Rosh's Reviews > Demon Copperhead
Demon Copperhead
by
by
![91622714](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p2/91622714.jpg)
In a Nutshell: A contemporary retelling of the Dickens’ epic, ‘David Copperfield’. True to the original in flow, but the rest left me with mostly negative feelings. Outlier opinion coming up.
Story Synopsis:
I remember the dilemma I had faced while reviewing Lan Samantha Chang’s The Family Chao, which was a modern-day retelling of Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. While her adaptation had been faithful to the original, the classic itself was not suitable to a modernisation by virtue of its themes and its philosophy. This made her novel seem highly stereotypical and even offensive.
I face a similar conundrum this time, though Charles Dickens’ classic ‘David Copperfield’ is much more flexible towards an updated retelling because of its universal themes.
If you have read the original epic, you will notice how faithfully and brilliantly Barbara Kingsolver has transported the characters to the Appalachian mountains. All the characters get a similar deal as in the original, albeit through a different approach thanks to the change in era and setting.
The characters have been given somewhat similar names as their older counterparts. Murdstone becomes Muller Stone, Steerforth becomes Sterling ford, Dora turns into Dori, Tommy Traddles is now Tommy Waddell… This kind of writing choice makes it very easy for us to remember whom each new character is based upon. (That said, I was not at all happy to see my favourite Agnes being changed to ‘Angus’.)
David Copperfield was the titular character’s coming-of-age story; Demon Copperhead is also a bindungsroman for its eponymous lead. Both characters are equally gutsy and equally judgemental. Both want to succeed despite the lemons life keeps throwing at them, and contrary to expectations, they do end up carving a niche for themselves in this haphazard world.
The plot is also faithful to the original. No one’s destiny changes paths just because of the modernisation. This is both good and bad. Good because I really respect authors who retain the spirit of the original in their retellings. (There’s no point calling a work a retelling if you retain nothing of the base work except the character names, right?) Bad because you already know what’s going to happen to every single one of them!
In other words, as a retelling, this book rates pretty high because it sticks to the format and still gives it enough of a twist to make it stand on its own as an independent work.
Where the book failed for me is in its tawdry portrayal of the mountain people. Don’t get me wrong. Kingsolver is a master at settings, and this book is no exception. The mountains of Lee County come alive through her beautiful descriptions. But it was somewhat disappointing to see every possible stereotype about the locals make its way into this book. This is somewhat ironic because Demon tells us multiple times how he feels upset about the stereotypes outsiders have about his people, and then he goes on to live a life reiterating every single cliché through his own deeds, which sounds even worse when heard in first person. Drugs, alcohol, sex, cuss words, poverty, physical violence, domestic violence, social backwardness, racial discrimination ,… you name it and it is there in this book. I am not going to remark on how much of this might be based on reality as I have no first-hand experience of that culture and hence have no right to judge. But from the way it was portrayed, I got hardly any good vibes about the community, and that it is a sure sign that only hackneyed ideas were being thrown at us.
Dickens’ work was also somewhat “misery porn” in style and slightly offensive against those not “physically perfect.” But as David Copperfield was written in the late 1840s, it gets away with this outdated style of writing. Demon Copperhead cannot use the era as an excuse. As it is a retelling, I am also taken aback by the amount of vulgarity in the story. This might not bother most readers, but to me, inserting crude content into a favourite classic story was akin to blasphemy.
How would you feel about this book without knowing the original? Well, you might like it better as you won’t keep comparing the two works and will read this one on its own merit. So if you are okay with the ribald content and the vapid portrayal of the hillbilly people, this story *might* work better for you. Then again, the book is needlessly lengthy, because it skips nothing from the original plot. The start is appealing, but the middle is quite repetitive. The story stays stuck in this looped narrative until almost the very end, by which time I had lost all my patience with it.
To me, the book feels like an epic writing achievement in some ways, transporting 1800s upper class London to a modern hillbilly setting. But in most other ways, it feels so unbelievably flat and so offensive to the original as well as to the contemporary dwellers of the location that I cannot endorse it wholeheartedly.
2.5 stars, rounding down because I expected far more from Ms. Kingsolver.
Do note that this is very much an outlier review. So please read other reviews and take a call on this joint-winner of the 2023 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Connect with me through:
My Blog | The StoryGraph | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter
Story Synopsis:
Think ‘David Copperfield’ in a modern-day hillbilly setting.
Damon Fields was born to a teenage druggie mom in a trailer home. Because of the colour of his hair and his attitude towards life and people, he is nicknamed ‘Demon Copperhead.’ As Demon grows up in Lee County in the Virginian Appalachian region, he fights against his destiny and tries to make something of himself, though the odds keep going against him.
The story comes to us in the first person perspective of Demon.
I remember the dilemma I had faced while reviewing Lan Samantha Chang’s The Family Chao, which was a modern-day retelling of Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. While her adaptation had been faithful to the original, the classic itself was not suitable to a modernisation by virtue of its themes and its philosophy. This made her novel seem highly stereotypical and even offensive.
I face a similar conundrum this time, though Charles Dickens’ classic ‘David Copperfield’ is much more flexible towards an updated retelling because of its universal themes.
If you have read the original epic, you will notice how faithfully and brilliantly Barbara Kingsolver has transported the characters to the Appalachian mountains. All the characters get a similar deal as in the original, albeit through a different approach thanks to the change in era and setting.
The characters have been given somewhat similar names as their older counterparts. Murdstone becomes Muller Stone, Steerforth becomes Sterling ford, Dora turns into Dori, Tommy Traddles is now Tommy Waddell… This kind of writing choice makes it very easy for us to remember whom each new character is based upon. (That said, I was not at all happy to see my favourite Agnes being changed to ‘Angus’.)
David Copperfield was the titular character’s coming-of-age story; Demon Copperhead is also a bindungsroman for its eponymous lead. Both characters are equally gutsy and equally judgemental. Both want to succeed despite the lemons life keeps throwing at them, and contrary to expectations, they do end up carving a niche for themselves in this haphazard world.
The plot is also faithful to the original. No one’s destiny changes paths just because of the modernisation. This is both good and bad. Good because I really respect authors who retain the spirit of the original in their retellings. (There’s no point calling a work a retelling if you retain nothing of the base work except the character names, right?) Bad because you already know what’s going to happen to every single one of them!
In other words, as a retelling, this book rates pretty high because it sticks to the format and still gives it enough of a twist to make it stand on its own as an independent work.
Where the book failed for me is in its tawdry portrayal of the mountain people. Don’t get me wrong. Kingsolver is a master at settings, and this book is no exception. The mountains of Lee County come alive through her beautiful descriptions. But it was somewhat disappointing to see every possible stereotype about the locals make its way into this book. This is somewhat ironic because Demon tells us multiple times how he feels upset about the stereotypes outsiders have about his people, and then he goes on to live a life reiterating every single cliché through his own deeds, which sounds even worse when heard in first person. Drugs, alcohol, sex, cuss words, poverty, physical violence, domestic violence, social backwardness, racial discrimination ,… you name it and it is there in this book. I am not going to remark on how much of this might be based on reality as I have no first-hand experience of that culture and hence have no right to judge. But from the way it was portrayed, I got hardly any good vibes about the community, and that it is a sure sign that only hackneyed ideas were being thrown at us.
Dickens’ work was also somewhat “misery porn” in style and slightly offensive against those not “physically perfect.” But as David Copperfield was written in the late 1840s, it gets away with this outdated style of writing. Demon Copperhead cannot use the era as an excuse. As it is a retelling, I am also taken aback by the amount of vulgarity in the story. This might not bother most readers, but to me, inserting crude content into a favourite classic story was akin to blasphemy.
How would you feel about this book without knowing the original? Well, you might like it better as you won’t keep comparing the two works and will read this one on its own merit. So if you are okay with the ribald content and the vapid portrayal of the hillbilly people, this story *might* work better for you. Then again, the book is needlessly lengthy, because it skips nothing from the original plot. The start is appealing, but the middle is quite repetitive. The story stays stuck in this looped narrative until almost the very end, by which time I had lost all my patience with it.
To me, the book feels like an epic writing achievement in some ways, transporting 1800s upper class London to a modern hillbilly setting. But in most other ways, it feels so unbelievably flat and so offensive to the original as well as to the contemporary dwellers of the location that I cannot endorse it wholeheartedly.
2.5 stars, rounding down because I expected far more from Ms. Kingsolver.
Do note that this is very much an outlier review. So please read other reviews and take a call on this joint-winner of the 2023 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Connect with me through:
My Blog | The StoryGraph | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Demon Copperhead.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-50 of 65 (65 new)
message 1:
by
Tina
(new)
-
added it
Aug 11, 2023 12:52PM
![Tina](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1708718276p1/66008211.jpg)
reply
|
flag
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Thank you kindly! I am very disappointed. David Copperfield is a favourite of mine, and so is author Barbara Kingsolver. I never expected this book to be such a dud for me. :(
![Piuh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1685979207p1/159707383.jpg)
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
![Sportyrod](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1592344277p1/25680606.jpg)
![A Mac](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1625941067p1/97390147.jpg)
![Thibault Busschots](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1578226172p1/76463472.jpg)
![Sujoya(theoverbookedbibliophile)](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1687954274p1/28082207.jpg)
![Srivalli Rekha](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1702292115p1/76236561.jpg)
![Rachel Hanes](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1612631995p1/75009563.jpg)
![Kaceey](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1666552661p1/13442817.jpg)
![Dorie - Cats&Books :)](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1550077760p1/16912659.jpg)
![Teres](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1625114818p1/39438556.jpg)
![Liz](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1316269997p1/4125660.jpg)
![Shelley's Book Nook](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1704680219p1/5599497.jpg)
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Jen CAN wrote: "Sorry you didn’t enjoy this one more. A fair and honest review, Rosh!"
Thanks, Maureen & Jen! I am glad it worked better for you both. 💜
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
"reinforced stereotypes instead of breaking them" - I couldn't have put it better, Rod! The main reason my rating is higher is that it is faithful as a retelling. If this were an independent story, I would have gone lower. The drug and crude sex talk was irritating to me too.
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Thanks, A! Will look for your review now. I recently reread the original so that I could go into this better prepared. It helped a lot.
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Jaidee wrote: "An amazing critique Ms. Rosh !"
Holly wrote: "Shame it missed the mark, Great review Rosh! 💖"
Carol wrote: "I am so sorry this was such a flop! I hope your current read is much better, Rosh 💖!!!!"
Kaceey wrote: "Excellent review Rosh! Sorry this one didn’t work for you and ended up feeling “offensive” at times!💜"
Pippa wrote: "Great review. Feels like it saved me a read."
Sharon wrote: "I greatly appreciate your honest, transparent review."
Thanks, Marquise, Jaidee, Holly, Carol, Kaceey, Pippa and Sharon! 💚 I did expect a far better experience with this one.
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Thanks, Thibault. The original is one of my favourite classics, and Barbara Kingsolver's The Poisonwood Bible was a wonderful experience for me. So I was expecting a 5 star read, to be honest. I didn't expect it to be so crass! :(
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Wow! Wish I had known that before, Marialyce! I had seen only the 5 star reviews from all my friends and assumed that I'd be the only spoilsport.
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Oh, ditto feelings, Sujoya! The writing was so good, but the misery was overdone! I wish I could be as kindhearted as you in evaluating retellings on their own merit, but I always end up comparing them with their originals in some way or the other.
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Good call, Sri. This was my choice for the Pulitzer winner prompt, so I *had* to complete it. Seriously didn't expect such a result. :/
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Thanks much, Rachel! 💚 Unless you are fond of the classics, I would honestly recommend neither, though the Charles Dickens work is an old favourite of mine :)
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Oh Dorie, I wish I had known beforehand. As I told Marialyce, almost all my friends here had loved it, so I really felt let down. If I had not picked this up for a reading challenge, I too might have given up on it. :(
I had loved her 'The Poisonwood Bible' and had been looking forward to this one. I guess I'll be more picky about her works now. Will take your advice and stick to her original stories.
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
I am truly glad you liked it, Teres. But your comment just reminded me of Indian-origin-now-settled-in-the-US writers such as Alka Joshi or Thrity Umrigar who write about India focussing only on its stereotypes. I didn't get how this book is an ode to the Appalachian people if it only highlights their bad aspects.
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Haha, that is funny, Liz! :D Maybe you liked because you disliked David Copperfield. For me, it was the other way around. ;)
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Thanks so much, Shelley! 💚 I wish I had read reviews such as mine. I only saw the 5 stars!! :D
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
My review:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show..."
So glad to have your company too, Patty!
![Bharath](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1658119369p1/12800930.jpg)
![Suz](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1593566451p1/11889829.jpg)
![Rowan](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1670842088p1/35794399.jpg)
![Karen](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1458171712p1/29279709.jpg)
![Catherine (alternativelytitledbooks) - so very behind!](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1565295366p1/29919991.jpg)
![Cara](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699852825p1/128343378.jpg)
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Thanks, Baba. I seem to often be on the critical side of popular works. :D
![Rosh](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1700254211p1/91622714.jpg)
Thanks much, Bharath. I heartily agree. We Indians have already seen how damaging stereotypes can be to the image of a people or a country. A balanced portrayal is always better.