Kat Kennedy's Reviews > Clockwork Angel

Clockwork Angel by Cassandra Clare
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3270188
** spoiler alert ** A lot of Goodreads friends that I have, people I deeply respect and whose opinions I actually hold in great value gave this book lots of stars and glowing reviews. Friends of mine, you know I adore you, so please don't take offense at this review. If you enjoyed this book then I’m really glad you did. It makes me happy when people enjoy literature. So you probably shouldn't read this review if you love this book.
It's nice to know that even though Cassandra Clare's Draco Trilogy ended years ago, I can pick up ANY SINGLE ONE of her books that she has published and see not only Draco’s character, but all my old friends from the Harry Potter Fanon Universe with different names and physical descriptions but otherwise pretty much intact. Because seven really long books just wasn’t enough for them apparently.

It's nice to know that the snappy little one-liners and cheap hijinks are being recycled because they worked so well the first AND second time she used them.

I don't think I've made it any great secret that I despise the writings of Cassandra Clare - so let me get the, few, good points out of the way so I can go back to imagining a world where authors like this are forcibly chained to their desks and made to read their own stories over and over again until they’re sorry.

-She stopped using so many damn similes. I no longer feel like gouging out my own eyes every single time she tries to describe something.

-There is no creepy incest in this book so my husband was spared walking in on me trying to choke the life out of a paperback novel.

And… that about it. I mean, let’s face it, if the only good things I can say about this book are that she’s made slight improvements so that I no longer feel the urge to commit seppuku by diving head first into a meat grinder, then it’s not high praise.

So what was wrong with this novel? Well, other than the fact that the characters were almost CARBON COPIES of ones that I’d read in City of Bones, Draco Dormiens, Draco Sinister and Draco Veritas, there was just so much to hate. The character building that they actually DO have only exists because she did the work years ago (on top of another author's pre-existing characters) – otherwise they’d be little more animated than the clockwork automatons that appear in this story.

Don’t get me started on how she wiki’d “Victorian Society”, copy and pasted the information into word and then randomly injected it into the story via the characters parroting the cans and can’ts of the time period. Not even going there. It’ll take too long to complain about that.

How about her inability to write a storyline that is in anyway surprising? Reading one of her novels is like watching a dumbed down version of Scooby Doo. I actually liked Scooby Doo (before Scrappy-Doo came along. Whoever made that character needed to be shot, hung, kheelhauled and quartered – the whole works) but you know how they’d go somewhere and they’d be like, “Hey guys, I think something’s going to happen! Hey, look gang, a perfectly inconspicuous diving mask… I WONDER IF THIS COULD BE A CLUE *WINK**WINK**NUDGE**NUDGE* FOR ALL THE FIVE YEAR OLD KIDS PLAYING AT HOME!”

In Clockwork Angel, Clare practically flags you down, makes you come look VERY hard at her clue that is painted bright, bright red and poorly hidden behind her back while she insists that it’s not actually there and giggles every time she tries to make you not look at her ENORMOUS FLIPPIN' CLUE. She insists on this behaviour until finally you pat her on the head, tell her that she ALMOST managed to colour inside all the lines.

The whole concept of this book wasn’t original! It was her looking at the Internet culture going, “Huh… so people are really getting into steampunk, eh? Hmmmm… how can I cash in on this with as little effort on my behalf as possible?”

She is recycling characters that she built on from the Harry Potter universe years ago. She's recycling storylines, conversations, personalities, plot-points, ideas and concepts from all around her and she recycles her own stuff (what little there is of it) just as frequently.

When she was accused of plagiarism for lifting entire paragraphs of text from other authors without referencing it, she made a comment that it didn't really matter because - hey, isn't fanfiction just pastiche anyway?

Well, fine. It was just fanfiction, who really cares? But I'd think after all these years she would have moved on past her pastiche style of writing to something that she could actually claim as her own.

But you know what? She can't. I feel no guilt in saying that she doesn’t deserve to be published or to be earning the money that she is. I will proudly complain about her books until she actually starts to care about the fudge that she’s packing.


1334 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Clockwork Angel.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 6, 2010 – Started Reading
September 6, 2010 – Shelved
September 6, 2010 –
page 1
0.21% "Okay, here we go on our magical adventure!"
September 9, 2010 –
page 230
48.02% "Cue: groan. So boring..."
October 7, 2010 – Shelved as: kat-s-book-reviews
October 7, 2010 – Shelved as: just-plain-bad
October 7, 2010 – Shelved as: books-that-deserve-painful-death
October 12, 2010 – Shelved as: kat-s-rants
November 9, 2010 – Finished Reading
December 28, 2011 – Shelved as: ya-pnr-maddness

Comments Showing 1-50 of 610 (610 new)


message 1: by [deleted user] (new)

haha. dare i ask what you thought of her first series?


Kat Kennedy The word "despise" does not begin to cover how I feel about this author and the only conceivable use I could find for the first series was back-up toilet paper. However I will try to be as fair and unbiased when I read this book as possible!

I'm kind like that!


message 3: by Tatiana (new)

Tatiana Well, this attempt will be an interesting thing to witness. Keep us all updated on your progress.


message 4: by Desperado (new)

Desperado Great review Kat, & hilarious as always! I decided long ago not to try CC after learning that her Mortal Instruments series has this psuedo-incest thing going on. I don't mind incest but not when it's there just for "Hey, I bet you didn't see that shit coming!" shock value.

Kat, you know I luv you, right? Please don't take this the wrong way but....well. Your review is chock-full of expletives...& this is a YA novel. Little kiddies & tweeny boppers are gonna read this. I don't care at all but I'm very afraid your review is gonna get flagged & then I would cry. Just saying. Do your thing.


Kat Kennedy *sigh* I know. I usually try to show SOME retraint but his book mad me crazy-angry. Will go edit now. :(


message 6: by AH (new) - added it

AH OMG, what a thorough review. I was sitting on the fence about buying this book. I did like MI when I first read the series, tried to read them again, but just could not get into them at all.

Maybe you can put a disclaimer on your review - for 18 yr old and up?


message 7: by Tatiana (new)

Tatiana Disclaimer at the top is probably all you need.

I've seen much raunchier reviews on GR, so I don't think it will be deleted or whatever.

And thank you for this review. I never knew the author back in the day, but reading COB got the same reaction out of me as this book - out of you. It is truly sad that many people find these books original when each and every idea in them is stolen from other works and accompanied by bad writing and bad characters. I will never understand the popularity of this particular author.


message 8: by Kat Kennedy (last edited Sep 10, 2010 07:49AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Kat Kennedy LOL, it's all good, AH. I went back and edited out most of the swearing. I agree it was a...little over the top so I've tried to tone it down a bit.

Damn Tatiana, you comment on just turned up now for me AFTER I edited it! Grr!


Spider the Doof Warrior HA! This review is bond to be better than the book even with a megaton of cussing and such.

Those first books I read by her frustrated me.
Also I hate the Clave. They are jerks. Nephilim suck.
YAY! SPELLCHECK!


Penny You have a finely-tuned ability to hate. I like it.


message 11: by MelissaB (new)

MelissaB Umm I don't know anything about this book or author but this was a hilarious review!


message 12: by Desperado (new)

Desperado Tatiana wrote: "Disclaimer at the top is probably all you need.

I've seen much raunchier reviews on GR, so I don't think it will be deleted or whatever.

And thank you for this review. I never knew the author ba..."


I'm not saying there aren't raunchier (is that a word?) reviews on GR. Hell, I've written a few of them. I have a mouth like a sailor & it shows in my reviews. I'm just worried because this book is aimed towards the younger crowd, is all. What if some tweenage fan-girl who LOVES this novel gets all her friends together to flag this review & gets it deleted because Kat hated CA? I'm just trying to look out for my fwends.

Either way, I support you Kat, expletives or no expletives. Fuck those fan-girls!


message 13: by Mariel (new)

Mariel I figure I'll read these if I ever hate myself enough to wanna atone for something. Don't send me to jail or hell, make me read Cassandra Clare!


message 14: by Kaia (new)

Kaia I've never read Cassandra Clare because the first thing I heard about her was her rampant plagiarism. But I almost wish I had, because I imagine this review would be even more awesome than it already is.


message 15: by Amanda (new)

Amanda Oh thank god someone said all these out. I can't understand why she's a famous author. I avoid all her work like plague and it gets me everytime someone says that her books are great.


Spider the Doof Warrior I never get to go to London. I'm from NY and I think I like Boston a bit better. The subways are less frightening here.


Kat Kennedy Thanks guys! Glad you enjoyed my rampaging anger captured in literary form!

Oh LL! You knows I loves you!

@penny - you crack me up with a single sentence. Most people would be politically correct and just say that I'm a passionate person. Fuck no! I just REALLY hate this book! ;p

Thanks Beth!

@Amanda - I know, it makes me grind my teeth! Then I try to remember that I'm glad people find thongs they enjoy and are reading blah blah blah.


message 18: by Vi (last edited Sep 10, 2010 09:43PM) (new)

Vi Vi This is actually the best review I've ever read. Thank you for articulating so spectacularly everything I was too lazy to say about this book. Maybe I'll write a review soon but I honestly can't be bothered to finish this book. Clare needs to try harder, which obviously won't happen since her nigh-defiant laziness and constant validation is what made her fortune.


message 19: by Meredith (new)

Meredith Holley Okay, do we need to have an intervention about the fact that you continue to subject yourself to her books? Guarantied to make your eyeballs (and ass) ache for, like, three days. Maybe four. Glad she tossed out the similes, though. I never saw them coming, and they were always painful.


message 20: by [deleted user] (last edited Sep 11, 2010 10:26AM) (new)

Meredith wrote: "Okay, do we need to have an intervention about the fact that you continue to subject yourself to her books? Guarantied to make your eyeballs (and ass) ache for, like, three days. Maybe four. Gla..."

Right? Although fun to read. [edit: the review, I mean, not the book, which I have no intention of reading.]

Goodreads generally does not remove a review for language alone, regardless of what the book is, or the audience of the book.

The options for flagging are - and you can go see them if you hit the flag button anywhere - don't worry, it doesn't automatically flag.

Slanderous
It contains a slanderous remark about another member.

Spoiler Alert
It contains a spoiler.

Inappropriate
It contains inappropriate content: spam, porn, pro-nazi, etc. Please don't flag items for having foul language, as Goodreads does not believe in censoring content and will not delete anything for foul language alone. Negative book reviews do not count as inappropriate. [emphasis mine]

Off Topic
It is off-topic or irrelevant.


Really, the one I don't understand is the off-topic one.


message 21: by Meredith (new)

Meredith Holley Off Topic is probably, like, if one of the spammers wrote a review about how cheap pharmaceuticals are. Because we go pretty off topic, but I've never had anything deleted.


message 22: by [deleted user] (new)

Greg's lost a couple, mostly of books he never read, usually from his kooky kristians shelf. I wonder if that idiot on your Soulless review flagged it? You *were* on-topic; he just missed the point or something.


message 23: by Meredith (new)

Meredith Holley I know, I was thinking about the Soulless dude. WHUT?! (about Greg losing reviews) His are usually so thoughtful on that topic (the ones I've seen). Weird. That kind of pisses me off.


message 24: by [deleted user] (new)

Hmmm. Let me see if I can find the thread where he talks about it. Hold on.

Aha:

http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...

I guess he thinks he lost a couple, but can't remember, so doesn't care, really. The thread's mostly about how bad amazon is about deleting negative reviews at the behest of authors.


message 25: by Meredith (new)

Meredith Holley Wow. I had no idea amazon did that. It kind of creeps me out to read the reviews over there anyway, because they usually seem to have an Oprah-zombie feel about them. That makes sense if they're deleting all the non-conforming reviews. Plus, they're all about censorship anyway, so I don't know why I'm surprised.

Greg should totally re-write that one and say he got 20 pages in. Crap, I should have written that on the other thread. Gah. Too late, I have to go to my doughnut-in-a-suit law challenge now.


message 26: by Misty (new)

Misty "so I can go back to imagining a world where authors like this are forcibly chained to their desks and made to read their stories over and over again UNTIL THEY ARE SORRY." <---- YESSSSSSSSS!!!!!!


message 27: by AH (new) - added it

AH Misty - that is awesome. Who would we chain to their desks?


message 28: by Samantha (last edited Sep 15, 2010 01:29PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Samantha Souza Ok,so after reviewing the book that you posted :) I do feel the need to point out that in no way, shape, or form has Draco Malfoy ever continuously attached himself to Harry Potter. Please reread the series if you think that this is so. Second, in no way is Will anything like Draco Malfoy. Draco is a nasty little twit with a taste for revenge against Harry who made his daddy look bad in the eyes Lord Voldemort. I know HP backwards and forwards and though I am not trying to persuade you in anyway to liking the series, I do think that you should be knowledgeable about it if you are going to compare two completely different styles of writing to one another. Other than the references to the Harry Potter series I agree. The book was mediocre.


Kat Kennedy Samantha - please reread the part of my review where I was referring to Cassandra Clare's FANFICTION in which Draco Malfoy and Harry Potter are bestest friends ever. Of course the real Draco Malfoy is nothing like Will but I was referring to her sloppiness as a writer in writingthe same character over and over again - not outright plagiarism of the character.


Samantha Souza Ah gotchya


message 31: by Echo (new) - rated it 4 stars

Echo Hmm . . . I only read a few chapters of her fanfic years and years ago, and this is the first of the books I've read, so I wasn't likely to pick up on her rehashing characters and plots.

But your review amuses me greatly. It also makes me wonder what I will think of Clare after I read more of her work.


message 32: by Lucy (new) - rated it 2 stars

Lucy Excellent review. I'd also LOVE to know how a hidden world book like Mortal Instruments has a prequel book in an alternate universe with Steampunk. There's no references to steampunk in the first three books, modern or not. Steampunk is alternate universe stuff. It all feels like she's going "steampunk sells? let's sling some of that shit."

I'm still horrified this chick has a career after the plagiarism fanfiction. I read the Mortal Instruments on the recommendation of a friend and was confused how it ever got published, it was that bad. So I goggled a little and found the fanfiction debacle. I think you might find this link wonderfully funny:
http://www.journalfen.net/community/b...


Kat Kennedy Lucy, I never managed to get anywhere in the Mortal Instruments series but thank you for the link. Bad Penny and I go way back and that particular narrative is one that I've found particularly helpful in the past as I deal with rabbid fangirls who tell me that Cassandra Clare could not possibly have plagiarized.


message 34: by Tatiana (last edited Sep 19, 2010 06:23AM) (new)

Tatiana I found that link very amusing, the extent of borrowing that is and the whole hoopla over it. I can't say that plagiarizing quotes for fanfiction bothers me, because fanfic is nothing but borrowed characters and plots, but the fact the her published books are written in the same manner does.


message 35: by AH (new) - added it

AH I'll jump in. I was never aware of the bruhaha with this author. I read the books, thought they were good and went on with my life. I must admit that I have read some Twilight fanfic that were way better than the original and I would love to see those published. Those particular fanfics did not plagirize, they were creative in their use of the characters, settings, and lines.


message 36: by Leandra (new)

Leandra Your my hero ^-^ That review was beyond anything I could do and you summed it up in an amazing fashion!


I am Bastet Hahahahahahahahaha!!! Omg that was so funny! Also, the robot that walks is really cute, and now I'm sucked into talking to Jabberwacky.


Kat Kennedy Leandra - Thanks!

Tatiana - I think it was the paragraphs of copied text from two out-of-print books that really annoyed me. I didn't care too much about the quoting except it would have been nice for her to source the quotes. When I first started reading her, before I'd watched Buffy, Red Dwarf or Black Adder I thought she was SOOOOOOO funny. But when I reread her FF years later I realized pretty much everything about it that I'd found funny had been almost directly copied from somewhere else.

Isis - Jabberwocky is kind of addictive to chat to, I know!


message 39: by Megan (new)

Megan Well, that was... all I can say is that you must've had a HUGE headache before you got all that jazz out. In your review you said you had a husband, so I'm just assuming that you're a seasoned book reader/analyzer/critic. Well me NOT being that "experienced" I really can't say anything that... profound. Except that this is a YA book. So the age range would be from 13-18. Being a naive teen, and being around other naive teens, nobody really cares or knows the difference between, say, Twilight and Tom Sawyer; except that one has big print and the latter has tiny. So, I really have no problem with your review and I highly advise you to go on fanfiction or fictionpress and write all that agression out. Who knows; it may turn into one great book.


Wicked Incognito Now LOL! Really Kat!! You need to find a way curb your enthusiasm lady. Seriously, if you had like a writing career or something--maybe you wouldn't be such an entertaining and enthusiastic reviewer. Writing more could tame the monster. :-P Oh no, I take that back. Your reviews are a thing of beauty.


Laurie  (barksbooks) "Without any doubt, in my not-so-professional opinion, this book is a little, flaccid dick waving free in the breeze of literature trying its very bestest to hardened up and bugger us all in the ass

My advice: don't let it."

Classic!


Kat Kennedy April - the funny thing is that I already do write. So what does that say about me? So many outlets and yet, still so many ranting reviews!

I'm glad you enjoyed it - even if it was a little over enthusiastic!

Thanks BarkLessWagMore!

Megan - I don't think age has so much to do with being critical in reading a book. I'd already begun forming my opinion that Cassandra Clare was not a good writer when I was 14 years old. I just think people like what they like - no matter their age, and I just personally don't like this.


Wicked Incognito Now Oh, I know you're a writer Kat. I was attempting to be facetious. I believe that the MORE someone writes, the more likely they are to hone their craft and become Kat-like reviewers. Well that's not necessarily true--Ca va!

What do you write BTW?


message 44: by Kat Kennedy (last edited Oct 10, 2010 02:50PM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Kat Kennedy Heather, entering a discussion and giving your opinion on what I should do or care about and prefacing it with "I have no clue" seems, just a little, to be asking to be informed. Fast. And not particularly nicely either.

After all, did I not EXPLICITLY state that my review was not meant for fans of the book and did I not give a warning to stop reading lest you be offended? Did I not state clearly that there are GR friends I have "whose opinions I respect and hold in high regard" who enjoyed this book?

So your clarification that you are not a teenager or a romance novel reader (I think Zosia, one of the more intelligent people I know AND a romance reader may take exception to this, Heather) seems to more represent YOUR views and assumptions than they do mine.

You don't care about her "scandal". So you would give a passing grade to a school student who copied entire paragraphs from other authors and passed it off as their own work?

I'm sorry but as an editor and a writer, I find this behaviour completely unacceptable. Even in the Fanfiction world where lines may be faint but outright copying of people's words without any referencing is unacceptable.

I never claimed that some other authors or corporations DIDN'T recycle formulas but in my opinion it's incredibly lazy and offensive. After all, if someone sold you a car, stole it and then tried to sell it back to you - you'd have a right to be angry. The fact that she is a lazy author recycling characters and ideas - most of them were not even hers to begin with - gives me a right to complain about it.

And lastly, where do you people come from? Honestly, I don't troll 5 star reviews and complain that they've gotten it all wrong. What the hell are you doing here if you love her and her work so much? Go find some 5 star reviews so that you can continue to validate your uninformed opinion because clearly you did not come here seeking facts, information or a broadening of your perspective.


Ceilidh It's something of a comfort to find a reviewer that hated this book as much as I did. I just finished it today and it was so dull, derivative and predictable. I've only read the first book in her other series but Clockwork Angel was a carbon copy of it except with a different setting and some cogs shoved in because Clare knows that steampunk is popular. Between the HP fan fiction plagiarism, her first series and now this, if it wasn't evident to people before, it should be plainly obvious that Clare doesn't have an original idea in her head. Great review!


message 46: by Danny (new)

Danny You are brilliant, I love your review. So glad to see that someone hates her books more than I do.


message 47: by Cathy (last edited Oct 22, 2010 12:36AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Cathy Wow, get a life. What a waste of your time. What are you torturing yourself for? Still reading her books 4 books later and giving detailed reviews makes you look like a fanatic. BTW, you know nothing about steampunk or the way that robots have been used historically, or you're just ignoring it to make your point. It would have been pretty dumb to include modern understanding of the idea. Whatever, I just think the whole diatribe actually makes you look look bad more than the author. But clearly you have your fans, so enjoy the wrath party. It's just distasteful to me, I want to read reviews not vendettas.


Kat Kennedy I love it when someone comes in and comments on one of my reviews, claims that I'm ignorant yet provides no actual information, further insights or links and then breezes off - all after complaining that I have no life for taking the time to write my opinion. That's not hypocritical at all.

I expect it from the insipid fangirls and I expect it from the trolls - but from the GoodReads Librarians too? There’s another illusion shattered.


Angela Dude you're so right,I mean I gave it 3.5 stars probably only because there wasn't any incest or anything like that, and let's face it there are a lot of worse books out there, like Twilight for example,at least vampires here don't sparkle.But really everything you said was 100% right.You have my respect.


Mishez I have a big issue with your review - you don't seem to mention the most infuriating thing of all - the ending!! /what was that?!?! shamelessly money-grabbing "you must buy the sequel" type of ending. I was so disgusted, like i need to be TOLD that i want to read another of her books, like i'm braindead and can't think for myself! Anyway, yeah for me that was the worst part of the whole book, and undermined it all.
Apart from that i quite liked it, i've never read a CC b4.


« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13
back to top