. Astaxanthin Production from Microalgae. In Microalgae Biotechnology for Food, Health and High Value Products; Alam, M., Xu, J.L., Wang, Z., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Leya, T. The CCCryo Culture Collection of Cryophilic Algae as a valuable bioresource for algal biodiversity and for novel, industrially marketable metabolites. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 3, 167–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Procházková, L.; Remias, D.; Holzinger, A.; Řezanka, T.; Nedbalová, L. Ecophysiological and morphological comparison of two populations of Chlainomonas sp. (Chlorophyta) causing red snow on ice-covered lakes in the High Tatras and Austrian Alps. Eur. J. Phycol. 2018, 53, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Procházková, L.; Remias, D.; Holzinger, A.; Řezanka, T.; Nedbalová, L. Ecophysiological and ultrastructural characterisation of the circumpolar orange snow alga Sanguina aurantia compared to the cosmopolitan red snow alga Sanguina nivaloides (Chlorophyta). Polar Biol. 2021, 44, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Procházková, L.; Remias, D.; Řezanka, T.; Nedbalová, L. Ecophysiology of Chloromonas hindakii sp. nov. (Chlorophyceae), Causing Orange Snow Blooms at Different Light Conditions. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Remias, D.; Pichrtová, M.; Pangratz, M.; Lütz, C.; Holzinger, A. Ecophysiology, secondary pigments and ultrastructure of Chlainomonas sp. (Chlorophyta) from the European Alps compared with Chlamydomonas nivalis forming red snow. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Remias, D.; Wastian, H.; Lütz, C.; Leya, T. Insight into the biology and phylogeny of Chloromonas polyptera (Chlorophyta), an alga causing orange snow in Maritime Antarctica. Antarct. Sci. 2013, 25, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Khoo, K.S.; Chew, K.W.; Ooi, C.W.; Ong, H.C.; Ling, T.C.; Show, P.L. Extraction of natural astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis using liquid biphasic flotation system. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 290, 121794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Hagen, C.; Grünewald, K.; Xyländer, M.; Rothe, E. Effect of cultivation parameters on growth and pigment biosynthesis in flagellated cells of Haematococcus pluvialis. J. Appl. Phycol. 2001, 13, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Devi, A.; Kalwani, M.; Patil, K.; Kumari, A.; Tyagi, A.; Shukla, P.; Pabbi, S. Microalgal Bio-pigments: Production and Enhancement Strategies to Enrich Microalgae-Derived Pigments. In Cyanobacterial Biotechnology in the 21st Century; Neilan, B., Passarini, M.R.Z., Singh, P.K., Kumar, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 85–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Caetano, N.S.; Corrêa, P.S.; de Morais Júnior, W.G.; Oliveira, G.M.; Martins, A.A.A.; Branco-Vieira, M.; Mata, T.M. Microalgae for Pigments and Cosmetics. In Algal Biorefineries and the Circular Bioeconomy. Volume 1: Algal Products and Processes; Mehariya, S., Bhatia, S.K., Karthikeyan, O.P., Eds.; CRC Press; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 133–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chekanov, K.; Fedorenko, T.; Kublanovskaya, A.; Litvinov, D.; Lobakova, E. Diversity of carotenogenic microalgae in the White Sea polar region. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2019, 96, fiz183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mendes-Pinto, M.M.; Raposo, M.F.J.; Bowen, J.; Young, A.J.; Morais, R. Evaluation of different cell disruption processes on encysted cells of Haematococcus pluvialis: Effects on astaxanthin recovery and implications for bio-availability. J. Appl. Phycol. 2001, 13, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Allewaert, C.C.; Vanormelingen, P.; Daveloose, I.; Verstraete, T.; Vyverman, W. Intraspecific trait variation affecting astaxanthin productivity in two Haematococcus (Chlorophyceae) species. Algal Res. 2017, 21, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tominaga, K.; Hongo, N.; Karato, M.; Yamashita, E. Cosmetic benefits of astaxanthin on humans subjects. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2012, 59, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ikarashi, N.; Kon, R.; Nagoya, C.; Ishikura, A.; Sugiyama, Y.; Takahashi, J.; Sugiyama, K. Effect of Astaxanthin on the Expression and Activity of Aquaporin-3 in Skin in an In-Vitro Study. Life 2020, 10, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Allewaert, C.C.; Vanormelingen, P.; Pröschold, T.; Gomez, P.I.; González, M.A.; Bilcke, G.; D’Hondt, S.; Vyverman, W. Species diversity in European Haematococcus pluvialis (Chlorophyceae, Volvocales). Phycologia 2015, 54, 583–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Czeczuga, B. Carotenoids in Euglena rubida Mainx. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Comp. Biochem. 1974, 48, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Grung, M.; Liaaen-Jensen, S. Algal carotenoids; secondary carotenoids of algae; carotenoids in a natural bloom of Euglena sanguinea. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1993, 21, 757–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kottuparambil, S.; Thankamony, R.L.; Agusti, S. Euglena as a potential natural source of value-added metabolites. A review. Algal Res. 2019, 37, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yao, R.; Fu, W.; Du, M.; Chen, Z.X.; Lei, A.P.; Wang, J.X. Carotenoids biosynthesis, accumulation, and applications of a model microalga Euglena gracilis. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Toyama, T.; Hanaoka, T.; Yamada, K.; Suzuki, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Morikawa, M.; Mori, K. Enhanced production of biomass and lipids by Euglena gracilis via co-culturing with a microalga growth-promoting bacterium, Emticicia sp. EG3. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Harada, R.; Nomura, T.; Yamada, K.; Mochida, K.; Suzuki, K. Genetic Engineering Strategies for Euglena gracilis and Its Industrial Contribution to Sustainable Development Goals: A Review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Green, J. The occurence of astaxanthin in the euglinoid Trachelomonas volvocina. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1963, 9, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Frassanito, R.; Flaim, G.; Mancini, I.; Guella, G. High production of unexpected carotenoids in Dinophyceae. Astaxanthin esters from the freshwater dinoflagellate Tovellia sanguinea. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2006, 34, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Pandeirada, M.S.; Craveiro, S.C.; Daugbjerg, N.; Moestrup, Ø.; Domingues, P.; Calado, A.J. Studies on Woloszynskioid Dinoflagellates X: Ultrastructure, Phylogeny and Colour Variation in Tovellia rubescens n. sp. (Dinophyceae). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2019, 66, 937–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Donato, M.; Vilela, M.H.; Bandarra, N.M. Fatty acids, sterols, α-tocopherol and total carotenoids composition of Diacronema vlkianum. J. Food Lipids 2003, 10, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Durmaz, Y.; Donato, M.; Monteiro, M.; Gouveia, L.; Nunes, M.L.; Gama Pereira, T.; Gökpinar, Ş.; Bandarra, N.M. Effect of temperature on α-tocopherol, fatty acid profile, and pigments of Diacronema vlkianum (Haptophyceae). Aquac. Int. 2009, 17, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Oren, A. A hundred years of Dunaliella research: 1905–2005. Saline Syst. 2005, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. El-Chaghaby, G.A.; Rashad, S. An overview of algae prospects in cosmeceuticals. J. Egypt. Women’s Dermatol. Soc. 2021, 18, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Takaichi, S. Carotenoids in Algae: Distributions, Biosyntheses and Functions. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1101–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Ambati, R.R.; Gogisetty, D.; Aswathanarayana, R.G.; Ravi, S.; Bikkina, P.N.; Bo, L.; Yuepeng, S. Industrial potential of carotenoid pigments from microalgae: Current trends and future prospects. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 1880–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Pereira, A.G.; Otero, P.; Echave, J.; Carreira-Casais, A.; Chamorro, F.; Collazo, N.; Jaboui, A.; Lourenço-Lopes, C.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Prieto, M.A. Xanthophylls from the Sea: Algae as Source of Bioactive Carotenoids. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Pollio, A.; Della Greca, M.; Monaco, P.; Pinto, G.; Previtera, L. Lipid composition of the acidophilic alga Dunaliella acidophila (Volvocales, Chlorophyta) I. Nonpolar lipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Lipids Lipid Metab. 1988, 963, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Leya, T.; Rahn, A.; Lütz, C.; Remias, D. Response of arctic snow and permafrost algae to high light and nitrogen stress by changes in pigment composition and applied aspects for biotechnology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 67, 432–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Soares, A.T.; da Costa, D.C.; Vieira, A.A.H.; Antoniosi Filho, N.R. Analysis of major carotenoids and fatty acid composition of freshwater microalgae. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ma, R.; Zhao, X.; Xie, Y.; Ho, S.-H.; Chen, J. Enhancing lutein productivity of Chlamydomonas sp. via high-intensity light exposure with corresponding carotenogenic genes expression profiles. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 275, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zhao, X.; Ma, R.; Liu, X.; Ho, S.-H.; Xie, Y.; Chen, J. Strategies related to light quality and temperature to improve lutein production of marine microalga Chlamydomonas sp. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 42, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Di Lena, G.; Casini, I.; Lucarini, M.; Lombardi-Boccia, G. Carotenoid profiling of five microalgae species from large-scale production. Food Res. Int. 2019, 120, 810–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Schüler, L.M.; Gangadhar, K.N.; Duarte, P.; Placines, C.; Molina-Márquez, A.M.; Léon-Bañares, R.; Sousa, V.S.; Varela, J.; Barreira, L. Improvement of carotenoid extraction from a recently isolated, robust microalga, Tetraselmis sp. CTP4 (chlorophyta). Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 43, 785–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Foo, S.C.; Yusoff, F.M.; Ismail, M.; Basri, M.; Yau, S.K.; Khong, N.M.; Chan, K.W.; Ebrahimi, M. Antioxidant capacities of fucoxanthin-producing algae as influenced by their carotenoid and phenolic contents. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 241, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ishika, T.; Moheimani, N.R.; Bahri, P.A.; Laird, D.W.; Blair, S.; Parlevliet, D. Halo-adapted microalgae for fucoxanthin production: Effect of incremental increase in salinity. Algal Res. 2017, 28, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wang, S.; Wu, S.; Yang, G.; Pan, K.; Wang, L.; Hu, Z. A review on the progress, challenges and prospects in commercializing microalgal fucoxanthin. Biotechnol. Adv. 2021, 53, 107865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Gérin, S.; Delhez, T.; Corato, A.; Remacle, C.; Franck, F. A novel culture medium for freshwater diatoms promotes efficient photoautotrophic batch production of biomass, fucoxanthin, and eicosapentaenoic acid. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 1581–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Li, Y.; Sun, H.; Wu, T.; Fu, Y.; He, Y.; Mao, X.; Chen, F. Storage carbon metabolism of Isochrysis zhangjiangensis under different light intensities and its application for co-production of fucoxanthin and stearidonic acid. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 282, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Mousavi Nadushan, R.; Hosseinzade, I. Optimization of Production and Antioxidant Activity of Fucoxanthin from Marine Haptophyte Algae, Isochrysis galbana. Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2020, 19, 2901–2908. [Google Scholar]
  125. Medina, E.; Cerezal, P.; Morales, J.; Ruiz-Domínguez, M.C. Fucoxanthin from Marine Microalga Isochrysis galbana: Optimization of Extraction Methods with Organic Solvents. DYNA 2019, 86, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kim, S.M.; Kang, S.-W.; Kwon, O.-N.; Chung, D.; Pan, C.-H. Fucoxanthin as a major carotenoid in Isochrysis aff. galbana: Characterization of extraction for commercial application. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2012, 55, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sun, Z.; Wang, X.; Liu, J. Screening of Isochrysis strains for simultaneous production of docosahexaenoic acid and fucoxanthin. Algal Res. 2019, 41, 101545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Crupi, P.; Toci, A.T.; Mangini, S.; Wrubl, F.; Rodolfi, L.; Tredici, M.R.; Coletta, A.; Antonacci, D. Determination of fucoxanthin isomers in microalgae (Isochrysis sp.) by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode-array detector multistage mass spectrometry coupled with positive electrospray ionization. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 27, 1027–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Gao, F.; Teles, I.; Wijffels, R.H.; Barbosa, M.J. Process optimization of fucoxanthin production with Tisochrysis lutea. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 315, 123894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Gao, F.; Sá, M.; Cabanelas, I.T.D.; Wijffels, R.H.; Barbosa, M.J. Improved fucoxanthin and docosahexaenoic acid productivities of a sorted self-settling Tisochrysis lutea phenotype at pilot scale. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 325, 124725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Mohamadnia, S.; Tavakoli, O.; Faramarzi, M.A.; Shamsollahi, Z. Production of fucoxanthin by the microalga Tisochrysis lutea: A review of recent developments. Aquaculture 2020, 516, 734637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Beuzenberg, V.; Goodwin, E.O.; Puddick, J.; Romanazzi, D.; Adams, S.L.; Packer, M.A. Optimising conditions for growth and xanthophyll production in continuous culture of Tisochrysis lutea using photobioreactor arrays and central composite design experiments. N. Z. J. Bot. 2017, 55, 64–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Premaratne, M.; Liyanaarachchi, V.C.; Nimarshana, P.H.V.; Ariyadasa, T.U.; Malik, A.; Attalage, R.A. Co-production of fucoxanthin, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and bioethanol from the marine microalga Tisochrysis lutea. Biochem. Eng. J. 2021, 176, 108160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kanamoto, A.; Kato, Y.; Yoshida, E.; Hasunuma, T.; Kondo, A. Development of a Method for Fucoxanthin Production Using the Haptophyte Marine Microalga Pavlova sp. OPMS 30543. Mar. Biotechnol. 2021, 23, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Withers, N.W.; Fiksdahl, A.; Tuttle, R.C.; Liaaen-Jensen, S. Carotenoids of the chrysophyceae. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Comp. Biochem. 1981, 68, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Matos, J.; Cardoso, C.; Gomes, A.; Campos, A.M.; Falé, P.; Afonso, C.; Bandarra, N.M. Bioprospection of Isochrysis galbana and its potential as a nutraceutical. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 7333–7342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Petrushkina, M.; Gusev, E.; Sorokin, B.; Zotko, N.; Mamaeva, A.; Filimonova, A.; Kulikovskiy, M.; Maltsev, Y.; Yampolsky, I.; Guglya, E.; et al. Fucoxanthin production by heterokont microalgae. Algal Res. 2017, 24, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Mostaert, A.S.; Karsten, U.; Hara, Y.; Watanabe, M.M. Pigments and fatty acids of marine raphidophytes: A chemotaxonomic re-evaluation. Phycol. Res. 1998, 46, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Stoyneva-Gärtner, M.; Stoykova, P.; Uzunov, B.; Dincheva, I.; Atanassov, I.; Draganova, P.; Borisova, C.; Gärtner, G. Carotenoids in five aeroterrestrial strains from Vischeria/Eustigmatos group: Updating the pigment pattern of Eustigmatophyceae. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2019, 33, 250–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Band-Schmidt, C.J.; Martínez-López, A.; Bustillos-Guzmán, J.J.; Carreón-Palau, L.; Morquecho, L.; Olguín-Monroy, N.O.; Zenteno-Savín, T.; Mendoza-Flores, A.; González-Acosta, B.; Hernández-Sandoval, F.H.; et al. Morphology, biochemistry, and growth of raphidophyte strains from the Gulf of California. Hydrobiologia 2012, 693, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mysliwa-Kurdziel, B.; Solymosi, K. Phycobilins and Phycobiliproteins Used in Food Industry and Medicine. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 1173–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Chen, H.; Qi, H.; Xiong, P. Phycobiliproteins—A Family of Algae-Derived Biliproteins: Productions, Characterization and Pharmaceutical Potentials. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Tounsi, L.; Ben Hlima, H.; Hentati, F.; Hentati, O.; Derbel, H.; Michaud, P.; Abdelkafi, S. Microalgae: A Promising Source of Bioactive Phycobiliproteins. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Jha, S.; Singh, V.K.; Singh, A.P.; Gupta, A.; Rana, P.; Sinha, R.P. The Radiant World of Cyanobacterial Phycobiliproteins: Examining Their Structure, Functions, and Biomedical Potentials. Targets 2024, 2, 32–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Wedemayer, G.J.; Kidd, D.G.; Wemmer, D.E.; Glazer, A.N. Phycobilins of cryptophycean algae. Structures of novel bilins with acryloyl substituents from phycoerythrin 566. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 4731–4741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Wedemayer, G.J.; Kidd, D.G.; Wemmer, D.E.; Glazer, A.N. Phycobilins of cryptophycean algae. Occurrence of dihydrobiliverdin and mesobiliverdin in cryptomonad biliproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 7315–7331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Li, W.; Su, H.-N.; Pu, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, L.-N.; Liu, Q.; Qin, S. Phycobiliproteins: Molecular structure, production, applications, and prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 340–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Sekar, S.; Chandramohan, M. Phycobiliproteins as a commodity: Trends in applied research, patents and commercialization. J. Appl. Phycol. 2008, 20, 113–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ashaolu, T.J.; Samborska, K.; Lee, C.C.; Tomas, M.; Capanoglu, E.; Tarhan, Ö.; Taze, B.; Jafari, S.M. Phycocyanin, a super functional ingredient from algae; properties, purification characterization, and applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 2320–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Chen, H.; Deng, J.; Li, L.; Liu, Z.; Sun, S.; Xiong, P. Recent Progress of Natural and Recombinant Phycobiliproteins as Fluorescent Probes. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Pagels, F.; Guedes, A.C.; Amaro, H.M.; Kijjoa, A.; Vasconcelos, V. Phycobiliproteins from cyanobacteria: Chemistry and biotechnological applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 422–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Balboa, E.M.; Conde, E.; Soto, M.L.; Pérez-Armada, L.; Domínguez, H. Cosmetics from Marine Sources. In Springer Handbook of Marine Biotechnology; Kim, S.K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 1015–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Jacob-Lopes, E.; Queiroz, M.I.; Zepka, L.Q. (Eds.) Pigments from Microalgae Handbook; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  154. Balasubramaniam, V.; Gunasegavan, R.D.N.; Mustar, S.; Lee, J.C.; Mohd Noh, M.F. Isolation of Industrial Important Bioactive Compounds from Microalgae. Molecules 2021, 26, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Chaloub, R.M.; Motta, N.M.S.; de Araujo, S.P.; de Aguiar, P.F.; da Silva, A.F. Combined effects of irradiance, temperature and nitrate concentration on phycoerythrin content in the microalga Rhodomonas sp. (Cryptophyceae). Algal Res. 2015, 8, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Nwoba, E.G.; Ogbonna, C.N.; Ishika, T.; Vadiveloo, A. Microalgal Pigments: A Source of Natural Food Colors. In Microalgae Biotechnology for Food, Health and High Value Products; Alam, M., Xu, J.L., Wang, Z., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Piñero Estrada, J.E.; Bermejo Bescós, P.; Villar del Fresno, A.M. Antioxidant activity of different fractions of Spirulina platensis protein extract. Farmaco 2001, 56, 497–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Romay, C.; Armesto, J.; Remirez, D.; González, R.; Ledon, N.; García, I. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of C-phycocyanin from blue-green algae. Inflamm. Res. 1998, 47, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Patel, A.; Mishra, S.; Ghosh, P.K. Antioxidant potential of C-phycocyanin isolated from cyanobacterial species Lyngbya, Phormidium and Spirulina spp. Ind. J. Biochem. Biophys. 2006, 43, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  160. Bermejo, P.; Piñero, E.; Villar, Á.M. Iron-chelating ability and antioxidant properties of phycocyanin isolated from a protean extract of Spirulina platensis. Food Chem. 2008, 110, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Sonani, R.R.; Rastogi, R.P.; Madamwar, D. Antioxidant Potential of Phycobiliproteins: Role in Anti-Aging Research. Biochem. Anal. Biochem. 2015, 4, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Chueh, C. Method of Allophycocyanin Inhibition of Enterovirus and Influenza Virus Reproduction Resulting in Cytopathic Effect. U.S. Patent 6,346,408, 12 February 2002. [Google Scholar]
  163. Shih, S.R.; Tsai, K.N.; Li, Y.S.; Chueh, C.C.; Chan, E.C. Inhibition of enterovirus 71-induced apoptosis by allophycocyanin isolated from a blue-green alga spirulina platensis. J. Med Virol. 2003, 70, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Dagnino-Leone, J.; Figueroa, C.P.; Castañeda, M.L.; Youlton, A.D.; Vallejos-Almirall, A.; Agurto-Muñoz, A.; Pérez, J.P.; Agurto-Muñoz, C. Phycobiliproteins: Structural aspects, functional characteristics, and biotechnological perspectives. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 1506–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Soni, A.; Dubey, M.; Verma, M.; Dhankhar, R.; Kaushal, V.; Atri, R.; Sabharwal, R. Revisiting the role of phycocyanin in current clinical practice. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 4588–4600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Telford, W.G.; Moss, M.W.; Morseman, J.P.; Allnutt, F.T. Cryptomonad algal phycobiliproteins as fluorochromes for extracellular and intracellular antigen detection by flow cytometry. Cytometry 2001, 44, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Mercier, L.; Peltomaa, E.; Ojala, A. Comparative analysis of phycoerythrin production in cryptophytes. J. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Tanifuji, G.; Onodera, N.T. Cryptomonads: A model organism sheds light on the evolutionary history of genome reorganization in secondary endosymbioses. Adv. Bot. Res. 2017, 84, 263–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Cunningham, B.R.; Greenwold, M.J.; Lachenmyer, E.M.; Heidenreich, K.M.; Davis, A.C.; Dudycha, J.L.; Richardson, T.L. Light capture and pigment diversity in marine and freshwater cryptophytes. J. Phycol. 2019, 55, 552–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Matos, Â.P. The impact of microalgae in food science and technology. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2017, 94, 1333–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Mata, T.M.; Martins, A.A.; Caetano, N.S. Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Thangavel, K.; Krishnan, P.R.; Nagaiah, S.; Kuppusamy, S.; Chinnasamy, S.; Rajadorai, J.S.; Olaganathan, G.N.; Dananjeyan, B. Growth and metabolic characteristics of oleaginous microalgal isolates from Nilgiri biosphere Reserve of India. BMC Microbiol. 2018, 18, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Kim, G.; Mujtaba, G.; Lee, K. Effects of nitrogen sources on cell growth and biochemical composition of marine chlorophyte Tetraselmis sp. for lipid production. ALGAE 2016, 31, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Lin, Z.; Raya, A.; Ju, L.-K. Microalga Ochromonas danica fermentation and lipid production from waste organics such as ketchup. Process. Biochem. 2014, 49, 1383–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Fahy, E.; Subramaniam, S.; Murphy, R.C.; Nishijima, M.; Raetz, C.R.H.; Shimizu, T.; Spener, F.; van Meer, G.; Wakelam, M.J.O.; Dennis, E.A. Update of the LIPID MAPS comprehensive classification system for lipids. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, S9–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Fuentes-Grünewald, C.; Garcés, E.; Alacid, E.; Rossi, S.; Camp, J. Biomass and Lipid Production of Dinoflagellates and Raphidophytes in Indoor and Outdoor Photobioreactors. Mar. Biotechnol. 2013, 15, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Spijkerman, E.; Wacker, A.; Weithoff, G.; Leya, T. Elemental and fatty acid composition of snow algae in Arctic habitats. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Liu, J.M.; Sommerfeld, Q.H. Screening and characterization of Isochrysis strains and optimization of culture conditions for docosahexaenoic acid production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 4785–4798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Carrier, G.; Baroukh, C.; Rouxel, C.; Duboscq-Bidot, L.; Schreiber, N.; Bougaran, G. Draft genomes and phenotypic characterization of Tisochrysis lutea strains. Toward the production of domesticated strains with high added value. Algal Res. 2018, 29, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Horrocks, L.A.; Yeo, Y.K. Health Benefits of Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA). Pharmacol. Res. 1999, 40, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Guil-Guerrero, J.L. Stearidonic acid (18:4n-3): Metabolism, nutritional importance, medical uses and natural sources. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2007, 109, 1226–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Nishshanka, G.K.S.H.; Don Praveen Anthonio, R.A.; Nimarshana, P.H.V.; Ariyadasa, T.U.; Chang, J.-S. Marine microalgae as sustainable feedstock for multi-product biorefineries. Biochem. Eng. J. 2022, 187, 108593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Mitani, E.; Nakayama, F.; Matsuwaki, I.; Ichi, I.; Kawabata, A.; Kawachi, M.; Kat, M. Fatty acid composition profiles of 235 strains of three microalgal divisions within the NIES Microbial Culture Collection. Microb. Resour. Syst. 2017, 33, 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  184. Kawachi, M.; Inouye, I.; Honda, D.; O’Kelly, C.J.; Bailey, J.C.; Bidigare, R.R.; Andersen, R.A. The Pinguiophyceae classis nova, a new class of photosynthetic stramenopiles whose members produce large amounts of omega-3 fatty acids. Phycol. Res. 2002, 50, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Peltomaa, E.T.; Aalto, S.L.; Vuorio, K.M.; Taipale, S.J. The Importance of Phytoplankton Biomolecule Availability for Secondary Production. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 5, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Peltomaa, E.; Johnson, M.D.; Taipale, S.J. Marine Cryptophytes Are Great Sources of EPA and DHA. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Taipale, S.; Strandberg, U.; Peltomaa, E.T.; Galloway, A.; Ojala, A.; Brett, M. Fatty acid composition as biomarkers of freshwater microalgae: Analysis of 37 strains of microalgae in 22 genera and in seven classes. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2013, 71, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Lee, B.I.; Kim, S.K.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, J.I.; Shin, W.; Rho, J.-R.; Yih, W. Intraspecific variations in macronutrient, amino acid, and fatty acid composition of mass-cultured Teleaulax amphioxeia (Cryptophyceae) strains. ALGAE 2019, 34, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Li-Beisson, Y.; Beisson, F.; Riekhof, W. Metabolism of acyl-lipids in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J. 2015, 82, 504–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Darwish, R.; Gedi, M.A.; Akepach, P.; Assaye, H.; Zaky, A.S.; Gray, D.A. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Is a Potential Food Supplement with the Capacity to Outperform Chlorella and Spirulina. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Procházková, L.; Remias, D.; Řezanka, T.; Nedbalová, L. Chloromonas nivalis subsp. tatrae, subsp. nov. (Chlamydomonadales, Chlorophyta): Re–examination of a snow alga from the High Tatra Mountains (Slovakia). Fottea 2018, 18, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Lang, I.; Hodac, L.; Friedl, T.; Feussner, I. Fatty acid profiles and their distribution patterns in microalgae: A comprehensive analysis of more than 2000 strains from the SAG culture collection. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Lutz, S.; Anesio, A.M.; Raiswell, R.; Edwards, A.; Newton, R.J.; Gill, F.; Benning, L.G. The biogeography of red snow microbiomes and their role in melting arctic glaciers. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. De Luca, M.; Pappalardo, I.; Limongi, A.R.; Viviano, E.; Radice, R.P.; Todisco, S.; Martelli, G.; Infantino, V.; Vassallo, A. Lipids from Microalgae for Cosmetic Applications. Cosmetics 2021, 8, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Lihanová, D.; Lukáčová, A.; Beck, T.; Jedlička, A.; Vešelényiová, D.; Krajčovič, J.; Vesteg, M. Versatile biotechnological applications of Euglena gracilis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 39, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Khan, M.I.; Shin, J.H.; Kim, J.D.; Khan, M.I.; Shin, J.H.; Kim, J.D. The promising future of microalgae: Current status, challenges, and optimization of a sustainable and renewable industry for biofuels, feed, and other products. Microb. Cell Fact. 2018, 17, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Gissibl, A.; Sun, A.; Care, A.; Nevalainen, H.; Sunna, A. Bioproducts from Euglena gracilis: Synthesis and Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Barbosa, M.; Valentão, P.; Andrade, P.B. Biologically Active Oxylipins from Enzymatic and Nonenzymatic Routes in Macroalgae. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. De los Reyes, C.; Ávila-Román, J.; Ortega, M.J.; de la Jara, A.; García-Mauriño, S.; Motilva, V.; Zubía, E. Oxylipins from the microalgae Chlamydomonas debaryana and Nannochloropsis gaditana and their activity as TNF-α inhibitors. Phytochemistry 2014, 102, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Mundt, S.; Kreitlow, S.; Jansen, R. Fatty acids with antibacterial activity from the cyanobacterium Oscillatoria redekei HUB 051. J. Appl. Phycol. 2003, 15, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Sorigué, D.; Légeret, B.; Cuiné, S.; Morales, P.; Mirabella, B.; Guédeney, G.; Li-Beisson, Y.; Jetter, R.; Peltier, G.; Beisson, F. Microalgae Synthesize Hydrocarbons from Long-Chain Fatty Acids via a Light-Dependent Pathway. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 2393–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Wichmann, J.; Lauersen, K.J.; Kruse, O. Green algal hydrocarbon metabolism is an exceptional source of sustainable chemicals. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020, 61, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Tetali, S.D. Terpenes and isoprenoids: A wealth of compounds for global use. Planta 2019, 249, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Melis, A. Carbon partitioning in photosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2013, 17, 453–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Lao, Y.M.; Jin, H.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, H.J.; Zhu, X.S.; Cai, Z.H. A Novel Hydrolytic Activity of Tri-Functional Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase in Haematococcus pluvialis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 2536–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Murakami, H.; Nobusawa, T.; Hori, K.; Shimojima, M.; Ohta, H. Betaine Lipid Is Crucial for Adapting to Low Temperature and Phosphate Deficiency in Nannochloropsis. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Giroud, C.; Gerber, A.; Eichenberger, W. Lipids of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Analysis of Molecular Species and Intracellular Site(s) of Biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 1988, 29, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Khozin-Goldberg, I. Lipid Metabolism in Microalgae. In The Physiology of Microalgae. Developments in Applied Phycology; Borowitzka, M.A., Beardall, J., Raven, J.A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 6, pp. 413–484. [Google Scholar]
  209. Li, J.; He, Y.; Anankanbil, S.; Guo, Z. Phospholipid-based surfactants. In Biobased Surfactants. Synthesis, Properties, and Applications, 2nd ed.; Hayes, D.G., Solaiman, D.K.Y., Ashby, R.D., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK; AOCS Press: Champaign, IL, USA, 2019; pp. 243–286. [Google Scholar]
  210. Park, K.; Lee, S.; Lee, Y.-M. Sphingolipids and Antimicrobial Peptides: Function and Roles in Atopic Dermatitis. Biomol. Ther. 2013, 21, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Imokawa, G.; Abe, A.; Jin, K.; Higaki, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Hidano, A. Decreased level of ceramides in stratum corneum of atopic dermatitis: An etiologic factor in atopic dry skin? J. Investig. Dermatol. 1991, 96, 523–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Liu, M.; Li, X.; Chen, X.-Y.; Xue, F.; Zheng, J. Topical application of a linoleic acid-ceramide containing moisturizer exhibit therapeutic and preventive benefits for psoriasis vulgaris: A randomized controlled trial. Dermatol. Ther. 2015, 28, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Inafuku, M.; Li, C.; Kanda, Y.; Kawamura, T.; Takeda, K.; Oku, H.; Watanabe, H. Beta-Glucosylceramide Administration (i.p.) Activates Natural Killer T cells In Vivo and Prevents Tumor Metastasis in Mice. Lipids 2012, 47, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Shimada, E.; Aida, K.; Sugawara, T.; Hirata, T. Inhibitory effect of topical maize glucosylceramide on skin photoaging in UV airradiated hairless mice. J. Oleo Sci. 2011, 60, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Miyagawa, M.; Fujikawa, A.; Nagadome, M.; Kohama, K.; Ogami, T.; Kitamura, S.; Kitagaki, H. Glycosylceramides Purified from the Japanese Traditional Non-Pathogenic Fungus Aspergillus and Koji Increase the Expression of Genes Involved in Tight Junctions and Ceramide Delivery in Normal Human Epidermal Keratinocytes. Fermentation 2019, 5, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Muralidhar, P.; Radhika, P.; Krishna, N.; Rao, D.V.; Rao, C.B. Sphingolipids from marine organisms: A Review. Nat. Prod. Sci. 2003, 9, 117–142. [Google Scholar]
  217. Li, Y.; Lou, Y.; Mu, T.; Ke, A.; Ran, Z.; Xu, J.; Chen, J.; Zhou, C.; Yan, X.; Xu, Q.; et al. Sphingolipids in marine microalgae: Development and application of a mass spectrometric method for global structural characterization of ceramides and glycosphingolipids in three major phyla. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 986, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Tanaka, I.; Matsuoka, S.; Murata, M.; Tachibana, K. A New Ceramide with a Novel Branched-Chain Fatty Acid Isolated from the Epiphytic Dinoflagellate Coolia monotis. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Arakaki, A.; Iwama, D.; Liang, Y.; Murakami, N.; Ishikura, M.; Tanaka, T.; Matsunaga, T. Glycosylceramides from marine green microalga Tetraselmis sp. Phytochemistry 2013, 85, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Ganfield, M.C.W. Isolation and Characterization of Sphingolipid from Ochromonas danica. Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 1970. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. p. 4308. Available online: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/4308 (accessed on 7 November 2021).
  221. Zhang, N.; Kohama, K.; Miyagawa, M.; Mansho, M.; Sugimoto, R.; Nakashima, A.; Suzuki, K.; Kitagaki, H. Identification of Monohexosylceramides from Euglena gracilis by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15, 1934578X20942351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Galasso, C.; Gentile, A.; Orefice, I.; Ianora, A.; Bruno, A.; Noonan, D.M.; Sansone, C.; Albini, A.; Brunet, C. Microalgal Derivatives as Potential Nutraceutical and Food Supplements for Human Health: A Focus on Cancer Prevention and Interception. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Stonik, V.A.; Stonik, I.V. Sterol and Sphingoid Glycoconjugates from Microalgae. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Volkman, J.K. Sterols in microrganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 60, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Ahmed, F.; Zhou, W.; Schenk, P.M. Pavlova lutheri is a high-level producer of phytosterols. Algal Res. 2015, 10, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Kaya, K.; Sano, T.; Shiraishi, F. Astasin, a novel cytotoxic carbohydrate-conjugated ergosterol from the colorless euglenoid, Astasia longa. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Lipids Lipid Metab. 1995, 1255, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Moon, E.J.; Lee, Y.M.; Lee, O.H.; Lee, M.J.; Lee, S.K.; Chung, M.H.; Park, Y.I.; Sung, C.K.; Choi, J.S.; Kim, K.W. A novel angiogenic factor derived from Aloe vera gel: Betasitosterol, a plant sterol. Angiogenesis 1999, 3, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Han, N.-R.; Kim, H.-M.; Jeong, H.-J. The β-sitosterol attenuates atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions through down-regulation of TSLP. Exp. Biol. Med. 2014, 239, 454–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Sun, Y.; Lin, Y.; Cao, X.; Xiang, L.; Qi, J. Sterols from Mytilidae Show Anti-Aging and Neuroprotective Effects via Anti-Oxidative Activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 21660–21673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Gabay, O.; Sanchez, C.; Salvat, C.; Chevy, F.; Breton, M.; Nourissat, G.; Wolf, C.; Jacques, C.; Berenbaum, F. Stigmasterol: A phytosterol with potential anti-osteoarthritic properties. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010, 18, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Tang, J.J.; Li, J.G.; Qi, W.; Qiu, W.W.; Li, P.S.; Li, B.L.; Song, B.L. Inhibition of SREBP by a small molecule, betulin, improves hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance and reduces atherosclerotic plaques. Cell Metabol. 2011, 13, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Díaz-Montes, E. Polysaccharides: Sources, Characteristics, Properties, and Their Application in Biodegradable Films. Polysaccharides 2022, 3, 480–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Ale, M.T.; Maruyama, H.; Tamauchi, H.; Mikkelsen, J.D.; Meyer, A.S. Fucose-Containing Sulfated Polysaccharides from Brown Seaweeds Inhibit Proliferation of Melanoma Cells and Induce Apoptosis by Activation of Caspase-3 In Vitro. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 2605–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. De Jesus Raposo, M.F.; de Morais, A.M.M.B.; de Morais, R.M.S.C. Marine polysaccharides from algae with potential biomedical applications. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 2967–3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Sousa, A.M.M.; Rocha, C.M.R.; Gonçalves, M.P. Agar. In Handbook of Hydrocolloids; Phillips, G.O., Williams, P.A., Eds.; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 731–765. [Google Scholar]
  236. Kamble, P.; Cheriyamundath, S.; Lopus, M.; Sirisha, V.L. Chemical characteristics, antioxidant and anticancer potential of sulfated polysaccharides from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 1641–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Paulsen, B.S.; Vieira, A.A.H.; Klaveness, D. Structure of extracellular polysaccharides produced by a soil Cryptomonas sp. (Cryptophyceae). J. Phycol. 1992, 28, 61–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Giroldo, D.; Vieira, A.A.H.; Paulsen, B.S. Extracellular polysaccharides produced by a tropical cryptophyte as a carbon source for natural bacterial populations. Eur. J. Phycol. 2005, 40, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Giroldo, D.; Vieira, A.A.H. An extracellular sulfated fucose-rich polysaccharide produced by a tropical strain of Cryptomonas obovata (Cryptophyceae). J. Appl. Phycol. 2002, 14, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Sun, A.; Hasan, M.T.; Hobba, G.; Nevalainen, H.; Te’o, J. Comparative assessment of the Euglena gracilis var. saccharophila variant strain as a producer of the β-1,3-glucan paramylon under varying light conditions. J. Phycol. 2018, 54, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Grimm, P.; Risse, J.M.; Cholewa, D.; Müller, J.M.; Beshay, U.; Friehs, K.; Flaschel, E. Applicability of Euglena gracilis for biorefineries demonstrated by the production of α-tocopherol and paramylon followed by anaerobic digestion. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 215, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Choi, J.A.; Oh, T.-H.; Choi, J.-S.; Chang, D.-J.; Joo, C.-K. Impact of β-1,3-glucan Isolated from Euglena gracilis on Corneal Epithelial Cell Migration and on Wound Healing in a Rat Alkali Burn Model. Curr. Eye Res. 2013, 38, 1207–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Ivušić, F.; Rezić, T.; Šantek, B. Heterotrophic Cultivation of Euglena gracilis in Stirred Tank Bioreactor: A Promising Bioprocess for Sustainable Paramylon Production. Molecules 2022, 27, 5866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Ma, M.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, F.; Yuan, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Ye, D.; Han, D.; Jin, H.; et al. High-cell-density cultivation of the flagellate alga Poterioochromonas malhamensis for biomanufacturing the water-soluble β-1,3-glucan with multiple biological activities. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Phadwal, K.; Singh, P.K. Isolation and characterization of an indigenous isolate of Dunaliella sp. for β-carotene and glycerol production from a hypersaline lake in India. J. Basic Microbiol. 2003, 43, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Ozcan, T.; Akpinar-Bayizit, A.; Yilmaz-Ersan, L.; Delikanli, B. Phenolics in Human Health. Int. J. Chem. Eng. Appl. 2014, 5, 393–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Santhakumaran, P.; Ayyappan, S.M.; Ray, J.G. Nutraceutical applications of twenty-five species of rapid-growing green-microalgae as indicated by their antibacterial, antioxidant and mineral content. Algal Res. 2020, 47, 101878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Cornish, M.L.; Garbary, D.J. Antioxidants from macroalgae: Potential applications in human health and nutrition. Algae 2010, 25, 155–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Holmann, P.C.H. Evidence for health benefits of plant phenols: Local or systemic effects? J. Sci. Food Agric. 2001, 81, 842–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Del Mondo, A.; Smerilli, A.; Ambrosino, L.; Albini, A.; Noonan, D.M.; Sansone, C.; Brunet, C. Insights into phenolic compounds from microalgae: Structural variety and complex beneficial activities from health to nutraceutics. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2021, 41, 155–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Alipieva, K.; Korkina, L.; Orhan, I.E.; Georgiev, M.I. Verbascoside—A review of its occurrence, (bio)synthesis and pharmacological significance. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Vornoli, A.; Grande, T.; Lubrano, V.; Vizzarri, F.; Gorelli, C.; Raffaelli, A.; Della Croce, C.M.; Zarate Baca, S.; Sandoval, C.; Longo, V.; et al. In vitro characterization of antioxidant, antibacterial and antimutagenic activities of the green microalga Ettlia pseudoalveolaris. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Sansone, C.; Brunet, C. Promises and Challenges of Microalgal Antioxidant Production. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Prihanto, A.A.; Jatmiko, Y.D.; Nurdiani, R.; Miftachurrochmah, A.; Wakayama, M. Freshwater Microalgae as Promising FoodSources: Nutritional and Functional Properties. Open Microbiol. J. 2022, 16, e187428582206200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Renukadevi, K.P.; Saravana, P.S.; Angayarkanni, J. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii sp. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2011, 2, 1467–1472. [Google Scholar]
  256. Goiris, K.; Muylaert, K.; Fraeye, I.; Foubert, I.; De Brabanter, J.; De Cooman, L. Antioxidant potential of microalgae in relation to their phenolic and carotenoid content. J. Appl. Phycol. 2012, 24, 1477–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Safafar, H.; Van Wagenen, J.; Møller, P.; Jacobsen, C. Carotenoids, Phenolic Compounds and Tocopherols Contribute to the Antioxidative Properties of Some Microalgae Species Grown on Industrial Wastewater. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 7339–7356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Duval, B.; Shetty, K.; Thomas, W.H. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties in the snow alga Chamydomonas nivalis after expose to light. J. Appl. Phycol. 1999, 11, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Faraloni, C.; Di Lorenzo, T.; Bonetti, A. Impact of light stress on the synthesis of both antioxidants polyphenols and carotenoids, as fast photoprotective response in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: New prospective for biotechnological potential of this microalga. Symmetry 2021, 13, 2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Brasil, B.d.S.A.F.; de Siqueira, F.G.; Salum, T.F.C.; Zanette, C.M.; Spier, M.R. Microalgae and cyanobacteria as enzyme biofactories. Algal Res. 2017, 25, 76–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Sonthalia, S.; Daulatabad, D.; Sarkar, R. Glutathione as a skin whitening agent: Facts, myths, evidence and controversies. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2016, 82, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Guzmán, F.; Wong, G.; Román, T.; Cárdenas, C.; Alvárez, C.; Schmitt, P.; Albericio, F.; Rojas, V. Identification of Antimicrobial Peptides from the Microalgae Tetraselmis suecica (Kylin) Butcher and Bactericidal Activity Improvement. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Suh, S.-S.; Hwang, J.; Park, M.; Seo, H.H.; Kim, H.-S.; Lee, J.H.; Moh, S.H.; Lee, T.-K. Anti-Inflammation Activities of Mycosporine-like Amino Acids (MAAs) in Response to UV Radiation Suggest Potential Anti-Skin Aging Activity. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 5174–5187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Řezanka, T.; Temina, M.; Tolstikov, A.G.; Dembitsky, V.M. Natural microbial UV radiation filters—Mycosporine-like amino acids. Folia Microbiol. 2004, 49, 339–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Oren, A.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Mycosporines and mycosproine-like amino acids: UV protectants or multipurpose secondary metabolites. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 269, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Schmid, D.; Schuerch, C.; Zülli, F. Mycosporine-like amino acids from red algae protect against premature skin-aging. Euro Cosmet. 2006, 9, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  267. Rosic, N.N. Mycosporine-Like Amino Acids: Making the Foundation for Organic Personalised Sunscreens. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Morone, J.; Alfeus, A.; Vasconcelos, V.; Martins, R. Revealing the potential of cyanobacteria in cosmetics and cosmeceuticals—A new bioactive approach. Algal Res. 2019, 41, 101541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Ryu, J.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, I.-H.; Choi, Y.H.; Nam, T.-J. Protective effect of porphyra-334 on UVA-induced photoaging in human skin fibroblasts. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 34, 796–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Jeffrey, S.W.; MacTavish, H.S.; Dunlap, W.C.; Vesk, M.; Groenewoud, K. Occurrence of UVA- and UVB-absorbing compounds in 152 species (206 strains) of marine microalgae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1999, 189, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Llewellyn, C.A.; Airs, R.L. Distribution and Abundance of MAAs in 33 Species of Microalgae across 13 Classes. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 1273–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Sinha, R.P.; Singh, S.P.; Häder, D.P. Database on mycosporine and mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) in fungi, cyanobacteria, macroalgae, phytoplankton and animals. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2007, 89, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Martínez-Francés, E.; Escudero-Oñate, C. Cyanobacteria and microalgae in the production of valuable bioactive compounds. Microalgal Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 104–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Kim, B.K.; Joo, H.; Lee, B.; Lee, D.-H.; Ahn, I.-Y.; Ha, S.-Y. Physiological Characteristics and Related Biochemical Parameters of Snow Algae from King George Island, Antarctica. Ocean Sci. J. 2018, 53, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Hasan, M.T.; Sun, A.; Mirzaei, M.; Te’o, J.; Hobba, G.; Sunna, A.; Nevalainen, H. A comprehensive assessment of the biosynthetic pathways of ascorbate, α-tocopherol and free amino acids in Euglena gracilis var. saccharophila. Algal Res. 2017, 27, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Brown, M.R.; Miller, K.A. The ascorbic acid content of eleven species of microalgae used in mariculture. J. Appl. Phycol. 1992, 4, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Huo, J.-Z.; Nelis, H.J.; Lavens, P.; Sorgeloos, P.; De Leenheer, A. Determination of E vitamers in microalgae using high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 782, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Lukáčová, A.; Beck, T.; Koptašiková, L.; Benda, A.; Tomečková, L.; Trniková, M.; Lihanová, D.; Steiner, J.M.; Krajčovič, J.J.; Vesteg, M.J. Euglena gracilis can grow in the mixed culture containing Cladosporium westerdijkiae, Lysinibacillus boronitolerans and Pseudobacillus badius without the addition of vitamins B1 and B12. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 351, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Rakuša, Ž.T.; Šenk, A.; Roškar, R. Content and stability of B complex vitamins in commercial cosmetic products. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2023, 22, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Wargala, E.; Sławska, M.; Zalewska, A.; Toporowska, M. Health Effects of Dyes, Minerals, and Vitamins Used in Cosmetics. Women 2021, 1, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Sylvander, P.; Häubner, N.; Snoeijs, P. The Thiamine Content of Phytoplankton Cells Is Affected by Abiotic Stress and Growth Rate. Microb. Ecol. 2013, 65, 566–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Forbat, E.; Al-Niaimi, F.; Ali, F.R. Use of nicotinamide in dermatology. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2017, 42, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Wohlrab, J.; Kreft, D. Niacinamide–Mechanisms of Action and Its Topical Use in Dermatology. Ski. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2014, 27, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Proksch, E.; de Bony, R.; Trapp, S.; Boudon, S. Topical use of dexpanthenol: A 70th anniversary article. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2017, 28, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Fujishiro, M.; Yahagi, S.; Takemi, S.; Nakahara, M.; Sakai, T.; Sakata, I. Pyridoxine stimulates filaggrin production in human epidermal keratinocytes. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 5513–5518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Stucker, M.; Pieck, C.; Stoerb, C.; Niedner, R.; Hartung, J.; Altmeyer, P. Topical vitamin B12—A new therapeutic approach in atopic dermatitis-evaluation of efficacy and tolerability in a randomized placebo-controlled multicentre clinical trial. Br. J. Dermatol. 2004, 150, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Januchowski, R. Evaluation of Topical Vitamin B12 for the Treatment of Childhood Eczema. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2009, 15, 387–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  288. Leclere-Bienfait, S.; Bredif, S. Extract of Chlamydomonas Acidophila, Method for Preparing Same and Cosmetic Compositions and Dermatological Compositions Comprising Same. WIPO (PCT) Patent WO2020136283A1, 2 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
  289. Bartenjev, I.; Oremović, L.; Butina, M.R.; Masnec, I.S.; Bouloc, A.; Voda, K.; Situm, M. Topical effectiveness of a cosmetic skincare treatment for acne-prone skin: A clinical study. Acta Dermatovenerol. Alp. Pannonica Adriat. 2011, 20, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  290. Darwesh, O.M.; Mahmoud, R.H.; Abdo, S.M.; Marrez, D.A. Isolation of Haematococcus lacustris as source of novel anti-multi-antibiotic resistant microbes agents; fractionation and identification of bioactive compounds. Biotechnol. Rep. 2022, 35, e00753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Herrmann, M.; Zanella, L.; Pertile, P.; Gaebler, S.; Joppe, H.; Vielhaber, G.; Schmaus, G. Microalgae derived extract with promising anti-hair loss potential. In Proceedings of the 27th IFSCC Congress, Johannesburg, South Africa, 15–18 October 2012. [Google Scholar]
  292. Elangovan, M.; Muju, G.; Anantharaman, P. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Platymonas sp. and Its Antibacterial Activity Against Biofouling Causing Bacterial Strains. J. Biol. Act. Prod. Nat. 2019, 9, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Evangelista, V.; Barsanti, L.; Frassanito, A.M.; Passarelli, V.; Gualtieri, P. (Eds.) Algal Toxins: Nature, Occurrence, Effect and Detection; NATO Advanced Study Institute on Sensor Systems for Biological Threats: The Algal Toxins Case, Pisa, Italy, 30 September–11 October 2007; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  294. Hofbauer, W.K. Toxic or Otherwise Harmful Algae and the Built Environment. Toxins 2021, 13, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  295. Zimba, P.V.; Huang, I.-S.; Gutierrez, D.; Shin, W.; Bennett, M.S.; Triemer, R.E. Euglenophycin is produced in at least six species of euglenoid algae and six of seven strains of Euglena sanguinea. Harmful Algae 2017, 63, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Zimba, P.V.; Rowan, M.; Triemer, R. Identification of euglenoid algae that produce ichthyotoxin(s). J. Fish Dis. 2004, 27, 115–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  297. Wang, D.-Z. Neurotoxins from Marine Dinoflagellates: A Brief Review. Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 349–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  298. Sobieraj, J.; Metelski, D. Insights into Toxic Prymnesium parvum Blooms as a Cause of the Ecological Disaster on the Odra River. Toxins 2023, 15, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  299. Binzer, S.B.; Svenssen, D.K.; Daugbjerg, N.; Alves-De-Souza, C.; Pinto, E.; Hansen, P.J.; Larsen, T.O.; Varga, E. A-, B- and C-type prymnesins are clade specific compounds and chemotaxonomic markers in Prymnesium parvum. Harmful Algae 2019, 81, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  300. Suriya, G.N.; Gaurav, K.; Sivaji, S. Isolation, identification and outdoor cultivation of thermophilic freshwater microalgae Coelastrella sp. FI69 in bubble column reactor for the application of biofuel production. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2018, 14, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Stoykova, P.; Stoyneva-Gärtner, M.; Uzunov, B.; Gärtner, G.; Atanassov, I.; Draganova, P.; Borisova, C. Morphological characterization and phylogenetic analysis of aeroterrestrial Vischeria/Eustigmatos strains with industrial potential. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2019, 33, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Wilkie, A.C.; Edmundson, S.J.; Duncan, J.G. Indigenous algae for local bioresource production: Phycoprospecting. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2011, 15, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphological types of unicellular algae with examples of (1) flagellate type represented by single-celled algae (a,b), colony (c), and coenobium (d), with white arrows indicating flagella; (2) palmelloid type—a general view of a colony (e) and part of the same colony under high (100×) magnification with immersion (f); (3) amoeboid type represented by a single-celled alga (g) and plasmodia (h), indicated by blue arrows, situated in the hyaline, water-storage cells of a Sphagnum moss; (4) coccal type represented by different single cells (im), colony (n) and coenobia (o,p).
Figure 1. Morphological types of unicellular algae with examples of (1) flagellate type represented by single-celled algae (a,b), colony (c), and coenobium (d), with white arrows indicating flagella; (2) palmelloid type—a general view of a colony (e) and part of the same colony under high (100×) magnification with immersion (f); (3) amoeboid type represented by a single-celled alga (g) and plasmodia (h), indicated by blue arrows, situated in the hyaline, water-storage cells of a Sphagnum moss; (4) coccal type represented by different single cells (im), colony (n) and coenobia (o,p).
Cosmetics 11 00115 g001
Figure 2. Algal evolutionary lines and relevant taxonomic phyla with indicated distribution of flagellate morphological type. The different size reflects the biodiversity in each phylum.
Figure 2. Algal evolutionary lines and relevant taxonomic phyla with indicated distribution of flagellate morphological type. The different size reflects the biodiversity in each phylum.
Cosmetics 11 00115 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of number of investigated strains of flagellate algae according to the main taxonomic groups (algal phyla). Colors reflect the natural dyes of algae in the relevant groups.
Figure 3. Distribution of number of investigated strains of flagellate algae according to the main taxonomic groups (algal phyla). Colors reflect the natural dyes of algae in the relevant groups.
Cosmetics 11 00115 g003
Figure 4. The biodiversity of investigated flagellate species according to the main taxonomic groups (algal phyla). Colors reflect the natural dyes of algae in the relevant groups.
Figure 4. The biodiversity of investigated flagellate species according to the main taxonomic groups (algal phyla). Colors reflect the natural dyes of algae in the relevant groups.
Cosmetics 11 00115 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of the flagellate algal genera in the main taxonomic groups (algal phyla). Colors reflect the natural dyes of algae in the relevant groups.
Figure 5. Distribution of the flagellate algal genera in the main taxonomic groups (algal phyla). Colors reflect the natural dyes of algae in the relevant groups.
Cosmetics 11 00115 g005
Figure 6. Number of investigated flagellate strains, species, and genera in the main taxonomic groups. Digits in white show the number in each of the categories.
Figure 6. Number of investigated flagellate strains, species, and genera in the main taxonomic groups. Digits in white show the number in each of the categories.
Cosmetics 11 00115 g006
Figure 7. Percentage distribution of genera in main taxonomic groups with one, two-four, five-nine, and ten-twelve compound groups (CGs) investigated. White digits show the real numbers of investigated compounds.
Figure 7. Percentage distribution of genera in main taxonomic groups with one, two-four, five-nine, and ten-twelve compound groups (CGs) investigated. White digits show the real numbers of investigated compounds.
Cosmetics 11 00115 g007
Table 1. Main bioactive substances investigated in flagellate algae with indication of their properties, real or potential application in cosmetics, studied strains (organized alphabetically in the taxonomic groups), and relevant references. For details of application and commercially utilized sources, please, follow the text.
Table 1. Main bioactive substances investigated in flagellate algae with indication of their properties, real or potential application in cosmetics, studied strains (organized alphabetically in the taxonomic groups), and relevant references. For details of application and commercially utilized sources, please, follow the text.
SubstanceActivity Important for CosmeticsUse/Potential Use in CosmeticsSpecies/StrainsReferences
  • Pigments
1.1.
Chloropohylls
Stimulate tissue growth; wound-healing, antioxidant, antibacterial, anticancer, antimutagenic, antitumor, anti-inflammatory propertiesSkin-care productsChlamydomonas reinhardtii, Diacronema lutheri,
Isochrysis galbana
[14,29,49,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]
1.2.
Carotenoids
Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunoprophylactic, and antitumor activities and UV-protective roleSkin-beauty products, products that slow down skin aging and sun damage, and formulations against skin cancer and inflammatory disorders [37,46,61]
  • Lutein
Improves skin elasticityColorant; skin tanning and sun-tan productsChlamydomonas acidophila, Chlamydomonas nivalis, Chlamydomonas plantogloea, Chlamydomonas rehinardtii, Chlamydomonas strain JSC4, Dunaliella tertiolecta, Dunaliella spp., Pyramimonas urceolata, Pyramimonas sp., Tetraselmis suecica, Tetraselmis wettsteinii, Tetraselmis sp., cryptophytes[12,19,23,37,39,62,63,64,107,113,114,115,116,117]
  • Canthaxanthin
Tan colorSkin tanning and suntan productsChlamydomonas nivalis,
Haematococcus lacustris
[12,19,37,63,64]
  • ß-cryptoxanthin
Skin whitening Dunaliella salina[1,65,66]
  • Fucoxanthin
Functional antioxidant ingredientHibberdia magna, Isochrysis galbana, Isochrysis zhangjiangensis, Isochrysis sp. CCMP1324, Isochrysis sp., Tisochrysis lutea, Tisochrysis lutea CS-177/7, Chrysotila carteriae, Chrysotila carterae CCMP647, Diacronema lutheri,
Chromulina ochromonoides, Poterioochromonas malhamensis, Poteriochromonas malhamensis CMBB-1, Ochromonas danica, Ochromonas spp., Mallomonas sp. SBV13, Sarcinochrysis marina, Olisthodiscus luteus, Synura petersenii, Chattonella subsalsa, Chattonella marina, Fibrocapsa japonica
[37,47,48,60,67,68,76,117,118,119,120,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,140]
  • ß-carotene
Inhibits proline oxidation in collagen, induced by UV radiation; improvement of a skin appearance by reducing the roughness and increasing the smoothness and hydration;
reduction in skin pigmentation disorders and enhance their removal; inhibits melanogenesis
Hair and personal care products (aftershave lotions and makeup) and suntan formulations; washing and hand creams; skin-whitening formulationsChlamydomonas nivalis, Dunaliella salina, Dunaliella tertiolecetra, Tetraselmis wettsteinii, Tetraselmis suecica, Tetraselmis sp.[10,29,37,66,69,70,71,72,75,76,107,108,109,110,111,117]
  • Zeaxanthin
Anti-tyrosinase activitySkin-whitening substituentsChlamydomonas nivalis, Dunaliella salina[13,73]
  • Lycopene
Personal care formulations as an antiaging agent, with possible application as a sunscreen and sunburn-preventing agentDunaliella acidophila[12,19,63,64,112]
  • Astaxanthin
Diminishment of melaninSunscreen and after sun lotionsSanguina nivaloides, Sanguina aurantia, Chlainomonas rubra, Chlainomonas sp. DR53, Chlainomonas sp. AS02, Chloromonas nivalis, Chloromonas hindakii, Chloromonas krienitzii and Chloromonas polyptera, Haematococcus lacustris, Haematococcus rubens, Haematoccus rubicundus, Euglena rubida, Euglena sanguinea, Trachelomonas volvocina, Tovellia rubescens, Tovelia sanguinea, Diacronema vlkianum[1,12,13,16,29,36,40,46,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106]
  • Anthocyanins
Chlamydomonas agloeoformis[17]
1.1.3.
Phycobilins
The only natural greenish or bluish colorants; pinkish colorants; antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities; antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, dermaprotective, melagonesis inhibiting and wound-healing abilitiesHair and personal care products; lipsticks, eye-shadows, eyeliners, face make-up and sun-protecting cream; anti-ageing formulationsCryptomonas curvata CCAP 979/63, Cryptomonas erosa CPCC 446, Cryptomonas lundii CCAP 979/69, Cryptomonas marssonii CCAP 979/70, Cryptomonas ozolinii UTEX LB 2782, Cryptomonas pyrenoidifera NIVA 2/81, Cryptomonas pyrenoidifera CCAP 979/61, Cryptomonas sp. CPCC 336, Rhodomonas salina CCMP 757, Proteomonas sulcata CCMP 704), Rhinomonas, Storeatula, Guillardia, Hanusia, Geminigera, Plagioselmis and Teleaulax; Proteomonas, Chroomonas, Komma, Flacomonas; Hemiselmis[10,62,141,142,143,144,148,152,153,154,155,156,162,163,164,165,168,169]
2.
Lipids
Indispensable cell components and precursors to many important molecules.NanoparticlesChlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlamydomonadales strains TGA3 and TGA5; Tetrasemis suecica, Poteriochromonas malhamensi, Ochromonas danicas[68,172,173,174,189]
2.1.
Fatty acryls
2.1.1.
Fatty acids
The major component of lipids in microalgaeEmollients, emulsifiers, softeners, and as raw material in soaps as wellChlamydomonas agloeformis, Dunaliella acidophila; Heterosigma akashiwo, Alexandrium minutum, Karlodinium veneficum[17,19,112,176]
  • PUFAs
Regulation of cell membrane fluidity, electron and oxygen transport; role in cell and tissue thermal adaptation as well; cryo-protective role; antibacterial, antiviral, antioxidant and detoxifying capacities with ability to mitigate several inflammatory and allergic reactions; hair nourishment and protectionSurfactants in soaps and other skin care products, including those for wound-healing and skin whitening; hair oils, hair serum, hair gels and spraysChlamydomonas agloeformis, Chlamydomonas planctogloea, Chloromonas alpina, Chloromonas hindakii, Chloromonas nivalis (incl. subsp. tatrae), Chloromonas polyptera, Chloromonas remiasii CCCryo 005–99, Chloromonas spp.; Hibberdia magna,
Poteriochoroomonas malhamensis; Isochrysis spp., Diacronema lutheri, Gephyrocapsa huxleyi; Tisochrysis lutea; Pseudopedinella sp.; Nephroselmis rotunda; Chroomonas nordstedtii, Chroomonas sp., Cryptomonas spp., Rhodomonas maculata, Rhodomonas spp., Storeatula major, Teleaulax spp., Proteomonas spp.; Chattonella subsalsa, Chattonella marina, Fibrocapsa japonica, other raphidophyceans; Phaeomonas parva, Phaeomonas sp., all other Pinguiphyceae; 235 strains
[13,16,17,19,41,48,60,68,75,83,114,127,138,140,167,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,192]
2.1.2.
Fatty acid esters
Texturizing properties to regulate viscosity of formulations and to increase their protective and lubricant properties for improvement the rigidity, hardness, texture and stabilityTexturizer agents in cosmetic formulations; LipsticksEuglena gracilis;
Dunaliella acidophila, Edaphochlamys debaryana
[19,112,134,195,196,197,199]
2.1.3.
Hydrocarbons and triadylglycerols
Essential role in preventing water loss of tissuesSkin-care formulations (potential)Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Haematococcus lacustris[19,201,202,203,204,205]
2.2.
Glycerolipids
Anticancer, antiviral and anti-inflammatory activitiesDermal cosmetics (potential)Chlamydomonas reinhardtii[19]
2.3.
Glycerophospolipids
Key components of cell membrane which may participate in responses to the stressExcellent emulsifying agents to stabilize oil–water emulsionsChloromonas hindakii[19,83,194,208,209]
2.4.
Sphingolipids
Significant role in maintaining cell membrane integrity; antimicrobial and antiviral activity; alleviation of atopic dermatitis; enhancement of psoriasis treatment; preventing of tumor formation; reduction in UV-induced wrinkle formation in a skin photoagingIngredients in cosmetic formulations for topical applicationAlexandrium minutum, Coolia monotis; Karlodinium veneficum; Prorocentrum donghaiense; Isochtysis galbana, Isochrysis zhanjiangensis, Pleurochrysis carterae; Ochromonas danica; Tetraselmis sp.; Euglena gracilis[19,210,211,212,213,214,217,219,220,221]
2.5.
Sterol lipids
Essential role in cell membrane structures and functioning; antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial properties; health-promoting benefitsAnti-aging cosmetic products, moisturizers, sunscreens and body washesDiacronema lutheri, Isochrysis galbana; Dunaliella acidophila, Dunaliella salina, Tetrselmis sp. and other strains from Ochrophyta (Chrysophyceae, Synurophyceae, Dictyophyceae, Raphidophyceae), Pyrrhophyta, Cryptophyta, Haptophyta (Coccolithophyceae, Pavlovaphyceae), Euglenophyta, Chlorophyta (Chlorophyceae); Astasia longa; 19 cryptophytes[10,19,60,62,112,222,223,224,225,226,227,230,231]
3.
Polysaccharides
S gelling, texturizing, thickening, and stabilizing properties Chlamydomonas oblonga, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Lobochlamys segnis; Cryptomonas obovata, Cryptomonas tetrapyrenoidosa, Cryptomonas soil strain; Euglena gracilis and all euglenophytes; Poterioochromonas malhamensis[39,167,195,197,232,234,236,237,238,239,240,243,244]
4.
Alcohols
Organic osmolytesIn hand creams for increasing the skin moisture in long-lasting skin hydrationChlamydomonas reinhardtii, Dunaliella salina[13,37,245]
5.
Phenolics
Antioxidants; chemical protectors against UV radiation and anti-melanogenic propertiesCosmetic ingredientsChlamydomoans agloeaformis, Chlamydomonas nivalis, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Tetraselmis suecica; Isochrysis sp.; Chrysophaeum taylori[17,62,250,253,254,255,256,257,258,259]
6.
Enzymes and peptides
Antioxidant capacity; anti-melanogenic properties; antibacterial activitiesSunscreens, skin protectors from photo-ageing and skin-lightening agents in many cosmetic products, mainly creams and lotionsChlamydomonas reinhardtii, Dunaliella parva, Dunaliella tertilecta, Tetraselmis suecica; Poterioochromonas malhamensis[37,260,261,262]
7.
Mycosporine-like aminoacids (MAAs)
Protection from UV radiation (sun-screen function and anti-aging abilities); strong antioxidants; anti-cancer agents; anti-inflammatory effects; inhibition of elastane decompositionStable and effective skin-care UV protective products; formulations to improve skin smoothness and inhibit wrinkle formation239 strains of 152 cultured marine microalgal species from raphidophyceans (incl. Chattonella, Fibrocapsa), haptophytes (incl. Chrysochromulina, Gephyrocapsa, Haptolina, Dicrateria and Phaeocystis pochetii, Phaeocystis sp.), euglenophyte, dinoflagellates (incl. Alexandrium margalefi, Gymnodinium catenatum, Gymnodiniun spp., Gyrodinium sp., Karlodinium veneficum, Kryptoperidinium foliaceum, Oxyrrhis marina, Scripsiella acuminata, Scrippsiella sp., Heterocapsa and Woloszynskaya), cryptophytes (Chroomonas, Rhodomonas baltica, Rhodomonas sp.) and green algae (incl. Tetraselmis chui); Chlamydomonas nivalis, Chlamydomonas hedleyi; strains from “reddish” and “greenish” snow[12,16,37,62,263,264,265,267,269,270,271,272,273,274]
8.
Vitamins
8.1.
Vitamin C
Strong antioxidant essential for collagen synthesisAnti-pigmentation skin treatmentDunaliella spp., Tetraselmis suecica; Euglena gracilis; Cryptomonas maculata[37,62,195,197,275,276]
8.2.
Vitamin E
Photoprotective skin creamsDunaliella tertiolecta, Tetraselmis suecica; Euglena gracilis; Diacronema vlkianum, Isochrysis galbana[37,106,197,277]
8.3.
Vitamin A (see also ß-carotene)
Euglena gracilis, Dunaliella tertiolecta[62,195,197,278]
8.4.
Vitamin B (B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B12)
Multiple favorable effects on the skin: antipruritic effect (B1, B3); anti-inflammatory effect (B2, B3, B5); sebostatic, antipruritic, vasoactive, barrier- and photo-protective, lightening, anti-microbial (B3); moisturizer; effect on the fibroblast proliferation (B5); stimulation of filaggrin production in human epidermal keratinocytes (B6); suppression of cytokine production, reduction of nitric oxide production, cell proliferation enhancement, modulation of lymphocyte activity (B12)Ingredients in versatile skin-care formulations for topical application
(against acne, atopic dermatitis, childhood eczema, skin aging, photo damages on the skin, etc.)
Rhodomonas salina; Dunaliella tertiolecta, Tetraselmis suecica[62,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288]
9.
Extracts
Strong effects in skin and hair protection, improvement of appearance, or other treatment regarding beauty-products or in treatment of skin and hair disordersAnti-aging cosmetic products; anti-acne formulation; diminishment of hyperpigmentationChlamydomonas agloeformis, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Haematococcus lacustris REH10, Tetraselmis sp. CTP4; Isochrysis sp. Tahitian strain (T-Iso), Isochrysis sp.[10,13,17,118,289,290,291,292]
10.
Nanoparticle sources
Ability to synthesize silver nanoparticles with antibacterial activity against pathogens, able to infect different woundsTopical application in wound-healing formulationsPlatymonas sp.[293]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stoyneva-Gärtner, M.; Uzunov, B.; Gärtner, G. A Spotlight on the Potential of Microscopic Motile Algae as Novel Sources for Modern Cosmetic Products. Cosmetics 2024, 11, 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11040115

AMA Style

Stoyneva-Gärtner M, Uzunov B, Gärtner G. A Spotlight on the Potential of Microscopic Motile Algae as Novel Sources for Modern Cosmetic Products. Cosmetics. 2024; 11(4):115. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11040115

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stoyneva-Gärtner, Maya, Blagoy Uzunov, and Georg Gärtner. 2024. "A Spotlight on the Potential of Microscopic Motile Algae as Novel Sources for Modern Cosmetic Products" Cosmetics 11, no. 4: 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11040115

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop