The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,531 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Artificial sweeteners and risk of cardiovascular diseases: results from the prospective NutriNet-Santé cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj-2022-071204 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte Debras, Eloi Chazelas, Laury Sellem, Raphaël Porcher, Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo, Younes Esseddik, Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi, Cédric Agaësse, Alexandre De Sa, Rebecca Lutchia, Léopold K Fezeu, Chantal Julia, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Benjamin Allès, Pilar Galan, Serge Hercberg, Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy, Inge Huybrechts, Bernard Srour, Mathilde Touvier |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 131 | 5% |
| United States | 73 | 3% |
| Mexico | 65 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 50 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 29 | 1% |
| Spain | 29 | 1% |
| India | 25 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 22 | <1% |
| Turkey | 19 | <1% |
| Other | 197 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1891 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2221 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 167 | 7% |
| Scientists | 115 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 28 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 227 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 123 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 128 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4731. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2024.
All research outputs
#919
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#22
of 65,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33
of 438,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 727 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 727 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.