Ted's Reviews > The Lovely Bones

The Lovely Bones by Alice Sebold
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
172983
's review

did not like it
bookshelves: garbagestbooksever

** spoiler alert ** Two-dimensional stereotyped characters
-Mother – living with the regret of losing her independence to the demands of childrearing. The tragic loss of a daughter accelerates her departure from those heavy burdens and into the arms of the detective working the case.
-Father – obsessed to the point that he neglects the living members of his family destroying his relationship with his wife. Only in her absence is he able to fall in love with her “all over again”.
-Detective – his ‘sob-story’ past (wife committed suicide) explains his devotion to make sense of senseless death by solving cases of murdered women. This leads him into the arms of the latest victim’s mother (who, incidentally, reminds him of his dead wife - eww).
-Mrs. Singh – the exotic, wise, independent, and strong foreigner who calmly dispenses cool sage-like personal advice to near-strangers.
-George Harvey – the ‘odd-but-harmless neighbor’ otherwise know as the psychotic pedophile/murderer who builds dollhouses in his spare time. Queue soundtrack with mangled version of a nursery rhyme transposed to a minor key ungainly lobbed from a detuned piano. Snippets from his mildly troubling childhood are revealed…explaining nothing.
-Grandma Lynn – the often drunk but all-knowing grandmother with a ‘wacky’ liberal perspective on life.
-I could go on…the youngest sibling who sees the ghost of Susie as his imaginary friend, the sister who struggles to become her own person from under the shadow of her dead sister, her boyfriend as the complete antithesis to the evil Mr. Harvey, her boyfriend’s older brother as the macho gear-head with a heart of gold.

The Narrative
There is only the occasional passage where the narrator’s voice sounds like that a teenage girl from the mid-seventies (“Lindsay had a boy in the kitchen!” – oh the giddiness of it all!). Small blessings. Cliché after cliché. If you haven’t already gotten a sense of the hackneyed construction of this book please re-read the first page of this rant. Only a sportscaster from some small-town cable station would stand a fighting chance of besting Sebold in a contest of cliché slinging.

The Ending
Worthy of Hallmark. Every loose end is tied up with nobody owning up to the consequences of their actions (with the exception of Mr. Harvey, because he’s bad, you see). The family is reunited, the murderer is murdered, the daughter marries her high school sweetheart and has a child of her own (thus proving that life does go on…sniff), and lastly, the teenaged ghost of murdered Susie Salmon transcends her personal minor heaven (a staging ground for spirits who persistently cling to the living world) by ‘falling’ back to earth, inhabiting the now 20-something body of a lesbian acquaintance in order to trespass into another person’s home and have sex with the now 20-something boy she had a crush on shortly before her murder. The moral? Only after wilfully experiencing the delightful carnal pleasures of the flesh can one, even the spirit of a murdered teenaged girl, let go of those lost earthly pleasures and move on to a higher and presumably more enlightened plane of existence where you are free to smite those that have wronged you. Touching, really.

The Lovely Bones reviews
-Why do they always say “brutal” murder or “brutal” rape? Is that opposed to the “wonderful” murders and “superb” rapes in other novels?
-Did any of these reviewers even read the book?! They just seem to be reading each other’s reviews, praising the unique first person narrative of a protagonist in heaven and how it deals with such a horrifying topic. The fist person perspective does not offer anything new and the only thing horrifying here is that people consume mind-numbing garbage like this at an alarming rate.
-There’s nothing new here. What was the point? Aside from, paranormal sex is a wonderfully liberating experience for both the possessive-spiri
328 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Lovely Bones.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
July 28, 2007 – Shelved
July 28, 2007 – Shelved as: garbagestbooksever

Comments Showing 1-18 of 18 (18 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Lorraine (last edited Aug 25, 2016 11:50AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Lorraine I was about to write a review, but you got it down pat. What an odious novel. The cliches abound and make me sick. The reviewers who praised it must have been on acid (or just paid to do so probably!)


message 2: by Janna (last edited Aug 25, 2016 12:15PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Janna If you don't like it, that's fine and great to get varied opinions. But I really don't see a point to insulting other people who use the site and liked the book. Why not just save the acid critiques for the books?


message 3: by Lorraine (last edited Aug 25, 2016 12:16PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Lorraine O I meant to slap the official reviewers, not the reviewers here -- I think the official reviewers have to judge by different standards. But yeah, I'm just bitchy. Sorry. By my standards it just doesn't cut it, and anyone trained as a literary critic (like those people who wrote the reviews for magazines) should not be praising the book.


message 4: by Ted (last edited Aug 25, 2016 12:16PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Ted I had assumed Janna's comment was addressing something I had written in my review. Like Lorraine, I was not referring to reviews written on this site (I haven't actually read any on this site), rather, the work of paid professional reviewers (of which I have read many...really, too many). I don't believe there is anything insulting to people using this site who liked the book in my review (or in Lorraine's comment). I was just stating (my personal opinion) that this is a horrible novel and in turn that I am horrified by the number of people who consume (what I consider) trash (like this book) based on the recommendations of bandwagon-like reviews that drive mediocrity* (*just my opinion, again) to the top of bestseller lists. "Da Vinci Code", anyone? Okay, now I'm asking for it... :)


message 5: by Janna (last edited Aug 25, 2016 12:18PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Janna Ah, I see. Thanks for clarifying. When I read your review (Ted), I thought it good, but thought the comments about reviewers were directed at the other reviewers using this site.

PS - I liked DaVinci Code. ;-) Sometimes it's nice to read something fast-paced and light, and even a bit predictable. Sort of like eating at In n'Out burger instead of at a 4-star restaurant. :)


message 6: by Sarah (last edited Aug 25, 2016 12:41PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Sarah thanks, ted, for a while there i thought i might be crazy since i read so much good stuff about it. i feel like we've survived something together. ...and i'll even admit to liking a lot of mainstream fiction.

uugggghh!


message 7: by Kitten (new)

Kitten I watched the movie and it scared the hell out of me!!!!!


message 8: by Deborah (new)

Deborah this is hilarious - thanks!


William Baker Thanks. Spot on review. This book was weak at best. Is this what the publishers mean when they say "send your best work"?


message 10: by Neha (new) - rated it 2 stars

Neha Excellent review! As soon as the first four chapters were over I really did not want to read that book anymore.


message 11: by Maya (new) - rated it 2 stars

Maya Rachel I so agree! The characters were all so stereotypical!


message 12: by Suzanne (new)

Suzanne in a word....."Oh My!"


Spider the Doof Warrior Detuned piano. LOL!


Trina Lol. Thank you for your review.


message 15: by Tigbench (new)

Tigbench " “superb” rapes" How dare you put those two words together! Shame on you!


Raynorthebubblequeen I guess from your perspective a mother shouldn't be distraught over loosing her child. It's not "stereotypical" it's a way people grieve


message 17: by Melo (new) - rated it 1 star

Melo Lmao nice review!


09217 Spot on, your review is soo nice, I was having a hard time trying to explain the characters


back to top