Rosh's Reviews > Demon Copperhead

Demon Copperhead by Barbara Kingsolver
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
91622714
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: 2-5-stars

In a Nutshell: A contemporary retelling of the Dickens’ epic, ‘David Copperfield’. True to the original in flow, but the rest left me with mostly negative feelings. Outlier opinion coming up.

Story Synopsis:
Think ‘David Copperfield’ in a modern-day hillbilly setting.
Damon Fields was born to a teenage druggie mom in a trailer home. Because of the colour of his hair and his attitude towards life and people, he is nicknamed ‘Demon Copperhead.’ As Demon grows up in Lee County in the Virginian Appalachian region, he fights against his destiny and tries to make something of himself, though the odds keep going against him.
The story comes to us in the first person perspective of Demon.


I remember the dilemma I had faced while reviewing Lan Samantha Chang’s The Family Chao, which was a modern-day retelling of Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. While her adaptation had been faithful to the original, the classic itself was not suitable to a modernisation by virtue of its themes and its philosophy. This made her novel seem highly stereotypical and even offensive.

I face a similar conundrum this time, though Charles Dickens’ classic ‘David Copperfield’ is much more flexible towards an updated retelling because of its universal themes.

If you have read the original epic, you will notice how faithfully and brilliantly Barbara Kingsolver has transported the characters to the Appalachian mountains. All the characters get a similar deal as in the original, albeit through a different approach thanks to the change in era and setting.

The characters have been given somewhat similar names as their older counterparts. Murdstone becomes Muller Stone, Steerforth becomes Sterling ford, Dora turns into Dori, Tommy Traddles is now Tommy Waddell… This kind of writing choice makes it very easy for us to remember whom each new character is based upon. (That said, I was not at all happy to see my favourite Agnes being changed to ‘Angus’.)

David Copperfield was the titular character’s coming-of-age story; Demon Copperhead is also a bindungsroman for its eponymous lead. Both characters are equally gutsy and equally judgemental. Both want to succeed despite the lemons life keeps throwing at them, and contrary to expectations, they do end up carving a niche for themselves in this haphazard world.

The plot is also faithful to the original. No one’s destiny changes paths just because of the modernisation. This is both good and bad. Good because I really respect authors who retain the spirit of the original in their retellings. (There’s no point calling a work a retelling if you retain nothing of the base work except the character names, right?) Bad because you already know what’s going to happen to every single one of them!

In other words, as a retelling, this book rates pretty high because it sticks to the format and still gives it enough of a twist to make it stand on its own as an independent work.

Where the book failed for me is in its tawdry portrayal of the mountain people. Don’t get me wrong. Kingsolver is a master at settings, and this book is no exception. The mountains of Lee County come alive through her beautiful descriptions. But it was somewhat disappointing to see every possible stereotype about the locals make its way into this book. This is somewhat ironic because Demon tells us multiple times how he feels upset about the stereotypes outsiders have about his people, and then he goes on to live a life reiterating every single cliché through his own deeds, which sounds even worse when heard in first person. Drugs, alcohol, sex, cuss words, poverty, physical violence, domestic violence, social backwardness, racial discrimination ,… you name it and it is there in this book. I am not going to remark on how much of this might be based on reality as I have no first-hand experience of that culture and hence have no right to judge. But from the way it was portrayed, I got hardly any good vibes about the community, and that it is a sure sign that only hackneyed ideas were being thrown at us.

Dickens’ work was also somewhat “misery porn” in style and slightly offensive against those not “physically perfect.” But as David Copperfield was written in the late 1840s, it gets away with this outdated style of writing. Demon Copperhead cannot use the era as an excuse. As it is a retelling, I am also taken aback by the amount of vulgarity in the story. This might not bother most readers, but to me, inserting crude content into a favourite classic story was akin to blasphemy.

How would you feel about this book without knowing the original? Well, you might like it better as you won’t keep comparing the two works and will read this one on its own merit. So if you are okay with the ribald content and the vapid portrayal of the hillbilly people, this story *might* work better for you. Then again, the book is needlessly lengthy, because it skips nothing from the original plot. The start is appealing, but the middle is quite repetitive. The story stays stuck in this looped narrative until almost the very end, by which time I had lost all my patience with it.

To me, the book feels like an epic writing achievement in some ways, transporting 1800s upper class London to a modern hillbilly setting. But in most other ways, it feels so unbelievably flat and so offensive to the original as well as to the contemporary dwellers of the location that I cannot endorse it wholeheartedly.

2.5 stars, rounding down because I expected far more from Ms. Kingsolver.


Do note that this is very much an outlier review. So please read other reviews and take a call on this joint-winner of the 2023 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction.







~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Connect with me through:
My Blog | The StoryGraph | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter
132 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Demon Copperhead.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

May 9, 2023 – Shelved
May 9, 2023 – Shelved as: to-read
August 6, 2023 – Started Reading
August 11, 2023 – Shelved as: 2-5-stars
August 11, 2023 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-50 of 65 (65 new)


message 1: by Tina (new) - added it

Tina Great review! I'm sorry the book turned out to be so offensive, it is always a bummer when that happens.


Rosh Tina wrote: "Great review! I'm sorry the book turned out to be so offensive, it is always a bummer when that happens."

Thank you kindly! I am very disappointed. David Copperfield is a favourite of mine, and so is author Barbara Kingsolver. I never expected this book to be such a dud for me. :(


message 3: by Piuh (new) - added it

Piuh Thank you so much for alerting me, Rosh! I have been reading the novel intermittently because its premise hasn't captured my attention yet. However, I think I will skip it now. Retellings are often quite tricky, and it seems Barbara Kingsolver allowed too much freedom to it. Excellent review, as always!


Rosh Thanks much, Piuh! I am glad I am not alone in my feelings of being let down by this read. I completed it only because I had to. Most readers have enjoyed this one, but I simply couldn't look beyond the negatives. :(


Maureen Fair and honest review Rosh, sorry it wasn’t for you ❤️


Sportyrod We read this for book club. I think it reinforced stereotypes instead of breaking them unfortunately. You are not alone as an outlier. You even rated it higher than I did! There was so much drug talk I couldn’t get into it.


message 7: by A (new) - rated it 3 stars

A Mac You're insight into how close the parallels are is helpful - it's been so long since I've read the original. I also really like the "misery porn" label (I should have read your review first so I could use that in mine!). I understand your mixed feelings, though. Fair review, Rosh!


message 8: by Jayme (new)

Jayme Enjoyed the review! I have read neither! ❤️


message 9: by Marquise (new)

Marquise Ow, sounds bad! Great review, Roshy.


message 10: by Jaidee (new) - added it

Jaidee An amazing critique Ms. Rosh !


message 11: by Thibault (new)

Thibault Busschots It’s cool that the story managed to remain quite true to the original. But I must admit, it doesn’t really sound like my kind of read either. Also seems like quite a lengthy book. Would perhaps been a better if some things were left out from the original. The portrayal of the too stereotypical mountain people is something that could definitely annoy me too. Good review, Rosh.


message 12: by Holly (new)

Holly  B (slower pace!) Shame it missed the mark, Great review Rosh! 💖


message 13: by Marialyce (new)

Marialyce I gave up on it early on. It tried but just didn’t grab my attention. Fabulous review, Rosh!


Sujoya(theoverbookedbibliophile) Fair and honest review, Rosh! I try not to compare contemporary retellings with the original classics that inspire the same, but it's easier said than done. The "misery" angle was laid on too thick in this one. I loved the writing, but yes, as far as content is concerned, I was somewhat disappointed. I hope your current read is going well!


Canadian Jen Sorry you didn’t enjoy this one more. A fair and honest review, Rosh!


message 16: by Srivalli (new) - added it

Srivalli Rekha Oh, dear! Just read A's review and now yours. Moving it to my nope list. yet another winner I wouldn't like. Superb review, Rosh.


message 17: by Rachel (new) - added it

Rachel Hanes Although this didn’t quite work out for you, you still gave a terrific review, Rosh! 💗 I have never read David Copperfield or this book, and I’m not sure that I ever will…


message 18: by Kaceey (new)

Kaceey Excellent review Rosh! Sorry this one didn’t work for you and ended up feeling “offensive” at times!💜


message 19: by Pippa (new)

Pippa Elliott Great review. Feels like it saved me a read.


message 20: by Dorie - Cats&Books :) (last edited Aug 12, 2023 10:02AM) (new) - added it

Dorie  - Cats&Books :) Great review Rosh. I tried reading this one at least three times and could not get into it. I gave up on it and it's just sitting with the others in the "not gong to read" !! Too many books to read something we don't like. Sorry you suffered through it! To be honest I don't like retelling of classics! Also I stopped liking Kingsolver a few books back, I loved her original books!


Teres Sorry you didn't enjoy it more, Rosh. I thought it was brilliant and the fact that Kingsolver grew up in Appalachia only added to her plot, characters, and setting.


message 22: by Liz (new) - rated it 5 stars

Liz Sorry this didn’t work for you. I loved it. Flip side, I couldn’t make it through David Copperfield.


Shelley's Book Nook Wonderful review, Rosh. Bummer this didn't work for you. I was going to pick this up but read reviews like yours and passed. I hope your next read is a winner, 💕🤗


Sharon Orlopp I greatly appreciate your honest, transparent review.


message 26: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Maureen wrote: "Fair and honest review Rosh, sorry it wasn’t for you ❤️"
Jen CAN wrote: "Sorry you didn’t enjoy this one more. A fair and honest review, Rosh!"

Thanks, Maureen & Jen! I am glad it worked better for you both. 💜


message 27: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Sportyrod wrote: "We read this for book club. I think it reinforced stereotypes instead of breaking them unfortunately. You are not alone as an outlier. You even rated it higher than I did! There was so much drug ta..."

"reinforced stereotypes instead of breaking them" - I couldn't have put it better, Rod! The main reason my rating is higher is that it is faithful as a retelling. If this were an independent story, I would have gone lower. The drug and crude sex talk was irritating to me too.


message 28: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh A wrote: "You're insight into how close the parallels are is helpful - it's been so long since I've read the original. I also really like the "misery porn" label (I should have read your review first so I co..."

Thanks, A! Will look for your review now. I recently reread the original so that I could go into this better prepared. It helped a lot.


message 29: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Jayme wrote: "Enjoyed the review! I have read neither! ❤️"

Thanks Jayme! 💜 Good for you, I'd say. :D


message 30: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Marquise wrote: "Ow, sounds bad! Great review, Roshy."
Jaidee wrote: "An amazing critique Ms. Rosh !"
Holly wrote: "Shame it missed the mark, Great review Rosh! 💖"
Carol wrote: "I am so sorry this was such a flop! I hope your current read is much better, Rosh 💖!!!!"
Kaceey wrote: "Excellent review Rosh! Sorry this one didn’t work for you and ended up feeling “offensive” at times!💜"
Pippa wrote: "Great review. Feels like it saved me a read."
Sharon wrote: "I greatly appreciate your honest, transparent review."

Thanks, Marquise, Jaidee, Holly, Carol, Kaceey, Pippa and Sharon! 💚 I did expect a far better experience with this one.


message 31: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Thibault wrote: "It’s cool that the story managed to remain quite true to the original. But I must admit, it doesn’t really sound like my kind of read either. Also seems like quite a lengthy book. Would perhaps bee..."

Thanks, Thibault. The original is one of my favourite classics, and Barbara Kingsolver's The Poisonwood Bible was a wonderful experience for me. So I was expecting a 5 star read, to be honest. I didn't expect it to be so crass! :(


message 32: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Marialyce wrote: "I gave up on it early on. It tried but just didn’t grab my attention. Fabulous review, Rosh!"

Wow! Wish I had known that before, Marialyce! I had seen only the 5 star reviews from all my friends and assumed that I'd be the only spoilsport.


message 33: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Sujoya(theoverbookedbibliophile) wrote: "Fair and honest review, Rosh! I try not to compare contemporary retellings with the original classics that inspire the same, but it's easier said than done. The "misery" angle was laid on too thick..."

Oh, ditto feelings, Sujoya! The writing was so good, but the misery was overdone! I wish I could be as kindhearted as you in evaluating retellings on their own merit, but I always end up comparing them with their originals in some way or the other.


message 34: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Srivalli wrote: "Oh, dear! Just read A's review and now yours. Moving it to my nope list. yet another winner I wouldn't like. Superb review, Rosh."

Good call, Sri. This was my choice for the Pulitzer winner prompt, so I *had* to complete it. Seriously didn't expect such a result. :/


message 35: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Rachel wrote: "Although this didn’t quite work out for you, you still gave a terrific review, Rosh! 💗 I have never read David Copperfield or this book, and I’m not sure that I ever will…"

Thanks much, Rachel! 💚 Unless you are fond of the classics, I would honestly recommend neither, though the Charles Dickens work is an old favourite of mine :)


message 36: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Dorie - Cats&Books :) wrote: "Great review Rosh. I tried reading this one at least three times and could not get into it. I gave up on it and it's just sitting with the others in the "not gong to read" !! Too many books to read..."

Oh Dorie, I wish I had known beforehand. As I told Marialyce, almost all my friends here had loved it, so I really felt let down. If I had not picked this up for a reading challenge, I too might have given up on it. :(
I had loved her 'The Poisonwood Bible' and had been looking forward to this one. I guess I'll be more picky about her works now. Will take your advice and stick to her original stories.


message 37: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Teres wrote: "Sorry you didn't enjoy it more, Rosh. I thought it was brilliant and the fact that Kingsolver grew up in Appalachia only added to her plot, characters, and setting."

I am truly glad you liked it, Teres. But your comment just reminded me of Indian-origin-now-settled-in-the-US writers such as Alka Joshi or Thrity Umrigar who write about India focussing only on its stereotypes. I didn't get how this book is an ode to the Appalachian people if it only highlights their bad aspects.


message 38: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Liz wrote: "Sorry this didn’t work for you. I loved it. Flip side, I couldn’t make it through David Copperfield."

Haha, that is funny, Liz! :D Maybe you liked because you disliked David Copperfield. For me, it was the other way around. ;)


message 39: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Shelley's Book Nook wrote: "Wonderful review, Rosh. Bummer this didn't work for you. I was going to pick this up but read reviews like yours and passed. I hope your next read is a winner, 💕🤗"

Thanks so much, Shelley! 💚 I wish I had read reviews such as mine. I only saw the 5 stars!! :D


message 40: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Sharon wrote: "I greatly appreciate your honest, transparent review."

Thank you!


message 41: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh PattyMacDotComma wrote: "EXACTLY!
My review:

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show..."


So glad to have your company too, Patty!


message 42: by Baba (new)

Baba Interesting to see a more critical review of this one, cheers Rosh :)


message 43: by Bharath (new)

Bharath Brilliant review Rosh. Very well reasoned and refreshingly honest. Staying close to the ethos of the original is important, but the other points you have mentioned are definitely detractors.


message 44: by Suz (new)

Suz Good review, Rosh. I haven't read David Copperfield but have this on my list. I don't know! My tbr is huge so I'll probably never get to it. You know the drill ;)


message 45: by Rowan (new) - added it

Rowan Fantastic review, Rosh, though sorry you didn't enjoy it more! As always, you articulated your thoughts beautifully - refreshing to see a different take on this popular book.


message 46: by Karen (new) - added it

Karen Exquisite review, Rosh :) This didn't appeal to me either. My favorite 💗 novel by Barbara Kingsolver is "The Poisonwood Bible," which I read over 20 years ago. I generally like her novels, but I agree with your rating & think you were fair and raised valid points for why this didn't work for you. I hope that you are doing well 💞! xx


message 47: by Catherine (new)

Catherine (alternativelytitledbooks) - so very behind! I have not yet read the source material (I know, I know…and I’m a Dickens fan! I just haven’t gotten to it yet 🙈) but wow. This sounds unpleasant on so many levels. I agree with keeping things at a certain level to maintain the integrity of the original…and keeping the twist etc the same isn’t always enough. Fair and wonderful review Rosh, I hope you love your next book!! 💘


message 48: by Cara (last edited Aug 14, 2023 11:41AM) (new)

Cara Great review, Rosh💞!!!!!!!! Oh no, I'm so sorry you didn't have any luck with this book, but that cover is so pretty😍😍!!!!!!!!!


message 49: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Baba wrote: "Interesting to see a more critical review of this one, cheers Rosh :)"

Thanks, Baba. I seem to often be on the critical side of popular works. :D


message 50: by Rosh (new) - rated it 2 stars

Rosh Bharath wrote: "Brilliant review Rosh. Very well reasoned and refreshingly honest. Staying close to the ethos of the original is important, but the other points you have mentioned are definitely detractors."

Thanks much, Bharath. I heartily agree. We Indians have already seen how damaging stereotypes can be to the image of a people or a country. A balanced portrayal is always better.


« previous 1
back to top