2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depression and reduced sensitivity to non-rewards versus rewards: Evidence from event-related potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

32
263
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
32
263
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The unexpected finding that anxious subjects show reduced FRNs while at the same time evincing enhanced ERNs is intriguing. That this has been replicated in other trait-anxious subjects by Gu, Huang, and Luo (2009) and reported also by Foti and Hajcak (2009) with depressed subjects not only speaks to the reliability of the FRN as a correlate of these internalizing individual differences, but in conjunction with the ERN may provide important insights into the role of internal and external feedback during performance monitoring and into how these processes may be biased in a number of clinical disorders (see Olvet & Hajcak, 2008, for a brief discussion of externalizing disorders). Lastly, we are encouraged by the possibility that the CRN too may reflect information processing biases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The unexpected finding that anxious subjects show reduced FRNs while at the same time evincing enhanced ERNs is intriguing. That this has been replicated in other trait-anxious subjects by Gu, Huang, and Luo (2009) and reported also by Foti and Hajcak (2009) with depressed subjects not only speaks to the reliability of the FRN as a correlate of these internalizing individual differences, but in conjunction with the ERN may provide important insights into the role of internal and external feedback during performance monitoring and into how these processes may be biased in a number of clinical disorders (see Olvet & Hajcak, 2008, for a brief discussion of externalizing disorders). Lastly, we are encouraged by the possibility that the CRN too may reflect information processing biases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…At the age 9 assessment, the reward task was conducted. The task was administered using Presentation software (Neurobehavioral Systems) similar to the version used in previous studies (Foti and Hajcak 2009). Participants were instructed to click either the left or right mouse button when presented with images of two doors, to guess which hid a monetary prize.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that the reduced amplitude FRN observed following win outcomes may not be an actual attenuated response to these events, but is rather driven by larger P300 amplitudes following favourable outcomes (Yeung and Sanfey, 2004). Furthermore, the relative contribution of negative and positive outcomes to the FRN remains unclear due to the fact that many studies have employed the computation of a difference waveform to measure FRN magnitude (e.g., Dunning and Hajcak, 2007;Foti and Hajcak, 2009;Hajcak et al, 2007;Holroyd et al, 2008;Miltner et al, 1997), and other recent research has suggested that, rather than a negative deflection to non-reward outcomes, the FRN is better conceptualised as a positive deflection that is greater following reward compared to non-reward outcomes (Foti et al, 2011;Holroyd et al, 2003;Holroyd et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%