I want to share this, because I believe David Joyner has written one of the most thoughtful explorations of #GenAI that I've yet seen.
As but one example of the wisdom he shares:
"As both users and creators of Generative AI tools, it’s important that we keep in mind to what extent certain artifacts have value because of what they are, and to what extent they have value because of the authentic process that created them."
I'll note he also offers some delightful witticisms such as:
"Generative AI is like the high-fructose corn syrup of content: it’s cheap and easy to use, but doesn’t yield as good of a result and has some long-term impacts if we use it too much."
But perhaps his wisest observation is this one:
"Generative AI is a solution looking for problems."
At the risk of sounding overly adulatory and not critical enough, I will say that I'm less of a fan of how the article wraps—I think it's become a bit of a trend to end articles about GenAI with an example of how GenAI would have written the content, and I think the arguments here are so strong and the questions so thoughtful, that the conclusion feels like a potential misstep.
That said, it also potentially serves to prove David's point, so perhaps that's the intention!
The GenAI version unquestionably lacks the nuance and sophistication he evidences with his own writing. (Unless this is all a trick, and the shorter version is the "real" one! In which case, game-set-match to you, David!).
Mainly, this is a brilliant example of someone really thinking through opportunities and challenges associated with this new and transformative technology, and I encourage anyone interested in the topic to give this a read. David Joyner is a top-notch thinker and an important voice.