Julie's Reviews > The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness
The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness
by
by
![1213607](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p2/1213607.jpg)
1988. English 201. I was a college freshman, required to write a paper about fads vs. trends. For reasons I cannot recall, I chose to write about the War on Drugs. I can’t recall anything about the paper, either, though I can still see the “This Is Your Brain On Drugs” commercial that was rolled out in 1987 by the Partnership for a Drug-Free America. Washington D. C. was embroiled in the Iran-Contra Affair. It was an election year. Perestroika had just begun rolling off western tongues. Benazir Bhutto was named Prime Minister of Pakistan. I was eighteen and although I knew all about apartheid in South Africa, and stood in line to see Mississippi Burning when it was released late that year, I had been raised in nearly all-white communities in rural Washington state. The notion that the War on Drugs was at the heart of a “stunningly comprehensive and well-disguised system of racialized social control that functions in a manner strikingly similar to Jim Crow” (p 4) would have been beyond my limited understanding of race in these United States.
Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness is stunning. The racialized social control she writes of in the introduction is quite simple to state, but devastating in complexity: the United States, since the dismantling of Jim Crow began in the mid-1940s, has sought to maintain the social dominance of its white population by the systematic mass incarceration of people of color, primarily young black men.
You can’t believe that so radical a policy, carried out on a massive scale that requires the collusion of each branch of government, not to mention the FBI, CIA, and local law enforcement, is possible? Don’t take my word for it. Read Alexander’s painstakingly documented book. Follow up her statements with research of your own; sadly, it’s very easy to connect the dots, all the way back to the start of slavery in the Colonies, long before the Federation was formed, long before the Constitution of the United States declared that slaves were defined as three-fifths of a man.
I could provide you the litany of statistical evidence Alexander lays out, but it’s hard to know where to start or where to stop. The data are here; the numbers are real, and they are soul-crushing. I challenge you to read this and learn for yourself. What makes this book so compelling, however, is Alexander’s ability to put human faces in front of the statistics, to show us that our shared history has neither a shared interpretation nor shared consequences.
Alexander effectively repeats and summarizes the concepts on a regular basis, which is a welcome relief, because so much of this information is hard to process. I expended much energy in rage and frustration of how this system came to be and is allowed to continue that I needed the frequent re-focus. About two-thirds of the way in, she offers this summation:
Michelle Alexander states in the opening sentence that
As a white woman living again in predominantly white, rural Washington state, I despair at my ability to contribute anything useful to the dialogue, much less to be an agent of change. I accept I’ll be branded an SJW (fine by me) and shout mostly to a choir of my own peers. But I know, after reading what Michelle Alexander wrote in her preface, that this book is for me; I am the audience she had in mind. She also states in the introduction that:
Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness is stunning. The racialized social control she writes of in the introduction is quite simple to state, but devastating in complexity: the United States, since the dismantling of Jim Crow began in the mid-1940s, has sought to maintain the social dominance of its white population by the systematic mass incarceration of people of color, primarily young black men.
You can’t believe that so radical a policy, carried out on a massive scale that requires the collusion of each branch of government, not to mention the FBI, CIA, and local law enforcement, is possible? Don’t take my word for it. Read Alexander’s painstakingly documented book. Follow up her statements with research of your own; sadly, it’s very easy to connect the dots, all the way back to the start of slavery in the Colonies, long before the Federation was formed, long before the Constitution of the United States declared that slaves were defined as three-fifths of a man.
I could provide you the litany of statistical evidence Alexander lays out, but it’s hard to know where to start or where to stop. The data are here; the numbers are real, and they are soul-crushing. I challenge you to read this and learn for yourself. What makes this book so compelling, however, is Alexander’s ability to put human faces in front of the statistics, to show us that our shared history has neither a shared interpretation nor shared consequences.
Alexander effectively repeats and summarizes the concepts on a regular basis, which is a welcome relief, because so much of this information is hard to process. I expended much energy in rage and frustration of how this system came to be and is allowed to continue that I needed the frequent re-focus. About two-thirds of the way in, she offers this summation:
This, in brief, is how the system works: The War on Drugs is the vehicle through which extraordinary numbers of black men are forced into the cage. The entrapment occurs in three distinct phases . . . The first stage is the roundup. Vast numbers of people are swept into the criminal justice system by the police, who conduct drug operations primarily in poor communities of color. … The conviction marks the beginning of the second phase: the period of formal control. Once arrested, defendants are generally denied meaningful legal representation and pressured to plead guilty whether they are or not. …The final stage has been dubbed by some advocates as the period of invisible punishment. … a form of punishment that operates largely outside of public view and takes effect outside the traditional sentencing framework. . . and collectively ensures that the offenders will never integrate into mainstream, white society.One of the most thought-provoking issues raised in The New Jim Crow is the concept of colorblindness, and how Martin Luther King’s call to create a society where people are not "judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character" has been badly distorted by politicians in their attempts to dismantle affirmative action and anti-poverty programs. Recognition of this distortion is not new, of course, but it’s been skillfully employed in the mass incarceration movement by those who don’t want to appear racist. As Alexander states:
“In the era of colorblindness, it is no longer socially permissible to use race, explicitly, as a justification for discrimination, exclusion, and social contempt. So we don’t. Rather than rely on race, we use our criminal justice system to label people of color “criminals” and then engage in all the practices we supposedly left behind. Today it is perfectly legal to discriminate against criminals in nearly all the ways that it was once legal to discriminate against African Americans. Once you’re labeled a felon, the old forms of discrimination—employment discrimination, housing discrimination, denial of the right to vote, denial of educational opportunity, denial of food stamps and other public benefits, and exclusion from jury service—are suddenly legal. As a criminal, you have scarcely more rights, and arguably less respect, than a black man living in Alabama at the height of Jim Crow. We have not ended racial caste in America; we have merely redesigned it.”Martin Luther King, Jr fought for a society where people were not judged by the color of their skin. He never called for the color of their skin to be ignored.
Michelle Alexander states in the opening sentence that
This book is not for everyone. I have a specific audience in mind—people who care deeply about racial justice but who, for any number of reasons, do not yet appreciate the magnitude faced by communities of color as a result of mass incarceration…(and) those who have been struggling to persuade their friends, neighbors, relatives, teachers, co-workers, or political representatives . . . but who have lacked the facts and data to back up their claims. Last, but definitely not least, I am writing this book for all those trapped within America’s latest caste system. You may be locked up our lock out of mainstream society, but you are not forgotten.So it’s natural to end such a bleak assessment of race in America with the question, what can be done? Michelle Alexander addresses this extensively, including taking the traditional civil rights organizations to task for turning their backs on the long-standing issue of mass incarceration of black and brown Americans.
As a white woman living again in predominantly white, rural Washington state, I despair at my ability to contribute anything useful to the dialogue, much less to be an agent of change. I accept I’ll be branded an SJW (fine by me) and shout mostly to a choir of my own peers. But I know, after reading what Michelle Alexander wrote in her preface, that this book is for me; I am the audience she had in mind. She also states in the introduction that:
A new social consensus must be forged about race and the role of race in defining the basic structure of our society, if we ever hope to abolish the New Jim Crow. The new consensus must begin with dialogue, a conversation that fosters critical consciousness, a key prerequisite to effective social action.After Michael Brown was killed by a police officer in Ferguson, MO last August, and the Black Lives Matter campaign spread across social media, I vowed to listen, read, and better educate myself about racial injustices, as well as hold myself accountable for on my own assumptions and prejudices. The New Jim Crow makes me uncomfortable; it makes me angry, ashamed, fearful, and determined. Determined never to be so blind again.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The New Jim Crow.
Sign In »
Quotes Julie Liked
![Michelle Alexander](https://cdn.statically.io/img/i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/authors/1680635545i/3051490._UX200_CR0,33,200,200_.jpg)
“racial caste systems do not require racial hostility or overt bigotry to thrive. They need only racial indifference, as Martin Luther King Jr. warned more than forty-five years ago.”
― The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness
― The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness
Reading Progress
February 13, 2015
–
Started Reading
February 13, 2015
– Shelved as:
social-political-commentary
February 13, 2015
– Shelved
February 14, 2015
–
19.31%
"This is one of those books I'm constantly setting aside to do my own research. In looking at how the Constitution & Federalism were structured to "protect the institution of slavery and the political power of slaveholding states" (p 26), I came across this 1992 article by journalist Juan Williams in the William and Mary Law Review http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/vie..."
page
56
February 15, 2015
–
35.86%
"http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6680412 wherein Bill Clinton apologizes to Mexico for the drug war, but who will apologize to the millions-mostly young men of color-rounded up and incarcerated under abusive mandatory sentencing laws for nonviolent drug offenses, in direct violation of their Fourth Amendment rights, at the cost of billions to the American taxpayer?"
page
104
February 16, 2015
– Shelved as:
best-of-2015
February 16, 2015
– Shelved as:
read-2015
February 16, 2015
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-33 of 33 (33 new)
date
newest »
![Down arrow](https://cdn.statically.io/img/s.gr-assets.com/assets/down_arrow-1e1fa5642066c151f5e0136233fce98a.gif)
message 1:
by
Julie
(last edited Feb 16, 2015 05:27PM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Feb 14, 2015 11:59AM
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
reply
|
flag
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
![Debbie "DJ"](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1407426768p1/12620745.jpg)
![Margitte](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1650004119p1/7481492.jpg)
![Leslie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1325635683p1/6584206.jpg)
![Cheryl](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1706236135p1/11255849.jpg)
![reading is my hustle](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1675807663p1/2069203.jpg)
...instead of a war on poverty they got a war on drugs so the police can bother me...
(well hey, that's just the way it is)
great review, julie. plan on adding this to my TBR.
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
I am so glad you mentioned this, Leslie. I looked up Ta-Nehisi's blog and found the start of the discussion. He really digs in and counters some of her arguments with other historical viewpoints. Just fascinating. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/a...
![Iris P](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1619818578p1/2641948.jpg)
Thanks for the link to the This American Life episodes, as a side note, I live in Miramar, Florida, just a few minutes away from Miami Gardens, the city discussed on Part two of the series. As the mother of an 18-year old boy, the killing of Trayvon Martin was so sad and deeply disturbing and brought the issue of racial tensions in Florida to the forefront in a stark way.
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
Thank you both- Debbie and Iris- I'm adding Stevenson's book to the list!
Iris, I'm so grateful to know more about your experiences and background. I see, sadly even in my own family, the fear and assumptions brought by ignorance and isolation. There is so much that is simple about the process of breaking down barriers- listening, asking questions, and listening more-but it's so hard to do. Peace to you, friend.
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
Debbie - thank you for these!
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
![Iris P](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1619818578p1/2641948.jpg)
I just finished listening to the podcast of the show Julie, truly fascinating and outrageous at the same time.
A few thoughts on the discussion:
* Kudos to Koch & Soros and their “unholy alliance”. Hopefully their resolution to push for reforms within our legal system will soon show positive results.
* This type of issues underscores the importance of having a strong and diverse local media sources.
* The concept of “Debtors prison” was supposed to be outlawed in the US a long time ago, but apparently as it frequently happens, the wording of the law is ambiguous an leaves too much room for interpretation.
* Finally this phrase by Nikole Hannah-Jones one of the guests on the show provide a new perspective:“(These)Policies might not be racialized, but the way they are implemented might be racialized”
Thanks for sharing!
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
Iris- I felt the same when I heard about Koch and Soros- you could have tipped me over with a feather. I truly hope the Koch fortune and influence is used for good.
Yes, yes to “(These)Policies might not be racialized, but the way they are implemented might be racialized.” I think this gets at the heart of the matter--it is so easy to point to policies and say, what's the problem? And walk away, shrugging off the knowledge and responsibility for how they are truly carried out.
Gah- I love these discussions. Thank you so much for continuing the conversation.
![Tony Hynes](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1447541936p1/48966753.jpg)
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
Tony, thank you for your comment and for reaching out.
This book launched a much-belated examination of my own views of racism, acknowledgement of my privilege, and a deep listening of voices and stories that have always been there, but because I passively bought into the myth of a post-racial society, I remained conveniently ignorant of. I refuse to turn away again.
![reading is my hustle](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1675807663p1/2069203.jpg)
The article that Ta Nahesi Coates wrote on reparations had the exact same effect on me, Julie. And, yes- ignorance was bliss. I tend to think in terms of before reading the article and after reading the article.
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
Elizabeth- yes! I was thinking of this article earlier today when this review came back up. Coates does amazing work. I'm thrilled he was awarded a "genius" MacArthur grant. So deserved.
![Naia](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1489871249p1/24390824.jpg)
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
Naia, yes! And thank you. This book was a revelation to me.
![✨ Anna ✨ | ReadAllNight](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1669600130p1/31397243.jpg)
The flip side of this issue that I don't think many grasp is the deterioration of skill in our law enforcement officers. Their directive has been to pursue drug offenders to increase stats for so long that solid policing and good detective work has deteriorated. That affects all of us, in every community. Thank you for sharing!
![Lee-ann Dunton](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1465332196p1/4741358.jpg)
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
Anna, I am just now discovering your comments. Thank you. Thank you for thinking this through, for your perspective and indignation and anger on behalf of all who have been victims of these policies.
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
Lee-Ann, thank you. I am eager to learn what you think as you read and absorb- it's a lot to take in and try to make sense of.
![Alan](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1333603994p1/8189212.jpg)
![Carol](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1438649960p1/3845138.jpg)
Julie,
Your review is brilliant , heartfelt and very thought-provoking. I hope that time of reckoning is now. It's way past due. I have Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption and I'll look for this one.
![Julie](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1699138619p1/1213607.jpg)
Julie,
Your review..."
Carol, I just came across your wonderful comment. Thank you! I can't believe this book is 10 years old already, and we are still talking about a system that has barely budged. I too hope that the reckoning is now inevitable.
You will love Just Mercy. It's more personal, but no less fascinating and urgent.