Elle's Reviews > The Maid
The Maid (Molly the Maid, #1)
by
by
Now a Goodreads Choice Nominee in Mystery & Thriller and Debut Novel
🤨
Mmmmmm yeah, no. This was not good. I did not enjoy it at all, and I recommend it to nobody. Okay that’s the review, bye!!!!!
Lol yeah, maybe one day I’ll be the person who can just rate and move on but today is not that day! And I am not that guy.
As of now, I can see I am in the minority opinion. It wasn’t far into The Maid before I realized this wasn’t going to be a positive experience for me. But I’d like to give a shout out to Jan B’s review for bringing up a lot of things I was thinking while reading, and to Chelsea who lets me complain to her uninhibited. As a BOTM pick, a book slated for adaptation and an author who is a publishing executive, this one’s gonna have a lot of eyes on it, and I want to make sure there are perspectives present beyond the flurry of glowing reviews.
The premise of The Maid is such: a hotel maid who is “different” from other people discovers the dead body of one of the hotel’s wealthiest patrons, foul play suspected. She gets further dragged into the fray and unintentionally incriminates herself, all while misreading what should be “obvious” social cues. There’s murder, money, drugs, off-page violence and ~mystery~ all wrapped in something meant to be somewhere between a cozy mystery and a genre thriller.
The plot itself is fine, though nothing we haven’t seen before. Instead, what’s carrying the story is the titular Molly the Maid, set up as a lovable underdog that just gets in over her head. She works hard! She is a good person! She tries her best! And she LOOOOOVES to clean!!!!!!! Clearly this is meant to be cute and charming.
But Molly is also written as neurodivergent in some never-specified way. I’ve seen a couple of weird arguments by people saying the author has not confirmed this, but she doesn’t have to. I read it; the writing is not exactly subtle. And I did not love the way she was depicted at all, to be totally honest. I can only guess that Nita Prose was trying to capitalize on that ‘quirky female main character who whoopsie-daisies her way into some trouble’ trend from like 5ish years ago. And frankly, she missed the boat. This isn’t a fresh, compelling character idea—and in the case of The Maid, it wasn’t even well done.
Listen, I understand the intent behind a character like this. I’m not saying it’s necessarily offensive, but it sure as hell isn’t cute. And the idea of a gaggle of privileged, upper-middle class book club women reading and gigging at a character like Molly being framed for murder because she ‘doesn’t understand how people work’ makes me feel kind of weird. Molly appears as a caricature, dreamed up by someone who’s only exposure to ND people has been Rain Man and Eleanor Oliphant.
As others have noted, Molly’s qualities aren’t very consistent. They wax and wane depending on the need of the story. She doesn’t understand what a rumba is or can’t tell if someone is smiling or not, but then is effectively spouting off complex behavioral analysis a few chapters later. The situations she finds herself in are beyond ludicrous, and the way she inevitably gets out of them even more ridiculous. And Molly isn’t the exception to bad characterizations. Every single other person, from the villain(s), to the fumbling police, to the rest of the hotel staff—are all cartoonishly portrayed.
There’s probably more subtext I’m missing, with the two additional POC maids and the undocumented kitchen employee (I’m sorry, where is this supposed to take place again? The UK?? Is there a large number of undocumented Mexican immigrants working at British hotels that I’m unaware of???). Because this book isn’t about the challenges of operating in a neurotypical world or the difficulties of navigating a new country while undocumented, but instead those are just secondary stumbling blocks on the road to figure out who murdered this rich white guy. And I don’t feel as though Molly and Juan Manuel were treated with care, but instead a kind of passive cruelty.
That said, the biggest offense for me though? This was boring as hell. I couldn’t read more than a dozen or so pages at a time, despite how short it was. I have genuinely no idea how or who chooses which mystery/thrillers to acquire, let alone adapt, but they need to have the company checkbook taken away immediately. Anything present in the story that was out of the ordinary was equal parts absurd and dumb, and anything remotely passable has been done a thousand times already. Seriously someone, anyone, clue me in to what was so compelling about this meditation on why ‘ummm service workers actually LOVE cleaning and waiting on our every whim?!’ with a side helping of murder. I’m literally begging you.
I’ll refrain from ending spoilers even though I don’t think it’s worth reading, but that big ‘twist’ was so obvious while also being completely unnecessary. It cheapened every bit of plot up to that point, though by then it was mostly a lost cause for me.
one additional note: (view spoiler)
Anyways, someone please call Florence Pugh’s agent and have her pull out of this ASAP. I’m having war flashbacks of Maddie Ziegler and Kate Hudson in Sia’s MUSIC. 😐
*Thanks to Random House - Ballantine for the advance review copy!
**For more book talk & reviews, follow me on Instagram at @elle_mentbooks!
Mmmmmm yeah, no. This was not good. I did not enjoy it at all, and I recommend it to nobody. Okay that’s the review, bye!!!!!
Lol yeah, maybe one day I’ll be the person who can just rate and move on but today is not that day! And I am not that guy.
As of now, I can see I am in the minority opinion. It wasn’t far into The Maid before I realized this wasn’t going to be a positive experience for me. But I’d like to give a shout out to Jan B’s review for bringing up a lot of things I was thinking while reading, and to Chelsea who lets me complain to her uninhibited. As a BOTM pick, a book slated for adaptation and an author who is a publishing executive, this one’s gonna have a lot of eyes on it, and I want to make sure there are perspectives present beyond the flurry of glowing reviews.
The premise of The Maid is such: a hotel maid who is “different” from other people discovers the dead body of one of the hotel’s wealthiest patrons, foul play suspected. She gets further dragged into the fray and unintentionally incriminates herself, all while misreading what should be “obvious” social cues. There’s murder, money, drugs, off-page violence and ~mystery~ all wrapped in something meant to be somewhere between a cozy mystery and a genre thriller.
The plot itself is fine, though nothing we haven’t seen before. Instead, what’s carrying the story is the titular Molly the Maid, set up as a lovable underdog that just gets in over her head. She works hard! She is a good person! She tries her best! And she LOOOOOVES to clean!!!!!!! Clearly this is meant to be cute and charming.
But Molly is also written as neurodivergent in some never-specified way. I’ve seen a couple of weird arguments by people saying the author has not confirmed this, but she doesn’t have to. I read it; the writing is not exactly subtle. And I did not love the way she was depicted at all, to be totally honest. I can only guess that Nita Prose was trying to capitalize on that ‘quirky female main character who whoopsie-daisies her way into some trouble’ trend from like 5ish years ago. And frankly, she missed the boat. This isn’t a fresh, compelling character idea—and in the case of The Maid, it wasn’t even well done.
Listen, I understand the intent behind a character like this. I’m not saying it’s necessarily offensive, but it sure as hell isn’t cute. And the idea of a gaggle of privileged, upper-middle class book club women reading and gigging at a character like Molly being framed for murder because she ‘doesn’t understand how people work’ makes me feel kind of weird. Molly appears as a caricature, dreamed up by someone who’s only exposure to ND people has been Rain Man and Eleanor Oliphant.
As others have noted, Molly’s qualities aren’t very consistent. They wax and wane depending on the need of the story. She doesn’t understand what a rumba is or can’t tell if someone is smiling or not, but then is effectively spouting off complex behavioral analysis a few chapters later. The situations she finds herself in are beyond ludicrous, and the way she inevitably gets out of them even more ridiculous. And Molly isn’t the exception to bad characterizations. Every single other person, from the villain(s), to the fumbling police, to the rest of the hotel staff—are all cartoonishly portrayed.
There’s probably more subtext I’m missing, with the two additional POC maids and the undocumented kitchen employee (I’m sorry, where is this supposed to take place again? The UK?? Is there a large number of undocumented Mexican immigrants working at British hotels that I’m unaware of???). Because this book isn’t about the challenges of operating in a neurotypical world or the difficulties of navigating a new country while undocumented, but instead those are just secondary stumbling blocks on the road to figure out who murdered this rich white guy. And I don’t feel as though Molly and Juan Manuel were treated with care, but instead a kind of passive cruelty.
That said, the biggest offense for me though? This was boring as hell. I couldn’t read more than a dozen or so pages at a time, despite how short it was. I have genuinely no idea how or who chooses which mystery/thrillers to acquire, let alone adapt, but they need to have the company checkbook taken away immediately. Anything present in the story that was out of the ordinary was equal parts absurd and dumb, and anything remotely passable has been done a thousand times already. Seriously someone, anyone, clue me in to what was so compelling about this meditation on why ‘ummm service workers actually LOVE cleaning and waiting on our every whim?!’ with a side helping of murder. I’m literally begging you.
I’ll refrain from ending spoilers even though I don’t think it’s worth reading, but that big ‘twist’ was so obvious while also being completely unnecessary. It cheapened every bit of plot up to that point, though by then it was mostly a lost cause for me.
one additional note: (view spoiler)
Anyways, someone please call Florence Pugh’s agent and have her pull out of this ASAP. I’m having war flashbacks of Maddie Ziegler and Kate Hudson in Sia’s MUSIC. 😐
*Thanks to Random House - Ballantine for the advance review copy!
**For more book talk & reviews, follow me on Instagram at @elle_mentbooks!
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Maid.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
October 1, 2021
– Shelved
October 1, 2021
– Shelved as:
to-read
December 14, 2021
– Shelved as:
2022
December 22, 2021
– Shelved as:
mystery-book-club
December 23, 2021
– Shelved as:
from-publisher
December 23, 2021
– Shelved as:
netgalley
January 3, 2022
–
Started Reading
January 19, 2022
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-50 of 92 (92 new)
message 1:
by
Hillary (abookishmarriage)
(new)
Jan 19, 2022 05:31AM
This is a really good bad review. I feel like it is more interesting than the book.
reply
|
flag
Hillary (abookishmarriage) wrote: "This is a really good bad review. I feel like it is more interesting than the book."
thank you, although that bar was set on the floor
thank you, although that bar was set on the floor
Terrific review! I'm always happy when someone feels the same as me about a (mostly) highly-rated book!
Carol wrote: "Terrific review! I'm always happy when someone feels the same as me about a (mostly) highly-rated book!"
I’m glad to have seen so many more people with reservations about Molly, I thought I was being too sensitive for a while.
I’m glad to have seen so many more people with reservations about Molly, I thought I was being too sensitive for a while.
Thanks for the shout out Elle 🤗
I'm glad you are not 'that person' because this quite possibly is the best bad review I've ever read! It was spot on and entertaining. Better than the book!
Oh, and your spoiler....agreed...wth?! It made no sense and had to be the author's personal agenda.
I'm glad you are not 'that person' because this quite possibly is the best bad review I've ever read! It was spot on and entertaining. Better than the book!
Oh, and your spoiler....agreed...wth?! It made no sense and had to be the author's personal agenda.
I definitely think your review outshines the book! What a waste of reading time this story was! Was the regular editor out sick the day this one came through? Anyway, loved your review!
JanB wrote: "Thanks for the shout out Elle 🤗
I'm glad you are not 'that person' because this quite possibly is the best bad review I've ever read! It was spot on and entertaining. Better than the book!
Oh, an..."
I appreciate it Jan! And omg I genuinely do not understand why the author gave Molly those couple of darker turns at the end. It just does not mesh with the way she was written throughout the rest of the book!
I'm glad you are not 'that person' because this quite possibly is the best bad review I've ever read! It was spot on and entertaining. Better than the book!
Oh, an..."
I appreciate it Jan! And omg I genuinely do not understand why the author gave Molly those couple of darker turns at the end. It just does not mesh with the way she was written throughout the rest of the book!
Marialyce (absltmom, yaya) wrote: "I definitely think your review outshines the book! What a waste of reading time this story was! Was the regular editor out sick the day this one came through? Anyway, loved your review!"
We picked it for our Instagram book club! 😑 I feel like such a chump now that I’ve finished it lol
Heidi wrote: "Great review, Elle - I agree with everything you said, and especially "it was boring as hell""
God, so boring! So much else could have been passable if it was at least interesting along the way.
We picked it for our Instagram book club! 😑 I feel like such a chump now that I’ve finished it lol
Heidi wrote: "Great review, Elle - I agree with everything you said, and especially "it was boring as hell""
God, so boring! So much else could have been passable if it was at least interesting along the way.
Colleen E wrote: "Oh no. Another one bites the dust :). Thanks for your honest review."
Yeah unfortunately I can’t recommend it, but thank you for reading!
Yeah unfortunately I can’t recommend it, but thank you for reading!
Okay, I enjoyed the story and I can also see your point of view. I guess I don’t analyse my reading that much as I read for entertainment only.
Elle. Love love love your review. I'm 20% into this hot mess and am grinding my teeth. Always good to find a kindred spirit. 🥰
Pat wrote: "Okay, I enjoyed the story and I can also see your point of view. I guess I don’t analyse my reading that much as I read for entertainment only."
I definitely went into this looking for some light entertainment, but I think when something personally affects you, you don’t necessarily have the luxury or even capacity to ignore it.
I definitely went into this looking for some light entertainment, but I think when something personally affects you, you don’t necessarily have the luxury or even capacity to ignore it.
Chelsea wrote: "Really thoughtful review!"
Thank you my lovely Chelsea! And for letting me dm you like a lunatic 🥰
Thank you my lovely Chelsea! And for letting me dm you like a lunatic 🥰
Linda wrote: "Elle. Love love love your review. I'm 20% into this hot mess and am grinding my teeth. Always good to find a kindred spirit. 🥰"
I’m glad to hear that, Linda! Though I wish it was going better for you overall haha
I’m glad to hear that, Linda! Though I wish it was going better for you overall haha
I’m almost done with the book finally and it’s taken me so long because it is sooooooo boring. I don’t understand why it’s so hard to finish but it is. I agree with you. 🙂
Spot on review. Gran’s assisted suicide was so out of character for Molly that I was “ what the heck?!” Then the Mrs. Black twist was salt in the wound.
Cathy wrote: "Spot on review. Gran’s assisted suicide was so out of character for Molly that I was “ what the heck?!” Then the Mrs. Black twist was salt in the wound."
Just bizarre and unnecessary
Just bizarre and unnecessary
Elle wrote: "JimZ wrote: "What does ND stand for? And POC?"
Neurodivergent and Person of Color!"
thank you!
Neurodivergent and Person of Color!"
thank you!
I didn't have any desire to read this, but your review solidified it. That last line..... please someone call sweet Florence!
I agree. I found this book to be boring and creepy, a difficult combination to achieve. Not creepy in a good way. Creepy in a these aren't people I want to read about way. I don't understand all of the high ratings.
This review sums up my thoughts SO well. I also struggled to get through this book. It took me a week to read, even though it's not even 300 pages. I think you summed up my discomfort with Molly's character perfectly. It's not, like you said, inherently offensive, but it felt kind of gross. There were moments where I felt like, to quote the book, the audience wasn't supposed to be laughing with Molly, but laughing *at* Molly, and that did not sit well with me at all.
So this was a DNF for me. FIrst, it was dull. Second, as the mother of a child with autism, I was left a bit bothered by using her neurodivergence as a plot point.
Camille wrote: "I've been looking for a review that echoes my sentiments and I think yours is the one! Good point on the whole "staff love to clean!" bit...I was bothered by the assumptions about race/ethnicity an..."
I knew the author was Canadian and watched to see if the language was a Molly-particular quirk, but there were many examples of people other than her using British idioms and slang. I have also seen some commentary that the court room scenes depicted were not reflective of the American or Canadian legal systems, so my best guess was that she tried to “blend” multiple places so that the story didn't feel location-specific.
I knew the author was Canadian and watched to see if the language was a Molly-particular quirk, but there were many examples of people other than her using British idioms and slang. I have also seen some commentary that the court room scenes depicted were not reflective of the American or Canadian legal systems, so my best guess was that she tried to “blend” multiple places so that the story didn't feel location-specific.
I DNFed this book because of a lot of the reasons you made. I'm glad to know I am not alone in feeling this way. Makes me sad because I was hoping I would like this book.
I wish I had read your review before I purchased this one. I’m only 10% in and am board out of my mind. I dread picking it back up. Lol. Great review!
This review is so fantastic. I especially love your point about white women sitting around giggling at Molly for being “cute”. This book was really offensive in my opinion toward ND folks.
Perhaps this was answered further down, but I believe the novel is set in Canada. The writer is a Canadian editor of some prominence.
LOL. "...us upper middle class readers..." Hilarious. That comment shows how outta touch the upper middle class is.
I like your review a lot. Still reading the first few chapters and trying to see whether I'm going to enjoy the rest of the story or not.
My child has autism and my husband is an aspie. This book was so hard for me. It made me feel sick that this character was intentionally written this was because someone probably thought it was funny. It’s not. It’s disgusting- Molly is a poorly informed cliche written by a person who clearly has no understanding of or respect for neurodivergent individuals.