Abstract
Despite being the dominant force of nature on large scales, gravity remains relatively elusive to precision laboratory experiments. Atom interferometers are powerful tools for investigating, for example, Earth’s gravity1, the gravitational constant2, deviations from Newtonian gravity3,4,5,6 and general relativity7. However, using atoms in free fall limits measurement time to a few seconds8, and much less when measuring interactions with a small source mass2,5,6,9. Recently, interferometers with atoms suspended for 70 s in an optical-lattice mode filtered by an optical cavity have been demonstrated10,11,12,13,14. However, the optical lattice must balance Earth’s gravity by applying forces that are a billionfold stronger than the putative signals, so even tiny imperfections may generate complex systematic effects. Thus, lattice interferometers have yet to be used for precision tests of gravity. Here we optimize the gravitational sensitivity of a lattice interferometer and use a system of signal inversions to suppress and quantify systematic effects. We measure the attraction of a miniature source mass to be amass = 33.3 ± 5.6stat ± 2.7syst nm s−2, consistent with Newtonian gravity, ruling out ‘screened fifth force’ theories3,15,16 over their natural parameter space. The overall accuracy of 6.2 nm s−2 surpasses by more than a factor of four the best similar measurements with atoms in free fall5,6. Improved atom cooling and tilt-noise suppression may further increase sensitivity for investigating forces at sub-millimetre ranges17,18, compact gravimetry19,20,21,22, measuring the gravitational Aharonov–Bohm effect9,23 and the gravitational constant2, and testing whether the gravitational field has quantum properties24.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data presented in this paper are deposited online63.
Code availability
Analysis code is available on request.
References
Peters, A., Chung, K. Y. & Chu, S. Measurement of gravitational acceleration by dropping atoms. Nature 400, 849–852 (1999).
Rosi, G., Sorrentino, F., Cacciapuoti, L., Prevedelli, M. & Tino, G. M. Precision measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant using cold atoms. Nature 510, 518–521 (2014).
Burrage, C., Copeland, E. J. & Hinds, E. A. Probing dark energy with atom interferometry. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 3, 042 (2015).
Hamilton, P. et al. Atom-interferometry constraints on dark energy. Science 349, 849–851 (2015).
Jaffe, M. et al. Testing sub-gravitational forces on atoms from a miniature in-vacuum source mass. Nat. Phys. 13, 938–942 (2017).
Sabulsky, D. O. et al. Experiment to detect dark energy forces using atom interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 061102 (2019).
Asenbaum, P., Overstreet, C., Kim, M., Curti, J. & Kasevich, M. A. Atom-interferometric test of the equivalence principle at the 10−12 level. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 191101 (2020).
Dickerson, S. M., Hogan, J. M., Sugarbaker, A., Johnson, D. M. S. & Kasevich, M. A. Multiaxis inertial sensing with long-time point source atom interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 83001 (2013).
Overstreet, C., Asenbaum, P., Curti, J., Kim, M. & Kasevich, M. A. Observation of a gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect. Science 375, 226–229 (2022).
Panda, C. D. et al. Coherence limits in lattice atom interferometry at the one-minute scale. Nat. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02518-9 (2024).
Xu, V. et al. Probing gravity by holding atoms for 20 seconds. Science 366, 745–749 (2019).
Zhang, X., del Aguila, R. P., Mazzoni, T., Poli, N. & Tino, G. M. Trapped-atom interferometer with ultracold Sr atoms. Phys. Rev. A 94, 043608 (2016).
Charrière, R., Cadoret, M., Zahzam, N., Bidel, Y. & Bresson, A. Local gravity measurement with the combination of atom interferometry and Bloch oscillations. Phys. Rev. A 85, 013639 (2012).
Cladé, P. et al. A promising method for the measurement of the local acceleration of gravity using Bloch oscillations of ultracold atoms in a vertical standing wave. Europhys. Lett. 71, 730–736 (2005).
Wang, J., Hui, L. & Khoury, J. No-go theorems for generalized chameleon field theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 241301 (2012).
Elder, B. et al. Chameleon dark energy and atom interferometry. Phys. Rev. D 94, 044051 (2016).
Tino, G. M. Testing gravity with cold atom interferometry: results and prospects. Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 024014 (2021).
Westphal, T., Hepach, H., Pfaff, J. & Aspelmeyer, M. Measurement of gravitational coupling between millimetre-sized masses. Nature 591, 225–228 (2021).
Geiger, R., Landragin, A., Merlet, S. & Pereira Dos Santos, F. High-accuracy inertial measurements with cold-atom sensors. AVS Quantum Sci. 2, 024702 (2020).
Stray, B. et al. Quantum sensing for gravity cartography. Nature 602, 590–594 (2022).
Janvier, C. et al. Compact differential gravimeter at the quantum projection-noise limit. Phys. Rev. A 105, 022801 (2022).
Vovrosh, J., Dragomir, A., Stray, B. & Boddice, D. Advances in portable atom interferometry-based gravity sensing. Sensors 23, 7651 (2023).
Hohensee, M. A., Estey, B., Hamilton, P., Zeilinger, A. & Müller, H. Force-free gravitational redshift: proposed gravitational Aharonov-Bohm experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 230404 (2012).
Carney, D., Müller, H. & Taylor, J. M. Using an atom interferometer to infer gravitational entanglement generation. PRX Quantum 2, 030330 (2021).
Brax, P., van de Bruck, C., Davis, A.-C., Khoury, J. & Weltman, A. Detecting dark energy in orbit: the cosmological chameleon. Phys. Rev. D 70, 123518 (2004).
Khoury, J. & Weltman, A. Chameleon fields: awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171104 (2004).
Olive, K. A. & Pospelov, M. Environmental dependence of masses and coupling constants. Phys. Rev. D 77, 43524 (2008).
Hinterbichler, K., Khoury, J., Levy, A. & Matas, A. Symmetron cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 84, 103521 (2011).
Li, K. et al. Neutron limit on the strongly-coupled chameleon field. Phys. Rev. D 93, 062001 (2016).
Cronenberg, G. et al. A gravity of Earth measurement with a qBOUNCE experiment. In European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics 408 (Proceedings of Science, 2015).
Yin, P. et al. Experiments with levitated force sensor challenge theories of dark energy. Nat. Phys. 18, 1181–1185 (2022).
Upadhye, A. Dark energy fifth forces in torsion pendulum experiments. Phys. Rev. D 86, 102003 (2012).
Betz, J., Manley, J., Wright, E. M., Grin, D. & Singh, S. Searching for chameleon dark energy with mechanical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 131302 (2022).
Kapner, D. J. et al. Tests of the gravitational inverse-square law below the dark-energy length scale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 021101 (2007).
Geraci, A. A., Smullin, S. J., Weld, D. M., Chiaverini, J. & Kapitulnik, A. Improved constraints on non-Newtonian forces at 10 microns. Phys. Rev. D 78, 022002 (2008).
Tan, W. H. et al. New test of the gravitational inverse-square law at the submillimeter range with dual modulation and compensation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 131101 (2016).
Chen, Y. J. et al. Stronger limits on hypothetical Yukawa interactions in the 30–8000 nm range. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221102 (2016).
Tan, W. H. et al. Improvement for testing the gravitational inverse-square law at the submillimeter range. Phys. Rev, Lett. 124, 051301 (2020).
Lee, J. G., Adelberger, E. G., Cook, T. S., Fleischer, S. M. & Heckel, B. R. New test of the gravitational 1/r2 law at separations down to 52 μm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 101101 (2020).
Ke, J. et al. Combined test of the gravitational inverse-square law at the centimeter range. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 211101 (2021).
Greve, G. P., Luo, C., Wu, B. & Thompson, J. K. Entanglement-enhanced matter-wave interferometry in a high-finesse cavity. Nature 610, 472–477 (2022).
Weidner, C. A. & Anderson, D. Z. Experimental demonstration of shaken-lattice interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 263201 (2018).
McAlpine, K. E., Gochnauer, D. & Gupta, S. Excited-band Bloch oscillations for precision atom interferometry. Phys. Rev. A 101, 023614 (2020).
Andreev, V. et al. Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron. Nature 562, 355–360 (2018).
Eckel, S., Hamilton, P., Kirilov, E., Smith, H. W. & DeMille, D. Search for the electron electric dipole moment using Ω-doublet levels in PbO. Phys. Rev. A 87, 052130 (2013).
Haslinger, P. et al. Attractive force on atoms due to blackbody radiation. Nat. Phys. 14, 257–260 (2018).
Gregoire, M. D., Hromada, I., Holmgren, W. F., Trubko, R. & Cronin, A. D. Measurements of the ground-state polarizabilities of Cs, Rb, and K using atom interferometry. Phys. Rev. A 92, 052513 (2015).
Scheel, S. & Buhmann, S. Y. Casimir-Polder forces on moving atoms. Phys. Rev. A 80, 042902 (2009).
Hung, C. L., Zhang, X., Gemelke, N. & Chin, C. Accelerating evaporative cooling of atoms into Bose-Einstein condensation in optical traps. Phys. Rev. A 78, 011604 (2008).
Hensley, J. M., Peters, A. & Chu, S. Active low frequency vertical vibration isolation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 2735–2741 (1999).
Zhang, T. et al. Ultrahigh-sensitivity Bragg atom gravimeter and its application in testing Lorentz violation. Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 14067 (2023).
Panda, C. D., Tao, M., Ceja, M., Reynoso, A. & Müller, H. Atomic gravimeter robust to environmental effects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 064001 (2023).
Bongs, K. et al. Taking atom interferometric quantum sensors from the laboratory to real-world applications. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 731–739 (2019).
Goossens, S. et al. High-resolution gravity field models from GRAIL data and implications for models of the density structure of the Moon’s crust. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 125, e2019JE006086 (2020).
Matichard, F. et al. Advanced LIGO two-stage twelve-axis vibration isolation and positioning platform. Part 1: design and production overview. Precis. Eng. 40, 273–286 (2015).
Hammad, F., Landry, A. & Mathieu, K. Prospects for testing the inverse-square law and gravitomagnetism using quantum interference. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30, 2150004 (2020).
Harber, D. M., Obrecht, J. M., McGuirk, J. M. & Cornell, E. A. Measurement of the Casimir-Polder force through center-of-mass oscillations of a Bose-Einstein condensate. Phys. Rev. A 72, 033610 (2005).
Sorrentino, F. et al. Quantum sensor for atom-surface interactions below 10 μm. Phys. Rev. A 79, 013409 (2009).
Balland, Y., Absil, L. & Pereira dos Santos, F. Quectonewton local force sensor. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14717 (2023).
Billingsley, G., Yamamoto, H. & Zhang, L. Characterization of advanced LIGO core optics. Am. Soc. Precis. Eng. 66, 78–83 (2017).
Turnbaugh, C. et al. High-power near-concentric Fabry–Perot cavity for phase contrast electron microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92, 053005 (2021).
Wolf, P. et al. From optical lattice clocks to the measurement of forces in the Casimir regime. Phys. Rev. A 75, 063608 (2007).
Panda, C. D. et al. Measuring gravitational attraction with a lattice atom interferometer. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10995225 (2024).
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Reynoso and J. Egelhoff for experimental assistance; J. Lopez, T. Gutierrez and G. Long for technical support; G. Louie and P. Bhattacharyya for discussions and comments on the manuscript; J. Axelrod, B. Elder, M. Jaffe, P. Haslinger, Y. Murakami, A. Singh and V. Xu and the entire Müller group for valuable discussions. This material is based on work supported by: National Science Foundation grants 1708160 and 2208029 (H.M.); Department of Defense Office of Naval Research grant N00014-20-1-2656 (H.M.); and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) grants 1659506 and 1669913 (H.M.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.D.P., M.J.T. and M.C. built the apparatus and implemented experimental upgrades. C.D.P. designed the data-acquisition sequence and analysed data. C.D.P. and M.J.T. collected data. H.M. conceptualized and supervised the experiment. C.D.P. and H.M. wrote the original draft. J.K. and G.M.T. participated in the writing of the introduction and conclusion, highlighting the implications of the results for the fields of fundamental physics and atom interferometry. All authors contributed to the review and editing of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Atom sample entering source mass.
Sequence of images showing the Cs atom sample at various positions along its atomic elevator trajectory. Acquiring this sequence from three different perspectives triangulates the position of the atom sample with respect to the source mass with an accuracy better than 1 mm.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Map of source-mass gravity.
A 2D slice of the z component of the gravitational field calculated using finite element analysis in COMSOL is shown. The black square shows the extent of the hollow cylinder. Gravity is stronger on the left side of the map because of the presence of the rectangular slot on the right side.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Acceleration shift owing to lattice divergence als.
In an auxiliary measurement, we observe a linear change in measured acceleration als as a function of vertical position z. This is because of the differential AC Stark shift from the changing trap potential, ΔU(z), as the atoms are held in various positions along the diverging lattice potential. We observe good agreement between the analytic equation derived above, simulation and experiment. The bands correspond to 95% (2σ) confidence intervals.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Atom interferometer decoherence rate as a function of scatter.
Projected lattice atom interferometer decoherence (contrast decay κ) versus level of scatter of the surface of the mirror. The atoms are held 100 μm from the mirror at three different offset distances between the atom cloud and scatterer positions: 0, 0.3 and 1.0 mm. We observe marked decoherence when the scattered intensity is more than 100 ppm of the incident laser power.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Panda, C.D., Tao, M.J., Ceja, M. et al. Measuring gravitational attraction with a lattice atom interferometer. Nature (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07561-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07561-3
- Springer Nature Limited