Glenn Russell's Reviews > The Time Machine

The Time Machine by H.G. Wells
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
23385697
's review





The Time Machine is a true classic. Originally published in 1895, H. G. Wells’ short novel of time travel is one of the most beloved works in all of science fiction. Back when I was a twelve-year-old, I vividly recall watching the 1960 film with Mom and Dad at the local movie house. Traveling through time with the turn of the century scientist as he encounters first the Eloi and then the Morlocks proved to be among my most powerful childhood experiences.

As I’m sure was the case with thousands of viewers, after reading the short novel, I discovered the book was actually better than the movie. I just did do a reread and my judgement is confirmed – the book is truly outstanding, worth a read or reread by both those new to science fiction as well as avid fans of the genre. SF Masterworks wisely published the novel as a stand-alone and also combined with the author’s The War of the Worlds.

The tale is told as a frame story, that is, the narrator is one of five guests in the home of a British gentleman referred to as the Time Traveller. One evening the Time Traveller shares his ideas about time and space and then displays a model of a device the size of a small clock he claims can move through time. After the Time Traveller places the finely crafted model on his desk next to his lamp and flips a switch, all the guests are astonished when the little time machine vanishes.

At their next meeting, the guests are taken aback when the Time Traveller enters the room pale, scrapped and his clothes dusty and dirty. He then proceeds to recount his extraordinary experience in the last eight days, an experience mostly focusing on his encounters in the far distant future, in the year 802,701 A.D.

Firstly, next to a large white sphinx, he is surrounded by a band of small, frail, beautiful, graceful people all with curly hair and wearing tunics and sandals. He soon learns they live communally in one buildings and are strict vegetarians eating only a curious futuristic fruit.

Such a future race prompts the Time Traveller (and indirectly the author) to pose a number of philosophic questions: Is this close resemblance of men and women a consequence of there being no need for physical force or to protect themselves from beasts or enemies? Why the sameness in all these people he comes to know as the Eloi (children simply miniatures of adults)? Is individuality a thing of the past? What are the reasons for their lack of curiosity and absence of any written language? What accounts for the apparent dearth of struggle and suffering? Is all what he's seeing the inevitable result of the elimination of class and rank? However, as he acknowledges, his general assumptions about the circumstances of their lives proves to be inaccurate.

But then it happens: he discovers his Time Machine is gone. Who moved it? Where is it now? This is but the first in a series of additional shocks: the Time Traveller recognizes, although they spend their days eating and chatting together, dancing and playing and having casual sex, the Eloi lack any deep feelings for one another. This stark fact is brought home when he watches a helpless woman carried down the river and not one of the Eloi comes to her rescue. Undaunted, the Time Traveller pulls her out of the water. Her name is Weena, and she and the Time Traveller subsequently form an emotional bond.

The most shocking revelation: there is a second race inhabiting this future world, a larger, more ferocious race with white fur and blazing eyes, a race living with their machines under the earth: the Morlocks. Thus the plot quickly thickens. The more the Time Traveller grasps the dynamics of this future world, the more sinister and disturbing. Is all this, he muses, the inevitable outcome of the division of class, the idle aristocrats on one side and the laboring commoners on the other?

His philosophic assumptions about a future society have been shattered. After all, he didn’t bring any provisions with him on his time travel since he assumed future peoples would maintain and expand science and technology thereby furnishing him with any needs he might have for things like medicine or clothing. And to think, he also took it for granted there would be one and only one future race of humans. Who would have guessed the human race would split in two?

With the appearance of the Morlocks, Wells’ tale kicks into one of high adventure. Along the way, the Time Traveller battles the Morlocks with an iron club and that most decisive part of human development: fire. Weena places two white flowers in his trouser pocket, flowers he eventually shows his five guests upon his return to Victorian England, flowers that serve as material evidence his time travel is fact not fiction.

Also worth noting: the Time Traveller reports even more distant future times. One particular account of a race of kangaroo-like brutes that have evolved from future humans was deemed too disturbing and cut by the author’s editors. Yet even without this specific inclusion, what the Time Traveler sees is truly remarkable.

A classic work of science fiction not to be missed.


British author H. G. Wells, 1866 - 1946

“So, as I see it, the Upperworld man had drifted towards his feeble prettiness, and the Underworld to mere mechanical industry. But that perfect state had lacked one thing even for mechanical perfection—absolute permanency. Apparently as time went on, the feeding of an Underworld, however it was effected, had become disjointed. Mother Necessity, who had been staved off for a few thousand years, came back again, and she began below. The Underworld being in contact with machinery, which, however perfect, still needs some little thought outside habit, had probably retained perforce rather more initiative, if less of every other human character, than the Upper. And when other meat failed them, they turned to what old habit had hitherto forbidden." - H. G. Wells, The Time Machine
115 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Time Machine.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
October 31, 2018 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-21 of 21 (21 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Lisa Very nice review, Glenn! Reminds me that it is time to revisit this classic soon.


message 2: by Glenn (new) - added it

Glenn Russell Lisa wrote: "Very nice review, Glenn! Reminds me that it is time to revisit this classic soon."

Thanks, Lisa! It has always surprised me how powerful this tale, and all told in 100 pages that can be read in one afternoon.


Paul Lovely review, Glenn. I need to travel back several decades to retrieve my detailed impressions of this remarkable book. Time for another visit, I think.


message 4: by Glenn (new) - added it

Glenn Russell Paul wrote: "Lovely review, Glenn. I need to travel back several decades to retrieve my detailed impressions of this remarkable book. Time for another visit, I think."

Thanks, Paul. I had great fun rereading (actually, I listened to a 3 hour audio book) and writing my review. Enjoy your own travel back, such a delightful read.


message 5: by William (last edited Oct 31, 2018 04:50PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

William Traveling through time with the turn of the century scientist as he encounters first the Eloi and then the Morlocks proved to be among my most powerful childhood experiences.

Me, too! Lovely review, Thank you.

Sadly, today's "egocentric" concept of time travel completely ignores the earth's rotation, it's movement around the sun, the sun's movement through the galaxy, and the galaxy's movement through the universe. Complicated.

Even in jumping one second into the past, the earth's movement would be quite fatal. Jumping an hour into the past would leave you in outer space, 66,000 miles ahead of the earth.

Your complex motion through space right now - https://youtu.be/r3p3K06dth4


message 6: by Glenn (new) - added it

Glenn Russell William wrote: "Traveling through time with the turn of the century scientist as he encounters first the Eloi and then the Morlocks proved to be among my most powerful childhood experiences.

Me, too! Lovely revi..."


You are quite welcome, William. Thanks in turn for reading my review of this classic.

That is complex! Makes me want to hang on for dear life.

Actually, my preference in time/space travel is via the imagination by reading great novels. To become something of a connoisseur of the novel takes a bit of a commitment, but such a commitment is well worth the effort. At least that's the way I see it.


Cheri I remember reading this when I was very young and then again when I was probably around 13. I think the last time I read this I was probably in my late 20s. I also remember watching the movie around the first time I read this with my older brother and his best friend, and probably multiple times after. I much prefer reading this to the movie itself, but the memory of watching it was a good one. Excellent review, Glenn!


Maria Fernanda Gama I love this review!


message 9: by Brian (new)

Brian Amazing review Glen! You inspired a desire in me. Sounds imaginitive and terrifying!


message 10: by Tristram (new) - added it

Tristram Shandy Glenn, this review not only makes me want to re-read the book but it made me realize how many of us have those childhood memories linked with that movie. When I was nine or ten, I must have watched in on TV at my grandparents' house in the late 70s, and I still vividly remember how terrified I was by the Morlocks, and how intriguing I found those rotating dics by the well. Even now, although the Morlock no longer scare me - in fact, I think we've got some at work -, I like to revisit the movie from time to time.


message 11: by Glenn (last edited Mar 04, 2019 03:06AM) (new) - added it

Glenn Russell Cheri wrote: "I remember reading this when I was very young and then again when I was probably around 13. I think the last time I read this I was probably in my late 20s. I also remember watching the movie aroun..."

Thanks, Cheri. Such a classic - wonderful you had multiple readings. The movie was scary. Glad you could watch without too much upset. (apologies for tardy acknowledgement of your comment here, Cheri. I just did see.


message 12: by Glenn (new) - added it

Glenn Russell Maria Fernanda wrote: "I love this review!"

Thanks, Maria! (Just did see your post here).


message 13: by Glenn (new) - added it

Glenn Russell Brian wrote: "Amazing review Glen! You inspired a desire in me. Sounds imaginitive and terrifying!"

Hey, Brian. Glad I did my job as a review. This is a very short novel - can be read in a couple of hours. Wells was ahead of his time, for sure.


message 14: by Glenn (new) - added it

Glenn Russell Tristram wrote: "Glenn, this review not only makes me want to re-read the book but it made me realize how many of us have those childhood memories linked with that movie. When I was nine or ten, I must have watched..."

Hey Tristram. Thanks for sharing your memories. Oh, yea, very scary movie for kids. I saw once back then and once was enough.


Radiantflux I loved this story. I remember reading this at school, when all the kids thought I was strange for reading 19th C literature. :)

Have you read the sequel by Stephen Baxter, Time Ships. It's extremely well done, as it keeps Wells' voice, but continues the story in 21st C hard science.


message 16: by Glenn (new) - added it

Glenn Russell Radiantflux wrote: "I loved this story. I remember reading this at school, when all the kids thought I was strange for reading 19th C literature. :)

Have you read the sequel by Stephen Baxter, Time Ships. It's extrem..."


Thanks for this, R! I'll have to check out the sequel by Baxter. What I did read and review was Christopher Priest's excellent combination of Wells' The Time Machine and The War of the Worlds in his The Space Machine. Link: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


message 17: by Radiantflux (last edited Mar 04, 2019 03:28AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Radiantflux Baxter was (I think) the president of the HG Wells Society (or something like that) so his book is a homage to Wells on it's 100th Anniversary. It's quite cool how he manages to incorporate quantum mechanics and multiple universes, while maintaining a fairly ignorant and racist 19th C outlook by the time traveler. It's a lot of fun if you're into Wells and hard scifi.

I have never read Christopher Priest, I'll have to check him out! Thanks for the tip.


message 18: by Cecily (new)

Cecily I really ought to reread this - after a gap of maybe 35 years. The trouble is, the film is so firmly lodged in my mind, they might not sit well together. Perhaps I need to read more reviews of this calibre, in preparation.


message 19: by Glenn (last edited Mar 13, 2019 04:05PM) (new) - added it

Glenn Russell Cecily wrote: "I really ought to reread this - after a gap of maybe 35 years. The trouble is, the film is so firmly lodged in my mind, they might not sit well together. Perhaps I need to read more reviews of this..."

Thanks, Cecily. I suspect you will be pleasantly surprised if you reread this short novel as it has loads of color and philosophic insights not in the film (I myself picked up more of this on my reread). Also, it is a very short novel - about 100 pages that can be read in a day.


message 20: by Cecily (new)

Cecily Thanks. I know it's short, and I'm sure it's deeper than the film, but the film sticks.


message 21: by Glenn (last edited Mar 14, 2019 05:15AM) (new) - added it

Glenn Russell Cecily wrote: "Thanks. I know it's short, and I'm sure it's deeper than the film, but the film sticks."

Darn those films! They can spoil novels. Although occasionally the film is better than the book - prime example, The Graduate as a film over Charles Webb's novel of the same name.


back to top