Ken Pucker’s Post

View profile for Ken Pucker, graphic
Ken Pucker Ken Pucker is an Influencer

Professor of the Practice @ The Fletcher School at Tufts University | Sustainable Business Dynamics

When is down, really up? If it is insufficiently concerning to see company after company (bp, Shell, ASOS.com, …) cut back on prior carbon reduction commitments, or company’s with unspecific sustainability commitments (e.g. Walmart and Scope 3 emissions) or company’s that have no authentic climate commitments (e.g. Skechers)…we also have to be concerned about companies fudging their decarbonization results. For example, the attached article details Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.'s (KDP) reported reduction of Scope 3 emissions from a 2018 base of -12% vs. their actual increase of Scope 3 emissions by 14%. Why? 🥤 KDP Science Based Targets initiative plan, against which they report, only includes “select” categories within Category 1 (“Purchased Goods and Services”). Said differently, KDP does report on PET and glass packaging emissions from Category 1, but, does not include other Category 1 emissions from fuel and energy related activities, upstream transportation and distribution and the use of products. Also worth noting is that “processing of sold products” representing 2.8MtCO2 in 2023 is not included in the calculations. 🛢️KDP is not alone. Other SBTi submissions also are allowed to exclude specific categories. While I do not subscribe to letting perfect be the enemy of good….I think it unhelpful to allow for exclusions that tilt a company’s reported carbon emissions from an impressive to a concerning outcome. David Burrows Bill Baue Leslie Johnston, M.Sc. Cynthia Cummis Katie Wallace Auden Schendler Joel Makower John Elkington Matt Powell Sarah Kent Clément Chenut Sucharita Kodali Devon Rufo Evan Wiener Daniel Stephens Aniket Shah, PhD https://lnkd.in/ePZ2Cw9s

The fizz firm fudging its footprint

The fizz firm fudging its footprint

https://foodservicefootprint.com

Dr. Vidhura Ralapanawe

Executive Vice President at Epic Group

2w

Ken, if you really want to see double digit savings on scope 3, please dont look into the methodology too closely. Its like a sausage factory - you got to decide whether you want to enjoy the sausage (and kill yourself with all the 'stuff in it') or you want to analyse whats in it. Remember the examples I showed you? But here is more. The methodology that we use in fashion industry is derived from LCA data, used for a purpose/method that is explicitly not allowed by LCAs (due to this giving outcomes that should not be relied on). Try untangling that! Its not about perfection or good enough, its knowingly doing this for decades!

What about their buildings and facilities? Its all scope 3 category 1, is one of the largest impact buckets, and is very measurable with minimal effort.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics