Be Prepared for More Taylor Swift-Themed Football Food

Plus, a lawsuit is alleging that Dunkin’s non-dairy milk upcharge is discriminatory, a woman in California tried to steal 65 Stanley Quenchers, and more.
Be Prepared for More Taylor SwiftThemed Football Food
Illustration by Hazel Zavala

Welcome to Delicious or Distressing, where we rate recent food memes, videos, and other entertainment news. Last week we discussed the Hidden Valley Ranch lip balm.

The Taylor Swift industrial complex is alive and flourishing. The latest to capitalize on it? None other than the NFL, obviously. After Swift and boyfriend Travis Kelce gifted the NFL with the sheer fact of their relationship, the league has made a conspicuous point of calling attention to her presence at this season’s games. Last Sunday, indeed, the Buffalo Bills’ catering team served up a Swiftie-themed menu at a home game against the Kansas City Chiefs, featuring items like “Bad Blood” waffle fries and a “Karma” quesadilla. The Chiefs are still in the running, meaning there could be many more Swiftie foods in the pipeline. That’s showbiz!

Also this week, Dunkin’ is getting slammed with a lawsuit for charging extra for non-dairy milks, alleging discrimination against the plant-based among us. People are frying and eating toothpicks, and for obvious reasons (or so one might think) this is a bad thing. Lastly, the ceaseless Stanley craze saw one California woman steal 65 of them, before getting arrested.

Read more below on this week’s food news around the internet.

Taylor Swift is getting menu items named after her at the football games she attends

I will admit that when I heard there would be Taylor Swift-themed foods at last Sunday’s game between the Buffalo Bills and the Kansas City Chiefs, I was skeptical. What could Taylor Swift-themed foods even be? Some kind of sandwich they’ve named “Anti-Gyro?” “BarbaCruel Summer Ribs?” Some other half-baked food pun that no one in their right mind would ever share with the general public? As it turns out, basically yes. The stadium served “Bad Blood” waffle fries (topped with buffalo chicken and blue cheese on one half, and pork, coleslaw, and pickles on the other) and “Karma” quesadillas, filled with chicken tenders and bacon. I can only hope that whoever is responsible for determining what TS snacks are in the pipeline is given more resources next time. I’m looking for arena food like a MilkShake it Off, or Look What You Made Me Stew. I will also take this opportunity to let it be known that I am available for Taylor Swift food-name-consulting. Somewhat egregious names aside, I confess I would absolutely go to town on any of these dishes, which is why I’m rating this news a greasy, cheesy 4/5 delicious. —Sam Stone, staff writer


A lawsuit is alleging that Dunkin’ charging extra for non-dairy milk is discriminatory

Is it discrimination to charge extra for non-dairy milk? That’s what a new lawsuit against Dunkin’ claims. The suit argues that the $2 surcharge for plant-based milks like oat or almond is discriminatory toward people with dairy milk allergies, and that the doughnut-and-coffee chain needs to stop.

Look, I feel for small cafes that want to offer alternative milks. Plant-based milks like oat and almond simply cost more to make for a variety of factors, and small shops struggle to swallow the extra fees. But in 2023, several major coffee-selling chains started ditching surcharges for plant-based milks. Panera, Pret a Manger, Philz, Stumptown, Blue Bottle—all of them started making oat milk the same price as dairy milk, and some of them even made oat milk the default option. “Larger chains with massive order volumes are likely, at least in part, capitalizing on the hype around oat milk,” my colleague Ali Francis reported last year about oat milk surcharges. So really, Dunkin’—the mega-chain that it is—may not have much ground to stand on to be charging extra. 2.4/5 distressing. —Serena Dai, editorial director


Don’t eat fried toothpicks, by the way

After taking the bus home in primary school, I used to microwave slices of processed cheese and eat the oily slick as a little snack (let me just say I’m currently using my preferred utensils to type this). After more than a year contributing to this deliciously distressing column, I kind of consider us friends. Like, you can keep a secret, right? In this case: I’ve eaten my fair share of truly disgusting things. But nothing as weird as…fried toothpicks, an apparent delicacy amongst Mukbang enthusiasts recently.

Videos of people sautéing the ’picks, until they pop like shrimp chips and corkscrew like curly fries, have skyrocketed across social platforms like TikTok and Instagram lately. The creators tend to season them with powdered cheese before downing the crunchy little pile. It’s wild but not without some reason: In South Korea, where the trend originated, toothpicks are supposedly made from corn or potato starch mixed with sorbitol, making them technically biodegradable and soluble. (In the US, they’re usually made of decidedly less puffable birch wood.) Still, South Korean health officials are cautioning against eating toothpicks, adding that, despite their backstage passes to your molars, the materials have not been approved for human consumption. I’ma be sticking with my cheese puddles, thank you. 4.3/5 distressing. —Ali Francis, staff writer


A woman in California stole 65 Stanley Quenchers

People. Love. Stanley. Water bottles. You know it. I know it. Every newsroom in America knows it. This week, one Stanley stan crossed a line by stealing 65 of the enormous, portable water jugs. Incredibly, this actually was the only thing on my 2024 bingo card. To be fair, some Stanleys go for as much as $50, and that's if you can get your hands on one before they sell out—much easier said than done. When will the Stanley craze end? It's a good question, and I think the answer is: Whenever people stop being influenced to buy things off of TikTok. That is, not any time soon. Still, what would one do with 65 Stanley water bottles? Personally, I would probably sell them on the internet to make a tidy profit, and invest that money in more Stanleys to sell. That's called infinite profit, folks, and it's my idea so no stealsies. This is getting a 2.5/5 distressing. —Sam Stone, staff writer