2
$\begingroup$

Group extensions of $G$ by $A$ $0\to A\to E\to G\to 0$ up to equivalence (where $G$ and $E$ may be nonabelian) are in bijection with the second group cohomology $H^2(G,A)=\text{Ext}^2_{\mathbb{Z}[G]}(\mathbb{Z},A).$

On the other hand, if $G$ is abelian, and we seek only abelian extensions, such extensions are (up to equivalence) in bijection with $\text{Ext}^1_{\mathbb{Z}}(G,A)$ (whence the $\text{Ext}$ functor gets its name).

Hence there is an inclusion $\text{Ext}^1_{\mathbb{Z}}(G,A)\hookrightarrow \text{Ext}^2_{\mathbb{Z}[G]}(\mathbb{Z},A).$ Perhaps we could say it’s induced by the inclusion functor of abelian groups into groups, acting on group extensions. Other than the description given, using the bijection to group extensions, is there another way to see this map?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ In your first line, you should write "Central group extensions". $\endgroup$
    – Watson
    Commented Apr 30, 2018 at 17:31

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

$H^2(G, A)$ can also be written $[BG, B^2 A]$, where

  • for spaces $X, Y$, $[X, Y]$ denotes the set of homotopy classes of maps $X \to Y$,
  • $BG$ denotes the Eilenberg-MacLane space $K(G, 1)$, and
  • $B^2 A$ denotes the Eilenberg-MacLane space $K(A, 2)$.

If $G$ is also abelian, then $BG$ and $B^2 A$ can both be modeled by simplicial abelian groups, and we can ask for homotopy classes of maps between them as simplicial abelian groups (more intrinsically this might be equivalent to asking for homotopy classes of infinite loop space maps; I'm not sure). We can then pass to chain complexes by Dold-Kan, and we get that the resulting set of homotopy classes of maps is $\text{Ext}^1(G, A)$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Oops, Dold-Kan might not even cut it here; I need an equivalence between the homotopy category of simplicial abelian groups and the derived category of (connective) chain complexes of abelian groups, or something like that. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 20, 2014 at 7:43
  • $\begingroup$ I was expecting an answer in terms of homological algebra. In fact I was certain that the change of rings spectral sequence would provide an answer, but I couldn’t get it to work out right. Of course, I like your homotopy theoretic answer far better. $\endgroup$
    – ziggurism
    Commented Aug 25, 2014 at 22:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .