Understanding Inspectors General in Illinois

Inspectors general are responsible for the direct oversight of a given federal, state, county, or city agency. They aim to stop corruption and hold its agency accountable through leading investigations that evaluate claims or instances of wrongdoing in the agency.

Inspectors general are present at multiple levels of government in Illinois, including state, county, and local bodies. They serve as independent watchdogs that investigate the wrongdoings of agencies. This BGA OpenGov guide to inspectors general looks into the goals and jurisdiction of each inspector general office and identifies the appropriate office to submit various claims of governmental wrongdoing. 

Federal Inspectors General

There is not one single inspector general for the federal government. Instead, most federal agencies have their own respective inspector general. A more detailed list provided by the Congressional Research Service can be found here

State Inspectors General

Illinois has five independent offices of the Executive Inspector General that aim to promote accountability and integrity in the administrative branch of the state government. The Governor, Attorney General, Secretary of State, Comptroller, and Treasurer each are responsible for appointing their specific executive inspector general and are meant to select their IG solely based on “integrity and demonstrated ability,” regardless of political affiliations.

The Office of Executive Inspector General for the Agencies of the Illinois Governor (OEIG) has jurisdiction over and the power to investigate the governor, the lieutenant governor, and other all state executive offices/agencies and personnel that are not under the jurisdiction of the attorney general, the secretary of state, the comptroller, and the treasurer. Executive agencies include administrative departments such as Illinois Department of Transportation and Illinois Department of Natural Resources. As of 2011, the OEIG also has jurisdiction over the Chicago region’s transit boards: RTA, CTA, Metra and Pace.


The Office of the Executive Inspector General for the Illinois Attorney General has jurisdiction over and can investigate the Illinois Attorney General and all bodies under the authority of the Illinois Attorney General, including the Workplace Rights Bureau and the Freedom of Information Act Office.  


The Secretary of State’s Inspector General investigates potential corruption or misdeeds within the Illinois Secretary of State’s Office and has jurisdiction over all its departments, including Driver Services and Organ Donation. 


The Executive Inspector General for the Office of Illinois Comptroller is responsible for pursuing all complaints falling under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Comptroller and the bodies with which it conducts business, including the Statewide Accounting Management System. 


The Office of the Executive Inspector General for the Illinois State Treasurer is responsible for advancing ethical practices within the Illinois State Treasurer’s office and investigates all misconduct pertaining to the Illinois State Treasurer’s office and transactions that occur within the agency, including Bright Start Illinois 529 and The Illinois Growth and Innovation Fund. 


The Illinois Legislative Inspector General investigates accusations of misdeed by Illinois legislators and other personnel in the legislative branch. Further, the office also supervises ethics and sexual harassment prevention training within the Illinois legislative branch. A BGA analysis of state-level legislative oversight revealed several weaknesses in Illinois’ policies leading to gridlock and a lack of accountability. 

Cook County Inspector General

The Office of the Independent Inspector General (OIIG) aims to suppress instances of wrongdoing and investigates allegations of misconduct within the Cook County government. All employees, elected and appointed officials, and individuals conducting business with the Cook County government are within the OIIG’s jurisdiction for investigation, including the Cook County Board of Commissioners and the Circuit Court of Cook County.  

In 2019, the OIIG entered an intergovernmental agreement with the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago and Cook County (MWRD), which dictates that the OIIG is responsible for investigating potential issues and allegations of fraud and misconduct within the MWRD. The BGA provided an analysis recommending oversight over the MWRD before the intergovernmental agreement was reached.

City of Chicago Office of the Inspector General

In Chicago, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) strives to rid the city’s government of waste, malfeasance, fraud, and other governmental wrongdoings. 

The OIG’s jurisdiction extends to “all City employees, elected officials (the Mayor, Aldermen, the City Clerk, and the City Treasurer), appointed officials, and contractors and vendors who provide goods and services to the City.” The BGA found that the Chicago OIG’s office is among one of the strongest in the country but is limited in releasing its findings to the public.

City of Chicago Sister Agencies

The OIG can oversee sister agencies if there is an intergovernmental agreement in place, but currently the Public Buildings Commission is the only sister agency that has an intergovernmental agreement. Other sister agencies include the Chicago Public Schools, Chicago Park District, City Colleges of Chicago, and Chicago Housing Authority.

The Chicago Park District Office of Inspector General investigates claims of wrongdoing and misbehavior made by Chicago Park District employees, contractors, board members, agents, and volunteers. 

The office also oversees the agency’s compliance with the Employment Plan’s directives on hiring and additional employment practices

Further, the office directs internal audits to “assess integrity of financial reporting systems, the effectiveness of internal controls, and the efficiency of established procedures”

The Office of Inspector General for the Chicago Board of Education oversees Chicago’s public, charter, and contract schools. They examine misconduct within CPS and also have a Sexual Allegations Unit, which investigates claims of sexual impropriety by a CPS-related adult towards a CPS student.

To file a complaint with their Sexual Allegations Unit, call 833-835-5277.
To file a complaint with their Fraud Hotline, call 773-483-7283.

Other Oversight Agencies

In addition to supervising forces within the government, there are other, non-governmental oversight agencies active in Chicago as well. Most aim to increase accountability within the government and bolster civilian oversight. 

The Civilian Office of Police Accountability (COPA) strives for greater police accountability by overseeing investigations surrounding police misconduct and unethical practices. COPA takes allegations from residents and individual police officers that fall within their jurisdiction, which is classified as “bias-based verbal abuse, coercion, death or serious bodily injury in custody, domestic violence, excessive force, improper search and seizure, firearm discharge, sexual misconduct, taser discharge that results in death or serious bodily injury, pattern or practices of misconduct, unlawful denial or access to counsel.”


The Chicago Commission On Human Relations (CCHR) strives to uphold and investigate violations of the Chicago Human Rights Ordinance and the Chicago Fair Housing Ordinance. Their jurisdiction extends to instances that defy the Chicago Human Rights Ordinance and the Chicago Fair Housing Ordinance, including discrimination complaints. 


The Board of Ethics (BoE) regulates Chicago’s Governmental Ethics and Campaign Financing Ordinances to guarantee that Chicago employees and officials are not involved in conflicts of interest. Their jurisdiction extends to establishing and monitoring ethical transparency practices within the city of Chicago, including regulating campaign financing and conflicts of interest disclosures.




Cómo Presentar Una Solicitud FOIA En Illinois

El acceso a los documentos gubernamentales es fundamental en nuestro sistema de gobierno abierto. Tienen derecho a saber qué están haciendo sus gobiernos.

Una forma en que las personas, grupos, corporaciones u organizaciones pueden obtener registros gubernamentales es presentando una solicitud bajo la Ley de Libertad de Información, (Freedom of Information Act o FOIA).

Hay muchas limitaciones a esta ley, pero saber cómo presentar una solicitud de registros es una herramienta que todos deben tener y saber cómo usar. Nos hace ciudadanos mejores y más comprometidos 

Esto es lo que necesita saber para presentar una solicitud de FOIA ante un organismo gubernamental.

¿Qué es la FOIA?

FOIA es un acrónimo de la Freedom of Information Act (Ley de Libertad de Información).

La FOIA es una ley de gobierno abierto basada en el principio de que el público puede acceder a los registros y la información que detalla cómo funcionan sus gobiernos. En lugar de simplemente tomar la palabra de los funcionarios electos al pie de la letra, la FOIA proporciona un acceso más amplio para que las personas inspeccionen y analicen los registros que generan los organismos gubernamentales. Se aplican amplias exenciones, pero ese acceso es necesario para ayudar a las personas a exigir responsabilidades a su gobierno.

Haga clic aquí para ver el texto completo del estatuto FOIA de Illinois.

¿Cómo presento una solicitud de FOIA en Illinois?

1. Encuentra al oficial de la FOIA.

Se requiere que cada organismo público tenga un oficial de la FOIA. Puede que no sea el único trabajo de una persona, pero es un deber que alguien en la oficina debe tener. El trabajo de un oficial de la FOIA es manejar todas las solicitudes de la FOIA o especificar dónde se deben enviar las solicitudes de la FOIA. El organismo público debe publicar esta información para el público en general, y lo más probable es que se encuentre en el sitio web de ese organismo gubernamental. También debe haber información sobre la estructura del organismo público y los tipos de registros que mantiene. Por ejemplo, si está buscando presentar una solicitud de FOIA con la ciudad de Chicago, visite la página de FOIA en Chicago.gov. Puede encontrar a los oficiales de la FOIA de todas las agencias estatales en el sitio web del gobierno de Illinois.

2. Escriba su solicitud.

Consejo Pro FOIA:

  • Correo electrónico o fax son los mejores métodos para enviar su solicitud, por lo que puede demostrar que el oficial de la FOIA lo recibió.
  • No hay “lenguaje mágico” especial para las solicitudes de FOIA.
  • No se requiere un formato específico. Pero debe ser por escrito, y no puede ser en forma de pregunta. Por ejemplo, “¿Cuántos coches de policía tiene?” no es una solicitud adecuada, pero “registros suficientes para mostrar el número de coches de policía o facturas correspondientes a cada coche de policía” es adecuado.
  • La parte de “información” de la Ley de Libertad de Información es un poco inapropiada. La “información” no es técnicamente pública, pero la información contenida en los registros públicos sí lo es. Siempre tenga eso en cuenta al presentar una solicitud de FOIA.
  • El organismo público generalmente ofrece un formulario para que los ciudadanos presenten solicitudes de FOIA, pero el organismo público no puede hacer que usted use ese formulario. A continuación, encontrará una carta de solicitud de plantilla FOIA que hemos escrito.
  • Usted no necesita una razón para hacer su solicitud, excepto una declaración sobre si su solicitud es para un “propósito comercial” (vea la Sección 1 (c-10) de la FOIA para una definición), o si está buscando una exención para pagar las cuotas de copia.
  • Describa los registros que desee, ya sea por categoría (“todos los documentos relacionados con ___”), identificando específicamente los registros (“el contrato entre ___ y ___”), o especificando una búsqueda electrónica (“todos los correos electrónicos de la semana pasada que contengan la palabra ‘bache’ o ‘baches'”).
  • No es necesario, pero puede ser útil saber con precisión qué tipo de registros está buscando. Lo que queremos decir con eso es que ayuda a conocer los nombres específicos de los formularios o documentos gubernamentales que usted está buscando. No tenga miedo de ser tan específico como pueda porque las solicitudes demasiado amplias pueden ser rechazadas.
  • Explique cómo desea que se entreguen los documentos (disponible para inspección en persona, copias en papel, escaneos en PDF, formato electrónico original, entregado por correo electrónico, recogida, correo).

UN EJEMPLO DE SOLICITUD FOIA:

[Mes, fecha, año]

Estimado oficial de la FOIA:

De acuerdo con la Ley de Libertad de Información de Illinois (5 ILCS 140), solicito acceso a los siguientes registros en posesión de su organización relacionados con [proporcione el tema de su solicitud de FOIA].

En el improbable caso de que usted reclame que cualquier porción de los registros públicos anteriores esté exenta de divulgación bajo 5 ILCS 140, por escrito por favor (i) identifique qué porción o porciones que usted reclama están exentas y la disposición legal o disposiciones que usted sostiene que aplican; (ii) exponga las razones de su conclusión de que tal porción o porciones están exentas; y (iii) libere el resto de tales registros para inspección y copia, redactando solo la porción o porciones que usted reclama están exentas.

Tenga en cuenta que el estatuto no permite a su agencia retener documentos en su totalidad si solo partes de los registros pueden estar exentas.

Sírvase proporcionar la información en un plazo de cinco días hábiles, como exige la ley. Si los registros se mantienen electrónicamente, sírvase facilitarlos de esa manera.

Gracias,

[Su nombre]

[Su organización, opcional]

[Su dirección de la calle]

[Ciudad, estado, código postal]

[Su número de teléfono]

[Su dirección de correo electrónico]

3. Espere la respuesta.

  • El organismo público debe responder a su solicitud en un plazo de cinco días hábiles. El gobierno puede cumplir con su solicitud, negarla o pedir más tiempo para responder más plenamente.
  • El organismo público puede extender automáticamente el plazo de cinco días hábiles adicionales, pero debe solicitar su permiso para extender el plazo más allá.
  • Ninguna respuesta del organismo público es lo mismo que una negación. Si se te niega de esta manera, eso todavía significa que puedes desafiarlo igual que lo harías con una negación escrita. (¡Encuentra cómo hacer retroceder en la siguiente sección!)
  • Mantenga notas y registros (nombres, fechas, horarios) de todas las comunicaciones, incluidas las llamadas telefónicas, y comuníquese por escrito tanto como sea posible. Insistir en que el organismo público documente todo por escrito, declare las exenciones específicas de la FOIA que se hacen valer y proporcione una base fáctica detallada para sus reclamaciones de exención.

¿Qué hago si se deniega mi solicitud de FOIA?

Varias opciones están disponibles.

1. Diríjase al estatuto de la FOIA y lea el texto de la exención solicitada.

  •  ¿Ha omitido el organismo público abordar todas las partes del lenguaje de exención (por ejemplo, el lenguaje que dice “pero solo en la medida”)? ¿Algo no tiene sentido? Si es así, póngase en contacto con el organismo público, explique por qué cree que el organismo público está equivocado y haga retroceder. A veces esto tiene éxito.

2. Someter a revisión.

  •  Usted puede presentar una revisión de su solicitud de FOIA por el consejero de acceso público del fiscal general de Illinois (public access counselor o PAC). Puede llamar al PAC al 877-299-3642, o enviar su solicitud a esta dirección postal: 500 S. Second St., Springfield, IL 62706. También puede enviar su solicitud por fax al 217-782-1396.

3. Presentar una demanda para hacer cumplir sus derechos de FOIA.

  •  Puede demandar al organismo gubernamental, incluida la ciudad o el estado, dependiendo de la agencia gubernamental a la que solicitó información.

4. Diríjase a nosotros, la BGA (Better Government Association)

  • Puede ponerse en contacto con Bryan Zarou, Director de Política, enviándole un correo electrónico a policy@bettergov.org.

Más Información Sobre La FOIA




How to Submit Public Comment at Chicago’s City Council

Chicago’s City Council allows public comment at all of its meetings, including meetings of its committees. There are multiple ways to submit public comment, but each has a specific application process and limited window of time for those applications. 

Our guide provides details on the current policies for public comment. Additional information can be found on the city clerk’s “About City Government” web page. 

Public Comment at City Council 

Public comment at a City Council meeting can be made in three ways, each with its own time constraints. See the individual sections below for details on how to register as a public commenter for each method, but keep in mind:

  • In-person public comment can be made by entering City Hall’s Washington Street entrance on the morning of a City Council meeting. Because many people frequently line up to attend, arriving at least an hour early is strongly recommended.
  • Remote public comment via phone can only be made by calling and leaving a message with the automated registration phone number between 12:01 a.m. on the Monday before a council meeting and 8 a.m. on the day before the meeting, and then answering a confirmation call from the sergeant-at-arms’ office between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. on the day before the meeting.
  • Written public comment must be submitted via email between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. on the day of the meeting. 

In-Person Public Comment

During each City Council meeting, 30 minutes is dedicated to public comment. Public comment is limited to three minutes per speaker, for a maximum of 10 speakers (although sometimes more names will be called due to no-shows). 

With the lifting of some COVID-19 restrictions, City Council now uses a hybrid verbal comment system that allows for both in-person and online speakers. Speaking time is divided equally between the two, with five in-person speakers and five remote speakers selected for each meeting. 

In-person commenters must enter City Hall from the Washington Street entrance (south side of the building) and inform the sergeant-at-arms’ staff that they wish to submit public comment during the City Council meeting. Arriving AT LEAST an hour early is strongly recommended. There is no separate line for public commenters, and the line to attend a City Council meeting can be long. Each person requesting to provide in-person public comment will be asked to fill out a form, and five speakers are be selected at random from those forms. 

Remote Public Comment

The process for remote public comment requires answering a call from the sergeant-at-arms’ office when they reach out, and is not recommended for individuals who cannot reliably answer their phone between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. on a Tuesday.

Requests to provide remote public comment may be made from 12:01 a.m. the Monday before the scheduled meeting until 8 a.m. on the day before the scheduled meeting,

Requests must be made by calling 312-744-6800 and leaving a voice message with the speaker’s name and telephone number. Participants are selected at random from all the submitted speakers.

Between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. on the day before the scheduled meeting (which is usually a Tuesday, since City Council meetings are scheduled for Wednesdays except for occasional special meetings), the sergeant-at-arms’ office will call each selected participant at the telephone number provided to confirm attendance and give the telephone number and passcode needed to access the meeting. Only one attempt to contact is made; if there is no live response, the selection is forfeited, and the sergeant-at-arms will move on to the next selected participant. 

If selected and confirmed, speakers must call the number provided and use the passcode to access the meeting at 10 a.m. on the day of the City Council meeting. (Unless otherwise directed by the sergeant-at-arms’s office during the confirmation call, which may happen in the occasional case of special meetings with different start times.)

Written Public Comment

In addition to the three-minute spoken comment options above, members of the public may also submit up to two pages of written comment on any matter before City Council to public_comments@cityofchicago.org

Written comments may only be submitted between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. on the day of the scheduled meeting, and will be provided to the alderpersons at the meeting and retained afterwards by the city clerk’s office. 

Public Comment at Committee Meetings

Currently, most committee meetings are still being held by videoconference and only allow remote public comment. The city clerk’s office does not have a posted policy for in-person public comment. 

Remote Public Comment at Committee Meetings

Requests to submit remote public comment must be made between 10 a.m. two business days before the scheduled meeting and 9 a.m. the business day before the scheduled meeting. 

To submit remote public comment at a meeting of a City Council committee, participants must call 312-744-6800 and leave a voice message with their name and telephone number. Participants will be selected at random from all the submitted speakers.

Between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. on the day before the scheduled meeting, the sergeant-at-arms’ office will call each selected participant at the telephone number provided to confirm attendance and give the telephone number and passcode needed to access the meeting. Only one attempt to contact is made; if there is no live response, the selection is forfeited, and the sergeant-at-arms will move on to the next selected participant. 

If selected and confirmed, speakers must call the number provided and use the passcode to access the meeting at its scheduled start time on the day of the meeting.

Written Public Comment at Committee Meetings

Individual committees will list the email contact and allowed window of time on the public meeting notice for each committee meeting. 

Upcoming meetings and their notices and agendas can be found on the City Clerk’s Legistar website

Contact Your Alderperson

As regular council-watchers know, the attention paid by alderpersons on the floor to the in-person public comment can be – to put it mildly – varying. Side conversations, absences from the floor and preparation for the next items on the agenda often distract from the public speakers. The three-minute cutoff also substantially limits the amount of detail that can be provided. 

On issues where individuals or organizations feel strongly, the Better Government Association recommends reaching out to legislators directly via their ward office, in addition to any written or verbal public comment. Different ward offices track constituent outreach in different ways, but most alderpersons are more attentive to direct contact from their own residents than they are to public comment at City Council and committee meetings. 

Ward office contact information for each alderperson can be found on the city clerk’s Legistar website. Many ward offices pay for and maintain their own websites and staff, so it may also be helpful to Google your individual representative and look for listed contact information on their website. Each ward is run slightly differently, so it can take some experimenting to find the best way of contacting your alderperson. 




Watching Your Government: What to Expect at a Meeting of Chicago’s City Council

For first-time watchers, Chicago’s City Council can seem incomprehensible. Most of the business is done in a routine, rapid-fire succession of votes and gavel raps, punctuated by repetitions of the phrase, “hearing no objections, so ordered.” 

Following along – and knowing when to watch for contested votes, floor debates and other things that impact the passage of laws – takes practice. Here to help is the Better Government Association’s guide to watching a City Council meeting, with a typical agenda broken down point by point, highlighting which important decisions and votes can happen at each step of the way. 

How to Watch Chicago’s City Council

Regular City Council meetings are currently held on the third Wednesday of each month, starting 10 a.m., at Chicago’s City Hall, 121 N. LaSalle St. City Council can call special meetings as well, and will occasionally move the regular meeting time, so it’s always best to check the city clerk’s legislative calendar for upcoming council meetings.

City Council meetings are currently livestreamed on the city clerk’s website. There is no dedicated URL for the stream. Links are posted on the front page at https://www.chicityclerk.com/ after the stream starts, so viewers may have to refresh the page a few times if they’re tuning in right at the start.  

Past meetings of the council and its committees can be found at the clerk’s video archives:

City Council also has limited gallery seating for in-person attendees. Currently, attendees enter through the City Hall’s Washington Street entrance on the morning of a City Council meeting. There is a small security kiosk where the building’s main north-south and east-west hallways intersect. Visitors inform security that they are there to attend a City Council meeting and will be directed to the queue. Because many people frequently line up to attend, arriving at least an hour early is strongly recommended, especially for those wishing to give public comment. 

Basic Rules – How Chicago’s City Council Works

Rules of Order and Procedure

All business conducted at a meeting of City Council is governed by the body’s Rules of Order and Procedure. The rules are based on the parliamentary framework Robert’s Rules of Order, which are occasionally referenced during procedural disputes, but a deep familiarity with Robert’s Rules is usually not needed to follow the action at City Council.

Meetings are guided by “the chair,” which is the term the rules use for the presiding officer. By default, under the current rules, the mayor acts as chair. The chair has significant latitude to call on members in the order they please, which gives the mayor a great deal of control over the flow of conversation. 

If the mayor is absent, the president pro tempore presides, and in the absence of both the vice-mayor presides. 

Legislative and Committee Process

To be passed into law, any item before the council first needs to be introduced, also known as being “read into the record.” The body assigns each new submission to a committee for consideration, with the exception of a few items that can be considered immediately. 

You will hear new items being read into the record at several points during the proceedings, described in detail below:

  • Reports and Communications from the Mayor
  • Communications from the City Clerk
  • Agreed Calendar
  • Presentation of Aldermanic Introductions
  • Ordinance Setting the Next Regular Meeting

Items that have been voted on in a committee are reported back out for a final vote. In most cases, the vote is to “concur with the recommendation of the committee,” meaning that if the item received a favorable vote in committee it is passed, and if it was voted down by committee it fails to pass. 

Most items are passed during the Reports of Committees sections on the agenda. However, items that were deferred at a previous meeting or that are being discharged from a committee are sometimes called for a vote during the Unfinished Business and Miscellaneous Business sections of the agenda, and the council can always temporarily suspend its rules for immediate consideration of an item at any point with a two-thirds majority vote. 

Types of Voting

Motions and items before the body require affirmative votes to proceed, but City Council has a number of ways to take a vote and enter it into the record:

  • Roll Call Vote: This is the most formal and time-consuming way to tally a vote. The chair or an assistant (typically staff from the city clerk’s office) will call the wards in order, starting with the 1st Ward and going all the way to the 50th, with each member actively responding “aye” or “nay.” Recently, City Council has begun using an electronic voting system that allows alderpersons to select their “aye” or “nay” vote on a tablet, with the results displayed on a large screen and on the livestream. The vote is tallied and the results are announced.
  • Voice Vote: A less formal and quicker option is for the chair to call “all in favor, say aye,” with a pause for replies, and then “all opposed, say nay,” after which, the chair will state which side they believe had the majority. A typical phrasing is “in the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it and the motion carries.” If there is significant dissension or an alderperson wants each vote to be on record, anyone can call for a roll call vote in place of a voice vote.
  • Unanimous Consent: Sometimes not even a voice vote is required. If a member makes a motion and the chair says “hearing no objections, so ordered,” the motion can be considered to have passed by unanimous consent. Alderpersons wishing to object or call for a more formal vote must do so quickly when motions are being passed in this manner. 

Most business in City Council is passed unanimously. The city clerk’s office maintains records of all items that were passed by a contested roll call vote as part of their Council Meeting Reports archive

Regular Meeting Agenda – Chicago’s City Council

City Council meetings follow an agenda that is posted at least 48 hours ahead of time. Currently the city clerk’s Legistar webpage is used to post agendas. 

Members of the body can request a “temporary suspension of the rules” to go out of order, but otherwise business must follow the posted agenda. The temporary suspensions are most commonly used when members wish to speak on honorary resolutions, which are typically approved without discussion or debate during the “Agreed Calendar” section of the agenda. 

Those honorary speeches can add unscheduled hours to a meeting – a BGA analysis found that on average, City Council spends one-third of its floor time discussing non-binding matters under suspension of the rules – but otherwise the meeting can be expected to follow the posted outline. Below is a breakdown of a typical agenda, with details on what to expect from each section. 

Call to Order, Call of the Roll and Determination of Quorum

The first three items of business are often listed as separate items, but they are all handled in quick succession. 

A “call to order” is simply the rap of the gavel and the declaration by the chair that council is “called to order.” The clerk then calls the roll of alderpersons, starting with the 1st Ward and going all the way down to the 50th, with members responding “aye” if present. 

If a majority of the body – at least 26 alderpersons – is present, the meeting is considered to have “quorum,” meaning the minimum number of members present to legally conduct business. Council cannot proceed or pass any items on the agenda without a majority of the members present. 

Very occasionally, you may hear a member request a “quorum check” later in the meeting, which means a repeat of the roll call to confirm that 26 members are still present. This usually will only happen if a large number of members have left the room before the conclusion of the meeting. 

Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation

These two items proceed as soon as quorum is established. The Pledge of Allegiance is a fixed speech with a known duration, but the invocation can vary in length and content. 

The invocation can seem odd to some observers, since it is almost always religious in nature, and often explicitly sectarian. However, the Supreme Court in 2014 ruled in favor of public bodies conducting prayer at their public meetings, with only minimal restrictions, including prohibiting denigrating other religions, threatening damnation or seeking to convert non-adherents. Unless a majority of City Council decides to remove the item from the agenda, invocations will continue to be a part of the body’s regular meetings. 

Public Comment

Public comment is limited to a 30-minute timeslot, with each speaker allowed up to three minutes of speaking time. 

Although no set agenda item specifies time for speeches on honorary resolutions, directly following the public comment period is a common time for alderpeople to request a suspension of the rules for purposes of hearing one or more honorary resolution. If this occurs, there may be a long delay between public comment and the next item on the agenda. (This is your chance for a bathroom break – City Council spends a lot of time on honorary resolutions.)

Reports and Communications from the Mayor

This is the first agenda section in which new items are read into the record. Items introduced here will list the mayor as the lead sponsor, rather than an alderperson. 

The clerk’s staff may read off some of the mayoral introductions as “on the behalf of …” followed by the name of a department head or other official. These items are proposed legislation from one of the city’s administrative departments, but they will still be listed as mayoral introductions for tracking purposes. 

Not all ordinances from the administration are introduced at City Council. Under council’s rules, the mayor and the administrative department heads have the privilege of introducing new business directly into the relevant committee. So-called “direct introductions” are not part of City Council meetings, and only occur at committee meetings. They are a way of shortcutting the legislative process, and they often mean that items are debated and even voted on before the public has access to the text of the ordinance.

Communications from the City Clerk

This agenda item is often combined with mayoral introductions, with the clerk or a representative from the clerk’s office reading off the mayoral introductions followed immediately by the clerk’s communications. 

Communications from the clerk typically include formal notices for financial instruments such as bonds, formal reports filed by the inspector general or administrative departments, and claims filed against the city. The clerk also formally confirms the publication of the Journal of Proceedings, which is the council’s official public record. 

These are mostly routine items, and there is very rarely any interruption or debate during the reading of the clerk’s introductions. 

This is also the point on the agenda at which any resident-introduced legislation read into the record as a “miscellaneous transmittal.” For an explanation of resident-introduced legislation, see our OpenGov article “How to Introduce Legislation to Chicago City Council: A Step-by-Step Guide.” 

Reports of Standing Committees

This is the main section of the agenda for final passage of legislative items. 

Each committee reports out in the order they are listed on the published agenda. The committee chair or their designated substitute will read each item that was voted on in the committee between the previous City Council meeting and the current one. Usually there will only have been one meeting, but committees will sometimes meet multiple times between Council sessions if they have a large amount of business to cover, or if the committee is recessed and reconvened. 

The vast majority of committee items are passed unanimously and without debate using a legislative maneuver known as a “previous roll call vote,” which is a sort of copy-paste of the vote taken on a previous item. Here’s how it works:

  • The very first item of the very first committee to report (usually Finance) is called for a roll-call vote. Each alderperson will actively cast an “aye” or “nay” vote. Since the first item is typically a non-controversial approval of the previous month’s minutes, that results in a unanimous roll call with no “nay” votes.
  • Following the roll call vote, a member of the body makes a “motion to reconsider.” This is a motion that can be made to re-take a vote later in the meeting, but it cannot be repeated, so by taking the motion to reconsider immediately, the vote is finalized.
  • On each subsequent item for all of the committee reports, the member reading out the report moves that the item being read be passed “by the first favorable roll-call vote of the Committee on Finance and the associated unsuccessful measure to reconsider.”
  • After a very brief pause, the chair declares “hearing no objections, so ordered.” At that point the record can officially reflect that the item under consideration was passed by the same unanimous roll call as the first vote in the finance committee. 

The “previous roll call vote” tool allows City Council to speed through unopposed legislation very quickly. However, it leaves a very short window for alderpersons to interject if they do wish to debate an item or call for a roll call vote. 

Debate is unusual, and amendment of the ordinance on the floor basically unheard of. On some controversial items, a member might call for a roll call, rather than passage by the unanimous “previous roll call” motion. 

Ending debate and taking a roll call vote technically requires what’s called a motion to “call the previous question,” but in practice the chair usually proceeds immediately with a roll call vote as soon as a member shouts “roll call.” Once the roll call vote has started, no further motions or debate can be heard. 

On rare occasions when at least some members of the body wish to oppose or delay a measure, they may make a motion to “defer and publish,” which requires the final vote to be deferred until the next scheduled meeting of City Council. While most motions on the floor require a majority, state law allows any two alderpersons to defer and publish a committee report, making it the easiest tool for a discontented majority to slow down an item’s passage.

Reports of Special Committees

This section of the agenda proceeds exactly as the “Reports of Regular Committees” section above, but for any joint or specially-convened committees. It follows the same floor rules and voting conventions as the regular committee reports. 

Agreed Calendar

City Council passes an enormous number of honorary, non-binding resolutions. Tributes to birthdays, retirements, work/business anniversaries, and deaths are all common subjects. 

Approval of the agreed calendar, also called the consent calendar, is a single vote taken to pass all honorary resolutions without debate. 

Alderpersons will sometimes rise and request suspension of the rules to speak on their honorary resolutions during this part of the agenda. 

Presentation of Aldermanic Introductions

This is the section of the agenda where ordinances and other items introduced by alderpersons are read into the record, making them official pieces of Council business. The introductions are done in ward order, alternating at each meeting between starting with the 1st Ward and starting with the 50th Ward. 

Introductions are usually done by the city clerk or a member of the clerk’s staff, and they are read very quickly. For each item, the presenter will recite the name and ward of the lead sponsor, a very brief description of the item’s topic, and the requested committee referral. 

Introductions are sometimes interrupted by alderpersons invoking council’s Rule 42, which instructs that, if two different committee assignments are requested, the item shall be sent to the Committee on Committees and Rules, which will determine which committee ultimately hears the item.

Sending an item to Rules is widely used as a delaying tactic. The committee does not meet on any regular schedule, and only convenes when the chair puts out a specific committee agenda. That effectively means that items cannot advance beyond being sent to the rules committee unless the chair is willing to call a meeting to re-refer the item to another committee.

Because Rule 42 does not specify any process for “calling” a committee, alderpersons who want to shuffle an item off to the Rules committee often do so by simply shouting “Rules!” from the floor. Since the Committee on Committees and Rules is a standing committee, that counts as two committees being called, and the item is sent to rules. 

Correction and Approval of the Journal of Proceedings

The Journal of Proceedings is the official legal record of City Council. An item does not technically become law until it has been passed by Council and the Journal of Proceedings in which that action is recorded is approved by the Council. 

At each Council session, the body approves the Journal of Proceedings from the previous regular session, as well as any special sessions that were called between the two regular meetings. This is also an opportunity to correct any errors found in items contained in the Journal. Corrections are relatively rare, and are typically introduced by the city clerk’s staff. 

Approval of the journal is usually a brief, routine vote with no discussion or debate.

Unfinished Business

Items that were deferred or tabled at a previous City Council meeting can be called up during the unfinished business section. 

Alderpersons wishing to call a deferred matter during the unfinished business section must provide written notice to the city clerk and all alderpersons at least 48 hours in advance of doing so. While uncommon, items of unfinished business will occasionally be challenged and ruled out of order (and therefore not heard) due to failure to provide the required notice. 

Miscellaneous Business

The miscellaneous business section is used for items which have been held in a committee without action for at least 60 days, and which a sponsor wishes to discharge under council’s Rule 41. The motion to discharge requires a majority vote to proceed, after which the item is business before the body and can be voted up or down. 

Invoking Rule 41 to move to discharge an item from committee requires written notice delivered to the city clerk and all alderpersons no later than by the close of business on the fifth business day prior to the City Council meeting.

Because it is not a report of a committee, items brought to the floor under the miscellaneous business section of the agenda are not subject to the two-person defer-and-publish tactic. 

Ordinance Setting the Next Regular Meeting

Per the municipal code, unless otherwise specified in ordinance, City Council has its regular meetings on the second and fourth Wednesday of each calendar month at 10 a.m.

In practice for more than a decade, the council has met only once a month. Currently the third Wednesday of the month is the most common default day for Council meetings. 

To avoid having to meet in the times specified in the municipal code, Council passes an ordinance at each meeting setting the date and time of the next regular meeting. 

A member of the body may occasionally suggest ordinance setting the date and time of the next regular meeting sooner, typically when a matter has been deferred and published. The state’s Open Meetings Act requires that meetings of a public body give public notice with a posted agenda at least 48 hours before meeting, and it is not uncommon when an item has been deferred and published for City Council to schedule its next meeting two days from the deferral.

Roll Call on Omnibus

The omnibus is a catch-all parliamentary procedure for any items not voted on separately or approved by reference to another vote. It is not normally needed – in a typical meeting of City Council, every item will either be voted on or will be passed by a previous roll call – but it provides a sort of legislative backstop to ensure that all matters of business were legally concluded. 

Although the two terms are sometimes used interchangeably, the omnibus is not the same thing as the agreed calendar, and the agreed calendar is usually approved by its own roll call vote. 

Adjournment

Rarely requiring a roll call vote, adjournment at the conclusion of other business is typically done by a motion to adjourn from one of the alderpersons, followed by either a voice vote or a simple “hearing no objections, so ordered” and a rap of the gavel. At that point City Council’s official business has concluded. 

The mayor often offers press availability after a City Council meeting, usually in a smaller room to the side of the council chambers. Those availabilities are not open to the public and typically require press credentials to attend. 




How to Introduce Legislation to Chicago City Council: A Step-by-Step Guide

We typically think of new laws as being written and introduced by elected officials, but thanks to a quirk of Illinois law and Chicago City Council rules, any individual can put a piece of proposed ordinance before the council for consideration. 

It’s a rarely-used power, and no individually-introduced ordinance has been passed into law in recent history. A few recent attempts, including an attempt to create a mayoral recall process introduced in 2016 and a student-led effort to ban single-use styrofoam food containers in 2019, were referred to committees but never called for a hearing or vote. 

Still, it’s a right that any member of the public can exercise. Legislation cannot progress beyond the introduction stage without being heard in a committee, however, so it is extremely helpful (though not technically mandatory) to discuss the introduction with the chair of the relevant committee before filing anything with the city clerk. 

The process for an individual to submit an ordinance is not explicitly laid out in state law or city ordinance. There is no mandatory process or set of qualifications enshrined in law that defines who can and cannot submit proposed ordinance to an Illinois municipality. 

However, state law gives city councils the authority to set their own rules (65 ILCS 5/3.1-40-15), and Rule 46 of the Chicago City Council’s rules of order and procedure states that “All ordinances, orders and resolutions which are introduced in the City Council shall be submitted on paper or electronically in duplicate and the City Clerk shall deliver one (1) copy to the City Council Legislative Reference Bureau.”

Since the rule does not limit or specify who can submit items to the city clerk, anyone whose submission meets the various formatting criteria laid out in Rule 46 can introduce an item into City Council. 

Submission Process

The city clerk’s website provides a single sentence of instructions: “Legislation may be introduced by the Mayor or the executive departments, by one or more aldermen, by a City Council committee, or by a citizen (through the City Clerk’s Office).”

More specifics are included in Rule 46 of City Council’s rules of order and procedure

  • All ordinances, orders and resolutions must be submitted in duplicate, either on paper or electronically.
  • All items must be typed, printed or submitted electronically – in other words, not handwritten – and must have numbered pages.
  • If the ordinance modifies the Municipal Code, it must show any new language by underlining, and any language removed/repealed by strikethrough.
  • While not required by the rules, it’s the default practice to put the preferred committee assignment at the top right of the first page, so that the item can be easily referred to the appropriate committee when it’s read into the record. 

Printed legislation should be submitted at the clerk’s office in Chicago’s City Hall. The reception desk is in its own room through a door at the west end of the larger clerk’s hall with payment terminals. 

A handful of subjects have specific application processes and cannot be done through public submission: vacation of public property, fixing of compensation to the City of Chicago, grants of rights in streets for utilities and zoning reclassifications. 

What Happens After Legislation is Submitted?

Once legislation is submitted to the clerk’s office, it will be formally introduced at the next regular meeting of City Council and referred to a committee, during the “new business” section of the agenda. Shortly after the council meeting, the bill will appear on the clerk’s Legistar website with a tracking number and a “Misc. Transmittal” label in the bill sponsor field. 

Typically, items are assigned to whatever committee was requested in the upper right-hand corner of the submitted legislation. To progress, the item must be put on the committee agenda by the committee chair (or by a majority vote of the committee, but in practice committees almost never add items or attempt to overrule the chair’s agenda-setting privileges). The authors/introducers of the bill will need to contact and work with the committee chair to try and arrange for a hearing, vote or other progress on the item.

Occasionally, a member of City Council will request that the item be sent to another committee, in which case it will be referred to the Committee on Committees and Rules, in which case the rules committee must meet and vote on the appropriate committee assignment before the item can be heard in committee. 

Once heard and voted on in committee, legislation is read out at the next City Council meeting, during the “Committee Reports” section of the agenda. In nearly all cases, the council concurs with the recommendation of the committee and unanimously approves all items that were approved in committee. Items that were reported out of committee as a “Do Not Pass” recommendation are usually unanimously rejected; however, any member of City Council can call for a roll call vote to disagree with the “Do Not Recommend” if they wish. 

Once the recommendation of the committee is accepted (or rejected) by vote on the City Council floor, it is officially done – passed legislation becomes law, while rejected legislation is done with the legislative process and would have to be re-introduced as a new bill to be considered again. The only exception is a mayoral veto, which sends the bill back to City Council and can only be overridden by a two-thirds majority.